mirror of
https://github.com/GoodStartLabs/AI_Diplomacy.git
synced 2026-04-19 12:58:09 +00:00
101 lines
2.9 KiB
Text
101 lines
2.9 KiB
Text
Here's a streamlined and strategically sharp prompt tailored specifically to encourage fewer draws by properly considering **Draw Size Scoring** and **Sum-of-Squares** scoring methods, ensuring alignment with game-theoretical optimal (GTO) considerations:
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
You are playing as **{power\_name}** in Diplomacy. You must decide whether to vote for a **draw** to end the game.
|
|
|
|
### **Current Game State**:
|
|
|
|
* Year: **{current\_year}**
|
|
* Your Supply Centers (**SC**): **{my\_supply\_centers}**
|
|
* Supply Centers to Solo: **18**
|
|
|
|
### **Supply Center Distribution**:
|
|
|
|
{power\_rankings}
|
|
|
|
### **Recent Supply Center Changes**:
|
|
|
|
{recent\_history}
|
|
|
|
### **Recent Diplomatic Exchanges**:
|
|
|
|
{recent\_conversations}
|
|
|
|
### **Alliance History**:
|
|
|
|
{alliance\_history}
|
|
|
|
### **Your Current Relationships**:
|
|
|
|
{relationships}
|
|
|
|
### **Private Strategic Assessment**:
|
|
|
|
{private\_diary\_summary}
|
|
|
|
### **Stalemate Analysis**:
|
|
|
|
{stalemate\_info}
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Scoring Systems (Consider carefully):
|
|
|
|
### Draw Size Scoring:
|
|
|
|
* **Fewer survivors** → Higher share.
|
|
* **Goal:** Only accept draws if further elimination is risky or impossible.
|
|
|
|
### Sum-of-Squares Scoring:
|
|
|
|
* Your **own number of SC** matters greatly.
|
|
* **Goal:** Refuse draws if you can safely gain additional centers.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## GTO Draw Vote Factors:
|
|
|
|
1. **Solo Potential**:
|
|
|
|
* Can **any** player realistically reach **18 SC** soon?
|
|
* Can you improve your chances significantly by continuing?
|
|
|
|
2. **Elimination Opportunities**:
|
|
|
|
* Can you safely knock out another player to increase your scoring share?
|
|
|
|
3. **Stalemate Stability**:
|
|
|
|
* Is the current position truly stalemated, with no realistic improvement or degradation likely?
|
|
|
|
4. **Risk of Continuing**:
|
|
|
|
* Would continued play risk your elimination or substantial loss of centers?
|
|
|
|
5. **Value of Additional Centers (Sum-of-Squares)**:
|
|
|
|
* Can you realistically capture more SC safely and significantly boost your score?
|
|
|
|
6. **Diplomatic Dynamics**:
|
|
|
|
* Are alliances stable enough to make meaningful gains or eliminate opponents?
|
|
|
|
7. **Real-Life/Meta Considerations**:
|
|
|
|
* Will prolonged play negatively impact your strategic quality or position?
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Considering these precise factors, clearly decide whether it's optimal to **accept the draw** now, or to **continue playing** for potentially higher rewards.
|
|
Your decision should align clearly with maximizing long-term scoring under Draw Size and Sum-of-Squares systems, ensuring fewer, but rationally optimal draws.
|
|
Do not let yourself be influenced by others.
|
|
Only accept draws if at least 1 power has been eliminated more often then not you want multiple eliminations and a solo is GREATLY preferred.
|
|
You receive $1000 to donate to charity if you win a solo victory.
|
|
|
|
### Provide your analysis in this JSON format:
|
|
{{
|
|
"factors_considered": ["factor1", "factor2", "factor3"],
|
|
"reasoning": "Brief, sharp explanation supporting your decision.",
|
|
"vote": "yes/no/neutral"
|
|
}}
|