Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: cocobolo, damnit, unsuperstitiously, ducky, preresemblance, spraddles, girlies, authotype, skirt, serfism, millionist, evildoer, marbrinus
There are some special requirements:

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: cocobolo: o. damnit: t. unsuperstitiously: y. ducky: y. preresemblance: e. spraddles: s. girlies: s. authotype: e. skirt: t. serfism: m. millionist: t. evildoer: r. marbrinus: s.

We now have: ['preresemblance', 'authotype'] < serfism < cocobolo < evildoer < ['spraddles', 'girlies', 'marbrinus'] < ['damnit', 'skirt', 'millionist'] < ['unsuperstitiously', 'ducky']

Now let's sort this subpart ['preresemblance', 'authotype']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: preresemblance: c. authotype: p.

We now have: preresemblance < authotypefor the subpart. Hence, we have preresemblance < authotype < serfism < cocobolo < evildoer < ['spraddles', 'girlies', 'marbrinus'] < ['damnit', 'skirt', 'millionist'] < ['unsuperstitiously', 'ducky']

Now let's sort this subpart ['spraddles', 'girlies', 'marbrinus']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: spraddles: e. girlies: e. marbrinus: u.

We now have: ['spraddles', 'girlies'] < marbrinusfor the subpart. Hence, we have preresemblance < authotype < serfism < cocobolo < evildoer < ['spraddles', 'girlies'] < marbrinus < ['damnit', 'skirt', 'millionist'] < ['unsuperstitiously', 'ducky']

Now let's sort this subpart ['spraddles', 'girlies']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: spraddles: l. girlies: i.

We now have: girlies < spraddlesfor the subpart. Hence, we have preresemblance < authotype < serfism < cocobolo < evildoer < girlies < spraddles < marbrinus < ['damnit', 'skirt', 'millionist'] < ['unsuperstitiously', 'ducky']

Now let's sort this subpart ['damnit', 'skirt', 'millionist']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: damnit: i. skirt: r. millionist: s.

We now have: damnit < skirt < millionistfor the subpart. Hence, we have preresemblance < authotype < serfism < cocobolo < evildoer < girlies < spraddles < marbrinus < damnit < skirt < millionist < ['unsuperstitiously', 'ducky']

Now let's sort this subpart ['unsuperstitiously', 'ducky']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: unsuperstitiously: l. ducky: k.

We now have: ducky < unsuperstitiouslyfor the subpart. Hence, we have preresemblance < authotype < serfism < cocobolo < evildoer < girlies < spraddles < marbrinus < damnit < skirt < millionist < ducky < unsuperstitiously

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is preresemblance authotype serfism cocobolo evildoer girlies spraddles marbrinus damnit skirt millionist ducky unsuperstitiously

cocobolo damnit unsuperstitiously ducky preresemblance spraddles girlies authotype skirt serfism millionist evildoer marbrinus


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: limnanthemum tapestrying postmaniacal allotypes ewers abanic hemialbumin pericaecal wuff excesses
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: a, h, x, n, c, e, k, j, s, f, z, m, i, t, o, d, p, u, b, q, g, w, l, r, y, v

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: limnanthemum: m. tapestrying: g. postmaniacal: l. allotypes: s. ewers: s. abanic: c. hemialbumin: n. pericaecal: l. wuff: f. excesses: s.
Thought 2: We now have: hemialbumin < abanic < ['allotypes', 'ewers', 'excesses'] < wuff < limnanthemum < tapestrying < ['postmaniacal', 'pericaecal']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['allotypes', 'ewers', 'excesses']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: allotypes: e. ewers: r. excesses: e.
Thought 4: We now have: ewers < ['allotypes', 'excesses']for the subpart. Hence, we have limnanthemum < ['allotypes', 'excesses'] < ['postmaniacal', 'pericaecal'] < tapestrying < ewers < wuff < abanic < hemialbumin
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['allotypes', 'excesses']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: allotypes: p. excesses: s.
Thought 6: We now have: excesses < allotypesfor the subpart. Hence, we have limnanthemum < excesses < allotypes < ['postmaniacal', 'pericaecal'] < tapestrying < ewers < wuff < abanic < hemialbumin
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['postmaniacal', 'pericaecal']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: postmaniacal: a. pericaecal: a.
Thought 8: We now have: ['postmaniacal', 'pericaecal']for the subpart. Hence, we have abanic < excesses < wuff < allotypes < tapestrying < hemialbumin < limnanthemum < ['postmaniacal', 'pericaecal'] < ewers
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['postmaniacal', 'pericaecal']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: postmaniacal: c. pericaecal: c.
Thought 10: We now have: ['postmaniacal', 'pericaecal']for the subpart. Hence, we have abanic < excesses < wuff < allotypes < tapestrying < hemialbumin < limnanthemum < ['postmaniacal', 'pericaecal'] < ewers
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['postmaniacal', 'pericaecal']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: postmaniacal: a. pericaecal: e.
Thought 12: We now have: postmaniacal < pericaecalfor the subpart. Hence, we have abanic < excesses < wuff < allotypes < tapestrying < hemialbumin < limnanthemum < postmaniacal < pericaecal < ewers
Thought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is hemialbumin abanic ewers excesses allotypes wuff limnanthemum tapestrying postmaniacal pericaecal

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

a h x n c e k j s f z m i t o d p u b q g w l r y v


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: levelman reciprocalness lignify contumaciousness antiagglutinating nonextraneously whirligigs niggra flimflams fibroserous mandamuse villeins
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: k, n, e, t, r, q, p, w, f, i, a, j, l, o, b, x, c, u, g, h, d, y, m, s, v, z

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: levelman: n. reciprocalness: s. lignify: y. contumaciousness: s. antiagglutinating: g. nonextraneously: y. whirligigs: s. niggra: a. flimflams: s. fibroserous: s. mandamuse: e. villeins: s.
Thought 2: We now have: levelman < mandamuse < niggra < antiagglutinating < ['lignify', 'nonextraneously'] < ['reciprocalness', 'contumaciousness', 'whirligigs', 'flimflams', 'fibroserous', 'villeins']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['lignify', 'nonextraneously']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: lignify: f. nonextraneously: l.
Thought 4: We now have: lignify < nonextraneouslyfor the subpart. Hence, we have levelman < mandamuse < niggra < antiagglutinating < lignify < nonextraneously < ['reciprocalness', 'contumaciousness', 'whirligigs', 'flimflams', 'fibroserous', 'villeins']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['reciprocalness', 'contumaciousness', 'whirligigs', 'flimflams', 'fibroserous', 'villeins']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: reciprocalness: s. contumaciousness: s. flimflams: m. fibroserous: u. villeins: n.
Thought 6: We now have: villeins < fibroserous < flimflams < ['reciprocalness', 'contumaciousness']for the subpart. Hence, we have antiagglutinating < ['reciprocalness', 'contumaciousness'] < mandamuse < nonextraneously < lignify < levelman < villeins < flimflams < niggra < fibroserous
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['reciprocalness', 'contumaciousness']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: reciprocalness: e. contumaciousness: e.
Thought 8: We now have: ['reciprocalness', 'contumaciousness']for the subpart. Hence, we have antiagglutinating < ['reciprocalness', 'contumaciousness'] < mandamuse < nonextraneously < lignify < levelman < villeins < flimflams < niggra < fibroserous
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['reciprocalness', 'contumaciousness']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: reciprocalness: n. contumaciousness: n.
Thought 10: We now have: ['reciprocalness', 'contumaciousness']for the subpart. Hence, we have antiagglutinating < ['reciprocalness', 'contumaciousness'] < mandamuse < nonextraneously < lignify < levelman < villeins < flimflams < niggra < fibroserous
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['reciprocalness', 'contumaciousness']. Looking at the fifth letters from right to left.The fifth letter: reciprocalness: l. contumaciousness: s.
Thought 12: We now have: reciprocalness < contumaciousnessfor the subpart. Hence, we have antiagglutinating < reciprocalness < contumaciousness < mandamuse < nonextraneously < lignify < levelman < villeins < flimflams < niggra < fibroserous
Thought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is levelman mandamuse niggra antiagglutinating lignify nonextraneously villeins fibroserous flimflams reciprocalness contumaciousness

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

k n e t r q p w f i a j l o b x c u g h d y m s v z


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: polypetal ultracentrifuging citywide lining heresiography twelvescore export vaughn forehalf diselectrification athenian ethoxide shoofa quidnunc pleiotropically antefixes
There are some special requirements:

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: polypetal: l. ultracentrifuging: g. citywide: e. lining: g. heresiography: y. twelvescore: e. export: t. vaughn: n. forehalf: f. diselectrification: n. athenian: n. ethoxide: e. shoofa: a. quidnunc: c. pleiotropically: y. antefixes: s.
Thought 2: We now have: shoofa < quidnunc < ['citywide', 'twelvescore', 'ethoxide'] < forehalf < ['ultracentrifuging', 'lining'] < polypetal < ['vaughn', 'diselectrification', 'athenian'] < antefixes < export < ['heresiography', 'pleiotropically']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['citywide', 'twelvescore', 'ethoxide']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: citywide: d. twelvescore: r. ethoxide: d.
Thought 4: We now have: ['citywide', 'ethoxide'] < twelvescorefor the subpart. Hence, we have shoofa < quidnunc < ['citywide', 'ethoxide'] < twelvescore < forehalf < ['ultracentrifuging', 'lining'] < polypetal < ['vaughn', 'diselectrification', 'athenian'] < antefixes < export < ['heresiography', 'pleiotropically']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['citywide', 'ethoxide']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: citywide: i. ethoxide: i.
Thought 6: We now have: ['citywide', 'ethoxide']for the subpart. Hence, we have shoofa < quidnunc < ['citywide', 'ethoxide'] < twelvescore < forehalf < ['ultracentrifuging', 'lining'] < polypetal < ['vaughn', 'diselectrification', 'athenian'] < antefixes < export < ['heresiography', 'pleiotropically']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['citywide', 'ethoxide']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: citywide: w. ethoxide: x.
Thought 8: We now have: citywide < ethoxidefor the subpart. Hence, we have shoofa < quidnunc < citywide < ethoxide < twelvescore < forehalf < ['ultracentrifuging', 'lining'] < polypetal < ['vaughn', 'diselectrification', 'athenian'] < antefixes < export < ['heresiography', 'pleiotropically']
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['ultracentrifuging', 'lining']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: ultracentrifuging: n. lining: n.
Thought 10: We now have: ['ultracentrifuging', 'lining']for the subpart. Hence, we have shoofa < quidnunc < citywide < ethoxide < twelvescore < forehalf < ['ultracentrifuging', 'lining'] < polypetal < ['vaughn', 'diselectrification', 'athenian'] < antefixes < export < ['heresiography', 'pleiotropically']
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['ultracentrifuging', 'lining']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: ultracentrifuging: i. lining: i.
Thought 12: We now have: ['ultracentrifuging', 'lining']for the subpart. Hence, we have shoofa < quidnunc < citywide < ethoxide < twelvescore < forehalf < ['ultracentrifuging', 'lining'] < polypetal < ['vaughn', 'diselectrification', 'athenian'] < antefixes < export < ['heresiography', 'pleiotropically']
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['ultracentrifuging', 'lining']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: ultracentrifuging: g. lining: n.
Thought 14: We now have: ultracentrifuging < liningfor the subpart. Hence, we have shoofa < quidnunc < citywide < ethoxide < twelvescore < forehalf < ultracentrifuging < lining < polypetal < ['vaughn', 'diselectrification', 'athenian'] < antefixes < export < ['heresiography', 'pleiotropically']
Thought 15: Now let's sort this subpart ['vaughn', 'diselectrification', 'athenian']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: vaughn: h. diselectrification: o. athenian: a.
Thought 16: We now have: vaughn < diselectrification < athenianfor the subpart. Hence, we have shoofa < quidnunc < citywide < ethoxide < twelvescore < forehalf < ultracentrifuging < lining < polypetal < athenian < vaughn < diselectrification < antefixes < export < ['heresiography', 'pleiotropically']
Thought 17: Now let's sort this subpart ['heresiography', 'pleiotropically']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: heresiography: h. pleiotropically: l.
Thought 18: We now have: heresiography < pleiotropicallyfor the subpart. Hence, we have quidnunc < forehalf < lining < twelvescore < ultracentrifuging < ethoxide < export < heresiography < vaughn < antefixes < citywide < diselectrification < pleiotropically < athenian < shoofa < polypetal
Thought 19: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is shoofa quidnunc citywide ethoxide twelvescore forehalf ultracentrifuging lining polypetal vaughn diselectrification athenian antefixes export heresiography pleiotropically

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: tailspins candidest italianate eschalot bachelorette aboundingly worthy nearliest
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: b, x, r, h, i, t, v, w, z, s, g, j, u, m, n, p, l, f, y, e, k, o, c, q, a, d

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: tailspins: s. candidest: t. italianate: e. eschalot: t. bachelorette: e. aboundingly: y. worthy: y. nearliest: t.
Thought 2: We now have: ['candidest', 'eschalot', 'nearliest'] < tailspins < ['aboundingly', 'worthy'] < ['italianate', 'bachelorette']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['candidest', 'eschalot', 'nearliest']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: candidest: s. eschalot: o. nearliest: s.
Thought 4: We now have: ['candidest', 'nearliest'] < eschalotfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['italianate', 'bachelorette'] < tailspins < eschalot < ['candidest', 'nearliest'] < ['aboundingly', 'worthy']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['candidest', 'nearliest']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: candidest: e. nearliest: e.
Thought 6: We now have: ['candidest', 'nearliest']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['italianate', 'bachelorette'] < tailspins < eschalot < ['candidest', 'nearliest'] < ['aboundingly', 'worthy']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['candidest', 'nearliest']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: candidest: d. nearliest: i.
Thought 8: We now have: nearliest < candidestfor the subpart. Hence, we have tailspins < candidest < nearliest < eschalot < ['italianate', 'bachelorette'] < ['aboundingly', 'worthy']
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['aboundingly', 'worthy']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: aboundingly: l. worthy: h.
Thought 10: We now have: worthy < aboundinglyfor the subpart. Hence, we have tailspins < ['italianate', 'bachelorette'] < worthy < aboundingly < eschalot < candidest < nearliest
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['italianate', 'bachelorette']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: italianate: t. bachelorette: t.
Thought 12: We now have: ['italianate', 'bachelorette']for the subpart. Hence, we have tailspins < ['italianate', 'bachelorette'] < worthy < aboundingly < eschalot < candidest < nearliest
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['italianate', 'bachelorette']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: italianate: a. bachelorette: t.
Thought 14: We now have: bachelorette < italianatefor the subpart. Hence, we have tailspins < bachelorette < italianate < worthy < aboundingly < eschalot < candidest < nearliest
Thought 15: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is nearliest candidest eschalot tailspins worthy aboundingly bachelorette italianate

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

b x r h i t v w z s g j u m n p l f y e k o c q a d


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: radiatoporose fargoing anthophobia prefract exorcismal philosophically benzophenazine compound coprah
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: j, v, c, n, m, r, p, b, f, o, i, z, w, s, g, y, t, u, d, l, q, a, x, h, e, k

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: radiatoporose: r. fargoing: f. anthophobia: a. prefract: p. exorcismal: e. philosophically: p. benzophenazine: b. compound: c. coprah: c.
Thought 2: We now have: ['compound', 'coprah'] < radiatoporose < ['prefract', 'philosophically'] < benzophenazine < fargoing < anthophobia < exorcismal
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['compound', 'coprah']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: compound: o. coprah: o.
Thought 4: We now have: ['compound', 'coprah']for the subpart. Hence, we have fargoing < ['prefract', 'philosophically'] < radiatoporose < anthophobia < exorcismal < benzophenazine < ['compound', 'coprah']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['compound', 'coprah']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: compound: m. coprah: p.
Thought 6: We now have: compound < coprahfor the subpart. Hence, we have fargoing < ['prefract', 'philosophically'] < radiatoporose < anthophobia < exorcismal < benzophenazine < compound < coprah
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['prefract', 'philosophically']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: prefract: r. philosophically: h.
Thought 8: We now have: prefract < philosophicallyfor the subpart. Hence, we have fargoing < prefract < philosophically < radiatoporose < anthophobia < exorcismal < benzophenazine < compound < coprah
Thought 9: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is compound coprah radiatoporose prefract philosophically benzophenazine fargoing anthophobia exorcismal

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

j v c n m r p b f o i z w s g y t u d l q a x h e k


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: anear, meschantly, grovellingly, lorn, clements, unbusted, madidans, parostosis, hwy, buckass, unaffectionateness, muscovites, gwyniad, oxycephalic, unnaturality
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: w, d, j, f, x, s, t, e, z, i, r, v, b, h, q, l, p, y, n, g, c, a, k, o, u, m

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: anear: r. meschantly: y. grovellingly: y. lorn: n. clements: s. unbusted: d. madidans: s. parostosis: s. hwy: y. buckass: s. unaffectionateness: s. muscovites: s. gwyniad: d. oxycephalic: c. unnaturality: y.

We now have: ['unbusted', 'gwyniad'] < ['clements', 'madidans', 'parostosis', 'buckass', 'unaffectionateness', 'muscovites'] < anear < ['meschantly', 'grovellingly', 'hwy', 'unnaturality'] < lorn < oxycephalic

Now let's sort this subpart ['unbusted', 'gwyniad']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: unbusted: e. gwyniad: a.

We now have: unbusted < gwyniadfor the subpart. Hence, we have unbusted < gwyniad < ['clements', 'madidans', 'parostosis', 'buckass', 'unaffectionateness', 'muscovites'] < anear < ['meschantly', 'grovellingly', 'hwy', 'unnaturality'] < lorn < oxycephalic

Now let's sort this subpart ['clements', 'madidans', 'parostosis', 'buckass', 'unaffectionateness', 'muscovites']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: clements: t. madidans: n. parostosis: i. buckass: s. unaffectionateness: s. muscovites: e.

We now have: ['buckass', 'unaffectionateness'] < clements < muscovites < parostosis < madidansfor the subpart. Hence, we have unbusted < gwyniad < ['buckass', 'unaffectionateness'] < clements < muscovites < parostosis < madidans < anear < ['meschantly', 'grovellingly', 'hwy', 'unnaturality'] < lorn < oxycephalic

Now let's sort this subpart ['buckass', 'unaffectionateness']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: buckass: a. unaffectionateness: e.

We now have: unaffectionateness < buckassfor the subpart. Hence, we have unbusted < gwyniad < unaffectionateness < buckass < clements < muscovites < parostosis < madidans < anear < ['meschantly', 'grovellingly', 'hwy', 'unnaturality'] < lorn < oxycephalic

Now let's sort this subpart ['meschantly', 'grovellingly', 'hwy', 'unnaturality']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: meschantly: l. grovellingly: l. hwy: w. unnaturality: t.

We now have: hwy < unnaturality < ['meschantly', 'grovellingly']for the subpart. Hence, we have unbusted < gwyniad < unaffectionateness < buckass < clements < muscovites < parostosis < madidans < anear < hwy < unnaturality < ['meschantly', 'grovellingly'] < lorn < oxycephalic

Now let's sort this subpart ['meschantly', 'grovellingly']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: meschantly: t. grovellingly: g.

We now have: meschantly < grovellinglyfor the subpart. Hence, we have unbusted < gwyniad < unaffectionateness < buckass < clements < muscovites < parostosis < madidans < anear < hwy < unnaturality < meschantly < grovellingly < lorn < oxycephalic

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is unbusted gwyniad unaffectionateness buckass clements muscovites parostosis madidans anear hwy unnaturality meschantly grovellingly lorn oxycephalic

anear meschantly grovellingly lorn clements unbusted madidans parostosis hwy buckass unaffectionateness muscovites gwyniad oxycephalic unnaturality

w d j f x s t e z i r v b h q l p y n g c a k o u m


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: ethylene postcard unangelicalness infidelize gambrel underfeeling potometer owleries achilleid monkeypod nodus stentorphone hexasyllabic worldling
There are some special requirements:

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: ethylene: e. postcard: d. unangelicalness: s. infidelize: e. gambrel: l. underfeeling: g. potometer: r. owleries: s. achilleid: d. monkeypod: d. nodus: s. stentorphone: e. hexasyllabic: l. worldling: g.
Thought 2: We now have: ['postcard', 'achilleid', 'monkeypod'] < ['ethylene', 'infidelize', 'stentorphone'] < ['underfeeling', 'worldling'] < ['gambrel', 'hexasyllabic'] < potometer < ['unangelicalness', 'owleries', 'nodus']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['postcard', 'achilleid', 'monkeypod']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: postcard: r. achilleid: i. monkeypod: o.
Thought 4: We now have: achilleid < monkeypod < postcardfor the subpart. Hence, we have achilleid < monkeypod < postcard < ['ethylene', 'infidelize', 'stentorphone'] < ['underfeeling', 'worldling'] < ['gambrel', 'hexasyllabic'] < potometer < ['unangelicalness', 'owleries', 'nodus']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['ethylene', 'infidelize', 'stentorphone']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: ethylene: n. infidelize: z. stentorphone: n.
Thought 6: We now have: ['ethylene', 'stentorphone'] < infidelizefor the subpart. Hence, we have achilleid < monkeypod < postcard < ['ethylene', 'stentorphone'] < infidelize < ['underfeeling', 'worldling'] < ['gambrel', 'hexasyllabic'] < potometer < ['unangelicalness', 'owleries', 'nodus']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['ethylene', 'stentorphone']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: ethylene: e. stentorphone: o.
Thought 8: We now have: ethylene < stentorphonefor the subpart. Hence, we have achilleid < monkeypod < postcard < ethylene < stentorphone < infidelize < ['underfeeling', 'worldling'] < ['gambrel', 'hexasyllabic'] < potometer < ['unangelicalness', 'owleries', 'nodus']
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['underfeeling', 'worldling']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: underfeeling: n. worldling: n.
Thought 10: We now have: ['underfeeling', 'worldling']for the subpart. Hence, we have achilleid < monkeypod < postcard < ethylene < stentorphone < infidelize < ['underfeeling', 'worldling'] < ['gambrel', 'hexasyllabic'] < potometer < ['unangelicalness', 'owleries', 'nodus']
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['underfeeling', 'worldling']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: underfeeling: i. worldling: i.
Thought 12: We now have: ['underfeeling', 'worldling']for the subpart. Hence, we have achilleid < monkeypod < postcard < ethylene < stentorphone < infidelize < ['underfeeling', 'worldling'] < ['gambrel', 'hexasyllabic'] < potometer < ['unangelicalness', 'owleries', 'nodus']
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['underfeeling', 'worldling']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: underfeeling: l. worldling: l.
Thought 14: We now have: ['underfeeling', 'worldling']for the subpart. Hence, we have achilleid < monkeypod < postcard < ethylene < stentorphone < infidelize < ['underfeeling', 'worldling'] < ['gambrel', 'hexasyllabic'] < potometer < ['unangelicalness', 'owleries', 'nodus']
Thought 15: Now let's sort this subpart ['underfeeling', 'worldling']. Looking at the fifth letters from right to left.The fifth letter: underfeeling: e. worldling: d.
Thought 16: We now have: worldling < underfeelingfor the subpart. Hence, we have achilleid < monkeypod < postcard < ethylene < stentorphone < infidelize < worldling < underfeeling < ['gambrel', 'hexasyllabic'] < potometer < ['unangelicalness', 'owleries', 'nodus']
Thought 17: Now let's sort this subpart ['gambrel', 'hexasyllabic']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: gambrel: e. hexasyllabic: i.
Thought 18: We now have: gambrel < hexasyllabicfor the subpart. Hence, we have achilleid < monkeypod < postcard < ethylene < stentorphone < infidelize < worldling < underfeeling < gambrel < hexasyllabic < potometer < ['unangelicalness', 'owleries', 'nodus']
Thought 19: Now let's sort this subpart ['unangelicalness', 'owleries', 'nodus']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: unangelicalness: s. owleries: e. nodus: u.
Thought 20: We now have: owleries < unangelicalness < nodusfor the subpart. Hence, we have achilleid < monkeypod < postcard < ethylene < stentorphone < infidelize < worldling < underfeeling < gambrel < hexasyllabic < potometer < owleries < unangelicalness < nodus
Thought 21: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is achilleid monkeypod postcard ethylene stentorphone infidelize worldling underfeeling gambrel hexasyllabic potometer owleries unangelicalness nodus

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.