Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: conceivably accumulated antennal metazoa nonimputableness erump girlishly corroborates
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: h, a, f, e, p, k, v, s, i, d, w, y, q, r, o, g, u, z, t, j, l, x, c, n, b, m

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: conceivably: c. accumulated: a. antennal: a. metazoa: m. nonimputableness: n. erump: e. girlishly: g. corroborates: c.
Thought 2: We now have: ['conceivably', 'corroborates'] < ['accumulated', 'antennal'] < metazoa < nonimputableness < erump < girlishly
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['conceivably', 'corroborates']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: conceivably: o. corroborates: o.
Thought 4: We now have: ['conceivably', 'corroborates']for the subpart. Hence, we have erump < metazoa < ['accumulated', 'antennal'] < nonimputableness < girlishly < ['conceivably', 'corroborates']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['conceivably', 'corroborates']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: conceivably: l. corroborates: r.
Thought 6: We now have: corroborates < conceivablyfor the subpart. Hence, we have erump < metazoa < ['accumulated', 'antennal'] < nonimputableness < girlishly < corroborates < conceivably
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['accumulated', 'antennal']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: accumulated: c. antennal: n.
Thought 8: We now have: accumulated < antennalfor the subpart. Hence, we have erump < antennal < corroborates < metazoa < girlishly < conceivably < accumulated < nonimputableness
Thought 9: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is corroborates conceivably accumulated antennal metazoa nonimputableness erump girlishly

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

h a f e p k v s i d w y q r o g u z t j l x c n b m


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: xenos pearlitic bituminate categorematical prosphoron pantatrophy talismanist depauperize cavitates bartsia oversecurity chrysene souchie

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: xenos: x. pearlitic: p. bituminate: b. categorematical: c. prosphoron: p. pantatrophy: p. talismanist: t. depauperize: d. cavitates: t. bartsia: b. oversecurity: o. chrysene: c. souchie: s.
Thought 2: We now have: ['bituminate', 'bartsia'] < ['categorematical', 'chrysene'] < depauperize < oversecurity < ['pearlitic', 'prosphoron', 'pantatrophy'] < souchie < ['talismanist', 'cavitates'] < xenos
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['bituminate', 'bartsia']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: bituminate: i. bartsia: a.
Thought 4: We now have: bartsia < bituminatefor the subpart. Hence, we have oversecurity < bartsia < ['talismanist', 'cavitates'] < ['pearlitic', 'prosphoron', 'pantatrophy'] < ['categorematical', 'chrysene'] < depauperize < xenos < souchie < bituminate
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['categorematical', 'chrysene']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: categorematical: a. chrysene: h.
Thought 6: We now have: chrysene < categorematicalfor the subpart. Hence, we have oversecurity < bartsia < ['talismanist', 'cavitates'] < ['pearlitic', 'prosphoron', 'pantatrophy'] < categorematical < chrysene < depauperize < xenos < souchie < bituminate
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['pearlitic', 'prosphoron', 'pantatrophy']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: pearlitic: e. prosphoron: r. pantatrophy: a.
Thought 8: We now have: pantatrophy < prosphoron < pearliticfor the subpart. Hence, we have pantatrophy < souchie < oversecurity < prosphoron < categorematical < bituminate < chrysene < pearlitic < xenos < depauperize < ['talismanist', 'cavitates'] < bartsia
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['talismanist', 'cavitates']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: talismanist: a. cavitates: a.
Thought 10: We now have: ['talismanist', 'cavitates']for the subpart. Hence, we have pantatrophy < souchie < oversecurity < prosphoron < categorematical < bituminate < chrysene < pearlitic < xenos < depauperize < ['talismanist', 'cavitates'] < bartsia
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['talismanist', 'cavitates']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: talismanist: m. cavitates: v.
Thought 12: We now have: talismanist < cavitatesfor the subpart. Hence, we have pantatrophy < souchie < oversecurity < prosphoron < categorematical < bituminate < chrysene < pearlitic < xenos < depauperize < talismanist < cavitates < bartsia
Thought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is bartsia bituminate chrysene categorematical depauperize oversecurity pantatrophy prosphoron pearlitic souchie talismanist cavitates xenos

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: dumpling luminophore pagne warragals palaeic unexceptionality earthlike unbethink nonethereal plumbaginaceae wanderers flighted
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: l, u, g, w, z, r, n, c, o, f, d, a, h, k, i, b, j, e, x, p, s, m, y, t, q, v

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: dumpling: d. luminophore: l. pagne: p. warragals: w. palaeic: p. unexceptionality: u. earthlike: e. unbethink: u. nonethereal: n. plumbaginaceae: p. wanderers: w. flighted: f.
Thought 2: We now have: luminophore < ['unexceptionality', 'unbethink'] < ['warragals', 'wanderers'] < nonethereal < flighted < dumpling < earthlike < ['pagne', 'palaeic', 'plumbaginaceae']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['unexceptionality', 'unbethink']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: unexceptionality: n. unbethink: n.
Thought 4: We now have: ['unexceptionality', 'unbethink']for the subpart. Hence, we have dumpling < flighted < nonethereal < ['unexceptionality', 'unbethink'] < earthlike < ['pagne', 'palaeic', 'plumbaginaceae'] < ['warragals', 'wanderers'] < luminophore
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['unexceptionality', 'unbethink']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: unexceptionality: e. unbethink: b.
Thought 6: We now have: unbethink < unexceptionalityfor the subpart. Hence, we have dumpling < flighted < nonethereal < unbethink < unexceptionality < earthlike < ['pagne', 'palaeic', 'plumbaginaceae'] < ['warragals', 'wanderers'] < luminophore
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['warragals', 'wanderers']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: warragals: r. wanderers: a.
Thought 8: We now have: warragals < wanderersfor the subpart. Hence, we have dumpling < flighted < nonethereal < unbethink < unexceptionality < earthlike < ['pagne', 'palaeic', 'plumbaginaceae'] < warragals < wanderers < luminophore
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['pagne', 'palaeic', 'plumbaginaceae']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: pagne: a. palaeic: a. plumbaginaceae: l.
Thought 10: We now have: plumbaginaceae < ['pagne', 'palaeic']for the subpart. Hence, we have unbethink < nonethereal < ['pagne', 'palaeic'] < dumpling < plumbaginaceae < wanderers < unexceptionality < warragals < earthlike < luminophore < flighted
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['pagne', 'palaeic']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: pagne: g. palaeic: l.
Thought 12: We now have: palaeic < pagnefor the subpart. Hence, we have unbethink < nonethereal < palaeic < pagne < dumpling < plumbaginaceae < wanderers < unexceptionality < warragals < earthlike < luminophore < flighted
Thought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is luminophore unbethink unexceptionality warragals wanderers nonethereal flighted dumpling earthlike plumbaginaceae palaeic pagne

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

l u g w z r n c o f d a h k i b j e x p s m y t q v


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: transport occamist manhandles materialize decurrency turbeh ferromagnesian disfashion plantigrady figmental spheres dermoneurosis

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: transport: t. occamist: o. manhandles: m. materialize: m. decurrency: d. turbeh: t. ferromagnesian: f. disfashion: d. plantigrady: p. spheres: s. dermoneurosis: d.
Thought 2: We now have: ['decurrency', 'disfashion', 'dermoneurosis'] < ferromagnesian < ['manhandles', 'materialize'] < occamist < plantigrady < spheres < ['transport', 'turbeh']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['decurrency', 'disfashion', 'dermoneurosis']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: decurrency: e. disfashion: i. dermoneurosis: e.
Thought 4: We now have: ['decurrency', 'dermoneurosis'] < disfashionfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['decurrency', 'dermoneurosis'] < disfashion < ferromagnesian < ['manhandles', 'materialize'] < occamist < plantigrady < spheres < ['transport', 'turbeh']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['decurrency', 'dermoneurosis']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: decurrency: c. dermoneurosis: r.
Thought 6: We now have: decurrency < dermoneurosisfor the subpart. Hence, we have decurrency < dermoneurosis < disfashion < ferromagnesian < ['manhandles', 'materialize'] < occamist < plantigrady < spheres < ['transport', 'turbeh']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['manhandles', 'materialize']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: manhandles: a. materialize: a.
Thought 8: We now have: ['manhandles', 'materialize']for the subpart. Hence, we have decurrency < dermoneurosis < disfashion < ferromagnesian < ['manhandles', 'materialize'] < occamist < plantigrady < spheres < ['transport', 'turbeh']
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['manhandles', 'materialize']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: manhandles: n. materialize: t.
Thought 10: We now have: manhandles < materializefor the subpart. Hence, we have decurrency < dermoneurosis < disfashion < ferromagnesian < manhandles < materialize < occamist < plantigrady < spheres < ['transport', 'turbeh']
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['transport', 'turbeh']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: turbeh: u.
Thought 12: We now have: turbehfor the subpart. Hence, we have decurrency < dermoneurosis < disfashion < ferromagnesian < manhandles < materialize < occamist < plantigrady < spheres < turbeh
Thought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is decurrency dermoneurosis disfashion ferromagnesian manhandles materialize occamist plantigrady spheres turbeh

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: unwooly draughtswoman archiver fishling disciplinatory thermogenesis unladed atherosclerotically swotters subacetate unindented quantitate oldstyles nitchies
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: w, b, h, s, i, j, f, z, v, t, c, e, k, a, g, p, m, l, q, r, y, u, x, o, n, d

