mirror of
https://github.com/InternLM/InternBootcamp.git
synced 2026-04-23 16:55:02 +00:00
init-commit
This commit is contained in:
commit
18a552597a
3461 changed files with 1150579 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,403 @@
|
|||
"""# 谜题训练场开发任务
|
||||
|
||||
## 任务概述
|
||||
你是一位资深程序员,我需要你帮我实现一个特定谜题的训练场环境类。这个类继承自`Basebootcamp`,用于生成谜题实例并验证解答。
|
||||
|
||||
## 背景说明
|
||||
我正在开发一系列谜题训练场,每个训练场对应一个特定类型的谜题。训练场类命名为`{PuzzleName}bootcamp`,其中`PuzzleName`是谜题的名称。
|
||||
|
||||
每个训练场类主要提供两个核心功能:
|
||||
1. 生成该谜题类型的问题实例
|
||||
2. 验证用户对问题的回答是否正确
|
||||
|
||||
## 技术接口规范
|
||||
|
||||
### 类方法实现要求
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from bootcamp import Basebootcamp
|
||||
|
||||
class {PuzzleName}bootcamp(Basebootcamp):
|
||||
def __init__(self, **params):
|
||||
\"\"\"
|
||||
请你自定义params,以保存该puzzle相关的参数,例如网格大小等,参数配有默认值
|
||||
\"\"\"
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
def case_generator(self):
|
||||
\"\"\"
|
||||
生成谜题实例,提示:为保证谜题有解,可以先生成结果再对结果处理得到谜题
|
||||
返回:一个可JSON序列化的字典(避免包含set等无法通过json.dumps处理的数据结构)
|
||||
\"\"\"
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
@staticmethod
|
||||
def prompt_func(question_case) -> str:
|
||||
\"\"\"
|
||||
将case_generator生成的谜题实例转换为文本形式的问题,问题中包含问题背景、对谜题规则的介绍、具体要解决的谜题实例、期望最终答案的格式,
|
||||
例如:你是xxxx,请你解答yyyy,规则如下:yyyy,最终答案放置在:zzzzz
|
||||
注意:请参照提供的谜题描述进行复述,规则应当描述详细,包括任务背景、具体任务操作规则、对题目格式和答案格式的含义介绍等,
|
||||
|
||||
参数:
|
||||
question_case: 由case_generator生成的谜题实例
|
||||
|
||||
返回:
|
||||
str: 格式化的问题字符串
|
||||
|
||||
注意:
|
||||
1. 需考虑问题的格式,以便后续能正确提取
|
||||
2. 问题描述中应包含期望的答案格式说明,以便后续能正确提取,为了避免抽取时匹配出干扰项,请要求模型将答案放在特定标签(如双括号)内,例如[[your answer here]]
|
||||
\"\"\"
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
@staticmethod
|
||||
def extract_output(output):
|
||||
\"\"\"
|
||||
从LLM的回复中提取符合格式要求的答案,如有多个,请抽取最后一个,避免使用re.search等只抽取第一个结果的方式。
|
||||
|
||||
参数:
|
||||
output: LLM的完整输出(包含原始问题和回答)
|
||||
|
||||
返回:
|
||||
提取的答案,若未找到符合格式的答案则返回None
|
||||
\"\"\"
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
@classmethod
|
||||
def _verify_correction(cls, solution, identity):
|
||||
\"\"\"
|
||||
验证提取的答案是否正确,注意一个问题可以能有多个解,按照谜题规则进行检验,不要直接匹配可能的答案。
|
||||
|
||||
参数:
|
||||
solution: extract_output提取的答案
|
||||
identity: case_generator生成的谜题实例
|
||||
|
||||
返回:
|
||||
bool: 答案是否正确
|
||||
\"\"\"
|
||||
pass
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 验证评分方法(基类已实现)
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
@classmethod
|
||||
def verify_score(cls, model_output, identity:dict, format_score=0.1) -> float:
|
||||
\"\"\"
|
||||
验证输出结果并评分。
|
||||
|
||||
参数:
|
||||
model_output: 模型的完整输出
|
||||
identity: 谜题实例(由case_generator生成)
|
||||
format_score: 答案格式正确时的基础分数
|
||||
|
||||
返回:
|
||||
float: 评分结果(0-1之间)
|
||||
\"\"\"
|
||||
score = 0.
|
||||
try:
|
||||
extract_solution = cls.extract_output(model_output)
|
||||
if extract_solution is None:
|
||||
return score
|
||||
else:
|
||||
score = format_score # 格式正确时的基础分数
|
||||
if cls._verify_correction(extract_solution, identity):
|
||||
score = 1. # 答案完全正确时的满分
|
||||
except Exception as e:
|
||||
# 处理异常情况
|
||||
pass
|
||||
return score
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 使用示例
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# 初始化谜题训练场
|
||||
bootcamp = Puzzlebootcamp()
|
||||
|
||||
# 生成谜题实例
|
||||
case = bootcamp.case_generator()
|
||||
|
||||
# 将谜题转换为文本问题
|
||||
prompt = Puzzlebootcamp.prompt_func(case)
|
||||
|
||||
# 获取LLM对问题的解答
|
||||
response = get_response(prompt, \"LLM\")
|
||||
|
||||
# 从完整对话中提取答案
|
||||
extracted_output = Puzzlebootcamp.extract_output(prompt + response)
|
||||
|
||||
# 验证答案并评分
|
||||
score = Puzzlebootcamp.verify_score(extracted_output, case)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## 你的任务
|
||||
请根据以下谜题描述(谜题描述可能不完整,请先结合你的知识澄清规则),实现一个完整的谜题训练场类:
|
||||
|
||||
### 谜题描述
|
||||
Propositions are represented using p1, p2, ..., pn.
|
||||
Let p1 be a proposition, the compound proposition \"not p1\" is represented as ~p1.
|
||||
Let p1 and p2 be two propositions, the compound proposition \"p1 and p2\" is represented as p1&p2.
|
||||
Let p1 and p2 be two propositions, the compound proposition \"p1 or p2\" is represented as p1||p2.
|
||||
Let p1 and p2 be two propositions, the compound proposition \"if p1, then p2\" is represented as p1=::>p2.
|
||||
Let p1 and p2 be two propositions, the compound proposition \"p1 if and only if p2\" is represented as p1=p2.
|
||||
A single proposition and proposition constants can be called a formula.
|
||||
Formulas are represented using F1, F2, ..., Fn.
|
||||
If F1 is a formula, then ~F1 is also a formula.
|
||||
If F1 and F2 are formulas, then F1&F2, F1||F2, F1=::>F2, F1=F2 are also formulas.
|
||||
Level A Formula: The most basic proposition unit, without logical connectives or nested structures.
|
||||
Level B Formula: A formula containing one logical connective, and the connected two propositions are both Level A formulas.For example, p1.
|
||||
Level C Formula: A formula containing nested logical connectives and at least one Level B formula.For example, ~p1.
|
||||
Other levels of logic follow by analogy; when higher than Level Z, they are classified as Z+n (n≥1).For example, ~(~p1).
|
||||
True assignment of a proposition: A proposition p1 is assigned as ✓, indicating that p1 is true.
|
||||
False assignment of a proposition: A proposition p1 is assigned as x, indicating that p1 is false.
|
||||
True assignment of a formula: If the formula is (~p1&~p2&~p3)||(p1&p2), then x|x|x,✓|✓|x are true assignments of the formula.
|
||||
False assignment of a formula: If the formula is (~p1&~p2&~p3)||(p1&p2), then x|x|✓,x|✓|✓ are false assignments of the formula.
|
||||
For p1=::>p2, only ✓|x is a false assignment of the formula.
|
||||
A formula that is true under all assignments is called a Truth Formula.
|
||||
A formula that is false under all assignments is called a Falsehood Formula.
|
||||
Recursive definition of formulas: Any formula containing nested logical connectives can be decomposed recursively to obtain its subformulas and their logical connective structures.
|
||||
Priority of logical connectives: The priority of logical connectives from high to low is as follows: ~ (not), & (and), || (or), =::> (if...then), = (if and only if).
|
||||
Without parentheses, operations are performed according to priority.
|
||||
Equivalence of formulas: Two formulas are equivalent if they have the same truth value under all assignments.
|
||||
Equivalent formulas can be interchanged.
|
||||
Simplification of formulas: Formulas can be simplified through logical rules to obtain a more concise form without changing the truth value of the formula.Example questions are as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
<example 0>
|
||||
Given:
|
||||
p1: Blue is a common color.
|
||||
p2: Yellow is a common color.
|
||||
p3: \sqrt{3} is irrational.
|
||||
p4: 5 is irrational.
|
||||
|
||||
Symbolize the following propositions:
|
||||
(1) Blue and yellow are both common colors.
|
||||
(2) Either \sqrt{3} or 5 is irrational.
|
||||
(3) Exactly one of \sqrt{3} and 5 is irrational.
|
||||
|
||||
Specify that only &,||,~ can be used for this question.
|
||||
Please format your answers as [[ ];[ ];[ ]], where each bracketed section contains the corresponding logical expression for each proposition.
|
||||
</example 0>
|
||||
|
||||
<example 1>
|
||||
Given:
|
||||
p1: 4 is even.
|
||||
p2: 5 is odd.
|
||||
|
||||
Symbolize the following propositions:
|
||||
(1) Only if 4 is even, 5 is odd.
|
||||
(2) If 4 is even, then 5 is even.
|
||||
(3) Only 4 being even makes 5 even.
|
||||
(4) 4 is even if and only if 5 is odd.
|
||||
Please format your answers as [[ ];[ ];[ ];[ ]], where each bracketed section contains the corresponding logical expression for each proposition.
|
||||
</example 1>
|
||||
|
||||
<example 2>
|
||||
Find the truth values and falsity values of the following formulas.
|
||||
(1) ~(p1&p2&~p3)
|
||||
(2) (~p1&p2)=::>(p1=p3)
|
||||
The answer format is [[T:...;F:...];[T:...;F:...]]. If there are multiple values in T(F), they should be separated by commas (,).For example [[T:✓|✓|✓;F:x|x|x];[T:x|x|x,x|x|✓;F:✓|✓|✓]]
|
||||
</example 2>
|
||||
|
||||
<example 3>
|
||||
Find the falsity values of the following formulas:
|
||||
(1)~(~p1&p2)||~p3
|
||||
(2)(~p2||p3)&(p1=::>p2)
|
||||
(3)(p1=::>p2)&(~(p1&p3)||p1)
|
||||
The answer format is [[F:...];[F:...];[F:...]].If there are multiple values in F, they should be separated by commas (,).For example [[F:x|x|x];[F:✓|✓|✓];[F:x|x|x,✓|✓|✓]]
|
||||
</example 3>
|
||||
|
||||
<example 4>
|
||||
Please determine the level of the formula (~p1&p2)=::>p3.
|
||||
The answer should be given as a single letter from A to Z, or Z+n (where n is a number greater than or equal to 1).The answer format should be like [[A]].
|
||||
</example 4>
|
||||
|
||||
<example 5>
|
||||
Please determine the level of the formula (~(p1=::>~p2))&((p3||p4)=~p1).
|
||||
The answer should be given as a single letter from A to Z, or Z+n (where n is a number greater than or equal to 1).The answer format should be like [[A]].
|
||||
</example 5>
|
||||
|
||||
<example 6>
|
||||
Determine whether the following formula is:
|
||||
A. Truth Formula, B. Falsehood Formula, C. Neither.
|
||||
|
||||
(1) p1=::>(p1||p2||p3)
|
||||
(2) (p1=::>~p1)=::>~p2
|
||||
|
||||
Provide the answer as a single letter.
|
||||
Separate the answers between each sub-question with ;.
|
||||
Eventually the entire answer should be formatted like [[A];[A]].
|
||||
</example 6>
|
||||
|
||||
<example 7>
|
||||
Determine whether the following formula is:
|
||||
A. Truth Formula, B. Falsehood Formula, C. Neither.
|
||||
|
||||
(1)~(p1=::>p2)&p2
|
||||
(2) (p1&p3)=(~p1&~p2)
|
||||
|
||||
Provide the answer as a single letter.
|
||||
Separate the answers between each sub-question with ;.
|
||||
Eventually the entire answer should be formatted like [[A];[A]].
|
||||
</example 7>
|
||||
|
||||
<example 8>
|
||||
Given that (p1=::>(p1||p2))&((p1&p2)=::>p1) is a Truth Formula, determine the type of the following formulas:
|
||||
(1) p1=::>(p1||p2)
|
||||
(2) (p1&p2)=::>p1
|
||||
|
||||
A. Truth Formula, B. Falsehood Formula, C. Neither.
|
||||
|
||||
Provide the answer as a single letter.
|
||||
Separate the answers between each sub-question with ;.
|
||||
Eventually the entire answer should be formatted like [[A];[A]].
|
||||
</example 8>
|
||||
|
||||
<example 9>
|
||||
Given that p1=::>(p1||p2) is a Truth Formula,
|
||||
~(p1=::>p2)&p2 is a Falsehood Formula,
|
||||
determine the type of the following formulas:
|
||||
(1) (p1=::>(p1||p2))&(~(p1=::>p2)&p2)
|
||||
(2) (p1=::>(p1||p2))||(~(p1=::>p2)&p2)
|
||||
|
||||
A. Truth Formula, B. Falsehood Formula, C. Neither.
|
||||
|
||||
Provide the answer as a single letter.
|
||||
Separate the answers between each sub-question with ;.
|
||||
Eventually the entire answer should be formatted like [[A];[A]].
|
||||
</example 9>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
请完成上述谜题的训练场环境类实现,包括所有必要的方法。
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from bootcamp import Basebootcamp
|
||||
import re
|
||||
import random
|
||||
from bootcamp import Basebootcamp
|
||||
|
||||
class KorLogicPropositionalLogicFormalizationbootcamp(Basebootcamp):
|
||||
def __init__(self, problem_type='symbolize', num_propositions=3, max_questions=3, allowed_connectives=None):
|
||||
super().__init__()
|
||||
self.problem_type = problem_type
|
||||
self.num_propositions = num_propositions
|
||||
self.max_questions = max_questions
|
||||
self.allowed_connectives = allowed_connectives if allowed_connectives is not None else ['&', '||', '~']
|
||||
self.proposition_templates = [
|
||||
"is even", "is odd", "is a prime number", "is a common color",
|
||||
"is divisible by 3", "is a fruit", "is considered lucky"
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.subjects = ["2", "4", "5", "7", "Blue", "Red", "Square root of 3", "Pi"]
|
||||
|
||||
def case_generator(self):
|
||||
if self.problem_type == 'symbolize':
|
||||
propositions = self._generate_propositions()
|
||||
questions, answers = self._generate_symbolize_questions(propositions)
|
||||
return {
|
||||
'type': 'symbolize',
|
||||
'propositions': propositions,
|
||||
'questions': questions,
|
||||
'answers': answers
|
||||
}
|
||||
else:
|
||||
raise NotImplementedError("Other problem types are not implemented yet.")
|
||||
|
||||
def _generate_propositions(self):
|
||||
propositions = {}
|
||||
used_subjects = set()
|
||||
for i in range(self.num_propositions):
|
||||
while True:
|
||||
subject = random.choice(self.subjects)
|
||||
if subject not in used_subjects:
|
||||
used_subjects.add(subject)
|
||||
prop = random.choice(self.proposition_templates)
|
||||
propositions[f'p{i+1}'] = f"{subject} {prop}."
|
||||
break
|
||||
return propositions
|
||||
|
||||
def _generate_symbolize_questions(self, propositions):
|
||||
questions = []
|
||||
answers = []
|
||||
variables = list(propositions.keys())
|
||||
for _ in range(self.max_questions):
|
||||
formula = self._generate_formula(variables)
|
||||
question_text = self._formula_to_natural_language(formula, propositions)
|
||||
questions.append(question_text)
|
||||
answers.append(formula)
|
||||
return questions, answers
|
||||
|
||||
def _generate_formula(self, variables, depth=0):
|
||||
if depth >= 2 or len(variables) < 2:
|
||||
return random.choice(variables)
|
||||
|
||||
connective = random.choice(self.allowed_connectives)
|
||||
if connective == '~':
|
||||
sub = self._generate_formula(variables, depth+1)
|
||||
return f'~{sub}'
|
||||
else:
|
||||
left = self._generate_formula(variables, depth+1)
|
||||
right = self._generate_formula(variables, depth+1)
|
||||
return f'({left}{connective}{right})'
|
||||
|
||||
def _formula_to_natural_language(self, formula, propositions):
|
||||
formula = formula.replace('(', '').replace(')', '')
|
||||
parts = re.split(r'(&|\|\||~)', formula)
|
||||
parts = [p for p in parts if p]
|
||||
|
||||
stack = []
|
||||
for part in parts:
|
||||
if part in ['&', '||', '~']:
|
||||
stack.append(part)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
stack.append(propositions.get(part, part))
|
||||
|
||||
natural = []
|
||||
prev_op = None
|
||||
for item in stack:
|
||||
if item == '&':
|
||||
natural.append("and")
|
||||
elif item == '||':
|
||||
natural.append("or")
|
||||
elif item == '~':
|
||||
natural.append("It is not the case that")
|
||||
else:
|
||||
if prev_op == '~':
|
||||
natural[-1] += f" {item}"
|
||||
else:
|
||||
natural.append(item)
|
||||
prev_op = item if item in ['&', '||', '~'] else None
|
||||
|
||||
return ' '.join(natural).replace(' .', '.')
|
||||
|
||||
@staticmethod
|
||||
def prompt_func(question_case):
|
||||
prop_text = "Given:\n" + "\n".join(
|
||||
[f"{var}: {desc}" for var, desc in question_case['propositions'].items()]
|
||||
)
|
||||
questions_text = "Symbolize the following propositions using &, ||, ~:\n" + "\n".join(
|
||||
[f"({i+1}) {q}" for i, q in enumerate(question_case['questions'])]
|
||||
)
|
||||
return f"{prop_text}\n\n{questions_text}\n\nFormat your answers as [[...];[...];...]"
|
||||
|
||||
@staticmethod
|
||||
def extract_output(output):
|
||||
matches = re.findall(r'\[\[(.*?)\]\]', output, re.DOTALL)
|
||||
if not matches:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
last_match = matches[-1].strip()
|
||||
answers = re.split(r';\s*', last_match)
|
||||
return [ans.strip() for ans in answers]
|
||||
|
||||
@classmethod
|
||||
def _verify_correction(cls, solution, identity):
|
||||
if identity['type'] != 'symbolize':
|
||||
return False
|
||||
return all(
|
||||
cls.normalize(ans) == cls.normalize(correct)
|
||||
for ans, correct in zip(solution, identity['answers'])
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@staticmethod
|
||||
def normalize(formula):
|
||||
return formula.replace(' ', '').replace('(', '').replace(')', '')
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue