Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: guests, krauts, bodo, coadventuring, deacon, zooplasty, dubitancy, undermaid, untying, oculiform, harmonicon, empurples, skaillie, fieldleft
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: b, d, k, z, u, m, o, i, q, s, n, l, g, y, v, c, h, r, w, a, t, x, j, f, p, e

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: guests: s. krauts: s. bodo: o. coadventuring: g. deacon: n. zooplasty: y. dubitancy: y. undermaid: d. untying: g. oculiform: m. harmonicon: n. empurples: s. skaillie: e. fieldleft: t.

We now have: undermaid < oculiform < bodo < ['guests', 'krauts', 'empurples'] < ['deacon', 'harmonicon'] < ['coadventuring', 'untying'] < ['zooplasty', 'dubitancy'] < fieldleft < skaillie

Now let's sort this subpart ['guests', 'krauts', 'empurples']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: guests: t. krauts: t. empurples: e.

We now have: ['guests', 'krauts'] < empurplesfor the subpart. Hence, we have undermaid < oculiform < bodo < ['guests', 'krauts'] < empurples < ['deacon', 'harmonicon'] < ['coadventuring', 'untying'] < ['zooplasty', 'dubitancy'] < fieldleft < skaillie

Now let's sort this subpart ['guests', 'krauts']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: guests: s. krauts: u.

We now have: krauts < guestsfor the subpart. Hence, we have undermaid < oculiform < bodo < krauts < guests < empurples < ['deacon', 'harmonicon'] < ['coadventuring', 'untying'] < ['zooplasty', 'dubitancy'] < fieldleft < skaillie

Now let's sort this subpart ['deacon', 'harmonicon']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: deacon: o. harmonicon: o.

We now have: ['deacon', 'harmonicon']for the subpart. Hence, we have undermaid < oculiform < bodo < krauts < guests < empurples < ['deacon', 'harmonicon'] < ['coadventuring', 'untying'] < ['zooplasty', 'dubitancy'] < fieldleft < skaillie

Now let's sort this subpart ['deacon', 'harmonicon']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: deacon: c. harmonicon: c.

Now let's sort this subpart ['deacon', 'harmonicon']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: deacon: a. harmonicon: i.

We now have: harmonicon < deaconfor the subpart. Hence, we have undermaid < oculiform < bodo < krauts < guests < empurples < harmonicon < deacon < ['coadventuring', 'untying'] < ['zooplasty', 'dubitancy'] < fieldleft < skaillie

Now let's sort this subpart ['coadventuring', 'untying']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: coadventuring: n. untying: n.

We now have: ['coadventuring', 'untying']for the subpart. Hence, we have undermaid < oculiform < bodo < krauts < guests < empurples < harmonicon < deacon < ['coadventuring', 'untying'] < ['zooplasty', 'dubitancy'] < fieldleft < skaillie

Now let's sort this subpart ['coadventuring', 'untying']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: coadventuring: i. untying: i.

Now let's sort this subpart ['coadventuring', 'untying']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: coadventuring: r. untying: y.

We now have: untying < coadventuringfor the subpart. Hence, we have undermaid < oculiform < bodo < krauts < guests < empurples < harmonicon < deacon < untying < coadventuring < ['zooplasty', 'dubitancy'] < fieldleft < skaillie

Now let's sort this subpart ['zooplasty', 'dubitancy']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: zooplasty: t. dubitancy: c.

We now have: dubitancy < zooplastyfor the subpart. Hence, we have undermaid < oculiform < bodo < krauts < guests < empurples < harmonicon < deacon < untying < coadventuring < dubitancy < zooplasty < fieldleft < skaillie

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is undermaid oculiform bodo krauts guests empurples harmonicon deacon untying coadventuring dubitancy zooplasty fieldleft skaillie

guests krauts bodo coadventuring deacon zooplasty dubitancy undermaid untying oculiform harmonicon empurples skaillie fieldleft

b d k z u m o i q s n l g y v c h r w a t x j f p e


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: pollening preallotted supercritically ungilt stours outcrows kinked ruralisation panpsychistic hazing
There are some special requirements:

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: pollening: g. preallotted: d. supercritically: y. ungilt: t. stours: s. outcrows: s. kinked: d. ruralisation: n. panpsychistic: c. hazing: g.
Thought 2: We now have: panpsychistic < ['preallotted', 'kinked'] < ['pollening', 'hazing'] < ruralisation < ['stours', 'outcrows'] < ungilt < supercritically
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['preallotted', 'kinked']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: preallotted: e. kinked: e.
Thought 4: We now have: ['preallotted', 'kinked']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['stours', 'outcrows'] < ['preallotted', 'kinked'] < ungilt < ['pollening', 'hazing'] < ruralisation < supercritically < panpsychistic
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['preallotted', 'kinked']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: preallotted: t. kinked: k.
Thought 6: We now have: kinked < preallottedfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['stours', 'outcrows'] < kinked < preallotted < ungilt < ['pollening', 'hazing'] < ruralisation < supercritically < panpsychistic
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['pollening', 'hazing']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: pollening: n. hazing: n.
Thought 8: We now have: ['pollening', 'hazing']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['stours', 'outcrows'] < kinked < preallotted < ungilt < ['pollening', 'hazing'] < ruralisation < supercritically < panpsychistic
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['pollening', 'hazing']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: pollening: i. hazing: i.
Thought 10: We now have: ['pollening', 'hazing']for the subpart. Hence, we have ruralisation < ['stours', 'outcrows'] < panpsychistic < kinked < ['pollening', 'hazing'] < supercritically < preallotted < ungilt
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['pollening', 'hazing']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: pollening: n. hazing: z.
Thought 12: We now have: pollening < hazingfor the subpart. Hence, we have ruralisation < ['stours', 'outcrows'] < panpsychistic < kinked < pollening < hazing < supercritically < preallotted < ungilt
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['stours', 'outcrows']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: stours: r. outcrows: w.
Thought 14: We now have: stours < outcrowsfor the subpart. Hence, we have ruralisation < stours < outcrows < panpsychistic < kinked < pollening < hazing < supercritically < preallotted < ungilt
Thought 15: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is panpsychistic kinked preallotted pollening hazing ruralisation stours outcrows ungilt supercritically

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: paratypically livingstoneite syriasm antecedently certie asway olivewood outgnawing weedow boltonite antistrophize sudanian saccharocolloid unenforcibility mesotherm multangulous

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: paratypically: p. livingstoneite: l. syriasm: s. antecedently: a. certie: c. asway: a. olivewood: o. outgnawing: o. weedow: w. boltonite: b. antistrophize: a. sudanian: s. saccharocolloid: s. unenforcibility: l. mesotherm: m. multangulous: m.
Thought 2: We now have: ['antecedently', 'asway', 'antistrophize'] < boltonite < certie < ['livingstoneite', 'unenforcibility'] < ['mesotherm', 'multangulous'] < ['olivewood', 'outgnawing'] < paratypically < ['syriasm', 'sudanian', 'saccharocolloid'] < weedow
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['antecedently', 'asway', 'antistrophize']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: antecedently: n. asway: s. antistrophize: n.
Thought 4: We now have: ['antecedently', 'antistrophize'] < aswayfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['antecedently', 'antistrophize'] < asway < boltonite < certie < ['livingstoneite', 'unenforcibility'] < ['mesotherm', 'multangulous'] < ['olivewood', 'outgnawing'] < paratypically < ['syriasm', 'sudanian', 'saccharocolloid'] < weedow
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['antecedently', 'antistrophize']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: antecedently: t. antistrophize: t.
Thought 6: We now have: ['antecedently', 'antistrophize']for the subpart. Hence, we have asway < ['olivewood', 'outgnawing'] < boltonite < ['livingstoneite', 'unenforcibility'] < ['mesotherm', 'multangulous'] < paratypically < ['syriasm', 'sudanian', 'saccharocolloid'] < weedow < ['antecedently', 'antistrophize'] < certie
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['antecedently', 'antistrophize']. Looking at the fourth letters.The fourth letter: antecedently: e. antistrophize: i.
Thought 8: We now have: antistrophize < antecedentlyfor the subpart. Hence, we have asway < ['olivewood', 'outgnawing'] < boltonite < ['livingstoneite', 'unenforcibility'] < ['mesotherm', 'multangulous'] < paratypically < ['syriasm', 'sudanian', 'saccharocolloid'] < weedow < antecedently < antistrophize < certie
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['livingstoneite', 'unenforcibility']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: livingstoneite: i. unenforcibility: n.
Thought 10: We now have: livingstoneite < unenforcibilityfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['syriasm', 'sudanian', 'saccharocolloid'] < unenforcibility < certie < antistrophize < weedow < antecedently < boltonite < asway < livingstoneite < ['olivewood', 'outgnawing'] < ['mesotherm', 'multangulous'] < paratypically
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['mesotherm', 'multangulous']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: mesotherm: e. multangulous: u.
Thought 12: We now have: mesotherm < multangulousfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['syriasm', 'sudanian', 'saccharocolloid'] < unenforcibility < certie < antistrophize < weedow < antecedently < boltonite < asway < livingstoneite < ['olivewood', 'outgnawing'] < mesotherm < multangulous < paratypically
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['olivewood', 'outgnawing']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: olivewood: l. outgnawing: u.
Thought 14: We now have: olivewood < outgnawingfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['syriasm', 'sudanian', 'saccharocolloid'] < unenforcibility < certie < antistrophize < weedow < antecedently < boltonite < asway < livingstoneite < olivewood < outgnawing < mesotherm < multangulous < paratypically
Thought 15: Now let's sort this subpart ['syriasm', 'sudanian', 'saccharocolloid']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: syriasm: y. sudanian: u. saccharocolloid: a.
Thought 16: We now have: saccharocolloid < sudanian < syriasmfor the subpart. Hence, we have saccharocolloid < sudanian < syriasm < unenforcibility < certie < antistrophize < weedow < antecedently < boltonite < asway < livingstoneite < olivewood < outgnawing < mesotherm < multangulous < paratypically
Thought 17: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is antistrophize antecedently asway boltonite certie livingstoneite unenforcibility mesotherm multangulous olivewood outgnawing paratypically saccharocolloid sudanian syriasm weedow

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: panelboard, cicatriculae, sulfuran, overelegancy, superinfinite, microzoaria, tidier, horrescent, phleboidal, alkine, benedictively, colibertus, malthite
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: k, m, g, o, n, j, h, e, t, u, d, l, c, x, i, s, r, v, f, w, p, b, z, y, q, a

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: panelboard: p. cicatriculae: c. sulfuran: s. overelegancy: o. superinfinite: s. microzoaria: m. tidier: t. horrescent: h. phleboidal: p. alkine: a. benedictively: b. colibertus: c. malthite: m.

We now have: ['microzoaria', 'malthite'] < overelegancy < horrescent < tidier < ['cicatriculae', 'colibertus'] < ['sulfuran', 'superinfinite'] < ['panelboard', 'phleboidal'] < benedictively < alkine

Now let's sort this subpart ['microzoaria', 'malthite']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: microzoaria: i. malthite: a.

We now have: microzoaria < malthitefor the subpart. Hence, we have microzoaria < malthite < overelegancy < horrescent < tidier < ['cicatriculae', 'colibertus'] < ['sulfuran', 'superinfinite'] < ['panelboard', 'phleboidal'] < benedictively < alkine

Now let's sort this subpart ['cicatriculae', 'colibertus']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: cicatriculae: i. colibertus: o.

We now have: colibertus < cicatriculaefor the subpart. Hence, we have microzoaria < malthite < overelegancy < horrescent < tidier < colibertus < cicatriculae < ['sulfuran', 'superinfinite'] < ['panelboard', 'phleboidal'] < benedictively < alkine

Now let's sort this subpart ['sulfuran', 'superinfinite']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: sulfuran: u. superinfinite: u.

We now have: ['sulfuran', 'superinfinite']for the subpart. Hence, we have microzoaria < malthite < overelegancy < horrescent < tidier < colibertus < cicatriculae < ['sulfuran', 'superinfinite'] < ['panelboard', 'phleboidal'] < benedictively < alkine

Now let's sort this subpart ['sulfuran', 'superinfinite']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: sulfuran: l. superinfinite: p.

We now have: sulfuran < superinfinitefor the subpart. Hence, we have microzoaria < malthite < overelegancy < horrescent < tidier < colibertus < cicatriculae < sulfuran < superinfinite < ['panelboard', 'phleboidal'] < benedictively < alkine

Now let's sort this subpart ['panelboard', 'phleboidal']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: panelboard: a. phleboidal: h.

We now have: phleboidal < panelboardfor the subpart. Hence, we have microzoaria < malthite < overelegancy < horrescent < tidier < colibertus < cicatriculae < sulfuran < superinfinite < phleboidal < panelboard < benedictively < alkine

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is microzoaria malthite overelegancy horrescent tidier colibertus cicatriculae sulfuran superinfinite phleboidal panelboard benedictively alkine

panelboard cicatriculae sulfuran overelegancy superinfinite microzoaria tidier horrescent phleboidal alkine benedictively colibertus malthite

k m g o n j h e t u d l c x i s r v f w p b z y q a


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: misted avshar weaseled unseasoned machinemonger uninfiltrated diddlers shilingi archesporium louts disked nonsociety overpluses
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: g, v, i, e, d, n, j, x, w, u, p, k, b, r, f, q, h, s, y, a, m, l, c, o, z, t

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: misted: m. weaseled: w. unseasoned: u. machinemonger: m. uninfiltrated: u. diddlers: d. shilingi: s. archesporium: a. louts: l. disked: d. nonsociety: n. overpluses: o.
Thought 2: We now have: ['diddlers', 'disked'] < nonsociety < weaseled < ['unseasoned', 'uninfiltrated'] < shilingi < archesporium < ['misted', 'machinemonger'] < louts < overpluses
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['diddlers', 'disked']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: diddlers: i. disked: i.
Thought 4: We now have: ['diddlers', 'disked']for the subpart. Hence, we have louts < ['misted', 'machinemonger'] < weaseled < overpluses < shilingi < archesporium < nonsociety < ['diddlers', 'disked'] < ['unseasoned', 'uninfiltrated']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['diddlers', 'disked']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: diddlers: d. disked: s.
Thought 6: We now have: diddlers < diskedfor the subpart. Hence, we have louts < ['misted', 'machinemonger'] < weaseled < overpluses < shilingi < archesporium < nonsociety < diddlers < disked < ['unseasoned', 'uninfiltrated']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['unseasoned', 'uninfiltrated']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: unseasoned: n. uninfiltrated: n.
Thought 8: We now have: ['unseasoned', 'uninfiltrated']for the subpart. Hence, we have louts < ['misted', 'machinemonger'] < weaseled < overpluses < shilingi < archesporium < nonsociety < diddlers < disked < ['unseasoned', 'uninfiltrated']
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['unseasoned', 'uninfiltrated']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: unseasoned: s. uninfiltrated: i.
Thought 10: We now have: uninfiltrated < unseasonedfor the subpart. Hence, we have louts < ['misted', 'machinemonger'] < weaseled < overpluses < shilingi < archesporium < nonsociety < diddlers < disked < uninfiltrated < unseasoned
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['misted', 'machinemonger']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: misted: i. machinemonger: a.
Thought 12: We now have: misted < machinemongerfor the subpart. Hence, we have louts < misted < machinemonger < weaseled < overpluses < shilingi < archesporium < nonsociety < diddlers < disked < uninfiltrated < unseasoned
Thought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is diddlers disked nonsociety weaseled uninfiltrated unseasoned shilingi archesporium misted machinemonger louts overpluses

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

g v i e d n j x w u p k b r f q h s y a m l c o z t


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: unblottedness, colove, nundinal, equipt, pteropegum, amman, preprimer, inhabitance, interpleading, guato, esbatement, fungoes, straightforwards, grudged, hysterometer
There are some special requirements:

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: unblottedness: s. colove: e. nundinal: l. equipt: t. pteropegum: m. amman: n. preprimer: r. inhabitance: e. interpleading: g. guato: o. esbatement: t. fungoes: s. straightforwards: s. grudged: d. hysterometer: r.

We now have: grudged < ['colove', 'inhabitance'] < interpleading < nundinal < pteropegum < amman < guato < ['preprimer', 'hysterometer'] < ['unblottedness', 'fungoes', 'straightforwards'] < ['equipt', 'esbatement']

Now let's sort this subpart ['colove', 'inhabitance']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: colove: v. inhabitance: c.

We now have: inhabitance < colovefor the subpart. Hence, we have grudged < inhabitance < colove < interpleading < nundinal < pteropegum < amman < guato < ['preprimer', 'hysterometer'] < ['unblottedness', 'fungoes', 'straightforwards'] < ['equipt', 'esbatement']

Now let's sort this subpart ['preprimer', 'hysterometer']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: preprimer: e. hysterometer: e.

We now have: ['preprimer', 'hysterometer']for the subpart. Hence, we have grudged < inhabitance < colove < interpleading < nundinal < pteropegum < amman < guato < ['preprimer', 'hysterometer'] < ['unblottedness', 'fungoes', 'straightforwards'] < ['equipt', 'esbatement']

Now let's sort this subpart ['preprimer', 'hysterometer']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: preprimer: m. hysterometer: t.

We now have: preprimer < hysterometerfor the subpart. Hence, we have grudged < inhabitance < colove < interpleading < nundinal < pteropegum < amman < guato < preprimer < hysterometer < ['unblottedness', 'fungoes', 'straightforwards'] < ['equipt', 'esbatement']

Now let's sort this subpart ['unblottedness', 'fungoes', 'straightforwards']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: unblottedness: s. fungoes: e. straightforwards: d.

We now have: straightforwards < fungoes < unblottednessfor the subpart. Hence, we have grudged < inhabitance < colove < interpleading < nundinal < pteropegum < amman < guato < preprimer < hysterometer < straightforwards < fungoes < unblottedness < ['equipt', 'esbatement']

Now let's sort this subpart ['equipt', 'esbatement']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: equipt: p. esbatement: n.

We now have: esbatement < equiptfor the subpart. Hence, we have grudged < inhabitance < colove < interpleading < nundinal < pteropegum < amman < guato < preprimer < hysterometer < straightforwards < fungoes < unblottedness < esbatement < equipt

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is grudged inhabitance colove interpleading nundinal pteropegum amman guato preprimer hysterometer straightforwards fungoes unblottedness esbatement equipt

unblottedness colove nundinal equipt pteropegum amman preprimer inhabitance interpleading guato esbatement fungoes straightforwards grudged hysterometer


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: adenophorous salicylize intuitionistic tyum evaporativity mispatched triazolic interacts attenuative subsist nathe metagnosticism hagbush orgiac adpromission embodiments

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: adenophorous: a. salicylize: s. intuitionistic: i. tyum: t. evaporativity: e. mispatched: m. triazolic: t. interacts: i. attenuative: a. subsist: s. nathe: n. metagnosticism: m. hagbush: h. orgiac: o. adpromission: a. embodiments: e.
Thought 2: We now have: ['adenophorous', 'attenuative', 'adpromission'] < ['evaporativity', 'embodiments'] < hagbush < ['intuitionistic', 'interacts'] < ['mispatched', 'metagnosticism'] < nathe < orgiac < ['salicylize', 'subsist'] < ['tyum', 'triazolic']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['adenophorous', 'attenuative', 'adpromission']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: adenophorous: d. attenuative: t.
Thought 4: We now have: adenophorous < attenuativefor the subpart. Hence, we have adenophorous < attenuative < ['evaporativity', 'embodiments'] < hagbush < ['intuitionistic', 'interacts'] < ['mispatched', 'metagnosticism'] < nathe < orgiac < ['salicylize', 'subsist'] < ['tyum', 'triazolic']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['evaporativity', 'embodiments']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: evaporativity: v. embodiments: m.
Thought 6: We now have: embodiments < evaporativityfor the subpart. Hence, we have adenophorous < attenuative < embodiments < evaporativity < hagbush < ['intuitionistic', 'interacts'] < ['mispatched', 'metagnosticism'] < nathe < orgiac < ['salicylize', 'subsist'] < ['tyum', 'triazolic']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['intuitionistic', 'interacts']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: intuitionistic: n. interacts: n.
Thought 8: We now have: ['intuitionistic', 'interacts']for the subpart. Hence, we have adenophorous < attenuative < embodiments < evaporativity < hagbush < ['intuitionistic', 'interacts'] < ['mispatched', 'metagnosticism'] < nathe < orgiac < ['salicylize', 'subsist'] < ['tyum', 'triazolic']
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['intuitionistic', 'interacts']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: intuitionistic: t. interacts: t.
Thought 10: We now have: ['intuitionistic', 'interacts']for the subpart. Hence, we have adenophorous < attenuative < embodiments < evaporativity < hagbush < ['intuitionistic', 'interacts'] < ['mispatched', 'metagnosticism'] < nathe < orgiac < ['salicylize', 'subsist'] < ['tyum', 'triazolic']
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['intuitionistic', 'interacts']. Looking at the fourth letters.The fourth letter: intuitionistic: u. interacts: e.
Thought 12: We now have: interacts < intuitionisticfor the subpart. Hence, we have adenophorous < attenuative < ['salicylize', 'subsist'] < hagbush < embodiments < ['tyum', 'triazolic'] < interacts < ['mispatched', 'metagnosticism'] < intuitionistic < nathe < evaporativity < orgiac
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['mispatched', 'metagnosticism']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: mispatched: i. metagnosticism: e.
Thought 14: We now have: metagnosticism < mispatchedfor the subpart. Hence, we have adenophorous < attenuative < ['salicylize', 'subsist'] < hagbush < embodiments < ['tyum', 'triazolic'] < interacts < metagnosticism < mispatched < intuitionistic < nathe < evaporativity < orgiac
Thought 15: Now let's sort this subpart ['salicylize', 'subsist']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: salicylize: a. subsist: u.
Thought 16: We now have: salicylize < subsistfor the subpart. Hence, we have adenophorous < attenuative < salicylize < subsist < hagbush < embodiments < ['tyum', 'triazolic'] < interacts < metagnosticism < mispatched < intuitionistic < nathe < evaporativity < orgiac
Thought 17: Now let's sort this subpart ['tyum', 'triazolic']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: tyum: y. triazolic: r.
Thought 18: We now have: triazolic < tyumfor the subpart. Hence, we have adenophorous < attenuative < salicylize < subsist < hagbush < embodiments < triazolic < tyum < interacts < metagnosticism < mispatched < intuitionistic < nathe < evaporativity < orgiac
Thought 19: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is adenophorous attenuative embodiments evaporativity hagbush interacts intuitionistic metagnosticism mispatched nathe orgiac salicylize subsist triazolic tyum

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: forcing serena uneffeminated tinted benchmark reaccept alumnae desquamatory samian drolls forestick manlikely unneighborly reagitated unethylated

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: forcing: f. serena: s. uneffeminated: u. tinted: t. benchmark: b. reaccept: r. alumnae: a. desquamatory: d. samian: s. drolls: d. forestick: f. unneighborly: u. reagitated: r. unethylated: u.
Thought 2: We now have: alumnae < benchmark < ['desquamatory', 'drolls'] < ['forcing', 'forestick'] < ['reaccept', 'reagitated'] < ['serena', 'samian'] < tinted < ['uneffeminated', 'unneighborly', 'unethylated']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['desquamatory', 'drolls']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: desquamatory: e. drolls: r.
Thought 4: We now have: desquamatory < drollsfor the subpart. Hence, we have alumnae < benchmark < desquamatory < drolls < ['forcing', 'forestick'] < ['reaccept', 'reagitated'] < ['serena', 'samian'] < tinted < ['uneffeminated', 'unneighborly', 'unethylated']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['forcing', 'forestick']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: forcing: o.
Thought 6: We now have: forcingfor the subpart. Hence, we have alumnae < benchmark < desquamatory < drolls < forcing < ['reaccept', 'reagitated'] < ['serena', 'samian'] < tinted < ['uneffeminated', 'unneighborly', 'unethylated']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['reaccept', 'reagitated']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: reaccept: e. reagitated: e.
Thought 8: We now have: ['reaccept', 'reagitated']for the subpart. Hence, we have alumnae < benchmark < desquamatory < drolls < forcing < ['reaccept', 'reagitated'] < ['serena', 'samian'] < tinted < ['uneffeminated', 'unneighborly', 'unethylated']
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['reaccept', 'reagitated']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: reaccept: a. reagitated: a.
Thought 10: We now have: ['reaccept', 'reagitated']for the subpart. Hence, we have alumnae < benchmark < desquamatory < drolls < forcing < ['reaccept', 'reagitated'] < ['serena', 'samian'] < tinted < ['uneffeminated', 'unneighborly', 'unethylated']
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['reaccept', 'reagitated']. Looking at the fourth letters.The fourth letter: reaccept: c. reagitated: g.
Thought 12: We now have: reaccept < reagitatedfor the subpart. Hence, we have alumnae < benchmark < desquamatory < drolls < forcing < reaccept < reagitated < ['serena', 'samian'] < tinted < ['uneffeminated', 'unneighborly', 'unethylated']
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['serena', 'samian']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: serena: e. samian: a.
Thought 14: We now have: samian < serenafor the subpart. Hence, we have alumnae < benchmark < desquamatory < drolls < forcing < reaccept < reagitated < samian < serena < tinted < ['uneffeminated', 'unneighborly', 'unethylated']
Thought 15: Now let's sort this subpart ['uneffeminated', 'unneighborly', 'unethylated']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: unneighborly: n. unethylated: n.
Thought 16: We now have: ['unneighborly', 'unethylated']for the subpart. Hence, we have reagitated < drolls < alumnae < serena < forcing < benchmark < tinted < ['unneighborly', 'unethylated'] < reaccept < samian < desquamatory
Thought 17: Now let's sort this subpart ['unneighborly', 'unethylated']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: unneighborly: n.
Thought 18: We now have: unneighborlyfor the subpart. Hence, we have reagitated < drolls < alumnae < serena < forcing < benchmark < tinted < unneighborly < reaccept < samian < desquamatory
Thought 19: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is alumnae benchmark desquamatory drolls forcing reaccept reagitated samian serena tinted unneighborly

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: doubty prostrates translucency sramana displanting manoeuvred attapulgite tremor acridan pochaise virulence

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: doubty: d. prostrates: t. translucency: t. sramana: s. displanting: d. manoeuvred: m. attapulgite: a. tremor: t. acridan: a. pochaise: p. virulence: v.
Thought 2: We now have: ['attapulgite', 'acridan'] < ['doubty', 'displanting'] < manoeuvred < pochaise < sramana < ['prostrates', 'translucency', 'tremor'] < virulence
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['attapulgite', 'acridan']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: attapulgite: t. acridan: c.
Thought 4: We now have: acridan < attapulgitefor the subpart. Hence, we have acridan < attapulgite < ['doubty', 'displanting'] < manoeuvred < pochaise < sramana < ['prostrates', 'translucency', 'tremor'] < virulence
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['doubty', 'displanting']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: doubty: o. displanting: i.
Thought 6: We now have: displanting < doubtyfor the subpart. Hence, we have acridan < attapulgite < displanting < doubty < manoeuvred < pochaise < sramana < ['prostrates', 'translucency', 'tremor'] < virulence
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['prostrates', 'translucency', 'tremor']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: prostrates: r. translucency: r. tremor: r.
Thought 8: We now have: ['prostrates', 'translucency', 'tremor']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['prostrates', 'translucency', 'tremor'] < attapulgite < acridan < doubty < pochaise < manoeuvred < displanting < sramana < virulence
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['prostrates', 'translucency', 'tremor']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: prostrates: o. translucency: a. tremor: e.
Thought 10: We now have: tremor < translucency < prostratesfor the subpart. Hence, we have translucency < tremor < manoeuvred < displanting < attapulgite < pochaise < sramana < acridan < virulence < doubty < prostrates
Thought 11: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is acridan attapulgite displanting doubty manoeuvred pochaise sramana tremor translucency prostrates virulence

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: despots, biblical, unsweetly, quinquennial, teruyuki, infracostalis, monachist, metages, biopsychical, ineruditely, reground, narrowingness
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: h, u, b, d, e, v, x, g, q, w, f, y, a, p, n, o, c, i, r, t, j, s, k, l, z, m

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: despots: s. biblical: l. unsweetly: y. quinquennial: l. teruyuki: i. infracostalis: s. monachist: t. metages: s. biopsychical: l. ineruditely: y. reground: d. narrowingness: s.

We now have: reground < ['unsweetly', 'ineruditely'] < teruyuki < monachist < ['despots', 'infracostalis', 'metages', 'narrowingness'] < ['biblical', 'quinquennial', 'biopsychical']

Now let's sort this subpart ['unsweetly', 'ineruditely']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: unsweetly: l. ineruditely: l.

We now have: ['unsweetly', 'ineruditely']for the subpart. Hence, we have reground < ['unsweetly', 'ineruditely'] < teruyuki < monachist < ['despots', 'infracostalis', 'metages', 'narrowingness'] < ['biblical', 'quinquennial', 'biopsychical']

Now let's sort this subpart ['unsweetly', 'ineruditely']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: unsweetly: t. ineruditely: e.

We now have: ineruditely < unsweetlyfor the subpart. Hence, we have reground < ineruditely < unsweetly < teruyuki < monachist < ['despots', 'infracostalis', 'metages', 'narrowingness'] < ['biblical', 'quinquennial', 'biopsychical']

Now let's sort this subpart ['despots', 'infracostalis', 'metages', 'narrowingness']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: despots: t. infracostalis: i. metages: e. narrowingness: s.

We now have: metages < infracostalis < despots < narrowingnessfor the subpart. Hence, we have reground < ineruditely < unsweetly < teruyuki < monachist < metages < infracostalis < despots < narrowingness < ['biblical', 'quinquennial', 'biopsychical']

Now let's sort this subpart ['biblical', 'quinquennial', 'biopsychical']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: biblical: a. quinquennial: a. biopsychical: a.

We now have: ['biblical', 'quinquennial', 'biopsychical']for the subpart. Hence, we have reground < ineruditely < unsweetly < teruyuki < monachist < metages < infracostalis < despots < narrowingness < ['biblical', 'quinquennial', 'biopsychical']

Now let's sort this subpart ['biblical', 'quinquennial', 'biopsychical']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: biblical: c. quinquennial: i. biopsychical: c.

We now have: ['biblical', 'biopsychical'] < quinquennialfor the subpart. Hence, we have reground < ineruditely < unsweetly < teruyuki < monachist < metages < infracostalis < despots < narrowingness < ['biblical', 'biopsychical'] < quinquennial

Now let's sort this subpart ['biblical', 'biopsychical']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: biblical: i. biopsychical: i.

We now have: ['biblical', 'biopsychical']for the subpart. Hence, we have reground < ineruditely < unsweetly < teruyuki < monachist < metages < infracostalis < despots < narrowingness < ['biblical', 'biopsychical'] < quinquennial

Now let's sort this subpart ['biblical', 'biopsychical']. Looking at the fifth letters from right to left.The fifth letter: biblical: l. biopsychical: h.

We now have: biopsychical < biblicalfor the subpart. Hence, we have reground < ineruditely < unsweetly < teruyuki < monachist < metages < infracostalis < despots < narrowingness < biopsychical < biblical < quinquennial

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is reground ineruditely unsweetly teruyuki monachist metages infracostalis despots narrowingness biopsychical biblical quinquennial

despots biblical unsweetly quinquennial teruyuki infracostalis monachist metages biopsychical ineruditely reground narrowingness

h u b d e v x g q w f y a p n o c i r t j s k l z m


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: jupe thoracicoacromial obmit impertinences hollering radiature pazend bundts sporocarpium costate fink gentrices nonconstricting
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: n, i, d, v, x, l, w, p, s, e, z, h, t, c, q, a, o, f, u, b, j, m, g, y, k, r

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: jupe: e. obmit: t. impertinences: s. hollering: g. radiature: e. pazend: d. bundts: s. sporocarpium: m. costate: e. fink: k. gentrices: s. nonconstricting: g.
Thought 2: We now have: pazend < ['impertinences', 'bundts', 'gentrices'] < ['jupe', 'radiature', 'costate'] < obmit < sporocarpium < ['hollering', 'nonconstricting'] < fink
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['impertinences', 'bundts', 'gentrices']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: impertinences: e. bundts: t. gentrices: e.
Thought 4: We now have: bundts < ['impertinences', 'gentrices']for the subpart. Hence, we have pazend < ['impertinences', 'gentrices'] < bundts < ['jupe', 'radiature', 'costate'] < obmit < sporocarpium < ['hollering', 'nonconstricting'] < fink
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['impertinences', 'gentrices']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: impertinences: c. gentrices: c.
Thought 6: We now have: ['impertinences', 'gentrices']for the subpart. Hence, we have pazend < ['impertinences', 'gentrices'] < bundts < ['jupe', 'radiature', 'costate'] < obmit < sporocarpium < ['hollering', 'nonconstricting'] < fink
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['impertinences', 'gentrices']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: impertinences: n. gentrices: i.
Thought 8: We now have: impertinences < gentricesfor the subpart. Hence, we have pazend < impertinences < gentrices < bundts < ['jupe', 'radiature', 'costate'] < obmit < sporocarpium < ['hollering', 'nonconstricting'] < fink
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['jupe', 'radiature', 'costate']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: jupe: p. radiature: r. costate: t.
Thought 10: We now have: jupe < costate < radiaturefor the subpart. Hence, we have pazend < impertinences < gentrices < bundts < jupe < costate < radiature < obmit < sporocarpium < ['hollering', 'nonconstricting'] < fink
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['hollering', 'nonconstricting']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: hollering: n. nonconstricting: n.
Thought 12: We now have: ['hollering', 'nonconstricting']for the subpart. Hence, we have pazend < impertinences < gentrices < bundts < jupe < costate < radiature < obmit < sporocarpium < ['hollering', 'nonconstricting'] < fink
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['hollering', 'nonconstricting']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: hollering: i. nonconstricting: i.
Thought 14: We now have: ['hollering', 'nonconstricting']for the subpart. Hence, we have pazend < impertinences < gentrices < bundts < jupe < costate < radiature < obmit < sporocarpium < ['hollering', 'nonconstricting'] < fink
Thought 15: Now let's sort this subpart ['hollering', 'nonconstricting']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: hollering: r. nonconstricting: t.
Thought 16: We now have: nonconstricting < holleringfor the subpart. Hence, we have pazend < impertinences < gentrices < bundts < jupe < costate < radiature < obmit < sporocarpium < nonconstricting < hollering < fink
Thought 17: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is pazend bundts impertinences gentrices jupe costate radiature obmit sporocarpium nonconstricting hollering fink

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

n i d v x l w p s e z h t c q a o f u b j m g y k r


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: bladderless, unthoroughness, fettling, portmantle, uncollectible, triternate, unexpropriable, gelatine, sinnet, ulmaceous, reaggregate, recivilize, himalaya
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: c, m, b, s, v, n, w, l, z, p, j, u, t, a, k, y, h, g, e, o, f, x, i, d, r, q

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: bladderless: s. unthoroughness: s. fettling: g. portmantle: e. uncollectible: e. triternate: e. unexpropriable: e. gelatine: e. sinnet: t. ulmaceous: s. reaggregate: e. recivilize: e. himalaya: a.

We now have: ['bladderless', 'unthoroughness', 'ulmaceous'] < sinnet < himalaya < fettling < ['portmantle', 'uncollectible', 'triternate', 'unexpropriable', 'gelatine', 'reaggregate', 'recivilize']

Now let's sort this subpart ['bladderless', 'unthoroughness', 'ulmaceous']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: bladderless: s. unthoroughness: s. ulmaceous: u.

We now have: ['bladderless', 'unthoroughness'] < ulmaceousfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['bladderless', 'unthoroughness'] < ulmaceous < sinnet < himalaya < fettling < ['portmantle', 'uncollectible', 'triternate', 'unexpropriable', 'gelatine', 'reaggregate', 'recivilize']

Now let's sort this subpart ['bladderless', 'unthoroughness']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: bladderless: e. unthoroughness: e.

We now have: ['bladderless', 'unthoroughness']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['bladderless', 'unthoroughness'] < ulmaceous < sinnet < himalaya < fettling < ['portmantle', 'uncollectible', 'triternate', 'unexpropriable', 'gelatine', 'reaggregate', 'recivilize']

Now let's sort this subpart ['bladderless', 'unthoroughness']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: bladderless: l. unthoroughness: n.

We now have: unthoroughness < bladderlessfor the subpart. Hence, we have unthoroughness < bladderless < ulmaceous < sinnet < himalaya < fettling < ['portmantle', 'uncollectible', 'triternate', 'unexpropriable', 'gelatine', 'reaggregate', 'recivilize']

Now let's sort this subpart ['portmantle', 'uncollectible', 'triternate', 'unexpropriable', 'gelatine', 'reaggregate', 'recivilize']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: portmantle: l. uncollectible: l. triternate: t. unexpropriable: l. gelatine: n. reaggregate: t. recivilize: z.

We now have: gelatine < ['portmantle', 'uncollectible', 'unexpropriable'] < recivilize < ['triternate', 'reaggregate']for the subpart. Hence, we have unthoroughness < bladderless < ulmaceous < sinnet < himalaya < fettling < gelatine < ['portmantle', 'uncollectible', 'unexpropriable'] < recivilize < ['triternate', 'reaggregate']

Now let's sort this subpart ['portmantle', 'uncollectible', 'unexpropriable']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: portmantle: t. uncollectible: b. unexpropriable: b.

We now have: ['uncollectible', 'unexpropriable'] < portmantlefor the subpart. Hence, we have unthoroughness < bladderless < ulmaceous < sinnet < himalaya < fettling < gelatine < ['uncollectible', 'unexpropriable'] < portmantle < recivilize < ['triternate', 'reaggregate']

Now let's sort this subpart ['uncollectible', 'unexpropriable']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: uncollectible: i. unexpropriable: a.

We now have: unexpropriable < uncollectiblefor the subpart. Hence, we have unthoroughness < bladderless < ulmaceous < sinnet < himalaya < fettling < gelatine < unexpropriable < uncollectible < portmantle < recivilize < ['triternate', 'reaggregate']

Now let's sort this subpart ['triternate', 'reaggregate']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: triternate: a. reaggregate: a.

We now have: ['triternate', 'reaggregate']for the subpart. Hence, we have unthoroughness < bladderless < ulmaceous < sinnet < himalaya < fettling < gelatine < unexpropriable < uncollectible < portmantle < recivilize < ['triternate', 'reaggregate']

Now let's sort this subpart ['triternate', 'reaggregate']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: triternate: n. reaggregate: g.

We now have: triternate < reaggregatefor the subpart. Hence, we have unthoroughness < bladderless < ulmaceous < sinnet < himalaya < fettling < gelatine < unexpropriable < uncollectible < portmantle < recivilize < triternate < reaggregate

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is unthoroughness bladderless ulmaceous sinnet himalaya fettling gelatine unexpropriable uncollectible portmantle recivilize triternate reaggregate

bladderless unthoroughness fettling portmantle uncollectible triternate unexpropriable gelatine sinnet ulmaceous reaggregate recivilize himalaya

c m b s v n w l z p j u t a k y h g e o f x i d r q


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: aquafer unentrance vocalizing etymonic guglets unchivalrously incentively expertized integrifolious egocentrically profluvium isohydric
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: w, y, s, g, l, o, t, c, u, k, x, p, b, n, z, h, r, m, q, e, i, f, d, j, v, a

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: aquafer: r. unentrance: e. vocalizing: g. etymonic: c. guglets: s. unchivalrously: y. incentively: y. expertized: d. integrifolious: s. egocentrically: y. profluvium: m. isohydric: c.
Thought 2: We now have: ['unchivalrously', 'incentively', 'egocentrically'] < ['guglets', 'integrifolious'] < vocalizing < ['etymonic', 'isohydric'] < aquafer < profluvium < unentrance < expertized
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['unchivalrously', 'incentively', 'egocentrically']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: unchivalrously: l. incentively: l. egocentrically: l.
Thought 4: We now have: ['unchivalrously', 'incentively', 'egocentrically']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['unchivalrously', 'incentively', 'egocentrically'] < ['guglets', 'integrifolious'] < vocalizing < ['etymonic', 'isohydric'] < aquafer < profluvium < unentrance < expertized
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['unchivalrously', 'incentively', 'egocentrically']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: incentively: e. egocentrically: l.
Thought 6: We now have: egocentrically < incentivelyfor the subpart. Hence, we have egocentrically < incentively < ['guglets', 'integrifolious'] < vocalizing < ['etymonic', 'isohydric'] < aquafer < profluvium < unentrance < expertized
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['guglets', 'integrifolious']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: guglets: t. integrifolious: u.
Thought 8: We now have: integrifolious < gugletsfor the subpart. Hence, we have egocentrically < incentively < guglets < integrifolious < vocalizing < ['etymonic', 'isohydric'] < aquafer < profluvium < unentrance < expertized
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['etymonic', 'isohydric']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: etymonic: i. isohydric: i.
Thought 10: We now have: ['etymonic', 'isohydric']for the subpart. Hence, we have egocentrically < incentively < guglets < integrifolious < vocalizing < ['etymonic', 'isohydric'] < aquafer < profluvium < unentrance < expertized
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['etymonic', 'isohydric']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: etymonic: n. isohydric: r.
Thought 12: We now have: etymonic < isohydricfor the subpart. Hence, we have egocentrically < incentively < guglets < integrifolious < vocalizing < etymonic < isohydric < aquafer < profluvium < unentrance < expertized
Thought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is egocentrically incentively integrifolious guglets vocalizing etymonic isohydric aquafer profluvium unentrance expertized

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

w y s g l o t c u k x p b n z h r m q e i f d j v a


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: sulphostannate, preexposed, unscriptural, pederastically, phenacyl, unjogged, hebrewess, spirantization, stereotomic
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: m, q, z, h, p, l, t, g, e, v, w, i, k, r, y, o, c, j, d, b, s, a, f, x, n, u

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: sulphostannate: e. preexposed: d. unscriptural: l. pederastically: y. phenacyl: l. unjogged: d. hebrewess: s. spirantization: n. stereotomic: c.

We now have: ['unscriptural', 'phenacyl'] < sulphostannate < pederastically < stereotomic < ['preexposed', 'unjogged'] < hebrewess < spirantization

Now let's sort this subpart ['unscriptural', 'phenacyl']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: unscriptural: a. phenacyl: y.

We now have: phenacyl < unscripturalfor the subpart. Hence, we have phenacyl < unscriptural < sulphostannate < pederastically < stereotomic < ['preexposed', 'unjogged'] < hebrewess < spirantization

Now let's sort this subpart ['preexposed', 'unjogged']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: preexposed: e. unjogged: e.

We now have: ['preexposed', 'unjogged']for the subpart. Hence, we have phenacyl < unscriptural < sulphostannate < pederastically < stereotomic < ['preexposed', 'unjogged'] < hebrewess < spirantization

Now let's sort this subpart ['preexposed', 'unjogged']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: preexposed: s. unjogged: g.

We now have: unjogged < preexposedfor the subpart. Hence, we have phenacyl < unscriptural < sulphostannate < pederastically < stereotomic < unjogged < preexposed < hebrewess < spirantization

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is phenacyl unscriptural sulphostannate pederastically stereotomic unjogged preexposed hebrewess spirantization

sulphostannate preexposed unscriptural pederastically phenacyl unjogged hebrewess spirantization stereotomic

m q z h p l t g e v w i k r y o c j d b s a f x n u


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: shadufs yappiness geomorphogeny clype surgeries gluttonised appro sciotheric cathouse sheddable pycnocoma carbonade imband