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: unwooly: y. draughtswoman: n. archiver: r. fishling: g. disciplinatory: y. thermogenesis: s. unladed: d. atherosclerotically: y. swotters: s. subacetate: e. quantitate: e. oldstyles: s. nitchies: s.
Thought 2: We now have: ['thermogenesis', 'swotters', 'oldstyles', 'nitchies'] < ['subacetate', 'quantitate'] < fishling < archiver < ['unwooly', 'disciplinatory', 'atherosclerotically'] < draughtswoman < unladed
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['thermogenesis', 'swotters', 'oldstyles', 'nitchies']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: thermogenesis: i. swotters: r. oldstyles: e. nitchies: e.
Thought 4: We now have: thermogenesis < swotters < ['oldstyles', 'nitchies']for the subpart. Hence, we have thermogenesis < ['oldstyles', 'nitchies'] < swotters < ['subacetate', 'quantitate'] < fishling < archiver < ['unwooly', 'disciplinatory', 'atherosclerotically'] < draughtswoman < unladed
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['oldstyles', 'nitchies']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: oldstyles: l. nitchies: i.
Thought 6: We now have: nitchies < oldstylesfor the subpart. Hence, we have fishling < archiver < ['unwooly', 'disciplinatory', 'atherosclerotically'] < thermogenesis < draughtswoman < oldstyles < unladed < swotters < ['subacetate', 'quantitate'] < nitchies
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['subacetate', 'quantitate']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: subacetate: t. quantitate: t.
Thought 8: We now have: ['subacetate', 'quantitate']for the subpart. Hence, we have fishling < archiver < ['unwooly', 'disciplinatory', 'atherosclerotically'] < thermogenesis < draughtswoman < oldstyles < unladed < swotters < ['subacetate', 'quantitate'] < nitchies
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['subacetate', 'quantitate']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: subacetate: a. quantitate: u.
Thought 10: We now have: subacetate < quantitatefor the subpart. Hence, we have draughtswoman < nitchies < swotters < archiver < ['unwooly', 'disciplinatory', 'atherosclerotically'] < unladed < fishling < oldstyles < thermogenesis < quantitate < subacetate
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['unwooly', 'disciplinatory', 'atherosclerotically']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: unwooly: l. disciplinatory: r. atherosclerotically: l.
Thought 12: We now have: disciplinatory < ['unwooly', 'atherosclerotically']for the subpart. Hence, we have draughtswoman < nitchies < swotters < archiver < ['unwooly', 'atherosclerotically'] < disciplinatory < unladed < fishling < oldstyles < thermogenesis < quantitate < subacetate
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['unwooly', 'atherosclerotically']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: unwooly: n. atherosclerotically: l.
Thought 14: We now have: atherosclerotically < unwoolyfor the subpart. Hence, we have draughtswoman < nitchies < swotters < archiver < atherosclerotically < unwooly < disciplinatory < unladed < fishling < oldstyles < thermogenesis < quantitate < subacetate
Thought 15: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is thermogenesis swotters nitchies oldstyles subacetate quantitate fishling archiver disciplinatory atherosclerotically unwooly draughtswoman unladed

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

w b h s i j f z v t c e k a g p m l q r y u x o n d


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: bacchanalias nonpacifist tenanting incitingly moi noncorruptness accedence noncontributively goldenpert dapicho churnmilk sporophorous epicrystalline betrim
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: q, s, b, f, k, a, m, w, t, y, l, p, c, g, z, u, r, h, e, i, x, o, d, v, j, n

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: bacchanalias: b. nonpacifist: n. tenanting: t. incitingly: i. moi: m. noncorruptness: n. accedence: d. noncontributively: n. goldenpert: g. dapicho: d. churnmilk: c. sporophorous: s. epicrystalline: e. betrim: b.
Thought 2: We now have: sporophorous < ['bacchanalias', 'betrim'] < moi < tenanting < churnmilk < goldenpert < epicrystalline < incitingly < ['accedence', 'dapicho'] < ['nonpacifist', 'noncorruptness', 'noncontributively']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['bacchanalias', 'betrim']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: bacchanalias: a. betrim: e.
Thought 4: We now have: betrim < bacchanaliasfor the subpart. Hence, we have sporophorous < bacchanalias < betrim < moi < tenanting < churnmilk < goldenpert < epicrystalline < incitingly < ['accedence', 'dapicho'] < ['nonpacifist', 'noncorruptness', 'noncontributively']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['accedence', 'dapicho']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: accedence: c. dapicho: a.
Thought 6: We now have: dapicho < accedencefor the subpart. Hence, we have sporophorous < bacchanalias < betrim < moi < tenanting < churnmilk < goldenpert < epicrystalline < incitingly < dapicho < accedence < ['nonpacifist', 'noncorruptness', 'noncontributively']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['nonpacifist', 'noncorruptness', 'noncontributively']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: nonpacifist: o. noncorruptness: o. noncontributively: o.
Thought 8: We now have: ['nonpacifist', 'noncorruptness', 'noncontributively']for the subpart. Hence, we have sporophorous < bacchanalias < betrim < moi < tenanting < churnmilk < goldenpert < epicrystalline < incitingly < dapicho < accedence < ['nonpacifist', 'noncorruptness', 'noncontributively']
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['nonpacifist', 'noncorruptness', 'noncontributively']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: nonpacifist: n. noncorruptness: n. noncontributively: n.
Thought 10: We now have: ['nonpacifist', 'noncorruptness', 'noncontributively']for the subpart. Hence, we have sporophorous < bacchanalias < betrim < moi < tenanting < churnmilk < goldenpert < epicrystalline < incitingly < dapicho < accedence < ['nonpacifist', 'noncorruptness', 'noncontributively']
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['nonpacifist', 'noncorruptness', 'noncontributively']. Looking at the fourth letters.The fourth letter: nonpacifist: p. noncorruptness: c. noncontributively: c.
Thought 12: We now have: nonpacifist < ['noncorruptness', 'noncontributively']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['noncorruptness', 'noncontributively'] < sporophorous < dapicho < accedence < betrim < epicrystalline < nonpacifist < churnmilk < incitingly < moi < goldenpert < bacchanalias < tenanting
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['noncorruptness', 'noncontributively']. Looking at the fifth letters.The fifth letter: noncorruptness: o. noncontributively: o.
Thought 14: We now have: ['noncorruptness', 'noncontributively']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['noncorruptness', 'noncontributively'] < sporophorous < dapicho < accedence < betrim < epicrystalline < nonpacifist < churnmilk < incitingly < moi < goldenpert < bacchanalias < tenanting
Thought 15: Now let's sort this subpart ['noncorruptness', 'noncontributively']. Looking at the sixth letters.The sixth letter: noncorruptness: r. noncontributively: n.
Thought 16: We now have: noncorruptness < noncontributivelyfor the subpart. Hence, we have noncorruptness < noncontributively < sporophorous < dapicho < accedence < betrim < epicrystalline < nonpacifist < churnmilk < incitingly < moi < goldenpert < bacchanalias < tenanting
Thought 17: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is sporophorous betrim bacchanalias moi tenanting churnmilk goldenpert epicrystalline incitingly dapicho accedence nonpacifist noncorruptness noncontributively

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

q s b f k a m w t y l p c g z u r h e i x o d v j n


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: condiddle rubian coalifying isonymy hinders protococcal enlargeable quodlibetic soundstripe ligamentta rehook prostomial
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: l, b, h, o, z, e, j, k, s, x, w, t, q, y, d, p, n, g, c, r, u, a, v, m, i, f

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: condiddle: c. rubian: r. coalifying: c. isonymy: i. hinders: h. protococcal: p. enlargeable: e. quodlibetic: q. soundstripe: s. ligamentta: l. rehook: r. prostomial: p.
Thought 2: We now have: ['condiddle', 'coalifying'] < ['rubian', 'rehook'] < isonymy < hinders < ['protococcal', 'prostomial'] < enlargeable < quodlibetic < soundstripe < ligamentta
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['condiddle', 'coalifying']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: condiddle: o. coalifying: o.
Thought 4: We now have: ['condiddle', 'coalifying']for the subpart. Hence, we have ligamentta < hinders < enlargeable < soundstripe < quodlibetic < ['protococcal', 'prostomial'] < ['condiddle', 'coalifying'] < ['rubian', 'rehook'] < isonymy
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['condiddle', 'coalifying']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: condiddle: n. coalifying: a.
Thought 6: We now have: condiddle < coalifyingfor the subpart. Hence, we have enlargeable < isonymy < soundstripe < condiddle < coalifying < ligamentta < hinders < ['protococcal', 'prostomial'] < quodlibetic < ['rubian', 'rehook']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['rubian', 'rehook']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: rubian: u. rehook: e.
Thought 8: We now have: rehook < rubianfor the subpart. Hence, we have enlargeable < isonymy < soundstripe < condiddle < coalifying < ligamentta < hinders < ['protococcal', 'prostomial'] < quodlibetic < rehook < rubian
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['protococcal', 'prostomial']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: protococcal: r. prostomial: r.
Thought 10: We now have: ['protococcal', 'prostomial']for the subpart. Hence, we have enlargeable < isonymy < soundstripe < condiddle < coalifying < ligamentta < hinders < ['protococcal', 'prostomial'] < quodlibetic < rehook < rubian
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['protococcal', 'prostomial']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: protococcal: o. prostomial: o.
Thought 12: We now have: ['protococcal', 'prostomial']for the subpart. Hence, we have enlargeable < isonymy < soundstripe < condiddle < coalifying < ligamentta < hinders < ['protococcal', 'prostomial'] < quodlibetic < rehook < rubian
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['protococcal', 'prostomial']. Looking at the fourth letters.The fourth letter: protococcal: t. prostomial: s.
Thought 14: We now have: prostomial < protococcalfor the subpart. Hence, we have enlargeable < isonymy < soundstripe < condiddle < coalifying < ligamentta < hinders < prostomial < protococcal < quodlibetic < rehook < rubian
Thought 15: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is condiddle coalifying rehook rubian isonymy hinders prostomial protococcal enlargeable quodlibetic soundstripe ligamentta

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

l b h o z e j k s x w t q y d p n g c r u a v m i f


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: riposts, backoff, sepalled, reservist, formativeness, onomatopoesis, impertinences, loath, sectist, suddenty, arvicole
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: e, g, z, r, v, p, h, k, c, n, i, a, s, j, d, l, y, m, f, q, x, t, o, w, b, u

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: riposts: r. backoff: b. sepalled: s. reservist: r. formativeness: f. onomatopoesis: o. impertinences: i. loath: l. sectist: s. suddenty: s. arvicole: a.

We now have: ['riposts', 'reservist'] < impertinences < arvicole < ['sepalled', 'sectist', 'suddenty'] < loath < formativeness < onomatopoesis < backoff

Now let's sort this subpart ['riposts', 'reservist']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: riposts: i. reservist: e.

We now have: reservist < ripostsfor the subpart. Hence, we have reservist < riposts < impertinences < arvicole < ['sepalled', 'sectist', 'suddenty'] < loath < formativeness < onomatopoesis < backoff

Now let's sort this subpart ['sepalled', 'sectist', 'suddenty']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: sepalled: e. sectist: e. suddenty: u.

We now have: ['sepalled', 'sectist'] < suddentyfor the subpart. Hence, we have reservist < riposts < impertinences < arvicole < ['sepalled', 'sectist'] < suddenty < loath < formativeness < onomatopoesis < backoff

Now let's sort this subpart ['sepalled', 'sectist']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: sepalled: p. sectist: c.

We now have: sepalled < sectistfor the subpart. Hence, we have reservist < riposts < impertinences < arvicole < sepalled < sectist < suddenty < loath < formativeness < onomatopoesis < backoff

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is reservist riposts impertinences arvicole sepalled sectist suddenty loath formativeness onomatopoesis backoff

riposts backoff sepalled reservist formativeness onomatopoesis impertinences loath sectist suddenty arvicole

e g z r v p h k c n i a s j d l y m f q x t o w b u


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: markkaa, dialyze, californicus, holobenthic, counsel, absit, feeless, etherification, witchlike, soddening, acclivitous, unplausible
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: m, l, s, q, z, y, w, c, x, h, n, g, r, v, e, p, b, j, k, a, u, t, f, i, o, d

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: markkaa: a. dialyze: e. californicus: s. holobenthic: c. counsel: l. absit: t. feeless: s. etherification: n. witchlike: e. soddening: g. acclivitous: s. unplausible: e.

We now have: counsel < ['californicus', 'feeless', 'acclivitous'] < holobenthic < etherification < soddening < ['dialyze', 'witchlike', 'unplausible'] < markkaa < absit

Now let's sort this subpart ['californicus', 'feeless', 'acclivitous']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: californicus: u. feeless: s. acclivitous: u.

We now have: feeless < ['californicus', 'acclivitous']for the subpart. Hence, we have counsel < feeless < ['californicus', 'acclivitous'] < holobenthic < etherification < soddening < ['dialyze', 'witchlike', 'unplausible'] < markkaa < absit

Now let's sort this subpart ['californicus', 'acclivitous']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: californicus: c. acclivitous: o.

We now have: californicus < acclivitousfor the subpart. Hence, we have counsel < feeless < californicus < acclivitous < holobenthic < etherification < soddening < ['dialyze', 'witchlike', 'unplausible'] < markkaa < absit

Now let's sort this subpart ['dialyze', 'witchlike', 'unplausible']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: dialyze: z. witchlike: k. unplausible: l.

We now have: unplausible < dialyze < witchlikefor the subpart. Hence, we have counsel < feeless < californicus < acclivitous < holobenthic < etherification < soddening < unplausible < dialyze < witchlike < markkaa < absit

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is counsel feeless californicus acclivitous holobenthic etherification soddening unplausible dialyze witchlike markkaa absit

markkaa dialyze californicus holobenthic counsel absit feeless etherification witchlike soddening acclivitous unplausible

m l s q z y w c x h n g r v e p b j k a u t f i o d


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: tuboperitoneal, scambling, unspecifically, succeeder, turret, spiriferous, autoradiography, synangia

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: tuboperitoneal: t. scambling: s. unspecifically: u. succeeder: s. turret: t. spiriferous: s. autoradiography: a. synangia: s.

We now have: autoradiography < ['scambling', 'succeeder', 'spiriferous', 'synangia'] < ['tuboperitoneal', 'turret'] < unspecifically

Now let's sort this subpart ['scambling', 'succeeder', 'spiriferous', 'synangia']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: scambling: c. succeeder: u. spiriferous: p. synangia: y.

We now have: scambling < spiriferous < succeeder < synangiafor the subpart. Hence, we have autoradiography < scambling < spiriferous < succeeder < synangia < ['tuboperitoneal', 'turret'] < unspecifically

Now let's sort this subpart ['tuboperitoneal', 'turret']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: tuboperitoneal: u. turret: u.

We now have: ['tuboperitoneal', 'turret']for the subpart. Hence, we have autoradiography < scambling < spiriferous < succeeder < synangia < ['tuboperitoneal', 'turret'] < unspecifically

Now let's sort this subpart ['tuboperitoneal', 'turret']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: tuboperitoneal: b. turret: r.

We now have: tuboperitoneal < turretfor the subpart. Hence, we have autoradiography < scambling < spiriferous < succeeder < synangia < tuboperitoneal < turret < unspecifically

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is autoradiography scambling spiriferous succeeder synangia tuboperitoneal turret unspecifically

tuboperitoneal scambling unspecifically succeeder turret spiriferous autoradiography synangia


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: decorativeness, upperch, exotica, crime, unhoary, refrustrating, micresthete, soroches, mudspate, fifteenth, insigne
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: z, w, d, u, v, g, q, c, f, a, l, o, e, k, m, t, x, p, r, h, s, y, j, n, i, b

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: decorativeness: d. upperch: u. exotica: e. crime: c. unhoary: u. refrustrating: r. micresthete: m. soroches: s. mudspate: m. fifteenth: f. insigne: i.

We now have: decorativeness < ['upperch', 'unhoary'] < crime < fifteenth < exotica < ['micresthete', 'mudspate'] < refrustrating < soroches < insigne

Now let's sort this subpart ['upperch', 'unhoary']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: upperch: p. unhoary: n.

We now have: upperch < unhoaryfor the subpart. Hence, we have decorativeness < upperch < unhoary < crime < fifteenth < exotica < ['micresthete', 'mudspate'] < refrustrating < soroches < insigne

Now let's sort this subpart ['micresthete', 'mudspate']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: micresthete: i. mudspate: u.

We now have: mudspate < micresthetefor the subpart. Hence, we have decorativeness < upperch < unhoary < crime < fifteenth < exotica < mudspate < micresthete < refrustrating < soroches < insigne

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is decorativeness upperch unhoary crime fifteenth exotica mudspate micresthete refrustrating soroches insigne

decorativeness upperch exotica crime unhoary refrustrating micresthete soroches mudspate fifteenth insigne

z w d u v g q c f a l o e k m t x p r h s y j n i b


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: geopolitic, corenounce, swandown, myxoma, rebale, squamulose, philosophizes, seraglios

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: geopolitic: g. corenounce: c. swandown: s. myxoma: m. rebale: r. squamulose: s. philosophizes: p. seraglios: s.

We now have: corenounce < geopolitic < myxoma < philosophizes < rebale < ['swandown', 'squamulose', 'seraglios']

Now let's sort this subpart ['swandown', 'squamulose', 'seraglios']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: swandown: w. squamulose: q. seraglios: e.

We now have: seraglios < squamulose < swandownfor the subpart. Hence, we have corenounce < geopolitic < myxoma < philosophizes < rebale < seraglios < squamulose < swandown

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is corenounce geopolitic myxoma philosophizes rebale seraglios squamulose swandown

geopolitic corenounce swandown myxoma rebale squamulose philosophizes seraglios


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: edictally metazoal comfily botryoidal servomechanisms synsporous verifiers pilkins incrust
There are some special requirements:

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: edictally: y. metazoal: l. comfily: y. botryoidal: l. servomechanisms: s. synsporous: s. verifiers: s. pilkins: s. incrust: t.
Thought 2: We now have: ['edictally', 'comfily'] < incrust < ['servomechanisms', 'synsporous', 'verifiers', 'pilkins'] < ['metazoal', 'botryoidal']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['edictally', 'comfily']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: edictally: l. comfily: l.
Thought 4: We now have: ['edictally', 'comfily']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['metazoal', 'botryoidal'] < ['servomechanisms', 'synsporous', 'verifiers', 'pilkins'] < incrust < ['edictally', 'comfily']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['edictally', 'comfily']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: edictally: l. comfily: i.
Thought 6: We now have: edictally < comfilyfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['metazoal', 'botryoidal'] < ['servomechanisms', 'synsporous', 'verifiers', 'pilkins'] < incrust < comfily < edictally
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['servomechanisms', 'synsporous', 'verifiers', 'pilkins']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: servomechanisms: m. synsporous: u. verifiers: r. pilkins: n.
Thought 8: We now have: servomechanisms < pilkins < verifiers < synsporousfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['metazoal', 'botryoidal'] < servomechanisms < pilkins < verifiers < synsporous < incrust < comfily < edictally
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['metazoal', 'botryoidal']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: metazoal: a. botryoidal: a.
Thought 10: We now have: ['metazoal', 'botryoidal']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['metazoal', 'botryoidal'] < servomechanisms < pilkins < verifiers < synsporous < incrust < comfily < edictally
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['metazoal', 'botryoidal']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: metazoal: o. botryoidal: d.
Thought 12: We now have: botryoidal < metazoalfor the subpart. Hence, we have botryoidal < metazoal < servomechanisms < pilkins < verifiers < synsporous < incrust < comfily < edictally
Thought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is edictally comfily incrust servomechanisms pilkins verifiers synsporous botryoidal metazoal

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: metagenesis sportswoman wrestled polymicrian yephede glamors quinte gittite stubbling kuku kumrah mennonite thalamencephalons aetat

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: metagenesis: m. sportswoman: s. wrestled: w. polymicrian: p. yephede: y. glamors: g. quinte: q. gittite: g. stubbling: s. kuku: k. kumrah: k. mennonite: m. thalamencephalons: t. aetat: a.
Thought 2: We now have: quinte < ['metagenesis', 'mennonite'] < ['kuku', 'kumrah'] < ['sportswoman', 'stubbling'] < aetat < ['glamors', 'gittite'] < polymicrian < wrestled < yephede < thalamencephalons
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['metagenesis', 'mennonite']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: metagenesis: e. mennonite: e.
Thought 4: We now have: ['metagenesis', 'mennonite']for the subpart. Hence, we have polymicrian < ['metagenesis', 'mennonite'] < ['sportswoman', 'stubbling'] < ['kuku', 'kumrah'] < thalamencephalons < aetat < wrestled < yephede < quinte < ['glamors', 'gittite']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['metagenesis', 'mennonite']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: metagenesis: t. mennonite: n.
Thought 6: We now have: mennonite < metagenesisfor the subpart. Hence, we have thalamencephalons < ['sportswoman', 'stubbling'] < yephede < mennonite < wrestled < polymicrian < quinte < metagenesis < ['glamors', 'gittite'] < aetat < ['kuku', 'kumrah']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['kuku', 'kumrah']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: kuku: u. kumrah: u.
Thought 8: We now have: ['kuku', 'kumrah']for the subpart. Hence, we have thalamencephalons < ['sportswoman', 'stubbling'] < yephede < mennonite < wrestled < polymicrian < quinte < metagenesis < ['glamors', 'gittite'] < aetat < ['kuku', 'kumrah']
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['kuku', 'kumrah']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: kuku: k. kumrah: m.
Thought 10: We now have: kuku < kumrahfor the subpart. Hence, we have thalamencephalons < ['sportswoman', 'stubbling'] < yephede < mennonite < wrestled < polymicrian < quinte < metagenesis < ['glamors', 'gittite'] < aetat < kuku < kumrah
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['sportswoman', 'stubbling']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: sportswoman: p. stubbling: t.
Thought 12: We now have: sportswoman < stubblingfor the subpart. Hence, we have thalamencephalons < sportswoman < stubbling < yephede < mennonite < wrestled < polymicrian < quinte < metagenesis < ['glamors', 'gittite'] < aetat < kuku < kumrah
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['glamors', 'gittite']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: glamors: l. gittite: i.
Thought 14: We now have: gittite < glamorsfor the subpart. Hence, we have thalamencephalons < sportswoman < stubbling < yephede < mennonite < wrestled < polymicrian < quinte < metagenesis < gittite < glamors < aetat < kuku < kumrah
Thought 15: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is quinte mennonite metagenesis kuku kumrah sportswoman stubbling aetat gittite glamors polymicrian wrestled yephede thalamencephalons

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: burros, mooseberry, reelections, conjuncture, embittering, ungroundably, finitesimal, audivise, shoddyism, kayoed, mythologise, outen, statelily
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: d, m, n, b, e, q, g, r, f, k, y, u, w, t, a, j, o, s, z, x, h, i, v, c, l, p

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: burros: s. mooseberry: y. reelections: s. conjuncture: e. embittering: g. ungroundably: y. finitesimal: l. audivise: e. shoddyism: m. kayoed: d. mythologise: e. outen: n. statelily: y.

We now have: kayoed < shoddyism < outen < ['conjuncture', 'audivise', 'mythologise'] < embittering < ['mooseberry', 'ungroundably', 'statelily'] < ['burros', 'reelections'] < finitesimal

Now let's sort this subpart ['conjuncture', 'audivise', 'mythologise']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: conjuncture: r. audivise: s. mythologise: s.

We now have: conjuncture < ['audivise', 'mythologise']for the subpart. Hence, we have kayoed < shoddyism < outen < conjuncture < ['audivise', 'mythologise'] < embittering < ['mooseberry', 'ungroundably', 'statelily'] < ['burros', 'reelections'] < finitesimal

Now let's sort this subpart ['audivise', 'mythologise']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: audivise: i. mythologise: i.

We now have: ['audivise', 'mythologise']for the subpart. Hence, we have kayoed < shoddyism < outen < conjuncture < ['audivise', 'mythologise'] < embittering < ['mooseberry', 'ungroundably', 'statelily'] < ['burros', 'reelections'] < finitesimal

Now let's sort this subpart ['audivise', 'mythologise']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: audivise: v. mythologise: g.

We now have: mythologise < audivisefor the subpart. Hence, we have kayoed < shoddyism < outen < conjuncture < mythologise < audivise < embittering < ['mooseberry', 'ungroundably', 'statelily'] < ['burros', 'reelections'] < finitesimal

Now let's sort this subpart ['mooseberry', 'ungroundably', 'statelily']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: mooseberry: r. ungroundably: l. statelily: l.

We now have: mooseberry < ['ungroundably', 'statelily']for the subpart. Hence, we have kayoed < shoddyism < outen < conjuncture < mythologise < audivise < embittering < mooseberry < ['ungroundably', 'statelily'] < ['burros', 'reelections'] < finitesimal

Now let's sort this subpart ['ungroundably', 'statelily']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: ungroundably: b. statelily: i.

We now have: ungroundably < statelilyfor the subpart. Hence, we have kayoed < shoddyism < outen < conjuncture < mythologise < audivise < embittering < mooseberry < ungroundably < statelily < ['burros', 'reelections'] < finitesimal

Now let's sort this subpart ['burros', 'reelections']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: burros: o. reelections: n.

We now have: reelections < burrosfor the subpart. Hence, we have kayoed < shoddyism < outen < conjuncture < mythologise < audivise < embittering < mooseberry < ungroundably < statelily < reelections < burros < finitesimal

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is kayoed shoddyism outen conjuncture mythologise audivise embittering mooseberry ungroundably statelily reelections burros finitesimal

burros mooseberry reelections conjuncture embittering ungroundably finitesimal audivise shoddyism kayoed mythologise outen statelily

d m n b e q g r f k y u w t a j o s z x h i v c l p


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: cypraeidae, flirtable, objectionable, compunction, gigantism, platoid, unconfining, cooperated, tricycle, unformed, bedaubed, oneanother, eviscerations, hepatocolic, pseudohalogen

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: cypraeidae: c. flirtable: f. objectionable: o. compunction: c. gigantism: g. platoid: p. unconfining: u. cooperated: c. tricycle: t. unformed: u. bedaubed: b. oneanother: o. eviscerations: e. hepatocolic: h. pseudohalogen: p.

We now have: bedaubed < ['cypraeidae', 'compunction', 'cooperated'] < eviscerations < flirtable < gigantism < hepatocolic < ['objectionable', 'oneanother'] < ['platoid', 'pseudohalogen'] < tricycle < ['unconfining', 'unformed']

Now let's sort this subpart ['cypraeidae', 'compunction', 'cooperated']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: cypraeidae: y. compunction: o. cooperated: o.

We now have: ['compunction', 'cooperated'] < cypraeidaefor the subpart. Hence, we have bedaubed < ['compunction', 'cooperated'] < cypraeidae < eviscerations < flirtable < gigantism < hepatocolic < ['objectionable', 'oneanother'] < ['platoid', 'pseudohalogen'] < tricycle < ['unconfining', 'unformed']

Now let's sort this subpart ['compunction', 'cooperated']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: compunction: m. cooperated: o.

We now have: compunction < cooperatedfor the subpart. Hence, we have bedaubed < compunction < cooperated < cypraeidae < eviscerations < flirtable < gigantism < hepatocolic < ['objectionable', 'oneanother'] < ['platoid', 'pseudohalogen'] < tricycle < ['unconfining', 'unformed']

Now let's sort this subpart ['objectionable', 'oneanother']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: objectionable: b. oneanother: n.

We now have: objectionable < oneanotherfor the subpart. Hence, we have bedaubed < compunction < cooperated < cypraeidae < eviscerations < flirtable < gigantism < hepatocolic < objectionable < oneanother < ['platoid', 'pseudohalogen'] < tricycle < ['unconfining', 'unformed']

Now let's sort this subpart ['platoid', 'pseudohalogen']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: platoid: l. pseudohalogen: s.

We now have: platoid < pseudohalogenfor the subpart. Hence, we have bedaubed < compunction < cooperated < cypraeidae < eviscerations < flirtable < gigantism < hepatocolic < objectionable < oneanother < platoid < pseudohalogen < tricycle < ['unconfining', 'unformed']

Now let's sort this subpart ['unconfining', 'unformed']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: unconfining: n. unformed: n.

We now have: ['unconfining', 'unformed']for the subpart. Hence, we have bedaubed < compunction < cooperated < cypraeidae < eviscerations < flirtable < gigantism < hepatocolic < objectionable < oneanother < platoid < pseudohalogen < tricycle < ['unconfining', 'unformed']

Now let's sort this subpart ['unconfining', 'unformed']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: unconfining: c. unformed: f.

We now have: unconfining < unformedfor the subpart. Hence, we have bedaubed < compunction < cooperated < cypraeidae < eviscerations < flirtable < gigantism < hepatocolic < objectionable < oneanother < platoid < pseudohalogen < tricycle < unconfining < unformed

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is bedaubed compunction cooperated cypraeidae eviscerations flirtable gigantism hepatocolic objectionable oneanother platoid pseudohalogen tricycle unconfining unformed

cypraeidae flirtable objectionable compunction gigantism platoid unconfining cooperated tricycle unformed bedaubed oneanother eviscerations hepatocolic pseudohalogen


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: monosymptomatic hyperpatriotically venture fissilinguia unfecundated menognathous urger virga highhat concert fierasferoid unswiveling swiping trundletail

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: monosymptomatic: m. hyperpatriotically: h. venture: v. fissilinguia: f. unfecundated: u. menognathous: m. urger: u. virga: v. highhat: h. concert: c. fierasferoid: f. unswiveling: u. swiping: s. trundletail: t.
Thought 2: We now have: concert < ['fissilinguia', 'fierasferoid'] < ['hyperpatriotically', 'highhat'] < ['monosymptomatic', 'menognathous'] < swiping < trundletail < ['unfecundated', 'urger', 'unswiveling'] < ['venture', 'virga']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['fissilinguia', 'fierasferoid']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: fissilinguia: i. fierasferoid: i.
Thought 4: We now have: ['fissilinguia', 'fierasferoid']for the subpart. Hence, we have concert < ['fissilinguia', 'fierasferoid'] < ['hyperpatriotically', 'highhat'] < ['monosymptomatic', 'menognathous'] < swiping < trundletail < ['unfecundated', 'urger', 'unswiveling'] < ['venture', 'virga']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['fissilinguia', 'fierasferoid']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: fissilinguia: s. fierasferoid: e.
Thought 6: We now have: fierasferoid < fissilinguiafor the subpart. Hence, we have concert < fierasferoid < fissilinguia < ['hyperpatriotically', 'highhat'] < ['monosymptomatic', 'menognathous'] < swiping < trundletail < ['unfecundated', 'urger', 'unswiveling'] < ['venture', 'virga']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['hyperpatriotically', 'highhat']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: hyperpatriotically: y. highhat: i.
Thought 8: We now have: highhat < hyperpatrioticallyfor the subpart. Hence, we have concert < fierasferoid < fissilinguia < highhat < hyperpatriotically < ['monosymptomatic', 'menognathous'] < swiping < trundletail < ['unfecundated', 'urger', 'unswiveling'] < ['venture', 'virga']
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['monosymptomatic', 'menognathous']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: monosymptomatic: s. menognathous: e.
Thought 10: We now have: menognathous < monosymptomaticfor the subpart. Hence, we have concert < fierasferoid < fissilinguia < highhat < hyperpatriotically < menognathous < monosymptomatic < swiping < trundletail < ['unfecundated', 'urger', 'unswiveling'] < ['venture', 'virga']
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['unfecundated', 'urger', 'unswiveling']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: urger: r. unswiveling: n.
Thought 12: We now have: unswiveling < urgerfor the subpart. Hence, we have trundletail < monosymptomatic < swiping < ['venture', 'virga'] < hyperpatriotically < fissilinguia < highhat < fierasferoid < unswiveling < urger < concert < menognathous
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['venture', 'virga']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: venture: e. virga: i.
Thought 14: We now have: virga < venturefor the subpart. Hence, we have trundletail < monosymptomatic < swiping < venture < virga < hyperpatriotically < fissilinguia < highhat < fierasferoid < unswiveling < urger < concert < menognathous
Thought 15: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is concert fierasferoid fissilinguia highhat hyperpatriotically menognathous monosymptomatic swiping trundletail unswiveling urger virga venture

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: possessionary dinophyceae coamiable unwarrantably impunible tanks terdiurnal biokinetics phocidae mawger pomatorhine herbane axopodia
There are some special requirements:

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: possessionary: y. dinophyceae: e. coamiable: e. unwarrantably: y. impunible: e. tanks: s. terdiurnal: l. biokinetics: s. mawger: r. pomatorhine: e. herbane: e. axopodia: a.
Thought 2: We now have: axopodia < ['dinophyceae', 'coamiable', 'impunible', 'pomatorhine', 'herbane'] < terdiurnal < mawger < ['tanks', 'biokinetics'] < ['possessionary', 'unwarrantably']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['dinophyceae', 'coamiable', 'impunible', 'pomatorhine', 'herbane']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: dinophyceae: a. coamiable: l. impunible: l. pomatorhine: n. herbane: a.
Thought 4: We now have: ['dinophyceae', 'herbane'] < ['coamiable', 'impunible'] < pomatorhinefor the subpart. Hence, we have axopodia < ['dinophyceae', 'herbane'] < ['coamiable', 'impunible'] < pomatorhine < terdiurnal < mawger < ['tanks', 'biokinetics'] < ['possessionary', 'unwarrantably']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['dinophyceae', 'herbane']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: dinophyceae: e. herbane: a.
Thought 6: We now have: herbane < dinophyceaefor the subpart. Hence, we have axopodia < herbane < dinophyceae < ['coamiable', 'impunible'] < pomatorhine < terdiurnal < mawger < ['tanks', 'biokinetics'] < ['possessionary', 'unwarrantably']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['coamiable', 'impunible']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: coamiable: b. impunible: b.
Thought 8: We now have: ['coamiable', 'impunible']for the subpart. Hence, we have axopodia < herbane < dinophyceae < ['coamiable', 'impunible'] < pomatorhine < terdiurnal < mawger < ['tanks', 'biokinetics'] < ['possessionary', 'unwarrantably']
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['coamiable', 'impunible']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: coamiable: a. impunible: i.
Thought 10: We now have: coamiable < impuniblefor the subpart. Hence, we have mawger < pomatorhine < ['possessionary', 'unwarrantably'] < terdiurnal < herbane < impunible < coamiable < dinophyceae < axopodia < ['tanks', 'biokinetics']
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['tanks', 'biokinetics']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: tanks: k. biokinetics: c.
Thought 12: We now have: biokinetics < tanksfor the subpart. Hence, we have mawger < pomatorhine < ['possessionary', 'unwarrantably'] < terdiurnal < herbane < impunible < coamiable < dinophyceae < axopodia < biokinetics < tanks
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['possessionary', 'unwarrantably']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: possessionary: r. unwarrantably: l.
Thought 14: We now have: possessionary < unwarrantablyfor the subpart. Hence, we have unwarrantably < herbane < coamiable < mawger < terdiurnal < impunible < axopodia < possessionary < pomatorhine < dinophyceae < tanks < biokinetics
Thought 15: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is axopodia herbane dinophyceae coamiable impunible pomatorhine terdiurnal mawger biokinetics tanks possessionary unwarrantably

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: reincorporating smothery matroclinous comprobate heartaching voyaging phonomania skewing indifulvin dayrooms usu affatuate win tapiolite jarmo underflowing
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: r, e, q, l, f, n, j, s, d, x, g, p, y, h, k, u, c, a, i, o, m, b, w, t, v, z

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: reincorporating: g. smothery: y. matroclinous: s. comprobate: e. heartaching: g. voyaging: g. phonomania: a. skewing: g. indifulvin: n. dayrooms: s. usu: u. affatuate: e. win: n. tapiolite: e. jarmo: o. underflowing: g.
Thought 2: We now have: ['reincorporating', 'heartaching', 'voyaging', 'skewing', 'underflowing'] < smothery < ['matroclinous', 'dayrooms'] < ['comprobate', 'affatuate', 'tapiolite'] < phonomania < ['indifulvin', 'win'] < usu < jarmo
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['reincorporating', 'heartaching', 'voyaging', 'skewing', 'underflowing']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: reincorporating: n. heartaching: n. voyaging: a. skewing: n. underflowing: n.
Thought 4: We now have: ['reincorporating', 'heartaching', 'skewing', 'underflowing'] < voyagingfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['matroclinous', 'dayrooms'] < usu < ['comprobate', 'affatuate', 'tapiolite'] < phonomania < jarmo < ['indifulvin', 'win'] < ['reincorporating', 'heartaching', 'skewing', 'underflowing'] < voyaging < smothery
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['reincorporating', 'heartaching', 'skewing', 'underflowing']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: reincorporating: i. heartaching: i. skewing: i. underflowing: i.
Thought 6: We now have: ['reincorporating', 'heartaching', 'skewing', 'underflowing']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['indifulvin', 'win'] < smothery < ['reincorporating', 'heartaching', 'skewing', 'underflowing'] < ['comprobate', 'affatuate', 'tapiolite'] < phonomania < ['matroclinous', 'dayrooms'] < jarmo < usu < voyaging
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['reincorporating', 'heartaching', 'skewing', 'underflowing']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: reincorporating: t. heartaching: h. skewing: w. underflowing: w.
Thought 8: We now have: heartaching < ['skewing', 'underflowing'] < reincorporatingfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['indifulvin', 'win'] < smothery < heartaching < ['skewing', 'underflowing'] < reincorporating < ['comprobate', 'affatuate', 'tapiolite'] < phonomania < ['matroclinous', 'dayrooms'] < jarmo < usu < voyaging
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['skewing', 'underflowing']. Looking at the fifth letters from right to left.The fifth letter: skewing: e. underflowing: o.
Thought 10: We now have: skewing < underflowingfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['indifulvin', 'win'] < smothery < heartaching < skewing < underflowing < reincorporating < ['comprobate', 'affatuate', 'tapiolite'] < phonomania < ['matroclinous', 'dayrooms'] < jarmo < usu < voyaging
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['matroclinous', 'dayrooms']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: matroclinous: u. dayrooms: m.
Thought 12: We now have: matroclinous < dayroomsfor the subpart. Hence, we have usu < voyaging < underflowing < phonomania < ['comprobate', 'affatuate', 'tapiolite'] < heartaching < reincorporating < smothery < dayrooms < matroclinous < jarmo < ['indifulvin', 'win'] < skewing
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['comprobate', 'affatuate', 'tapiolite']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: comprobate: t. affatuate: t. tapiolite: t.
Thought 14: We now have: ['comprobate', 'affatuate', 'tapiolite']for the subpart. Hence, we have usu < voyaging < underflowing < phonomania < ['comprobate', 'affatuate', 'tapiolite'] < heartaching < reincorporating < smothery < dayrooms < matroclinous < jarmo < ['indifulvin', 'win'] < skewing
Thought 15: Now let's sort this subpart ['comprobate', 'affatuate', 'tapiolite']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: comprobate: a. affatuate: a. tapiolite: i.
Thought 16: We now have: ['comprobate', 'affatuate'] < tapiolitefor the subpart. Hence, we have smothery < reincorporating < jarmo < heartaching < dayrooms < underflowing < usu < voyaging < matroclinous < tapiolite < phonomania < skewing < ['indifulvin', 'win'] < ['comprobate', 'affatuate']
Thought 17: Now let's sort this subpart ['comprobate', 'affatuate']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: comprobate: b. affatuate: u.
Thought 18: We now have: affatuate < comprobatefor the subpart. Hence, we have smothery < reincorporating < jarmo < heartaching < dayrooms < underflowing < usu < voyaging < matroclinous < tapiolite < phonomania < skewing < ['indifulvin', 'win'] < affatuate < comprobate
Thought 19: Now let's sort this subpart ['indifulvin', 'win']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: indifulvin: i. win: i.
Thought 20: We now have: ['indifulvin', 'win']for the subpart. Hence, we have smothery < reincorporating < jarmo < heartaching < dayrooms < underflowing < usu < voyaging < matroclinous < tapiolite < phonomania < skewing < ['indifulvin', 'win'] < affatuate < comprobate
Thought 21: Now let's sort this subpart ['indifulvin', 'win']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: indifulvin: v. win: w.
Thought 22: We now have: win < indifulvinfor the subpart. Hence, we have tapiolite < phonomania < usu < smothery < skewing < win < underflowing < affatuate < voyaging < heartaching < indifulvin < comprobate < dayrooms < matroclinous < reincorporating < jarmo
Thought 23: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is heartaching skewing underflowing reincorporating voyaging smothery matroclinous dayrooms affatuate comprobate tapiolite phonomania win indifulvin usu jarmo

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

r e q l f n j s d x g p y h k u c a i o m b w t v z


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: confess, nudation, comparatist, cephalanthium, overreplete, apiaca, argolic, cardinalitian, silicospongiae, morasses, supermunicipal, matureness
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: r, t, w, d, y, n, i, f, q, c, x, l, p, b, e, m, u, s, k, h, j, g, v, o, a, z

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: confess: c. nudation: n. comparatist: c. cephalanthium: c. overreplete: o. apiaca: a. argolic: a. cardinalitian: c. silicospongiae: s. morasses: m. supermunicipal: s. matureness: m.

We now have: nudation < ['confess', 'comparatist', 'cephalanthium', 'cardinalitian'] < ['morasses', 'matureness'] < ['silicospongiae', 'supermunicipal'] < overreplete < ['apiaca', 'argolic']

Now let's sort this subpart ['confess', 'comparatist', 'cephalanthium', 'cardinalitian']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: confess: o. comparatist: o. cephalanthium: e. cardinalitian: a.

We now have: cephalanthium < ['confess', 'comparatist'] < cardinalitianfor the subpart. Hence, we have nudation < cephalanthium < ['confess', 'comparatist'] < cardinalitian < ['morasses', 'matureness'] < ['silicospongiae', 'supermunicipal'] < overreplete < ['apiaca', 'argolic']

Now let's sort this subpart ['confess', 'comparatist']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: confess: n. comparatist: m.

We now have: confess < comparatistfor the subpart. Hence, we have nudation < cephalanthium < confess < comparatist < cardinalitian < ['morasses', 'matureness'] < ['silicospongiae', 'supermunicipal'] < overreplete < ['apiaca', 'argolic']

Now let's sort this subpart ['morasses', 'matureness']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: morasses: o. matureness: a.

We now have: morasses < maturenessfor the subpart. Hence, we have nudation < cephalanthium < confess < comparatist < cardinalitian < morasses < matureness < ['silicospongiae', 'supermunicipal'] < overreplete < ['apiaca', 'argolic']

Now let's sort this subpart ['silicospongiae', 'supermunicipal']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: silicospongiae: i. supermunicipal: u.

We now have: silicospongiae < supermunicipalfor the subpart. Hence, we have nudation < cephalanthium < confess < comparatist < cardinalitian < morasses < matureness < silicospongiae < supermunicipal < overreplete < ['apiaca', 'argolic']

Now let's sort this subpart ['apiaca', 'argolic']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: apiaca: p. argolic: r.

We now have: argolic < apiacafor the subpart. Hence, we have nudation < cephalanthium < confess < comparatist < cardinalitian < morasses < matureness < silicospongiae < supermunicipal < overreplete < argolic < apiaca

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is nudation cephalanthium confess comparatist cardinalitian morasses matureness silicospongiae supermunicipal overreplete argolic apiaca

confess nudation comparatist cephalanthium overreplete apiaca argolic cardinalitian silicospongiae morasses supermunicipal matureness

r t w d y n i f q c x l p b e m u s k h j g v o a z


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: halve, dazzlement, repurchasing, outteasing, preexpectant, chancemen, necrobiosis, mesogastrium, antipolitically, gorgeousness, appropriative, ovenbirds, unhidable
There are some special requirements:

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: halve: e. dazzlement: t. repurchasing: g. outteasing: g. preexpectant: t. chancemen: n. necrobiosis: s. mesogastrium: m. antipolitically: y. gorgeousness: s. appropriative: e. ovenbirds: s. unhidable: e.

We now have: ['halve', 'appropriative', 'unhidable'] < ['repurchasing', 'outteasing'] < mesogastrium < chancemen < ['necrobiosis', 'gorgeousness', 'ovenbirds'] < ['dazzlement', 'preexpectant'] < antipolitically

Now let's sort this subpart ['halve', 'appropriative', 'unhidable']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: halve: v. appropriative: v. unhidable: l.

We now have: unhidable < ['halve', 'appropriative']for the subpart. Hence, we have unhidable < ['halve', 'appropriative'] < ['repurchasing', 'outteasing'] < mesogastrium < chancemen < ['necrobiosis', 'gorgeousness', 'ovenbirds'] < ['dazzlement', 'preexpectant'] < antipolitically

Now let's sort this subpart ['halve', 'appropriative']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: halve: l. appropriative: i.

We now have: appropriative < halvefor the subpart. Hence, we have unhidable < appropriative < halve < ['repurchasing', 'outteasing'] < mesogastrium < chancemen < ['necrobiosis', 'gorgeousness', 'ovenbirds'] < ['dazzlement', 'preexpectant'] < antipolitically

Now let's sort this subpart ['repurchasing', 'outteasing']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: repurchasing: n. outteasing: n.

We now have: ['repurchasing', 'outteasing']for the subpart. Hence, we have unhidable < appropriative < halve < ['repurchasing', 'outteasing'] < mesogastrium < chancemen < ['necrobiosis', 'gorgeousness', 'ovenbirds'] < ['dazzlement', 'preexpectant'] < antipolitically

Now let's sort this subpart ['repurchasing', 'outteasing']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: repurchasing: i. outteasing: i.

