data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Mandatorytobacco use in public areas→permittedtobacco use in public areas?

Options:
A) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
B) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
C) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
D) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: Mandatorytobacco use in public areas→permittedtobacco use in public areas?

options:
A. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
B. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
C. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
D. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
tobacco use in public areas is mandatory, but national property protection is prohibited.

Variable definitions:
a) tobacco use in public areas
b) national property protection

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

type: symbolization

[A] tobacco use in public areas

b: national property protection

solution: ¶p ∧ ‽q


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
reasonable sports collisions is permitted, but remarriage rights is prohibited.

Variable definitions:
a) reasonable sports collisions
b) remarriage rights

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

[A] reasonable sports collisions

b: remarriage rights

solution: §p ∧ ‽q


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
noise in quiet zones is mandatory, but disruptive behavior in cultural venues is prohibited.

Variable definitions:
a) noise in quiet zones
b) disruptive behavior in cultural venues

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

[A] noise in quiet zones

b: disruptive behavior in cultural venues

solution: ¶p ∧ ‽q


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. may operate legally for reasonable profits
   b. is permitted for not operate legally for reasonable profits
Pair 2:
   a. must noise in quiet zones
   b. must not noise in quiet zones

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

type: relationship

pairs:
must noise in quiet zones
must not noise in quiet zones

Cannot be true/false together

x: Cannot both be true

Cannot both be false

No mutual exclusion


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
tobacco use in public areas is mandatory, but remarriage rights is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) tobacco use in public areas
b) remarriage rights

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

solution: ¶p ∧ §¬q


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedreasonable sports collisions?

Options:
A) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
B) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
C) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
D) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedreasonable sports collisions?

options:
A. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
B. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
C. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
D. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
operate legally for reasonable profits is mandatory, but noise in quiet zones is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) operate legally for reasonable profits
b) noise in quiet zones

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

[A] operate legally for reasonable profits

b: noise in quiet zones

solution: ¶p ∧ §¬q


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: ¬permittedremarriage rights→permitted¬remarriage rights?

Options:
A) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
C) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
D) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: ¬permittedremarriage rights→permitted¬remarriage rights?

options:
A. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
C. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
D. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Permittedcitizens' rights protection?

Options:
A) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
B) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
C) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
D) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: Permittedcitizens' rights protection?

options:
A. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
B. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
C. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
D. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is obligatory for tobacco use in public areas
   b. may tobacco use in public areas
Pair 2:
   a. is obligatory for price fraud occurs
   b. is prohibited for price fraud occurs

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

pairs:
is obligatory for price fraud occurs
is prohibited for price fraud occurs

key: % x


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: ¬permitteddisruptive behavior in cultural venues→permitted¬disruptive behavior in cultural venues?

Options:
A) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
C) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
D) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: ¬permitteddisruptive behavior in cultural venues→permitted¬disruptive behavior in cultural venues?

options:
A. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
C. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
D. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedprice fraud occurs→permitted¬price fraud occurs?

Options:
A) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
B) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
C) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
D) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedprice fraud occurs→permitted¬price fraud occurs?

options:
A. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
B. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
C. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
D. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
tobacco use in public areas is prohibited, but abuse of vulnerable groups is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) tobacco use in public areas
b) abuse of vulnerable groups

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

b: abuse of vulnerable groups

solution: ‽p ∧ §¬q


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: ¬permitteddisruptive behavior in cultural venues→permitted¬disruptive behavior in cultural venues?

Options:
A) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
C) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
D) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: ¬permitteddisruptive behavior in cultural venues→permitted¬disruptive behavior in cultural venues?

options:
A. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
C. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
D. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Mandatorynoise in quiet zones→¬prohibitednoise in quiet zones?

Options:
A) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
B) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
C) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
D) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: Mandatorynoise in quiet zones→¬prohibitednoise in quiet zones?

options:
A. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
B. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
C. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
D. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is permitted for reasonable sports collisions
   b. is permitted for not reasonable sports collisions
Pair 2:
   a. must remarriage rights
   b. may not remarriage rights

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

pairs:
must remarriage rights
may not remarriage rights


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is obligatory for noise in quiet zones
   b. must not noise in quiet zones
Pair 2:
   a. is prohibited for citizens' rights protection
   b. may citizens' rights protection

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

pairs:
is obligatory for noise in quiet zones
must not noise in quiet zones

key: x *


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is permitted for disruptive behavior in cultural venues
   b. may not disruptive behavior in cultural venues
Pair 2:
   a. is obligatory for citizens' rights protection
   b. is permitted for not citizens' rights protection

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is obligatory for citizens' rights protection
   b. may not citizens' rights protection
Pair 2:
   a. must not tobacco use in public areas
   b. is permitted for not tobacco use in public areas

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. must not youth development support
   b. may not youth development support
Pair 2:
   a. is obligatory for national property protection
   b. is prohibited for national property protection

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

pairs:
must not youth development support
may not youth development support


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
abuse of vulnerable groups is prohibited, but contract fulfillment is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) abuse of vulnerable groups
b) contract fulfillment

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

[A] abuse of vulnerable groups

b: contract fulfillment

solution: ‽p ∧ §¬q


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. must disruptive behavior in cultural venues
   b. is permitted for not disruptive behavior in cultural venues
Pair 2:
   a. is obligatory for noise in quiet zones
   b. is permitted for not noise in quiet zones

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Permittedprice fraud occurs?

Options:
A) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
B) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
C) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
D) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: Permittedprice fraud occurs?

options:
A. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
B. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
C. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
D. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. must tobacco use in public areas
   b. is prohibited for tobacco use in public areas
Pair 2:
   a. must price fraud occurs
   b. must not price fraud occurs

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

pairs:
must price fraud occurs
must not price fraud occurs

key: x x


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
tobacco use in public areas is prohibited, but price fraud occurs is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) tobacco use in public areas
b) price fraud occurs

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

b: price fraud occurs

solution: ‽p ∧ §¬q


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Mandatorycitizens' rights protection→permittedcitizens' rights protection?

Options:
A) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
B) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
C) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
D) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: Mandatorycitizens' rights protection→permittedcitizens' rights protection?

options:
A. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
B. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
C. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
D. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is prohibited for reasonable sports collisions
   b. may not reasonable sports collisions
Pair 2:
   a. is prohibited for citizens' rights protection
   b. may citizens' rights protection

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
national property protection is mandatory, but citizens' rights protection is prohibited.

Variable definitions:
a) national property protection
b) citizens' rights protection

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

[A] national property protection

b: citizens' rights protection

solution: ¶p ∧ ‽q


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is obligatory for price fraud occurs
   b. may not price fraud occurs
Pair 2:
   a. may youth development support
   b. is permitted for not youth development support

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

pairs:
is obligatory for price fraud occurs
may not price fraud occurs


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
tobacco use in public areas is mandatory, but contract fulfillment is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) tobacco use in public areas
b) contract fulfillment

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

solution: ¶p ∧ §¬q


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Permittedyouth development support?

Options:
A) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
B) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
C) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: Permittedyouth development support?

options:
A. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
B. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
C. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. may citizens' rights protection
   b. may not citizens' rights protection
Pair 2:
   a. may reasonable sports collisions
   b. may not reasonable sports collisions

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

pairs:
may citizens' rights protection
may not citizens' rights protection

pairs:
may reasonable sports collisions
may not reasonable sports collisions


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Mandatorycontract fulfillment→¬prohibitedcontract fulfillment?

Options:
A) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
B) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
C) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
D) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: Mandatorycontract fulfillment→¬prohibitedcontract fulfillment?

options:
A. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
B. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
C. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
D. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
remarriage rights is prohibited, but youth development support is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) remarriage rights
b) youth development support

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

[A] remarriage rights

b: youth development support

solution: ‽p ∧ §¬q


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. must not operate legally for reasonable profits
   b. may not operate legally for reasonable profits
Pair 2:
   a. is obligatory for remarriage rights
   b. may not remarriage rights

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

pairs:
is obligatory for remarriage rights
may not remarriage rights


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedcitizens' rights protection?

Options:
A) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
B) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
C) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedcitizens' rights protection?

options:
A. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
B. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
C. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: ¬permittedcontract fulfillment→permitted¬contract fulfillment?

Options:
A) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
C) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: ¬permittedcontract fulfillment→permitted¬contract fulfillment?

options:
A. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
C. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: ¬permittedyouth development support→permitted¬youth development support?

Options:
A) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
C) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
D) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: ¬permittedyouth development support→permitted¬youth development support?

options:
A. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
C. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
D. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedremarriage rights→permitted¬remarriage rights?

Options:
A) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
B) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
C) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
D) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedremarriage rights→permitted¬remarriage rights?

options:
A. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
B. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
C. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
D. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
youth development support is prohibited, but tobacco use in public areas is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) youth development support
b) tobacco use in public areas

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

[A] youth development support

b: tobacco use in public areas

solution: ‽p ∧ §¬q


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
youth development support is permitted, but citizens' rights protection is prohibited.

Variable definitions:
a) youth development support
b) citizens' rights protection

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

solution: §p ∧ ‽q


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Mandatoryremarriage rights→permittedremarriage rights?

Options:
A) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
B) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
C) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
D) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: Mandatoryremarriage rights→permittedremarriage rights?

options:
A. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
B. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
C. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
D. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is prohibited for noise in quiet zones
   b. may not noise in quiet zones
Pair 2:
   a. must not national property protection
   b. may national property protection

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

pairs:
is prohibited for noise in quiet zones
may not noise in quiet zones

pairs:
must not national property protection
may national property protection


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
tobacco use in public areas is permitted, but disruptive behavior in cultural venues is prohibited.

Variable definitions:
a) tobacco use in public areas
b) disruptive behavior in cultural venues

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

solution: §p ∧ ‽q


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
noise in quiet zones is mandatory, but youth development support is prohibited.

Variable definitions:
a) noise in quiet zones
b) youth development support

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

solution: ¶p ∧ ‽q


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Permittedcontract fulfillment?

Options:
A) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
B) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
C) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
D) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: Permittedcontract fulfillment?

options:
A. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
B. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
C. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
D. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. must not disruptive behavior in cultural venues
   b. may disruptive behavior in cultural venues
Pair 2:
   a. must contract fulfillment
   b. is permitted for not contract fulfillment

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: ¬permittedabuse of vulnerable groups→permitted¬abuse of vulnerable groups?

Options:
A) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
C) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
D) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: ¬permittedabuse of vulnerable groups→permitted¬abuse of vulnerable groups?

options:
A. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
C. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
D. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Mandatorynational property protection→¬prohibitednational property protection?

Options:
A) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
B) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
C) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
D) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: Mandatorynational property protection→¬prohibitednational property protection?

options:
A. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
B. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
C. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
D. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedoperate legally for reasonable profits→permitted¬operate legally for reasonable profits?

Options:
A) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
B) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
C) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
D) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedoperate legally for reasonable profits→permitted¬operate legally for reasonable profits?

options:
A. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
B. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
C. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
D. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitednoise in quiet zones?

Options:
A) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
B) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
C) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
D) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitednoise in quiet zones?

options:
A. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
B. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
C. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
D. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is prohibited for abuse of vulnerable groups
   b. may not abuse of vulnerable groups
Pair 2:
   a. must price fraud occurs
   b. must not price fraud occurs

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. must not disruptive behavior in cultural venues
   b. may not disruptive behavior in cultural venues
Pair 2:
   a. may remarriage rights
   b. may not remarriage rights

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

pairs:
may remarriage rights
may not remarriage rights


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
remarriage rights is permitted, but tobacco use in public areas is prohibited.

Variable definitions:
a) remarriage rights
b) tobacco use in public areas

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

solution: §p ∧ ‽q


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Prohibiteddisruptive behavior in cultural venues?

Options:
A) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
B) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
C) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
D) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: Prohibiteddisruptive behavior in cultural venues?

options:
A. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
B. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
C. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
D. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is obligatory for price fraud occurs
   b. is prohibited for price fraud occurs
Pair 2:
   a. may price fraud occurs
   b. is permitted for not price fraud occurs

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

pairs:
may price fraud occurs
is permitted for not price fraud occurs


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: ¬permittednational property protection→permitted¬national property protection?

Options:
A) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
C) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
D) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: ¬permittednational property protection→permitted¬national property protection?

options:
A. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
C. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
D. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
reasonable sports collisions is prohibited, but national property protection is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) reasonable sports collisions
b) national property protection

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

solution: ‽p ∧ §¬q


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Permitteddisruptive behavior in cultural venues?

Options:
A) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
B) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
C) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
D) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: Permitteddisruptive behavior in cultural venues?

options:
A. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
B. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
C. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
D. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is obligatory for youth development support
   b. is permitted for youth development support
Pair 2:
   a. must national property protection
   b. may national property protection

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

pairs:
must national property protection
may national property protection


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. may disruptive behavior in cultural venues
   b. is permitted for not disruptive behavior in cultural venues
Pair 2:
   a. is permitted for disruptive behavior in cultural venues
   b. is permitted for not disruptive behavior in cultural venues

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: ¬permittedremarriage rights→permitted¬remarriage rights?

Options:
A) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
C) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
D) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

type: formula

question: Which formula corresponds to: ¬permittedremarriage rights→permitted¬remarriage rights?

options:
A. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
C. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
D. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality


data_source: KorLogicCanonicalPropositions

prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. must disruptive behavior in cultural venues
   b. is permitted for not disruptive behavior in cultural venues
Pair 2:
   a. is prohibited for abuse of vulnerable groups
   b. may not abuse of vulnerable groups

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])