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: shadufs: s. yappiness: y. geomorphogeny: g. clype: c. surgeries: s. gluttonised: g. appro: a. sciotheric: s. cathouse: c. sheddable: s. pycnocoma: p. carbonade: c. imband: i.
Thought 2: We now have: appro < ['clype', 'cathouse', 'carbonade'] < ['geomorphogeny', 'gluttonised'] < imband < pycnocoma < ['shadufs', 'surgeries', 'sciotheric', 'sheddable'] < yappiness
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['clype', 'cathouse', 'carbonade']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: cathouse: a. carbonade: a.
Thought 4: We now have: ['cathouse', 'carbonade']for the subpart. Hence, we have imband < yappiness < ['cathouse', 'carbonade'] < pycnocoma < ['geomorphogeny', 'gluttonised'] < appro < ['shadufs', 'surgeries', 'sciotheric', 'sheddable']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['cathouse', 'carbonade']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: cathouse: t. carbonade: r.
Thought 6: We now have: carbonade < cathousefor the subpart. Hence, we have appro < imband < ['geomorphogeny', 'gluttonised'] < ['shadufs', 'surgeries', 'sciotheric', 'sheddable'] < cathouse < pycnocoma < yappiness < carbonade
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['geomorphogeny', 'gluttonised']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: geomorphogeny: e. gluttonised: l.
Thought 8: We now have: geomorphogeny < gluttonisedfor the subpart. Hence, we have appro < imband < geomorphogeny < gluttonised < ['shadufs', 'surgeries', 'sciotheric', 'sheddable'] < cathouse < pycnocoma < yappiness < carbonade
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['shadufs', 'surgeries', 'sciotheric', 'sheddable']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: shadufs: h. surgeries: u. sciotheric: c. sheddable: h.
Thought 10: We now have: sciotheric < ['shadufs', 'sheddable'] < surgeriesfor the subpart. Hence, we have appro < imband < geomorphogeny < gluttonised < sciotheric < ['shadufs', 'sheddable'] < surgeries < cathouse < pycnocoma < yappiness < carbonade
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['shadufs', 'sheddable']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: shadufs: a. sheddable: e.
Thought 12: We now have: shadufs < sheddablefor the subpart. Hence, we have imband < gluttonised < shadufs < geomorphogeny < carbonade < sheddable < appro < cathouse < sciotheric < yappiness < surgeries < pycnocoma
Thought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is appro carbonade cathouse geomorphogeny gluttonised imband pycnocoma sciotheric shadufs sheddable surgeries yappiness

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: underdog, elegant, overscrupling, osteodiastasis, patriotship, roofward, sphagia, ansulate, intervertebral, contortionistic, antheriferous, selictar, concertantes, tetratheism
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: x, c, j, e, w, m, z, l, y, g, s, v, i, h, q, f, a, p, n, t, r, d, k, u, b, o

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: underdog: u. elegant: e. overscrupling: o. osteodiastasis: o. patriotship: p. roofward: r. sphagia: s. ansulate: a. intervertebral: i. contortionistic: c. antheriferous: a. selictar: s. concertantes: c. tetratheism: t.

We now have: ['contortionistic', 'concertantes'] < elegant < ['sphagia', 'selictar'] < intervertebral < ['ansulate', 'antheriferous'] < patriotship < tetratheism < roofward < underdog < ['overscrupling', 'osteodiastasis']

Now let's sort this subpart ['contortionistic', 'concertantes']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: contortionistic: o. concertantes: o.

We now have: ['contortionistic', 'concertantes']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['contortionistic', 'concertantes'] < elegant < ['sphagia', 'selictar'] < intervertebral < ['ansulate', 'antheriferous'] < patriotship < tetratheism < roofward < underdog < ['overscrupling', 'osteodiastasis']

Now let's sort this subpart ['contortionistic', 'concertantes']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: contortionistic: n. concertantes: n.

Now let's sort this subpart ['contortionistic', 'concertantes']. Looking at the fourth letters.The fourth letter: contortionistic: t. concertantes: c.

We now have: concertantes < contortionisticfor the subpart. Hence, we have concertantes < contortionistic < elegant < ['sphagia', 'selictar'] < intervertebral < ['ansulate', 'antheriferous'] < patriotship < tetratheism < roofward < underdog < ['overscrupling', 'osteodiastasis']

Now let's sort this subpart ['sphagia', 'selictar']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: sphagia: p. selictar: e.

We now have: selictar < sphagiafor the subpart. Hence, we have concertantes < contortionistic < elegant < selictar < sphagia < intervertebral < ['ansulate', 'antheriferous'] < patriotship < tetratheism < roofward < underdog < ['overscrupling', 'osteodiastasis']

Now let's sort this subpart ['ansulate', 'antheriferous']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: ansulate: n. antheriferous: n.

We now have: ['ansulate', 'antheriferous']for the subpart. Hence, we have concertantes < contortionistic < elegant < selictar < sphagia < intervertebral < ['ansulate', 'antheriferous'] < patriotship < tetratheism < roofward < underdog < ['overscrupling', 'osteodiastasis']

Now let's sort this subpart ['ansulate', 'antheriferous']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: ansulate: s. antheriferous: t.

We now have: ansulate < antheriferousfor the subpart. Hence, we have concertantes < contortionistic < elegant < selictar < sphagia < intervertebral < ansulate < antheriferous < patriotship < tetratheism < roofward < underdog < ['overscrupling', 'osteodiastasis']

Now let's sort this subpart ['overscrupling', 'osteodiastasis']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: overscrupling: v. osteodiastasis: s.

We now have: osteodiastasis < overscruplingfor the subpart. Hence, we have concertantes < contortionistic < elegant < selictar < sphagia < intervertebral < ansulate < antheriferous < patriotship < tetratheism < roofward < underdog < osteodiastasis < overscrupling

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is concertantes contortionistic elegant selictar sphagia intervertebral ansulate antheriferous patriotship tetratheism roofward underdog osteodiastasis overscrupling

underdog elegant overscrupling osteodiastasis patriotship roofward sphagia ansulate intervertebral contortionistic antheriferous selictar concertantes tetratheism

x c j e w m z l y g s v i h q f a p n t r d k u b o


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: warklume, tankerabogus, millimho, unmoated, unsaponified, ultramicro, remobilizing, rebate, axiferous, interresponsibility, skewnesses

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: warklume: w. tankerabogus: t. millimho: m. unmoated: u. unsaponified: u. ultramicro: u. remobilizing: r. rebate: r. axiferous: a. interresponsibility: i. skewnesses: s.

We now have: axiferous < interresponsibility < millimho < ['remobilizing', 'rebate'] < skewnesses < tankerabogus < ['unmoated', 'unsaponified', 'ultramicro'] < warklume

Now let's sort this subpart ['remobilizing', 'rebate']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: remobilizing: e. rebate: e.

We now have: ['remobilizing', 'rebate']for the subpart. Hence, we have axiferous < interresponsibility < millimho < ['remobilizing', 'rebate'] < skewnesses < tankerabogus < ['unmoated', 'unsaponified', 'ultramicro'] < warklume

Now let's sort this subpart ['remobilizing', 'rebate']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: remobilizing: m. rebate: b.

We now have: rebate < remobilizingfor the subpart. Hence, we have axiferous < interresponsibility < millimho < rebate < remobilizing < skewnesses < tankerabogus < ['unmoated', 'unsaponified', 'ultramicro'] < warklume

Now let's sort this subpart ['unmoated', 'unsaponified', 'ultramicro']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: unmoated: n. unsaponified: n. ultramicro: l.

We now have: ultramicro < ['unmoated', 'unsaponified']for the subpart. Hence, we have axiferous < interresponsibility < millimho < rebate < remobilizing < skewnesses < tankerabogus < ultramicro < ['unmoated', 'unsaponified'] < warklume

Now let's sort this subpart ['unmoated', 'unsaponified']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: unmoated: m. unsaponified: s.

