mirror of
https://github.com/InternLM/InternBootcamp.git
synced 2026-04-19 12:58:04 +00:00
init-commit
This commit is contained in:
commit
18a552597a
3461 changed files with 1150579 additions and 0 deletions
100
examples/pipelines/puzzle_configs/korLogicCanonicalPropositions_test.json
Executable file
100
examples/pipelines/puzzle_configs/korLogicCanonicalPropositions_test.json
Executable file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
|
|||
[
|
||||
{
|
||||
"variable_pool": [
|
||||
"operate legally for reasonable profits",
|
||||
"price fraud occurs",
|
||||
"abuse of vulnerable groups",
|
||||
"reasonable sports collisions",
|
||||
"disruptive behavior in cultural venues",
|
||||
"tobacco use in public areas",
|
||||
"contract fulfillment",
|
||||
"citizens' rights protection",
|
||||
"youth development support",
|
||||
"national property protection",
|
||||
"noise in quiet zones",
|
||||
"remarriage rights"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"formula_pool": [
|
||||
[
|
||||
2,
|
||||
"‽p←→¬§p",
|
||||
"Prohibition-Permission Negation"
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
3,
|
||||
"§p←→¬‽p",
|
||||
"Permission-Prohibition Duality"
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
5,
|
||||
"¶p→¬‽p",
|
||||
"Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion"
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
7,
|
||||
"¬§p→§¬p",
|
||||
"Permission Negation Implication"
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
9,
|
||||
"¶p→§p",
|
||||
"Obligation-Permission Entailment"
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
10,
|
||||
"‽p→§¬p",
|
||||
"Prohibition-Permission Consequence"
|
||||
]
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"variable_pool": [
|
||||
"operate legally for reasonable profits",
|
||||
"price fraud occurs",
|
||||
"abuse of vulnerable groups",
|
||||
"reasonable sports collisions",
|
||||
"disruptive behavior in cultural venues",
|
||||
"tobacco use in public areas",
|
||||
"contract fulfillment",
|
||||
"citizens' rights protection",
|
||||
"youth development support",
|
||||
"national property protection",
|
||||
"noise in quiet zones",
|
||||
"remarriage rights",
|
||||
"donation activities",
|
||||
"public speech"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"formula_pool": [
|
||||
[
|
||||
3,
|
||||
"§p←→¬‽p",
|
||||
"Permission-Prohibition Duality"
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
2,
|
||||
"‽p←→¬§p",
|
||||
"Prohibition-Permission Negation"
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
5,
|
||||
"¶p→¬‽p",
|
||||
"Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion"
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
7,
|
||||
"¬§p→§¬p",
|
||||
"Permission Negation Implication"
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
9,
|
||||
"¶p→§p",
|
||||
"Obligation-Permission Entailment"
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
10,
|
||||
"‽p→§¬p",
|
||||
"Prohibition-Permission Consequence"
|
||||
]
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue