Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: empresa outissued philippize hemosalpinx closefistedly franciscans feloniousness nonsymbiotically undisbarred chasteness unstoutly morros marconi primer

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: empresa: e. outissued: o. philippize: p. hemosalpinx: h. closefistedly: c. franciscans: f. feloniousness: f. nonsymbiotically: n. undisbarred: u. chasteness: c. unstoutly: u. morros: m. marconi: m. primer: p.
Thought 2: We now have: ['closefistedly', 'chasteness'] < empresa < ['franciscans', 'feloniousness'] < hemosalpinx < ['morros', 'marconi'] < nonsymbiotically < outissued < ['philippize', 'primer'] < ['undisbarred', 'unstoutly']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['closefistedly', 'chasteness']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: chasteness: h.
Thought 4: We now have: chastenessfor the subpart. Hence, we have nonsymbiotically < outissued < ['undisbarred', 'unstoutly'] < empresa < ['morros', 'marconi'] < ['philippize', 'primer'] < hemosalpinx < ['franciscans', 'feloniousness'] < chasteness
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['franciscans', 'feloniousness']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: franciscans: r. feloniousness: e.
Thought 6: We now have: feloniousness < franciscansfor the subpart. Hence, we have hemosalpinx < empresa < franciscans < ['undisbarred', 'unstoutly'] < feloniousness < outissued < ['morros', 'marconi'] < ['philippize', 'primer'] < nonsymbiotically < chasteness
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['morros', 'marconi']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: morros: o. marconi: a.
Thought 8: We now have: marconi < morrosfor the subpart. Hence, we have hemosalpinx < empresa < franciscans < ['undisbarred', 'unstoutly'] < feloniousness < outissued < marconi < morros < ['philippize', 'primer'] < nonsymbiotically < chasteness
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['philippize', 'primer']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: philippize: e. primer: r.
Thought 10: We now have: primer < philippizefor the subpart. Hence, we have hemosalpinx < empresa < franciscans < ['undisbarred', 'unstoutly'] < feloniousness < outissued < marconi < morros < philippize < primer < nonsymbiotically < chasteness
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['undisbarred', 'unstoutly']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: undisbarred: n. unstoutly: n.
Thought 12: We now have: ['undisbarred', 'unstoutly']for the subpart. Hence, we have nonsymbiotically < empresa < ['undisbarred', 'unstoutly'] < morros < marconi < philippize < hemosalpinx < franciscans < chasteness < outissued < feloniousness < primer
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['undisbarred', 'unstoutly']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: undisbarred: d. unstoutly: s.
Thought 14: We now have: undisbarred < unstoutlyfor the subpart. Hence, we have nonsymbiotically < empresa < undisbarred < unstoutly < morros < marconi < philippize < hemosalpinx < franciscans < chasteness < outissued < feloniousness < primer
Thought 15: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is chasteness empresa feloniousness franciscans hemosalpinx marconi morros nonsymbiotically outissued primer philippize undisbarred unstoutly

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: pencilers disminister unrelated smote demonization unprofessing devein gossipmonger
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: n, h, w, d, u, z, j, c, f, k, s, m, p, x, q, r, v, t, i, e, l, a, g, y, b, o

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: pencilers: s. disminister: r. unrelated: d. smote: e. demonization: n. unprofessing: g. devein: n. gossipmonger: r.
Thought 2: We now have: pencilers < unrelated < smote < ['disminister', 'gossipmonger'] < unprofessing < ['demonization', 'devein']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['disminister', 'gossipmonger']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: disminister: e. gossipmonger: e.
Thought 4: We now have: ['disminister', 'gossipmonger']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['demonization', 'devein'] < smote < pencilers < ['disminister', 'gossipmonger'] < unprofessing < unrelated
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['disminister', 'gossipmonger']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: disminister: t. gossipmonger: g.
Thought 6: We now have: disminister < gossipmongerfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['demonization', 'devein'] < smote < pencilers < disminister < gossipmonger < unprofessing < unrelated
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['demonization', 'devein']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: demonization: o. devein: i.
Thought 8: We now have: devein < demonizationfor the subpart. Hence, we have devein < demonization < smote < pencilers < disminister < gossipmonger < unprofessing < unrelated
Thought 9: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is pencilers unrelated smote disminister gossipmonger unprofessing devein demonization

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

n h w d u z j c f k s m p x q r v t i e l a g y b o


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: nitrosylsulfuric, complementarity, longsomeness, inthrallment, monstrance, bowers, nonelucidative, garigue, prospectors, sabbaticals
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: m, t, n, v, f, d, c, q, e, u, o, y, s, p, b, x, w, g, l, i, k, h, z, a, j, r

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: nitrosylsulfuric: c. complementarity: y. longsomeness: s. inthrallment: t. monstrance: e. bowers: s. nonelucidative: e. garigue: e. prospectors: s. sabbaticals: s.

We now have: inthrallment < nitrosylsulfuric < ['monstrance', 'nonelucidative', 'garigue'] < complementarity < ['longsomeness', 'bowers', 'prospectors', 'sabbaticals']

Now let's sort this subpart ['monstrance', 'nonelucidative', 'garigue']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: monstrance: c. nonelucidative: v. garigue: u.

We now have: nonelucidative < monstrance < gariguefor the subpart. Hence, we have inthrallment < nitrosylsulfuric < nonelucidative < monstrance < garigue < complementarity < ['longsomeness', 'bowers', 'prospectors', 'sabbaticals']

Now let's sort this subpart ['longsomeness', 'bowers', 'prospectors', 'sabbaticals']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: longsomeness: s. bowers: r. prospectors: r. sabbaticals: l.

We now have: longsomeness < sabbaticals < ['bowers', 'prospectors']for the subpart. Hence, we have inthrallment < nitrosylsulfuric < nonelucidative < monstrance < garigue < complementarity < longsomeness < sabbaticals < ['bowers', 'prospectors']

Now let's sort this subpart ['bowers', 'prospectors']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: bowers: e. prospectors: o.

We now have: bowers < prospectorsfor the subpart. Hence, we have inthrallment < nitrosylsulfuric < nonelucidative < monstrance < garigue < complementarity < longsomeness < sabbaticals < bowers < prospectors

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is inthrallment nitrosylsulfuric nonelucidative monstrance garigue complementarity longsomeness sabbaticals bowers prospectors

nitrosylsulfuric complementarity longsomeness inthrallment monstrance bowers nonelucidative garigue prospectors sabbaticals

m t n v f d c q e u o y s p b x w g l i k h z a j r


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: unsummable romped bimarine huffing exalted unheedful chattermagging inweight dissonancy quartersawn wratack obside decimalizes electrican pitchi onychia
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: h, j, q, c, b, z, o, v, i, t, x, f, n, a, w, d, p, k, u, s, y, g, l, e, m, r

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: unsummable: e. romped: d. bimarine: e. huffing: g. exalted: d. unheedful: l. chattermagging: g. inweight: t. dissonancy: y. quartersawn: n. wratack: k. obside: e. electrican: n. pitchi: i. onychia: a.
Thought 2: We now have: pitchi < inweight < ['quartersawn', 'electrican'] < onychia < ['romped', 'exalted'] < wratack < dissonancy < ['huffing', 'chattermagging'] < unheedful < ['unsummable', 'bimarine', 'obside']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['quartersawn', 'electrican']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: quartersawn: w. electrican: a.
Thought 4: We now have: electrican < quartersawnfor the subpart. Hence, we have pitchi < inweight < electrican < quartersawn < onychia < ['romped', 'exalted'] < wratack < dissonancy < ['huffing', 'chattermagging'] < unheedful < ['unsummable', 'bimarine', 'obside']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['romped', 'exalted']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: romped: e. exalted: e.
Thought 6: We now have: ['romped', 'exalted']for the subpart. Hence, we have pitchi < inweight < electrican < quartersawn < onychia < ['romped', 'exalted'] < wratack < dissonancy < ['huffing', 'chattermagging'] < unheedful < ['unsummable', 'bimarine', 'obside']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['romped', 'exalted']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: romped: p. exalted: t.
Thought 8: We now have: exalted < rompedfor the subpart. Hence, we have inweight < unheedful < quartersawn < onychia < ['unsummable', 'bimarine', 'obside'] < electrican < wratack < dissonancy < romped < ['huffing', 'chattermagging'] < pitchi < exalted
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['huffing', 'chattermagging']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: huffing: n. chattermagging: n.
Thought 10: We now have: ['huffing', 'chattermagging']for the subpart. Hence, we have inweight < unheedful < quartersawn < onychia < ['unsummable', 'bimarine', 'obside'] < electrican < wratack < dissonancy < romped < ['huffing', 'chattermagging'] < pitchi < exalted
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['huffing', 'chattermagging']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: huffing: i. chattermagging: i.
Thought 12: We now have: ['huffing', 'chattermagging']for the subpart. Hence, we have inweight < unheedful < quartersawn < onychia < ['unsummable', 'bimarine', 'obside'] < electrican < wratack < dissonancy < romped < ['huffing', 'chattermagging'] < pitchi < exalted
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['huffing', 'chattermagging']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: huffing: f. chattermagging: g.
Thought 14: We now have: huffing < chattermaggingfor the subpart. Hence, we have quartersawn < dissonancy < inweight < exalted < electrican < wratack < pitchi < huffing < onychia < romped < chattermagging < ['unsummable', 'bimarine', 'obside'] < unheedful
Thought 15: Now let's sort this subpart ['unsummable', 'bimarine', 'obside']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: unsummable: l. bimarine: n. obside: d.
Thought 16: We now have: bimarine < obside < unsummablefor the subpart. Hence, we have quartersawn < dissonancy < inweight < exalted < electrican < wratack < pitchi < huffing < onychia < romped < chattermagging < bimarine < obside < unsummable < unheedful
Thought 17: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is pitchi inweight electrican quartersawn onychia exalted romped wratack dissonancy huffing chattermagging unheedful bimarine obside unsummable

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

h j q c b z o v i t x f n a w d p k u s y g l e m r


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: diplococcic, fructificative, ecologically, angering, whereases, mystagog, sobriety, straddles, sluggish, overanxiously, grandstanding, pinchecks
There are some special requirements:

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: diplococcic: c. fructificative: e. ecologically: y. angering: g. whereases: s. mystagog: g. sobriety: y. straddles: s. sluggish: h. overanxiously: y. grandstanding: g. pinchecks: s.

We now have: diplococcic < fructificative < ['angering', 'mystagog', 'grandstanding'] < sluggish < ['whereases', 'straddles', 'pinchecks'] < ['ecologically', 'sobriety', 'overanxiously']

Now let's sort this subpart ['angering', 'mystagog', 'grandstanding']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: angering: n. mystagog: o. grandstanding: n.

We now have: ['angering', 'grandstanding'] < mystagogfor the subpart. Hence, we have diplococcic < fructificative < ['angering', 'grandstanding'] < mystagog < sluggish < ['whereases', 'straddles', 'pinchecks'] < ['ecologically', 'sobriety', 'overanxiously']

Now let's sort this subpart ['angering', 'grandstanding']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: angering: i. grandstanding: i.

We now have: ['angering', 'grandstanding']for the subpart. Hence, we have diplococcic < fructificative < ['angering', 'grandstanding'] < mystagog < sluggish < ['whereases', 'straddles', 'pinchecks'] < ['ecologically', 'sobriety', 'overanxiously']

Now let's sort this subpart ['angering', 'grandstanding']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: angering: r. grandstanding: d.

We now have: grandstanding < angeringfor the subpart. Hence, we have diplococcic < fructificative < grandstanding < angering < mystagog < sluggish < ['whereases', 'straddles', 'pinchecks'] < ['ecologically', 'sobriety', 'overanxiously']

Now let's sort this subpart ['whereases', 'straddles', 'pinchecks']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: whereases: e. straddles: e. pinchecks: k.

We now have: ['whereases', 'straddles'] < pinchecksfor the subpart. Hence, we have diplococcic < fructificative < grandstanding < angering < mystagog < sluggish < ['whereases', 'straddles'] < pinchecks < ['ecologically', 'sobriety', 'overanxiously']

Now let's sort this subpart ['whereases', 'straddles']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: whereases: s. straddles: l.

We now have: straddles < whereasesfor the subpart. Hence, we have diplococcic < fructificative < grandstanding < angering < mystagog < sluggish < straddles < whereases < pinchecks < ['ecologically', 'sobriety', 'overanxiously']

Now let's sort this subpart ['ecologically', 'sobriety', 'overanxiously']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: ecologically: l. sobriety: t. overanxiously: l.

We now have: ['ecologically', 'overanxiously'] < sobrietyfor the subpart. Hence, we have diplococcic < fructificative < grandstanding < angering < mystagog < sluggish < straddles < whereases < pinchecks < ['ecologically', 'overanxiously'] < sobriety

Now let's sort this subpart ['ecologically', 'overanxiously']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: ecologically: l. overanxiously: s.

We now have: ecologically < overanxiouslyfor the subpart. Hence, we have diplococcic < fructificative < grandstanding < angering < mystagog < sluggish < straddles < whereases < pinchecks < ecologically < overanxiously < sobriety

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is diplococcic fructificative grandstanding angering mystagog sluggish straddles whereases pinchecks ecologically overanxiously sobriety

diplococcic fructificative ecologically angering whereases mystagog sobriety straddles sluggish overanxiously grandstanding pinchecks


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: accrete ectoloph passemeasure shiningly forepaws greenfly abovementioned shillingless peritoneoclysis extratubal opinional overcertifying twatterlight calescence subdistinctions

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: accrete: a. ectoloph: e. passemeasure: p. shiningly: s. forepaws: f. greenfly: g. abovementioned: a. shillingless: s. peritoneoclysis: p. extratubal: e. opinional: o. overcertifying: o. twatterlight: t. calescence: c. subdistinctions: i.
Thought 2: We now have: ['accrete', 'abovementioned'] < calescence < ['ectoloph', 'extratubal'] < forepaws < greenfly < subdistinctions < ['opinional', 'overcertifying'] < ['passemeasure', 'peritoneoclysis'] < ['shiningly', 'shillingless'] < twatterlight
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['accrete', 'abovementioned']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: accrete: c. abovementioned: b.
Thought 4: We now have: abovementioned < accretefor the subpart. Hence, we have abovementioned < accrete < calescence < ['ectoloph', 'extratubal'] < forepaws < greenfly < subdistinctions < ['opinional', 'overcertifying'] < ['passemeasure', 'peritoneoclysis'] < ['shiningly', 'shillingless'] < twatterlight
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['ectoloph', 'extratubal']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: ectoloph: c. extratubal: x.
Thought 6: We now have: ectoloph < extratubalfor the subpart. Hence, we have abovementioned < accrete < calescence < ectoloph < extratubal < forepaws < greenfly < subdistinctions < ['opinional', 'overcertifying'] < ['passemeasure', 'peritoneoclysis'] < ['shiningly', 'shillingless'] < twatterlight
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['opinional', 'overcertifying']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: opinional: p.
Thought 8: We now have: opinionalfor the subpart. Hence, we have abovementioned < accrete < calescence < ectoloph < extratubal < forepaws < greenfly < subdistinctions < opinional < ['passemeasure', 'peritoneoclysis'] < ['shiningly', 'shillingless'] < twatterlight
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['passemeasure', 'peritoneoclysis']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: passemeasure: a. peritoneoclysis: e.
Thought 10: We now have: passemeasure < peritoneoclysisfor the subpart. Hence, we have abovementioned < accrete < calescence < ectoloph < extratubal < forepaws < greenfly < subdistinctions < opinional < passemeasure < peritoneoclysis < ['shiningly', 'shillingless'] < twatterlight
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['shiningly', 'shillingless']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: shiningly: h. shillingless: h.
Thought 12: We now have: ['shiningly', 'shillingless']for the subpart. Hence, we have extratubal < ectoloph < passemeasure < opinional < subdistinctions < greenfly < calescence < ['shiningly', 'shillingless'] < abovementioned < twatterlight < forepaws < peritoneoclysis < accrete
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['shiningly', 'shillingless']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: shiningly: i. shillingless: i.
Thought 14: We now have: ['shiningly', 'shillingless']for the subpart. Hence, we have extratubal < ectoloph < passemeasure < opinional < subdistinctions < greenfly < calescence < ['shiningly', 'shillingless'] < abovementioned < twatterlight < forepaws < peritoneoclysis < accrete
Thought 15: Now let's sort this subpart ['shiningly', 'shillingless']. Looking at the fourth letters.The fourth letter: shiningly: n. shillingless: l.
Thought 16: We now have: shillingless < shininglyfor the subpart. Hence, we have extratubal < ectoloph < passemeasure < opinional < subdistinctions < greenfly < calescence < shillingless < shiningly < abovementioned < twatterlight < forepaws < peritoneoclysis < accrete
Thought 17: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is abovementioned accrete calescence ectoloph extratubal forepaws greenfly subdistinctions opinional passemeasure peritoneoclysis shillingless shiningly twatterlight

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: pandit, kerner, ondatra, urbanest, epiphanizing, landwreck, carobs, superarduous, lv, portrayable, queenite, impressionally, gymnoconia, hypothecater, undetachment, agriculturists
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: a, k, d, m, f, q, g, w, e, u, b, n, t, z, j, y, h, r, l, o, p, x, s, c, v, i

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: pandit: t. kerner: r. ondatra: a. urbanest: t. epiphanizing: g. landwreck: k. carobs: s. superarduous: s. lv: v. portrayable: e. queenite: e. impressionally: y. gymnoconia: a. hypothecater: r. undetachment: t. agriculturists: s.

We now have: ['ondatra', 'gymnoconia'] < landwreck < epiphanizing < ['portrayable', 'queenite'] < ['pandit', 'urbanest', 'undetachment'] < impressionally < ['kerner', 'hypothecater'] < ['carobs', 'superarduous', 'agriculturists'] < lv

Now let's sort this subpart ['ondatra', 'gymnoconia']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: ondatra: r. gymnoconia: i.

We now have: ondatra < gymnoconiafor the subpart. Hence, we have ondatra < gymnoconia < landwreck < epiphanizing < ['portrayable', 'queenite'] < ['pandit', 'urbanest', 'undetachment'] < impressionally < ['kerner', 'hypothecater'] < ['carobs', 'superarduous', 'agriculturists'] < lv

Now let's sort this subpart ['portrayable', 'queenite']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: portrayable: l. queenite: t.

We now have: queenite < portrayablefor the subpart. Hence, we have ondatra < gymnoconia < landwreck < epiphanizing < queenite < portrayable < ['pandit', 'urbanest', 'undetachment'] < impressionally < ['kerner', 'hypothecater'] < ['carobs', 'superarduous', 'agriculturists'] < lv

Now let's sort this subpart ['pandit', 'urbanest', 'undetachment']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: pandit: i. urbanest: s. undetachment: n.

We now have: undetachment < urbanest < panditfor the subpart. Hence, we have ondatra < gymnoconia < landwreck < epiphanizing < queenite < portrayable < undetachment < urbanest < pandit < impressionally < ['kerner', 'hypothecater'] < ['carobs', 'superarduous', 'agriculturists'] < lv

Now let's sort this subpart ['kerner', 'hypothecater']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: kerner: e. hypothecater: e.

We now have: ['kerner', 'hypothecater']for the subpart. Hence, we have ondatra < gymnoconia < landwreck < epiphanizing < queenite < portrayable < undetachment < urbanest < pandit < impressionally < ['kerner', 'hypothecater'] < ['carobs', 'superarduous', 'agriculturists'] < lv

Now let's sort this subpart ['kerner', 'hypothecater']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: kerner: n. hypothecater: t.

We now have: kerner < hypothecaterfor the subpart. Hence, we have ondatra < gymnoconia < landwreck < epiphanizing < queenite < portrayable < undetachment < urbanest < pandit < impressionally < kerner < hypothecater < ['carobs', 'superarduous', 'agriculturists'] < lv

Now let's sort this subpart ['carobs', 'superarduous', 'agriculturists']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: carobs: b. superarduous: u. agriculturists: t.

We now have: superarduous < carobs < agriculturistsfor the subpart. Hence, we have ondatra < gymnoconia < landwreck < epiphanizing < queenite < portrayable < undetachment < urbanest < pandit < impressionally < kerner < hypothecater < superarduous < carobs < agriculturists < lv

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is ondatra gymnoconia landwreck epiphanizing queenite portrayable undetachment urbanest pandit impressionally kerner hypothecater superarduous carobs agriculturists lv

pandit kerner ondatra urbanest epiphanizing landwreck carobs superarduous lv portrayable queenite impressionally gymnoconia hypothecater undetachment agriculturists

a k d m f q g w e u b n t z j y h r l o p x s c v i


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: settings, phototelegraphic, pentadrachm, coracoacromial, reliquidated, potman, orvietan, dalis, polydispersity, acidemia, ferneries, dactylioglyphy, matthias, vincibility, feynesses, zoolatries

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: settings: s. phototelegraphic: p. pentadrachm: p. coracoacromial: c. reliquidated: r. potman: p. orvietan: o. dalis: d. polydispersity: p. acidemia: a. ferneries: f. dactylioglyphy: d. matthias: m. vincibility: v. feynesses: f. zoolatries: z.

We now have: acidemia < coracoacromial < ['dalis', 'dactylioglyphy'] < ['ferneries', 'feynesses'] < matthias < orvietan < ['phototelegraphic', 'pentadrachm', 'potman', 'polydispersity'] < reliquidated < settings < vincibility < zoolatries

Now let's sort this subpart ['dalis', 'dactylioglyphy']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: dalis: a. dactylioglyphy: a.

We now have: ['dalis', 'dactylioglyphy']for the subpart. Hence, we have acidemia < coracoacromial < ['dalis', 'dactylioglyphy'] < ['ferneries', 'feynesses'] < matthias < orvietan < ['phototelegraphic', 'pentadrachm', 'potman', 'polydispersity'] < reliquidated < settings < vincibility < zoolatries

Now let's sort this subpart ['dalis', 'dactylioglyphy']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: dalis: l. dactylioglyphy: c.

We now have: dactylioglyphy < dalisfor the subpart. Hence, we have acidemia < coracoacromial < dactylioglyphy < dalis < ['ferneries', 'feynesses'] < matthias < orvietan < ['phototelegraphic', 'pentadrachm', 'potman', 'polydispersity'] < reliquidated < settings < vincibility < zoolatries

Now let's sort this subpart ['ferneries', 'feynesses']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: ferneries: e. feynesses: e.

We now have: ['ferneries', 'feynesses']for the subpart. Hence, we have acidemia < coracoacromial < dactylioglyphy < dalis < ['ferneries', 'feynesses'] < matthias < orvietan < ['phototelegraphic', 'pentadrachm', 'potman', 'polydispersity'] < reliquidated < settings < vincibility < zoolatries

Now let's sort this subpart ['ferneries', 'feynesses']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: ferneries: r. feynesses: y.

We now have: ferneries < feynessesfor the subpart. Hence, we have acidemia < coracoacromial < dactylioglyphy < dalis < ferneries < feynesses < matthias < orvietan < ['phototelegraphic', 'pentadrachm', 'potman', 'polydispersity'] < reliquidated < settings < vincibility < zoolatries

Now let's sort this subpart ['phototelegraphic', 'pentadrachm', 'potman', 'polydispersity']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: phototelegraphic: h. pentadrachm: e. potman: o. polydispersity: o.

We now have: pentadrachm < phototelegraphic < ['potman', 'polydispersity']for the subpart. Hence, we have acidemia < coracoacromial < dactylioglyphy < dalis < ferneries < feynesses < matthias < orvietan < pentadrachm < phototelegraphic < ['potman', 'polydispersity'] < reliquidated < settings < vincibility < zoolatries

Now let's sort this subpart ['potman', 'polydispersity']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: potman: t. polydispersity: l.

We now have: polydispersity < potmanfor the subpart. Hence, we have acidemia < coracoacromial < dactylioglyphy < dalis < ferneries < feynesses < matthias < orvietan < pentadrachm < phototelegraphic < polydispersity < potman < reliquidated < settings < vincibility < zoolatries

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is acidemia coracoacromial dactylioglyphy dalis ferneries feynesses matthias orvietan pentadrachm phototelegraphic polydispersity potman reliquidated settings vincibility zoolatries

settings phototelegraphic pentadrachm coracoacromial reliquidated potman orvietan dalis polydispersity acidemia ferneries dactylioglyphy matthias vincibility feynesses zoolatries


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: perpetuality integers unconscionably frontages sopiting perturbant shoebindery enhazard jurant
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: m, j, n, b, e, x, h, t, w, d, z, o, p, f, u, l, i, y, r, v, k, c, a, g, s, q

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: perpetuality: y. integers: s. unconscionably: y. frontages: s. sopiting: g. perturbant: t. enhazard: d. jurant: t.
Thought 2: We now have: ['perturbant', 'jurant'] < enhazard < ['perpetuality', 'unconscionably'] < sopiting < ['integers', 'frontages']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['perturbant', 'jurant']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: perturbant: n. jurant: n.
Thought 4: We now have: ['perturbant', 'jurant']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['perturbant', 'jurant'] < enhazard < ['perpetuality', 'unconscionably'] < sopiting < ['integers', 'frontages']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['perturbant', 'jurant']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: perturbant: a. jurant: a.
Thought 6: We now have: ['perturbant', 'jurant']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['perturbant', 'jurant'] < enhazard < ['perpetuality', 'unconscionably'] < sopiting < ['integers', 'frontages']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['perturbant', 'jurant']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: perturbant: b. jurant: r.
Thought 8: We now have: perturbant < jurantfor the subpart. Hence, we have perturbant < jurant < enhazard < ['perpetuality', 'unconscionably'] < sopiting < ['integers', 'frontages']
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['perpetuality', 'unconscionably']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: perpetuality: t. unconscionably: l.
Thought 10: We now have: unconscionably < perpetualityfor the subpart. Hence, we have perturbant < jurant < enhazard < perpetuality < unconscionably < sopiting < ['integers', 'frontages']
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['integers', 'frontages']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: integers: r. frontages: e.
Thought 12: We now have: frontages < integersfor the subpart. Hence, we have perturbant < jurant < enhazard < perpetuality < unconscionably < sopiting < frontages < integers
Thought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is perturbant jurant enhazard unconscionably perpetuality sopiting frontages integers

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

m j n b e x h t w d z o p f u l i y r v k c a g s q


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: stoter deindustrialize marcor cory poliad ramming minorca macrotherium pregenerate lowse cynomorphous supplicating cattalo nonobese doctorally
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: t, m, f, j, r, n, g, b, q, w, s, z, x, a, o, h, d, u, c, i, v, l, k, y, e, p

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: stoter: s. deindustrialize: d. marcor: m. cory: c. poliad: p. ramming: r. minorca: m. macrotherium: m. pregenerate: p. lowse: l. cynomorphous: c. supplicating: s. cattalo: c. nonobese: n. doctorally: d.
Thought 2: We now have: ['marcor', 'minorca', 'macrotherium'] < ramming < nonobese < ['stoter', 'supplicating'] < ['deindustrialize', 'doctorally'] < ['cory', 'cynomorphous', 'cattalo'] < lowse < ['poliad', 'pregenerate']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['marcor', 'minorca', 'macrotherium']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: marcor: a. minorca: i. macrotherium: a.
Thought 4: We now have: ['marcor', 'macrotherium'] < minorcafor the subpart. Hence, we have ['marcor', 'macrotherium'] < minorca < ramming < nonobese < ['stoter', 'supplicating'] < ['deindustrialize', 'doctorally'] < ['cory', 'cynomorphous', 'cattalo'] < lowse < ['poliad', 'pregenerate']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['marcor', 'macrotherium']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: marcor: r. macrotherium: c.
Thought 6: We now have: marcor < macrotheriumfor the subpart. Hence, we have marcor < macrotherium < minorca < ramming < nonobese < ['stoter', 'supplicating'] < ['deindustrialize', 'doctorally'] < ['cory', 'cynomorphous', 'cattalo'] < lowse < ['poliad', 'pregenerate']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['stoter', 'supplicating']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: stoter: t. supplicating: u.
Thought 8: We now have: stoter < supplicatingfor the subpart. Hence, we have marcor < macrotherium < minorca < ramming < nonobese < stoter < supplicating < ['deindustrialize', 'doctorally'] < ['cory', 'cynomorphous', 'cattalo'] < lowse < ['poliad', 'pregenerate']
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['deindustrialize', 'doctorally']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: deindustrialize: e. doctorally: o.
Thought 10: We now have: deindustrialize < doctorallyfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['cory', 'cynomorphous', 'cattalo'] < deindustrialize < doctorally < supplicating < lowse < nonobese < ramming < ['poliad', 'pregenerate'] < marcor < stoter < macrotherium < minorca
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['cory', 'cynomorphous', 'cattalo']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: cory: r. cynomorphous: y. cattalo: a.
Thought 12: We now have: cory < cattalo < cynomorphousfor the subpart. Hence, we have cory < cattalo < cynomorphous < deindustrialize < doctorally < supplicating < lowse < nonobese < ramming < ['poliad', 'pregenerate'] < marcor < stoter < macrotherium < minorca
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['poliad', 'pregenerate']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: poliad: o. pregenerate: r.
Thought 14: We now have: poliad < pregeneratefor the subpart. Hence, we have cory < cattalo < cynomorphous < deindustrialize < doctorally < supplicating < lowse < nonobese < ramming < pregenerate < poliad < marcor < stoter < macrotherium < minorca
Thought 15: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is marcor macrotherium minorca ramming nonobese stoter supplicating deindustrialize doctorally cory cattalo cynomorphous lowse poliad pregenerate

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

t m f j r n g b q w s z x a o h d u c i v l k y e p


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: lazarole, biniou, enumerative, endocrinologists, pyroxenoid, tachylyte, recentralized, lamella, unriveting
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: p, j, l, i, o, h, n, v, u, t, k, e, z, b, w, c, d, x, r, a, s, q, y, m, f, g

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: lazarole: e. biniou: u. enumerative: e. endocrinologists: s. pyroxenoid: d. tachylyte: e. recentralized: d. lamella: a. unriveting: g.

We now have: biniou < ['lazarole', 'enumerative', 'tachylyte'] < ['pyroxenoid', 'recentralized'] < lamella < endocrinologists < unriveting

Now let's sort this subpart ['lazarole', 'enumerative', 'tachylyte']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: lazarole: l. enumerative: v. tachylyte: t.

We now have: lazarole < enumerative < tachylytefor the subpart. Hence, we have biniou < lazarole < enumerative < tachylyte < ['pyroxenoid', 'recentralized'] < lamella < endocrinologists < unriveting

Now let's sort this subpart ['pyroxenoid', 'recentralized']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: pyroxenoid: i. recentralized: e.

We now have: pyroxenoid < recentralizedfor the subpart. Hence, we have biniou < lazarole < enumerative < tachylyte < pyroxenoid < recentralized < lamella < endocrinologists < unriveting

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is biniou lazarole enumerative tachylyte pyroxenoid recentralized lamella endocrinologists unriveting

lazarole biniou enumerative endocrinologists pyroxenoid tachylyte recentralized lamella unriveting

p j l i o h n v u t k e z b w c d x r a s q y m f g


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: tattings, parabolizer, youthhood, premiums, wirehair, scheme, beguileful, ectoderms, selvage, charlady, preannouncing, dejeuners, osiers, ptyalolith, spermolysis
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: n, d, j, i, z, r, h, l, x, b, e, c, m, p, y, s, q, g, w, t, f, v, a, k, u, o

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: tattings: t. parabolizer: p. youthhood: y. premiums: p. wirehair: w. scheme: s. beguileful: b. ectoderms: e. selvage: s. charlady: c. preannouncing: p. dejeuners: d. osiers: o. ptyalolith: p. spermolysis: s.

We now have: dejeuners < beguileful < ectoderms < charlady < ['parabolizer', 'premiums', 'preannouncing', 'ptyalolith'] < youthhood < ['scheme', 'selvage', 'spermolysis'] < wirehair < tattings < osiers

Now let's sort this subpart ['parabolizer', 'premiums', 'preannouncing', 'ptyalolith']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: parabolizer: a. premiums: r. preannouncing: r. ptyalolith: t.

We now have: ['premiums', 'preannouncing'] < ptyalolith < parabolizerfor the subpart. Hence, we have dejeuners < beguileful < ectoderms < charlady < ['premiums', 'preannouncing'] < ptyalolith < parabolizer < youthhood < ['scheme', 'selvage', 'spermolysis'] < wirehair < tattings < osiers

Now let's sort this subpart ['premiums', 'preannouncing']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: premiums: e. preannouncing: e.

We now have: ['premiums', 'preannouncing']for the subpart. Hence, we have dejeuners < beguileful < ectoderms < charlady < ['premiums', 'preannouncing'] < ptyalolith < parabolizer < youthhood < ['scheme', 'selvage', 'spermolysis'] < wirehair < tattings < osiers

Now let's sort this subpart ['premiums', 'preannouncing']. Looking at the fourth letters.The fourth letter: premiums: m. preannouncing: a.

We now have: premiums < preannouncingfor the subpart. Hence, we have dejeuners < beguileful < ectoderms < charlady < premiums < preannouncing < ptyalolith < parabolizer < youthhood < ['scheme', 'selvage', 'spermolysis'] < wirehair < tattings < osiers

Now let's sort this subpart ['scheme', 'selvage', 'spermolysis']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: scheme: c. selvage: e. spermolysis: p.

We now have: selvage < scheme < spermolysisfor the subpart. Hence, we have dejeuners < beguileful < ectoderms < charlady < premiums < preannouncing < ptyalolith < parabolizer < youthhood < selvage < scheme < spermolysis < wirehair < tattings < osiers

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is dejeuners beguileful ectoderms charlady premiums preannouncing ptyalolith parabolizer youthhood selvage scheme spermolysis wirehair tattings osiers

tattings parabolizer youthhood premiums wirehair scheme beguileful ectoderms selvage charlady preannouncing dejeuners osiers ptyalolith spermolysis

n d j i z r h l x b e c m p y s q g w t f v a k u o


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: overtarry hosannaed predispose zoiatrics politize incorporeity holophotometer gribane demilawyer korero portugese outmaneuvering prolificated paeonia
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: a, r, q, e, c, s, j, m, i, l, n, k, d, x, g, h, w, v, y, o, t, p, u, b, f, z

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: overtarry: o. hosannaed: h. predispose: p. zoiatrics: z. politize: p. incorporeity: i. holophotometer: h. gribane: g. demilawyer: d. korero: k. portugese: p. outmaneuvering: o. prolificated: p. paeonia: p.
Thought 2: We now have: incorporeity < korero < demilawyer < gribane < ['hosannaed', 'holophotometer'] < ['overtarry', 'outmaneuvering'] < ['predispose', 'politize', 'portugese', 'prolificated', 'paeonia'] < zoiatrics
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['hosannaed', 'holophotometer']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: hosannaed: o. holophotometer: o.
Thought 4: We now have: ['hosannaed', 'holophotometer']for the subpart. Hence, we have incorporeity < korero < demilawyer < gribane < ['hosannaed', 'holophotometer'] < ['overtarry', 'outmaneuvering'] < ['predispose', 'politize', 'portugese', 'prolificated', 'paeonia'] < zoiatrics
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['hosannaed', 'holophotometer']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: hosannaed: s. holophotometer: l.
Thought 6: We now have: hosannaed < holophotometerfor the subpart. Hence, we have incorporeity < korero < demilawyer < gribane < hosannaed < holophotometer < ['overtarry', 'outmaneuvering'] < ['predispose', 'politize', 'portugese', 'prolificated', 'paeonia'] < zoiatrics
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['overtarry', 'outmaneuvering']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: overtarry: v. outmaneuvering: u.
Thought 8: We now have: outmaneuvering < overtarryfor the subpart. Hence, we have incorporeity < korero < demilawyer < gribane < hosannaed < holophotometer < overtarry < outmaneuvering < ['predispose', 'politize', 'portugese', 'prolificated', 'paeonia'] < zoiatrics
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['predispose', 'politize', 'portugese', 'prolificated', 'paeonia']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: predispose: r. politize: o. portugese: o. prolificated: r. paeonia: a.
Thought 10: We now have: ['predispose', 'prolificated'] < ['politize', 'portugese'] < paeoniafor the subpart. Hence, we have paeonia < hosannaed < overtarry < ['politize', 'portugese'] < demilawyer < holophotometer < gribane < incorporeity < zoiatrics < ['predispose', 'prolificated'] < korero < outmaneuvering
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['predispose', 'prolificated']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: predispose: e. prolificated: o.
Thought 12: We now have: predispose < prolificatedfor the subpart. Hence, we have paeonia < hosannaed < overtarry < ['politize', 'portugese'] < demilawyer < holophotometer < gribane < incorporeity < zoiatrics < predispose < prolificated < korero < outmaneuvering
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['politize', 'portugese']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: politize: l. portugese: r.
Thought 14: We now have: portugese < politizefor the subpart. Hence, we have paeonia < hosannaed < overtarry < portugese < politize < demilawyer < holophotometer < gribane < incorporeity < zoiatrics < predispose < prolificated < korero < outmaneuvering
Thought 15: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is incorporeity korero demilawyer gribane hosannaed holophotometer outmaneuvering overtarry predispose prolificated portugese politize paeonia zoiatrics

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

a r q e c s j m i l n k d x g h w v y o t p u b f z


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: rationing, tyauve, unvouched, curiatii, hurlement, suramin, resolicit, indazin, actinocutitis, pretended, interlocutor, yajnopavita, prorogue, phthiocol

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: rationing: r. tyauve: t. unvouched: u. curiatii: c. hurlement: h. suramin: s. resolicit: r. indazin: i. actinocutitis: a. pretended: p. interlocutor: i. yajnopavita: y. prorogue: p. phthiocol: p.

We now have: actinocutitis < curiatii < hurlement < ['indazin', 'interlocutor'] < ['pretended', 'prorogue', 'phthiocol'] < ['rationing', 'resolicit'] < suramin < tyauve < unvouched < yajnopavita

Now let's sort this subpart ['indazin', 'interlocutor']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: indazin: n. interlocutor: n.

We now have: ['indazin', 'interlocutor']for the subpart. Hence, we have actinocutitis < curiatii < hurlement < ['indazin', 'interlocutor'] < ['pretended', 'prorogue', 'phthiocol'] < ['rationing', 'resolicit'] < suramin < tyauve < unvouched < yajnopavita

Now let's sort this subpart ['indazin', 'interlocutor']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: indazin: d. interlocutor: t.

We now have: indazin < interlocutorfor the subpart. Hence, we have actinocutitis < curiatii < hurlement < indazin < interlocutor < ['pretended', 'prorogue', 'phthiocol'] < ['rationing', 'resolicit'] < suramin < tyauve < unvouched < yajnopavita

Now let's sort this subpart ['pretended', 'prorogue', 'phthiocol']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: pretended: r. prorogue: r. phthiocol: h.

We now have: phthiocol < ['pretended', 'prorogue']for the subpart. Hence, we have actinocutitis < curiatii < hurlement < indazin < interlocutor < phthiocol < ['pretended', 'prorogue'] < ['rationing', 'resolicit'] < suramin < tyauve < unvouched < yajnopavita

Now let's sort this subpart ['pretended', 'prorogue']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: pretended: e. prorogue: o.

We now have: pretended < proroguefor the subpart. Hence, we have actinocutitis < curiatii < hurlement < indazin < interlocutor < phthiocol < pretended < prorogue < ['rationing', 'resolicit'] < suramin < tyauve < unvouched < yajnopavita

Now let's sort this subpart ['rationing', 'resolicit']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: rationing: a. resolicit: e.

We now have: rationing < resolicitfor the subpart. Hence, we have actinocutitis < curiatii < hurlement < indazin < interlocutor < phthiocol < pretended < prorogue < rationing < resolicit < suramin < tyauve < unvouched < yajnopavita

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is actinocutitis curiatii hurlement indazin interlocutor phthiocol pretended prorogue rationing resolicit suramin tyauve unvouched yajnopavita

rationing tyauve unvouched curiatii hurlement suramin resolicit indazin actinocutitis pretended interlocutor yajnopavita prorogue phthiocol


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: ploughgang intertoll saiyids dillweed sphenophyllales magas omniprudent plantarium telotype cageot chitin meliorable

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: ploughgang: p. intertoll: i. saiyids: s. dillweed: d. sphenophyllales: s. magas: m. omniprudent: o. plantarium: p. telotype: t. cageot: c. chitin: c. meliorable: m.
Thought 2: We now have: ['cageot', 'chitin'] < dillweed < intertoll < ['magas', 'meliorable'] < omniprudent < ['ploughgang', 'plantarium'] < ['saiyids', 'sphenophyllales'] < telotype
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['cageot', 'chitin']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: cageot: a. chitin: h.
Thought 4: We now have: cageot < chitinfor the subpart. Hence, we have cageot < chitin < dillweed < intertoll < ['magas', 'meliorable'] < omniprudent < ['ploughgang', 'plantarium'] < ['saiyids', 'sphenophyllales'] < telotype
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['magas', 'meliorable']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: magas: a. meliorable: e.
Thought 6: We now have: magas < meliorablefor the subpart. Hence, we have magas < intertoll < ['ploughgang', 'plantarium'] < meliorable < omniprudent < chitin < dillweed < cageot < ['saiyids', 'sphenophyllales'] < telotype
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['ploughgang', 'plantarium']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: ploughgang: l. plantarium: l.
Thought 8: We now have: ['ploughgang', 'plantarium']for the subpart. Hence, we have magas < intertoll < ['ploughgang', 'plantarium'] < meliorable < omniprudent < chitin < dillweed < cageot < ['saiyids', 'sphenophyllales'] < telotype
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['ploughgang', 'plantarium']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: ploughgang: o. plantarium: a.
Thought 10: We now have: ploughgang < plantariumfor the subpart. Hence, we have magas < intertoll < plantarium < ploughgang < meliorable < omniprudent < chitin < dillweed < cageot < ['saiyids', 'sphenophyllales'] < telotype
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['saiyids', 'sphenophyllales']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: saiyids: a. sphenophyllales: p.
Thought 12: We now have: saiyids < sphenophyllalesfor the subpart. Hence, we have omniprudent < sphenophyllales < ploughgang < meliorable < saiyids < chitin < cageot < intertoll < plantarium < magas < dillweed < telotype
Thought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is cageot chitin dillweed intertoll magas meliorable omniprudent ploughgang plantarium saiyids sphenophyllales telotype

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: surcingling ceremonialism pachyacria nonmathematical aequipalpia pseudococcus pneumatology recognise clothespin distortedly dentiferous incremate pseudogalena entrepots intranidal termites
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: o, v, g, z, q, l, r, c, k, d, p, h, x, t, w, f, y, n, u, b, j, m, a, s, i, e

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: surcingling: s. ceremonialism: c. pachyacria: p. nonmathematical: n. aequipalpia: a. pseudococcus: p. pneumatology: p. recognise: r. clothespin: c. distortedly: d. dentiferous: d. incremate: i. pseudogalena: p. entrepots: e. intranidal: i. termites: t.
Thought 2: We now have: recognise < ['ceremonialism', 'clothespin'] < ['distortedly', 'dentiferous'] < ['pachyacria', 'pseudococcus', 'pneumatology', 'pseudogalena'] < termites < nonmathematical < aequipalpia < surcingling < ['incremate', 'intranidal'] < entrepots
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['ceremonialism', 'clothespin']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: ceremonialism: e. clothespin: l.
Thought 4: We now have: clothespin < ceremonialismfor the subpart. Hence, we have recognise < clothespin < ceremonialism < ['distortedly', 'dentiferous'] < ['pachyacria', 'pseudococcus', 'pneumatology', 'pseudogalena'] < termites < nonmathematical < aequipalpia < surcingling < ['incremate', 'intranidal'] < entrepots
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['distortedly', 'dentiferous']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: distortedly: i. dentiferous: e.
Thought 6: We now have: dentiferous < distortedlyfor the subpart. Hence, we have recognise < clothespin < ceremonialism < distortedly < dentiferous < ['pachyacria', 'pseudococcus', 'pneumatology', 'pseudogalena'] < termites < nonmathematical < aequipalpia < surcingling < ['incremate', 'intranidal'] < entrepots
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['pachyacria', 'pseudococcus', 'pneumatology', 'pseudogalena']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: pachyacria: a. pseudococcus: s. pneumatology: n. pseudogalena: s.
Thought 8: We now have: pneumatology < pachyacria < ['pseudococcus', 'pseudogalena']for the subpart. Hence, we have surcingling < pneumatology < ['pseudococcus', 'pseudogalena'] < aequipalpia < dentiferous < clothespin < pachyacria < ['incremate', 'intranidal'] < entrepots < distortedly < ceremonialism < termites < recognise < nonmathematical
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['pseudococcus', 'pseudogalena']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: pseudococcus: e. pseudogalena: e.
Thought 10: We now have: ['pseudococcus', 'pseudogalena']for the subpart. Hence, we have dentiferous < nonmathematical < ceremonialism < termites < ['incremate', 'intranidal'] < clothespin < entrepots < pneumatology < pachyacria < ['pseudococcus', 'pseudogalena'] < distortedly < surcingling < recognise < aequipalpia
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['pseudococcus', 'pseudogalena']. Looking at the fourth letters.The fourth letter: pseudococcus: u. pseudogalena: u.
Thought 12: We now have: ['pseudococcus', 'pseudogalena']for the subpart. Hence, we have dentiferous < nonmathematical < ceremonialism < termites < ['incremate', 'intranidal'] < clothespin < entrepots < pneumatology < pachyacria < ['pseudococcus', 'pseudogalena'] < distortedly < surcingling < recognise < aequipalpia
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['pseudococcus', 'pseudogalena']. Looking at the fifth letters.The fifth letter: pseudococcus: d. pseudogalena: d.
Thought 14: We now have: ['pseudococcus', 'pseudogalena']for the subpart. Hence, we have dentiferous < nonmathematical < ceremonialism < termites < ['incremate', 'intranidal'] < clothespin < entrepots < pneumatology < pachyacria < ['pseudococcus', 'pseudogalena'] < distortedly < surcingling < recognise < aequipalpia
Thought 15: Now let's sort this subpart ['pseudococcus', 'pseudogalena']. Looking at the sixth letters.The sixth letter: pseudococcus: o. pseudogalena: o.
Thought 16: We now have: ['pseudococcus', 'pseudogalena']for the subpart. Hence, we have nonmathematical < ['incremate', 'intranidal'] < clothespin < recognise < ceremonialism < termites < aequipalpia < entrepots < pachyacria < pneumatology < dentiferous < ['pseudococcus', 'pseudogalena'] < surcingling < distortedly
Thought 17: Now let's sort this subpart ['pseudococcus', 'pseudogalena']. Looking at the seventh letters.The seventh letter: pseudococcus: c. pseudogalena: g.
Thought 18: We now have: pseudogalena < pseudococcusfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['incremate', 'intranidal'] < clothespin < pneumatology < pachyacria < termites < ceremonialism < distortedly < pseudococcus < aequipalpia < surcingling < recognise < pseudogalena < dentiferous < nonmathematical < entrepots
Thought 19: Now let's sort this subpart ['incremate', 'intranidal']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: incremate: n. intranidal: n.
Thought 20: We now have: ['incremate', 'intranidal']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['incremate', 'intranidal'] < clothespin < pneumatology < pachyacria < termites < ceremonialism < distortedly < pseudococcus < aequipalpia < surcingling < recognise < pseudogalena < dentiferous < nonmathematical < entrepots
Thought 21: Now let's sort this subpart ['incremate', 'intranidal']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: incremate: c. intranidal: t.
Thought 22: We now have: incremate < intranidalfor the subpart. Hence, we have incremate < intranidal < clothespin < pneumatology < pachyacria < termites < ceremonialism < distortedly < pseudococcus < aequipalpia < surcingling < recognise < pseudogalena < dentiferous < nonmathematical < entrepots
Thought 23: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is recognise clothespin ceremonialism dentiferous distortedly pneumatology pachyacria pseudogalena pseudococcus termites nonmathematical aequipalpia surcingling incremate intranidal entrepots

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

o v g z q l r c k d p h x t w f y n u b j m a s i e


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: bootlegger, oviger, pectinic, nightmarish, gangflower, bawcocks, predeficient, hoti, polygenist, animations, overfastidious, bluffing, eurystheus, haussmannize
There are some special requirements:

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: bootlegger: r. oviger: r. pectinic: c. nightmarish: h. gangflower: r. bawcocks: s. predeficient: t. hoti: i. polygenist: t. animations: s. overfastidious: s. bluffing: g. eurystheus: s. haussmannize: e.

We now have: pectinic < haussmannize < bluffing < nightmarish < hoti < ['bootlegger', 'oviger', 'gangflower'] < ['bawcocks', 'animations', 'overfastidious', 'eurystheus'] < ['predeficient', 'polygenist']

Now let's sort this subpart ['bootlegger', 'oviger', 'gangflower']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: bootlegger: e. oviger: e. gangflower: e.

We now have: ['bootlegger', 'oviger', 'gangflower']for the subpart. Hence, we have pectinic < haussmannize < bluffing < nightmarish < hoti < ['bootlegger', 'oviger', 'gangflower'] < ['bawcocks', 'animations', 'overfastidious', 'eurystheus'] < ['predeficient', 'polygenist']

Now let's sort this subpart ['bootlegger', 'oviger', 'gangflower']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: bootlegger: g. oviger: g. gangflower: w.

We now have: ['bootlegger', 'oviger'] < gangflowerfor the subpart. Hence, we have pectinic < haussmannize < bluffing < nightmarish < hoti < ['bootlegger', 'oviger'] < gangflower < ['bawcocks', 'animations', 'overfastidious', 'eurystheus'] < ['predeficient', 'polygenist']

Now let's sort this subpart ['bootlegger', 'oviger']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: bootlegger: g. oviger: i.

We now have: bootlegger < ovigerfor the subpart. Hence, we have pectinic < haussmannize < bluffing < nightmarish < hoti < bootlegger < oviger < gangflower < ['bawcocks', 'animations', 'overfastidious', 'eurystheus'] < ['predeficient', 'polygenist']

Now let's sort this subpart ['bawcocks', 'animations', 'overfastidious', 'eurystheus']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: bawcocks: k. animations: n. overfastidious: u. eurystheus: u.

We now have: bawcocks < animations < ['overfastidious', 'eurystheus']for the subpart. Hence, we have pectinic < haussmannize < bluffing < nightmarish < hoti < bootlegger < oviger < gangflower < bawcocks < animations < ['overfastidious', 'eurystheus'] < ['predeficient', 'polygenist']

Now let's sort this subpart ['overfastidious', 'eurystheus']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: overfastidious: o. eurystheus: e.

We now have: eurystheus < overfastidiousfor the subpart. Hence, we have pectinic < haussmannize < bluffing < nightmarish < hoti < bootlegger < oviger < gangflower < bawcocks < animations < eurystheus < overfastidious < ['predeficient', 'polygenist']

Now let's sort this subpart ['predeficient', 'polygenist']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: predeficient: n. polygenist: s.

We now have: predeficient < polygenistfor the subpart. Hence, we have pectinic < haussmannize < bluffing < nightmarish < hoti < bootlegger < oviger < gangflower < bawcocks < animations < eurystheus < overfastidious < predeficient < polygenist

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is pectinic haussmannize bluffing nightmarish hoti bootlegger oviger gangflower bawcocks animations eurystheus overfastidious predeficient polygenist

bootlegger oviger pectinic nightmarish gangflower bawcocks predeficient hoti polygenist animations overfastidious bluffing eurystheus haussmannize


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: presented oraches chinin planetabler terpane pennales joyleaf noseband prothalline radectomieseph
There are some special requirements:

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: presented: d. oraches: s. chinin: n. planetabler: r. terpane: e. pennales: s. joyleaf: f. noseband: d. prothalline: e. radectomieseph: h.
Thought 2: We now have: ['presented', 'noseband'] < ['terpane', 'prothalline'] < joyleaf < radectomieseph < chinin < planetabler < ['oraches', 'pennales']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['presented', 'noseband']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: presented: e. noseband: n.
Thought 4: We now have: presented < nosebandfor the subpart. Hence, we have chinin < ['terpane', 'prothalline'] < ['oraches', 'pennales'] < radectomieseph < presented < noseband < joyleaf < planetabler
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['terpane', 'prothalline']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: terpane: n. prothalline: n.
Thought 6: We now have: ['terpane', 'prothalline']for the subpart. Hence, we have chinin < ['terpane', 'prothalline'] < ['oraches', 'pennales'] < radectomieseph < presented < noseband < joyleaf < planetabler
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['terpane', 'prothalline']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: terpane: a. prothalline: i.
Thought 8: We now have: terpane < prothallinefor the subpart. Hence, we have chinin < terpane < prothalline < ['oraches', 'pennales'] < radectomieseph < presented < noseband < joyleaf < planetabler
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['oraches', 'pennales']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: oraches: e. pennales: e.
Thought 10: We now have: ['oraches', 'pennales']for the subpart. Hence, we have joyleaf < radectomieseph < noseband < presented < terpane < ['oraches', 'pennales'] < planetabler < chinin < prothalline
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['oraches', 'pennales']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: oraches: h. pennales: l.
Thought 12: We now have: oraches < pennalesfor the subpart. Hence, we have joyleaf < radectomieseph < noseband < presented < terpane < oraches < pennales < planetabler < chinin < prothalline
Thought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is presented noseband terpane prothalline joyleaf radectomieseph chinin planetabler oraches pennales

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: reshoulder setaceous annularity polabish antitheistically gametoid fugged pluvioscopic actinoelectricity arabiyeh dubitant guesses tequilas onrushing cursorial
There are some special requirements:

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: reshoulder: r. setaceous: s. annularity: y. polabish: h. antitheistically: y. gametoid: d. fugged: d. pluvioscopic: c. actinoelectricity: y. arabiyeh: h. dubitant: t. guesses: s. tequilas: s. onrushing: g. cursorial: l.
Thought 2: We now have: pluvioscopic < ['gametoid', 'fugged'] < onrushing < ['polabish', 'arabiyeh'] < cursorial < reshoulder < ['setaceous', 'guesses', 'tequilas'] < dubitant < ['annularity', 'antitheistically', 'actinoelectricity']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['gametoid', 'fugged']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: gametoid: i. fugged: e.
Thought 4: We now have: fugged < gametoidfor the subpart. Hence, we have onrushing < ['setaceous', 'guesses', 'tequilas'] < pluvioscopic < cursorial < reshoulder < fugged < gametoid < ['polabish', 'arabiyeh'] < dubitant < ['annularity', 'antitheistically', 'actinoelectricity']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['polabish', 'arabiyeh']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: polabish: s. arabiyeh: e.
Thought 6: We now have: arabiyeh < polabishfor the subpart. Hence, we have onrushing < ['setaceous', 'guesses', 'tequilas'] < pluvioscopic < cursorial < reshoulder < fugged < gametoid < arabiyeh < polabish < dubitant < ['annularity', 'antitheistically', 'actinoelectricity']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['setaceous', 'guesses', 'tequilas']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: setaceous: u. guesses: e. tequilas: a.
Thought 8: We now have: tequilas < guesses < setaceousfor the subpart. Hence, we have onrushing < tequilas < guesses < setaceous < pluvioscopic < cursorial < reshoulder < fugged < gametoid < arabiyeh < polabish < dubitant < ['annularity', 'antitheistically', 'actinoelectricity']
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['annularity', 'antitheistically', 'actinoelectricity']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: annularity: t. antitheistically: l. actinoelectricity: t.
Thought 10: We now have: antitheistically < ['annularity', 'actinoelectricity']for the subpart. Hence, we have onrushing < tequilas < guesses < setaceous < pluvioscopic < cursorial < reshoulder < fugged < gametoid < arabiyeh < polabish < dubitant < antitheistically < ['annularity', 'actinoelectricity']
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['annularity', 'actinoelectricity']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: annularity: i. actinoelectricity: i.
Thought 12: We now have: ['annularity', 'actinoelectricity']for the subpart. Hence, we have onrushing < tequilas < guesses < setaceous < pluvioscopic < cursorial < reshoulder < fugged < gametoid < arabiyeh < polabish < dubitant < antitheistically < ['annularity', 'actinoelectricity']
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['annularity', 'actinoelectricity']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: annularity: r. actinoelectricity: c.
Thought 14: We now have: actinoelectricity < annularityfor the subpart. Hence, we have onrushing < tequilas < guesses < setaceous < pluvioscopic < cursorial < reshoulder < fugged < gametoid < arabiyeh < polabish < dubitant < antitheistically < actinoelectricity < annularity
Thought 15: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is pluvioscopic fugged gametoid onrushing arabiyeh polabish cursorial reshoulder tequilas guesses setaceous dubitant antitheistically actinoelectricity annularity

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: unapocryphal calycule whorry priv irreligionism senatrix sarcocarcinomata undiffractiveness spherulate exorcista sneaksman oblongs miserable
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: b, t, g, a, f, n, y, d, c, l, k, v, r, w, i, h, e, m, s, q, j, x, u, p, o, z

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: unapocryphal: l. calycule: e. whorry: y. priv: v. irreligionism: m. senatrix: x. sarcocarcinomata: a. undiffractiveness: s. spherulate: e. exorcista: a. sneaksman: a. oblongs: s. miserable: e.
Thought 2: We now have: ['sarcocarcinomata', 'exorcista', 'sneaksman'] < whorry < unapocryphal < priv < ['calycule', 'spherulate', 'miserable'] < irreligionism < ['undiffractiveness', 'oblongs'] < senatrix
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['sarcocarcinomata', 'exorcista', 'sneaksman']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: sarcocarcinomata: t. exorcista: t. sneaksman: a.
Thought 4: We now have: ['sarcocarcinomata', 'exorcista'] < sneaksmanfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['sarcocarcinomata', 'exorcista'] < sneaksman < whorry < unapocryphal < priv < ['calycule', 'spherulate', 'miserable'] < irreligionism < ['undiffractiveness', 'oblongs'] < senatrix
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['sarcocarcinomata', 'exorcista']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: sarcocarcinomata: a. exorcista: s.
Thought 6: We now have: sarcocarcinomata < exorcistafor the subpart. Hence, we have sarcocarcinomata < exorcista < sneaksman < whorry < unapocryphal < priv < ['calycule', 'spherulate', 'miserable'] < irreligionism < ['undiffractiveness', 'oblongs'] < senatrix
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['calycule', 'spherulate', 'miserable']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: calycule: l. spherulate: t. miserable: l.
Thought 8: We now have: spherulate < ['calycule', 'miserable']for the subpart. Hence, we have sarcocarcinomata < exorcista < sneaksman < whorry < unapocryphal < priv < spherulate < ['calycule', 'miserable'] < irreligionism < ['undiffractiveness', 'oblongs'] < senatrix
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['calycule', 'miserable']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: calycule: u. miserable: b.
Thought 10: We now have: miserable < calyculefor the subpart. Hence, we have sarcocarcinomata < exorcista < sneaksman < whorry < unapocryphal < priv < spherulate < miserable < calycule < irreligionism < ['undiffractiveness', 'oblongs'] < senatrix
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['undiffractiveness', 'oblongs']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: undiffractiveness: d. oblongs: g.
Thought 12: We now have: undiffractiveness < oblongsfor the subpart. Hence, we have sarcocarcinomata < calycule < priv < whorry < miserable < senatrix < spherulate < sneaksman < undiffractiveness < exorcista < oblongs < unapocryphal < irreligionism
Thought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is sarcocarcinomata exorcista sneaksman whorry unapocryphal priv spherulate miserable calycule irreligionism undiffractiveness oblongs senatrix

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

b t g a f n y d c l k v r w i h e m s q j x u p o z


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: perfidies, outcharms, iglulirmiut, clerically, pantochromism, pinfeathery, stilter, nonattacking

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: perfidies: p. outcharms: o. iglulirmiut: i. clerically: c. pantochromism: p. pinfeathery: p. stilter: s. nonattacking: n.

We now have: clerically < iglulirmiut < nonattacking < outcharms < ['perfidies', 'pantochromism', 'pinfeathery'] < stilter

Now let's sort this subpart ['perfidies', 'pantochromism', 'pinfeathery']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: perfidies: e. pantochromism: a. pinfeathery: i.

We now have: pantochromism < perfidies < pinfeatheryfor the subpart. Hence, we have clerically < iglulirmiut < nonattacking < outcharms < pantochromism < perfidies < pinfeathery < stilter

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is clerically iglulirmiut nonattacking outcharms pantochromism perfidies pinfeathery stilter

perfidies outcharms iglulirmiut clerically pantochromism pinfeathery stilter nonattacking


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: buckstall orthiconoscope spaghetti amulae swarthily nonhydraulic nondependable brattling babbitts endromididae redeemability preemphasis phlebostasis
There are some special requirements:

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: buckstall: l. orthiconoscope: e. spaghetti: i. amulae: e. swarthily: y. nonhydraulic: c. nondependable: e. brattling: g. babbitts: s. endromididae: e. redeemability: y. preemphasis: s. phlebostasis: s.
Thought 2: We now have: ['swarthily', 'redeemability'] < ['babbitts', 'preemphasis', 'phlebostasis'] < buckstall < spaghetti < brattling < ['orthiconoscope', 'amulae', 'nondependable', 'endromididae'] < nonhydraulic
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['swarthily', 'redeemability']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: swarthily: l. redeemability: t.
Thought 4: We now have: swarthily < redeemabilityfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['babbitts', 'preemphasis', 'phlebostasis'] < swarthily < redeemability < buckstall < brattling < ['orthiconoscope', 'amulae', 'nondependable', 'endromididae'] < spaghetti < nonhydraulic
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['babbitts', 'preemphasis', 'phlebostasis']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: babbitts: t. preemphasis: i. phlebostasis: i.
Thought 6: We now have: ['preemphasis', 'phlebostasis'] < babbittsfor the subpart. Hence, we have redeemability < ['orthiconoscope', 'amulae', 'nondependable', 'endromididae'] < brattling < nonhydraulic < spaghetti < babbitts < swarthily < ['preemphasis', 'phlebostasis'] < buckstall
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['preemphasis', 'phlebostasis']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: preemphasis: s. phlebostasis: s.
Thought 8: We now have: ['preemphasis', 'phlebostasis']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['preemphasis', 'phlebostasis'] < redeemability < swarthily < buckstall < brattling < babbitts < ['orthiconoscope', 'amulae', 'nondependable', 'endromididae'] < nonhydraulic < spaghetti
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['preemphasis', 'phlebostasis']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: preemphasis: a. phlebostasis: a.
Thought 10: We now have: ['preemphasis', 'phlebostasis']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['preemphasis', 'phlebostasis'] < redeemability < swarthily < buckstall < brattling < babbitts < ['orthiconoscope', 'amulae', 'nondependable', 'endromididae'] < nonhydraulic < spaghetti
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['preemphasis', 'phlebostasis']. Looking at the fifth letters from right to left.The fifth letter: phlebostasis: t.
Thought 12: We now have: phlebostasisfor the subpart. Hence, we have phlebostasis < redeemability < swarthily < buckstall < brattling < babbitts < ['orthiconoscope', 'amulae', 'nondependable', 'endromididae'] < nonhydraulic < spaghetti
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['orthiconoscope', 'amulae', 'nondependable', 'endromididae']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: orthiconoscope: p. amulae: a. nondependable: l. endromididae: a.
Thought 14: We now have: orthiconoscope < ['amulae', 'endromididae'] < nondependablefor the subpart. Hence, we have phlebostasis < redeemability < swarthily < buckstall < brattling < babbitts < ['amulae', 'endromididae'] < nondependable < orthiconoscope < nonhydraulic < spaghetti
Thought 15: Now let's sort this subpart ['amulae', 'endromididae']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: amulae: l.
Thought 16: We now have: amulaefor the subpart. Hence, we have phlebostasis < redeemability < swarthily < buckstall < brattling < babbitts < amulae < nondependable < orthiconoscope < nonhydraulic < spaghetti
Thought 17: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is swarthily redeemability phlebostasis babbitts buckstall spaghetti brattling orthiconoscope amulae nondependable nonhydraulic

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: roofman ussels nonpreservative nontractableness plicatile multiversion puslike bajardo unadoptional ribboned

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: roofman: r. ussels: u. nonpreservative: n. nontractableness: n. plicatile: p. multiversion: m. puslike: p. bajardo: b. unadoptional: u. ribboned: r.
Thought 2: We now have: bajardo < multiversion < ['nonpreservative', 'nontractableness'] < ['plicatile', 'puslike'] < ['roofman', 'ribboned'] < ['ussels', 'unadoptional']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['nonpreservative', 'nontractableness']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: nonpreservative: o. nontractableness: o.
Thought 4: We now have: ['nonpreservative', 'nontractableness']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['ussels', 'unadoptional'] < ['nonpreservative', 'nontractableness'] < multiversion < ['plicatile', 'puslike'] < ['roofman', 'ribboned'] < bajardo
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['nonpreservative', 'nontractableness']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: nonpreservative: n. nontractableness: n.
Thought 6: We now have: ['nonpreservative', 'nontractableness']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['ussels', 'unadoptional'] < ['nonpreservative', 'nontractableness'] < multiversion < ['plicatile', 'puslike'] < ['roofman', 'ribboned'] < bajardo
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['nonpreservative', 'nontractableness']. Looking at the fourth letters.The fourth letter: nonpreservative: p. nontractableness: t.
Thought 8: We now have: nonpreservative < nontractablenessfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['ussels', 'unadoptional'] < nonpreservative < nontractableness < multiversion < ['plicatile', 'puslike'] < ['roofman', 'ribboned'] < bajardo
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['plicatile', 'puslike']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: plicatile: l. puslike: u.
Thought 10: We now have: plicatile < puslikefor the subpart. Hence, we have ['ussels', 'unadoptional'] < nonpreservative < nontractableness < multiversion < plicatile < puslike < ['roofman', 'ribboned'] < bajardo
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['roofman', 'ribboned']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: roofman: o. ribboned: i.
Thought 12: We now have: ribboned < roofmanfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['ussels', 'unadoptional'] < nonpreservative < nontractableness < multiversion < plicatile < puslike < ribboned < roofman < bajardo
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['ussels', 'unadoptional']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: ussels: s. unadoptional: n.
Thought 14: We now have: unadoptional < usselsfor the subpart. Hence, we have unadoptional < ussels < nonpreservative < nontractableness < multiversion < plicatile < puslike < ribboned < roofman < bajardo
Thought 15: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is bajardo multiversion nonpreservative nontractableness plicatile puslike ribboned roofman unadoptional ussels

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: eupione judah shouldst isidioid joculatory canonicate orpit dekameter stereos arthrodirous decurtate
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: x, n, m, w, f, l, t, k, c, a, d, j, z, p, q, i, r, h, e, u, s, y, v, o, g, b

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: eupione: e. judah: h. shouldst: t. isidioid: d. joculatory: y. canonicate: e. orpit: t. dekameter: r. stereos: s. arthrodirous: s. decurtate: e.
Thought 2: We now have: joculatory < judah < dekameter < isidioid < ['shouldst', 'orpit'] < ['stereos', 'arthrodirous'] < ['eupione', 'canonicate', 'decurtate']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['shouldst', 'orpit']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: shouldst: s. orpit: i.
Thought 4: We now have: orpit < shouldstfor the subpart. Hence, we have orpit < shouldst < isidioid < dekameter < judah < ['eupione', 'canonicate', 'decurtate'] < ['stereos', 'arthrodirous'] < joculatory
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['stereos', 'arthrodirous']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: stereos: o. arthrodirous: u.
Thought 6: We now have: arthrodirous < stereosfor the subpart. Hence, we have orpit < shouldst < isidioid < dekameter < judah < ['eupione', 'canonicate', 'decurtate'] < arthrodirous < stereos < joculatory
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['eupione', 'canonicate', 'decurtate']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: eupione: n. canonicate: t. decurtate: t.
Thought 8: We now have: eupione < ['canonicate', 'decurtate']for the subpart. Hence, we have orpit < shouldst < isidioid < dekameter < judah < eupione < ['canonicate', 'decurtate'] < arthrodirous < stereos < joculatory
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['canonicate', 'decurtate']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: canonicate: a. decurtate: a.
Thought 10: We now have: ['canonicate', 'decurtate']for the subpart. Hence, we have stereos < orpit < dekameter < judah < ['canonicate', 'decurtate'] < arthrodirous < eupione < joculatory < shouldst < isidioid
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['canonicate', 'decurtate']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: canonicate: c. decurtate: t.
Thought 12: We now have: decurtate < canonicatefor the subpart. Hence, we have dekameter < stereos < judah < arthrodirous < shouldst < eupione < canonicate < decurtate < orpit < isidioid < joculatory
Thought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is joculatory judah dekameter isidioid orpit shouldst arthrodirous stereos eupione decurtate canonicate

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

x n m w f l t k c a d j z p q i r h e u s y v o g b


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: cyanochlorous clamps curvograph subbings ventrosuspension dichotomisation cantharides speronaras shamoy rhythmed outpouring victorianize syphilid
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: c, w, b, i, a, e, j, h, x, r, v, t, l, z, m, o, g, y, n, q, s, f, p, u, k, d

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: cyanochlorous: s. clamps: s. curvograph: h. subbings: s. ventrosuspension: n. dichotomisation: n. cantharides: s. speronaras: s. shamoy: y. rhythmed: d. outpouring: g. victorianize: e. syphilid: d.
Thought 2: We now have: victorianize < curvograph < outpouring < shamoy < ['ventrosuspension', 'dichotomisation'] < ['cyanochlorous', 'clamps', 'subbings', 'cantharides', 'speronaras'] < ['rhythmed', 'syphilid']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['ventrosuspension', 'dichotomisation']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: ventrosuspension: o. dichotomisation: o.
Thought 4: We now have: ['ventrosuspension', 'dichotomisation']for the subpart. Hence, we have victorianize < curvograph < outpouring < shamoy < ['ventrosuspension', 'dichotomisation'] < ['cyanochlorous', 'clamps', 'subbings', 'cantharides', 'speronaras'] < ['rhythmed', 'syphilid']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['ventrosuspension', 'dichotomisation']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: ventrosuspension: i. dichotomisation: i.
Thought 6: We now have: ['ventrosuspension', 'dichotomisation']for the subpart. Hence, we have victorianize < curvograph < outpouring < shamoy < ['ventrosuspension', 'dichotomisation'] < ['cyanochlorous', 'clamps', 'subbings', 'cantharides', 'speronaras'] < ['rhythmed', 'syphilid']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['ventrosuspension', 'dichotomisation']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: ventrosuspension: s. dichotomisation: t.
Thought 8: We now have: dichotomisation < ventrosuspensionfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['rhythmed', 'syphilid'] < shamoy < victorianize < ventrosuspension < ['cyanochlorous', 'clamps', 'subbings', 'cantharides', 'speronaras'] < dichotomisation < curvograph < outpouring
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['cyanochlorous', 'clamps', 'subbings', 'cantharides', 'speronaras']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: cyanochlorous: u. clamps: p. subbings: g. cantharides: e. speronaras: a.
Thought 10: We now have: speronaras < cantharides < subbings < clamps < cyanochlorousfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['rhythmed', 'syphilid'] < curvograph < shamoy < clamps < ventrosuspension < cantharides < cyanochlorous < outpouring < subbings < dichotomisation < speronaras < victorianize
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['rhythmed', 'syphilid']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: rhythmed: e. syphilid: i.
Thought 12: We now have: syphilid < rhythmedfor the subpart. Hence, we have syphilid < rhythmed < curvograph < shamoy < clamps < ventrosuspension < cantharides < cyanochlorous < outpouring < subbings < dichotomisation < speronaras < victorianize
Thought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is victorianize curvograph outpouring shamoy dichotomisation ventrosuspension speronaras cantharides subbings clamps cyanochlorous syphilid rhythmed

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

c w b i a e j h x r v t l z m o g y n q s f p u k d


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: percussive, heinies, enhungered, stereotaxic, sundanesian, caroteel, arcade, extemporarily, serpuloid
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: s, j, x, z, b, t, a, f, d, n, g, y, m, p, q, v, l, o, i, w, h, e, c, k, r, u

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: percussive: p. heinies: h. enhungered: e. stereotaxic: s. sundanesian: s. caroteel: c. arcade: a. extemporarily: e. serpuloid: s.

We now have: ['stereotaxic', 'sundanesian', 'serpuloid'] < arcade < percussive < heinies < ['enhungered', 'extemporarily'] < caroteel

Now let's sort this subpart ['stereotaxic', 'sundanesian', 'serpuloid']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: stereotaxic: t. sundanesian: u. serpuloid: e.

We now have: stereotaxic < serpuloid < sundanesianfor the subpart. Hence, we have stereotaxic < serpuloid < sundanesian < arcade < percussive < heinies < ['enhungered', 'extemporarily'] < caroteel

Now let's sort this subpart ['enhungered', 'extemporarily']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: enhungered: n. extemporarily: x.

We now have: extemporarily < enhungeredfor the subpart. Hence, we have stereotaxic < serpuloid < sundanesian < arcade < percussive < heinies < extemporarily < enhungered < caroteel

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is stereotaxic serpuloid sundanesian arcade percussive heinies extemporarily enhungered caroteel

percussive heinies enhungered stereotaxic sundanesian caroteel arcade extemporarily serpuloid

s j x z b t a f d n g y m p q v l o i w h e c k r u