Now let's sort this subpart ['repurchasing', 'outteasing']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: repurchasing: s. outteasing: s.

Now let's sort this subpart ['repurchasing', 'outteasing']. Looking at the fifth letters from right to left.The fifth letter: repurchasing: a. outteasing: a.

Now let's sort this subpart ['repurchasing', 'outteasing']. Looking at the sixth letters from right to left.The sixth letter: repurchasing: h. outteasing: e.

We now have: outteasing < repurchasingfor the subpart. Hence, we have unhidable < appropriative < halve < outteasing < repurchasing < mesogastrium < chancemen < ['necrobiosis', 'gorgeousness', 'ovenbirds'] < ['dazzlement', 'preexpectant'] < antipolitically

Now let's sort this subpart ['necrobiosis', 'gorgeousness', 'ovenbirds']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: necrobiosis: i. gorgeousness: s. ovenbirds: d.

We now have: ovenbirds < necrobiosis < gorgeousnessfor the subpart. Hence, we have unhidable < appropriative < halve < outteasing < repurchasing < mesogastrium < chancemen < ovenbirds < necrobiosis < gorgeousness < ['dazzlement', 'preexpectant'] < antipolitically

Now let's sort this subpart ['dazzlement', 'preexpectant']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: dazzlement: n. preexpectant: n.

We now have: ['dazzlement', 'preexpectant']for the subpart. Hence, we have unhidable < appropriative < halve < outteasing < repurchasing < mesogastrium < chancemen < ovenbirds < necrobiosis < gorgeousness < ['dazzlement', 'preexpectant'] < antipolitically

Now let's sort this subpart ['dazzlement', 'preexpectant']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: dazzlement: e. preexpectant: a.

We now have: preexpectant < dazzlementfor the subpart. Hence, we have unhidable < appropriative < halve < outteasing < repurchasing < mesogastrium < chancemen < ovenbirds < necrobiosis < gorgeousness < preexpectant < dazzlement < antipolitically

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is unhidable appropriative halve outteasing repurchasing mesogastrium chancemen ovenbirds necrobiosis gorgeousness preexpectant dazzlement antipolitically

halve dazzlement repurchasing outteasing preexpectant chancemen necrobiosis mesogastrium antipolitically gorgeousness appropriative ovenbirds unhidable


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: bicentral, distractibility, shriekingly, polygynaiky, sensible, wynris, hemisystematic, restrain, metapneumonic, interarrival, alkoranic, polygyny
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: m, b, j, h, t, f, v, i, y, r, e, p, k, g, n, l, s, w, c, q, z, o, x, u, d, a

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: bicentral: b. distractibility: d. shriekingly: s. polygynaiky: p. sensible: s. wynris: w. hemisystematic: h. restrain: r. metapneumonic: m. interarrival: i. alkoranic: a. polygyny: p.

We now have: metapneumonic < bicentral < hemisystematic < interarrival < restrain < ['polygynaiky', 'polygyny'] < ['shriekingly', 'sensible'] < wynris < distractibility < alkoranic

Now let's sort this subpart ['polygynaiky', 'polygyny']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: polygynaiky: o. polygyny: o.

We now have: ['polygynaiky', 'polygyny']for the subpart. Hence, we have metapneumonic < bicentral < hemisystematic < interarrival < restrain < ['polygynaiky', 'polygyny'] < ['shriekingly', 'sensible'] < wynris < distractibility < alkoranic

Now let's sort this subpart ['polygynaiky', 'polygyny']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: polygynaiky: l. polygyny: l.

Now let's sort this subpart ['polygynaiky', 'polygyny']. Looking at the fourth letters.The fourth letter: polygynaiky: y. polygyny: y.

Now let's sort this subpart ['polygynaiky', 'polygyny']. Looking at the fifth letters.The fifth letter: polygynaiky: g. polygyny: g.

Now let's sort this subpart ['polygynaiky', 'polygyny']. Looking at the sixth letters.The sixth letter: polygynaiky: y. polygyny: y.

Now let's sort this subpart ['polygynaiky', 'polygyny']. Looking at the seventh letters.The seventh letter: polygynaiky: n. polygyny: n.

Now let's sort this subpart ['polygynaiky', 'polygyny']. Looking at the eighth letters.The eighth letter: polygynaiky: a. polygyny: y.

We now have: polygyny < polygynaikyfor the subpart. Hence, we have metapneumonic < bicentral < hemisystematic < interarrival < restrain < polygyny < polygynaiky < ['shriekingly', 'sensible'] < wynris < distractibility < alkoranic

Now let's sort this subpart ['shriekingly', 'sensible']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: shriekingly: h. sensible: e.

We now have: shriekingly < sensiblefor the subpart. Hence, we have metapneumonic < bicentral < hemisystematic < interarrival < restrain < polygyny < polygynaiky < shriekingly < sensible < wynris < distractibility < alkoranic

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is metapneumonic bicentral hemisystematic interarrival restrain polygyny polygynaiky shriekingly sensible wynris distractibility alkoranic

bicentral distractibility shriekingly polygynaiky sensible wynris hemisystematic restrain metapneumonic interarrival alkoranic polygyny

m b j h t f v i y r e p k g n l s w c q z o x u d a


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: supereffluent unpacifiedness amelia umpteens holophane esterases phylarchy unmoving bamboozlers abroad argify hautein
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: g, w, e, u, y, m, z, r, a, s, t, n, c, p, d, v, f, h, j, k, b, i, o, q, x, l

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: supereffluent: s. unpacifiedness: u. amelia: a. umpteens: u. holophane: h. esterases: e. phylarchy: h. unmoving: u. bamboozlers: s. abroad: a. argify: a. hautein: h.
Thought 2: We now have: esterases < ['unpacifiedness', 'umpteens', 'unmoving'] < ['amelia', 'abroad', 'argify'] < ['supereffluent', 'bamboozlers'] < ['holophane', 'phylarchy', 'hautein']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['unpacifiedness', 'umpteens', 'unmoving']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: unpacifiedness: n. umpteens: m. unmoving: n.
Thought 4: We now have: umpteens < ['unpacifiedness', 'unmoving']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['holophane', 'phylarchy', 'hautein'] < esterases < ['supereffluent', 'bamboozlers'] < umpteens < ['amelia', 'abroad', 'argify'] < ['unpacifiedness', 'unmoving']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['unpacifiedness', 'unmoving']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: unpacifiedness: p. unmoving: m.
Thought 6: We now have: unmoving < unpacifiednessfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['holophane', 'phylarchy', 'hautein'] < esterases < ['supereffluent', 'bamboozlers'] < umpteens < ['amelia', 'abroad', 'argify'] < unmoving < unpacifiedness
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['amelia', 'abroad', 'argify']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: amelia: m. abroad: b. argify: r.
Thought 8: We now have: amelia < argify < abroadfor the subpart. Hence, we have umpteens < unpacifiedness < abroad < amelia < esterases < ['supereffluent', 'bamboozlers'] < ['holophane', 'phylarchy', 'hautein'] < unmoving < argify
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['supereffluent', 'bamboozlers']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: supereffluent: u. bamboozlers: a.
Thought 10: We now have: supereffluent < bamboozlersfor the subpart. Hence, we have umpteens < unpacifiedness < abroad < amelia < esterases < supereffluent < bamboozlers < ['holophane', 'phylarchy', 'hautein'] < unmoving < argify
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['holophane', 'phylarchy', 'hautein']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: holophane: o. phylarchy: h. hautein: a.
Thought 12: We now have: hautein < phylarchy < holophanefor the subpart. Hence, we have umpteens < unpacifiedness < abroad < amelia < esterases < supereffluent < bamboozlers < hautein < phylarchy < holophane < unmoving < argify
Thought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is esterases umpteens unmoving unpacifiedness amelia argify abroad supereffluent bamboozlers hautein phylarchy holophane

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

g w e u y m z r a s t n c p d v f h j k b i o q x l


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: theocritan yelk monstrances amniotes palaeethnologist hydrophyll maeandrina samogon atwist arcus
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: l, e, x, q, j, m, w, o, c, u, f, y, h, s, g, k, a, r, p, d, v, t, z, i, n, b

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: theocritan: n. yelk: k. monstrances: s. amniotes: s. palaeethnologist: t. hydrophyll: l. maeandrina: a. samogon: n. atwist: t. arcus: s.
Thought 2: We now have: hydrophyll < ['monstrances', 'amniotes', 'arcus'] < yelk < maeandrina < ['palaeethnologist', 'atwist'] < ['theocritan', 'samogon']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['monstrances', 'amniotes', 'arcus']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: monstrances: e. amniotes: e. arcus: r.
Thought 4: We now have: ['monstrances', 'amniotes'] < arcusfor the subpart. Hence, we have maeandrina < ['palaeethnologist', 'atwist'] < ['monstrances', 'amniotes'] < ['theocritan', 'samogon'] < yelk < hydrophyll < arcus
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['monstrances', 'amniotes']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: amniotes: t.
Thought 6: We now have: amniotesfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['theocritan', 'samogon'] < maeandrina < amniotes < ['palaeethnologist', 'atwist'] < hydrophyll < arcus < yelk
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['palaeethnologist', 'atwist']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: palaeethnologist: s. atwist: s.
Thought 8: We now have: ['palaeethnologist', 'atwist']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['theocritan', 'samogon'] < maeandrina < amniotes < ['palaeethnologist', 'atwist'] < hydrophyll < arcus < yelk
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['palaeethnologist', 'atwist']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: palaeethnologist: i. atwist: i.
Thought 10: We now have: ['palaeethnologist', 'atwist']for the subpart. Hence, we have amniotes < ['palaeethnologist', 'atwist'] < arcus < hydrophyll < maeandrina < yelk < ['theocritan', 'samogon']
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['palaeethnologist', 'atwist']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: palaeethnologist: g. atwist: w.
Thought 12: We now have: atwist < palaeethnologistfor the subpart. Hence, we have arcus < palaeethnologist < ['theocritan', 'samogon'] < maeandrina < hydrophyll < amniotes < atwist < yelk
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['theocritan', 'samogon']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: theocritan: a. samogon: o.
Thought 14: We now have: samogon < theocritanfor the subpart. Hence, we have arcus < palaeethnologist < samogon < theocritan < maeandrina < hydrophyll < amniotes < atwist < yelk
Thought 15: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is hydrophyll amniotes arcus yelk maeandrina atwist palaeethnologist samogon theocritan

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

l e x q j m w o c u f y h s g k a r p d v t z i n b


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: demonization unveridically trusters glossotomies coreigner nonconjunction aspersing outperform sopper redhibition artfully misimproving
There are some special requirements:

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: demonization: n. unveridically: y. trusters: s. glossotomies: s. coreigner: i. nonconjunction: n. aspersing: g. outperform: m. sopper: r. redhibition: n. artfully: y. misimproving: g.
Thought 2: We now have: ['aspersing', 'misimproving'] < coreigner < outperform < ['demonization', 'nonconjunction', 'redhibition'] < sopper < ['trusters', 'glossotomies'] < ['unveridically', 'artfully']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['aspersing', 'misimproving']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: misimproving: n.
Thought 4: We now have: misimprovingfor the subpart. Hence, we have misimproving < coreigner < outperform < ['demonization', 'nonconjunction', 'redhibition'] < sopper < ['trusters', 'glossotomies'] < ['unveridically', 'artfully']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['demonization', 'nonconjunction', 'redhibition']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: demonization: o. nonconjunction: o. redhibition: o.
Thought 6: We now have: ['demonization', 'nonconjunction', 'redhibition']for the subpart. Hence, we have misimproving < coreigner < outperform < ['demonization', 'nonconjunction', 'redhibition'] < sopper < ['trusters', 'glossotomies'] < ['unveridically', 'artfully']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['demonization', 'nonconjunction', 'redhibition']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: demonization: i. nonconjunction: i. redhibition: i.
Thought 8: We now have: ['demonization', 'nonconjunction', 'redhibition']for the subpart. Hence, we have misimproving < coreigner < outperform < ['demonization', 'nonconjunction', 'redhibition'] < sopper < ['trusters', 'glossotomies'] < ['unveridically', 'artfully']
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['demonization', 'nonconjunction', 'redhibition']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: demonization: t. nonconjunction: t. redhibition: t.
Thought 10: We now have: ['demonization', 'nonconjunction', 'redhibition']for the subpart. Hence, we have misimproving < coreigner < outperform < ['demonization', 'nonconjunction', 'redhibition'] < sopper < ['trusters', 'glossotomies'] < ['unveridically', 'artfully']
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['demonization', 'nonconjunction', 'redhibition']. Looking at the fifth letters from right to left.The fifth letter: demonization: a. nonconjunction: c. redhibition: i.
Thought 12: We now have: demonization < nonconjunction < redhibitionfor the subpart. Hence, we have coreigner < outperform < ['unveridically', 'artfully'] < misimproving < redhibition < sopper < ['trusters', 'glossotomies'] < nonconjunction < demonization
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['trusters', 'glossotomies']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: trusters: r. glossotomies: e.
Thought 14: We now have: glossotomies < trustersfor the subpart. Hence, we have glossotomies < nonconjunction < outperform < demonization < coreigner < misimproving < ['unveridically', 'artfully'] < sopper < redhibition < trusters
Thought 15: Now let's sort this subpart ['unveridically', 'artfully']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: unveridically: l. artfully: l.
Thought 16: We now have: ['unveridically', 'artfully']for the subpart. Hence, we have glossotomies < nonconjunction < outperform < demonization < coreigner < misimproving < ['unveridically', 'artfully'] < sopper < redhibition < trusters
Thought 17: Now let's sort this subpart ['unveridically', 'artfully']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: unveridically: l. artfully: l.
Thought 18: We now have: ['unveridically', 'artfully']for the subpart. Hence, we have glossotomies < nonconjunction < outperform < demonization < coreigner < misimproving < ['unveridically', 'artfully'] < sopper < redhibition < trusters
Thought 19: Now let's sort this subpart ['unveridically', 'artfully']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: unveridically: a. artfully: u.
Thought 20: We now have: artfully < unveridicallyfor the subpart. Hence, we have glossotomies < nonconjunction < outperform < demonization < coreigner < misimproving < unveridically < artfully < sopper < redhibition < trusters
Thought 21: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is misimproving coreigner outperform demonization nonconjunction redhibition sopper glossotomies trusters artfully unveridically

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: unwestern tyrannicly handstand scabrous brutes blockages anorexy farseeingness waggonage
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: h, i, e, p, m, q, z, g, s, r, l, w, a, f, b, o, x, c, k, t, n, v, d, y, u, j

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: unwestern: n. tyrannicly: y. handstand: d. scabrous: s. brutes: s. blockages: s. anorexy: y. farseeingness: s. waggonage: e.
Thought 2: We now have: waggonage < ['scabrous', 'brutes', 'blockages', 'farseeingness'] < unwestern < handstand < ['tyrannicly', 'anorexy']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['scabrous', 'brutes', 'blockages', 'farseeingness']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: scabrous: u. brutes: e. blockages: e. farseeingness: s.
Thought 4: We now have: ['brutes', 'blockages'] < farseeingness < scabrousfor the subpart. Hence, we have waggonage < ['brutes', 'blockages'] < farseeingness < scabrous < unwestern < handstand < ['tyrannicly', 'anorexy']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['brutes', 'blockages']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: brutes: t. blockages: g.
Thought 6: We now have: blockages < brutesfor the subpart. Hence, we have waggonage < blockages < brutes < farseeingness < scabrous < unwestern < handstand < ['tyrannicly', 'anorexy']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['tyrannicly', 'anorexy']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: tyrannicly: l. anorexy: x.
Thought 8: We now have: tyrannicly < anorexyfor the subpart. Hence, we have waggonage < blockages < brutes < farseeingness < scabrous < unwestern < handstand < tyrannicly < anorexy
Thought 9: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is waggonage blockages brutes farseeingness scabrous unwestern handstand tyrannicly anorexy

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

h i e p m q z g s r l w a f b o x c k t n v d y u j


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: obviating, karoos, synodally, crankism, bacubert, civilizing, leptothrix, chloropsia, alorcinic, predetermined, sturshum, infected
There are some special requirements:

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: obviating: g. karoos: s. synodally: y. crankism: m. bacubert: t. civilizing: g. leptothrix: x. chloropsia: a. alorcinic: c. predetermined: d. sturshum: m. infected: d.

We now have: chloropsia < alorcinic < ['predetermined', 'infected'] < ['obviating', 'civilizing'] < ['crankism', 'sturshum'] < karoos < bacubert < leptothrix < synodally

Now let's sort this subpart ['predetermined', 'infected']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: predetermined: e. infected: e.

We now have: ['predetermined', 'infected']for the subpart. Hence, we have chloropsia < alorcinic < ['predetermined', 'infected'] < ['obviating', 'civilizing'] < ['crankism', 'sturshum'] < karoos < bacubert < leptothrix < synodally

Now let's sort this subpart ['predetermined', 'infected']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: predetermined: n. infected: t.

We now have: predetermined < infectedfor the subpart. Hence, we have chloropsia < alorcinic < predetermined < infected < ['obviating', 'civilizing'] < ['crankism', 'sturshum'] < karoos < bacubert < leptothrix < synodally

Now let's sort this subpart ['obviating', 'civilizing']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: obviating: n. civilizing: n.

We now have: ['obviating', 'civilizing']for the subpart. Hence, we have chloropsia < alorcinic < predetermined < infected < ['obviating', 'civilizing'] < ['crankism', 'sturshum'] < karoos < bacubert < leptothrix < synodally

Now let's sort this subpart ['obviating', 'civilizing']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: obviating: i. civilizing: i.

Now let's sort this subpart ['obviating', 'civilizing']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: obviating: t. civilizing: z.

We now have: obviating < civilizingfor the subpart. Hence, we have chloropsia < alorcinic < predetermined < infected < obviating < civilizing < ['crankism', 'sturshum'] < karoos < bacubert < leptothrix < synodally

Now let's sort this subpart ['crankism', 'sturshum']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: crankism: s. sturshum: u.

We now have: crankism < sturshumfor the subpart. Hence, we have chloropsia < alorcinic < predetermined < infected < obviating < civilizing < crankism < sturshum < karoos < bacubert < leptothrix < synodally

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is chloropsia alorcinic predetermined infected obviating civilizing crankism sturshum karoos bacubert leptothrix synodally

obviating karoos synodally crankism bacubert civilizing leptothrix chloropsia alorcinic predetermined sturshum infected