We now have: unmoated < unsaponifiedfor the subpart. Hence, we have axiferous < interresponsibility < millimho < rebate < remobilizing < skewnesses < tankerabogus < ultramicro < unmoated < unsaponified < warklume

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is axiferous interresponsibility millimho rebate remobilizing skewnesses tankerabogus ultramicro unmoated unsaponified warklume

warklume tankerabogus millimho unmoated unsaponified ultramicro remobilizing rebate axiferous interresponsibility skewnesses


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: rumbled congos nonpervertible fairkeeper cobleskill preorder handsbreadth nonchangeable intorts cranch spiderless subtilist inconsumable nonpapistic orth

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: rumbled: r. congos: c. nonpervertible: n. fairkeeper: f. cobleskill: c. preorder: p. handsbreadth: h. nonchangeable: n. intorts: i. cranch: c. spiderless: s. subtilist: l. inconsumable: i. nonpapistic: n. orth: o.
Thought 2: We now have: ['congos', 'cobleskill', 'cranch'] < fairkeeper < handsbreadth < ['intorts', 'inconsumable'] < subtilist < ['nonpervertible', 'nonchangeable', 'nonpapistic'] < orth < preorder < rumbled < spiderless
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['congos', 'cobleskill', 'cranch']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: congos: o. cobleskill: o. cranch: r.
Thought 4: We now have: ['congos', 'cobleskill'] < cranchfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['congos', 'cobleskill'] < cranch < fairkeeper < handsbreadth < ['intorts', 'inconsumable'] < subtilist < ['nonpervertible', 'nonchangeable', 'nonpapistic'] < orth < preorder < rumbled < spiderless
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['congos', 'cobleskill']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: congos: n. cobleskill: b.
Thought 6: We now have: cobleskill < congosfor the subpart. Hence, we have rumbled < cobleskill < ['nonpervertible', 'nonchangeable', 'nonpapistic'] < congos < spiderless < fairkeeper < cranch < subtilist < preorder < handsbreadth < orth < ['intorts', 'inconsumable']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['intorts', 'inconsumable']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: intorts: n. inconsumable: n.
Thought 8: We now have: ['intorts', 'inconsumable']for the subpart. Hence, we have rumbled < cobleskill < ['nonpervertible', 'nonchangeable', 'nonpapistic'] < congos < spiderless < fairkeeper < cranch < subtilist < preorder < handsbreadth < orth < ['intorts', 'inconsumable']
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['intorts', 'inconsumable']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: intorts: t. inconsumable: c.
Thought 10: We now have: inconsumable < intortsfor the subpart. Hence, we have rumbled < cobleskill < ['nonpervertible', 'nonchangeable', 'nonpapistic'] < congos < spiderless < fairkeeper < cranch < subtilist < preorder < handsbreadth < orth < inconsumable < intorts
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['nonpervertible', 'nonchangeable', 'nonpapistic']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: nonpervertible: o. nonchangeable: o. nonpapistic: o.
Thought 12: We now have: ['nonpervertible', 'nonchangeable', 'nonpapistic']for the subpart. Hence, we have cranch < ['nonpervertible', 'nonchangeable', 'nonpapistic'] < fairkeeper < preorder < orth < rumbled < inconsumable < intorts < handsbreadth < spiderless < congos < cobleskill < subtilist
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['nonpervertible', 'nonchangeable', 'nonpapistic']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: nonpervertible: n. nonchangeable: n. nonpapistic: t.
Thought 14: We now have: ['nonpervertible', 'nonchangeable'] < nonpapisticfor the subpart. Hence, we have cranch < ['nonpervertible', 'nonchangeable'] < nonpapistic < fairkeeper < preorder < orth < rumbled < inconsumable < intorts < handsbreadth < spiderless < congos < cobleskill < subtilist
Thought 15: Now let's sort this subpart ['nonpervertible', 'nonchangeable']. Looking at the fourth letters.The fourth letter: nonpervertible: p. nonchangeable: c.
Thought 16: We now have: nonchangeable < nonpervertiblefor the subpart. Hence, we have cranch < nonchangeable < nonpervertible < nonpapistic < fairkeeper < preorder < orth < rumbled < inconsumable < intorts < handsbreadth < spiderless < congos < cobleskill < subtilist
Thought 17: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is cobleskill congos cranch fairkeeper handsbreadth inconsumable intorts subtilist nonchangeable nonpervertible nonpapistic orth preorder rumbled spiderless

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: schematiser, tumming, becollier, cariosity, architectural, forgave, amante, liberalness, dixie, despatcher, pudenda, inconspicuously, penlike, turcize
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: k, b, f, i, r, p, e, m, a, h, l, w, z, j, g, u, c, q, t, s, o, y, d, v, n, x

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: schematiser: r. tumming: g. becollier: r. cariosity: y. architectural: l. forgave: e. amante: e. liberalness: s. dixie: e. despatcher: r. pudenda: a. inconspicuously: y. penlike: e. turcize: e.

We now have: ['schematiser', 'becollier', 'despatcher'] < ['forgave', 'amante', 'dixie', 'penlike', 'turcize'] < pudenda < architectural < tumming < liberalness < ['cariosity', 'inconspicuously']

Now let's sort this subpart ['schematiser', 'becollier', 'despatcher']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: schematiser: e. becollier: e. despatcher: e.

We now have: ['schematiser', 'becollier', 'despatcher']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['schematiser', 'becollier', 'despatcher'] < ['forgave', 'amante', 'dixie', 'penlike', 'turcize'] < pudenda < architectural < tumming < liberalness < ['cariosity', 'inconspicuously']

Now let's sort this subpart ['schematiser', 'becollier', 'despatcher']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: schematiser: s. becollier: i. despatcher: h.

We now have: becollier < despatcher < schematiserfor the subpart. Hence, we have becollier < despatcher < schematiser < ['forgave', 'amante', 'dixie', 'penlike', 'turcize'] < pudenda < architectural < tumming < liberalness < ['cariosity', 'inconspicuously']

Now let's sort this subpart ['forgave', 'amante', 'dixie', 'penlike', 'turcize']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: forgave: v. amante: t. dixie: i. penlike: k. turcize: z.

We now have: penlike < dixie < turcize < amante < forgavefor the subpart. Hence, we have becollier < despatcher < schematiser < penlike < dixie < turcize < amante < forgave < pudenda < architectural < tumming < liberalness < ['cariosity', 'inconspicuously']

Now let's sort this subpart ['cariosity', 'inconspicuously']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: cariosity: t. inconspicuously: l.

We now have: inconspicuously < cariosityfor the subpart. Hence, we have becollier < despatcher < schematiser < penlike < dixie < turcize < amante < forgave < pudenda < architectural < tumming < liberalness < inconspicuously < cariosity

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is becollier despatcher schematiser penlike dixie turcize amante forgave pudenda architectural tumming liberalness inconspicuously cariosity

schematiser tumming becollier cariosity architectural forgave amante liberalness dixie despatcher pudenda inconspicuously penlike turcize

k b f i r p e m a h l w z j g u c q t s o y d v n x


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: sulphurously urochs metapostscutellum geobotany urbanization misprized catastrophe diplomas
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: j, o, d, h, f, z, y, c, r, x, s, p, a, b, v, e, m, g, k, q, u, l, i, w, t, n

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: sulphurously: s. urochs: u. metapostscutellum: m. geobotany: g. urbanization: u. misprized: m. catastrophe: c. diplomas: d.
Thought 2: We now have: diplomas < catastrophe < sulphurously < ['metapostscutellum', 'misprized'] < geobotany < ['urochs', 'urbanization']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['metapostscutellum', 'misprized']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: metapostscutellum: e. misprized: i.
Thought 4: We now have: metapostscutellum < misprizedfor the subpart. Hence, we have diplomas < catastrophe < sulphurously < metapostscutellum < misprized < geobotany < ['urochs', 'urbanization']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['urochs', 'urbanization']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: urochs: r. urbanization: r.
Thought 6: We now have: ['urochs', 'urbanization']for the subpart. Hence, we have diplomas < metapostscutellum < catastrophe < misprized < ['urochs', 'urbanization'] < sulphurously < geobotany
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['urochs', 'urbanization']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: urochs: o. urbanization: b.
Thought 8: We now have: urochs < urbanizationfor the subpart. Hence, we have diplomas < metapostscutellum < catastrophe < misprized < urochs < urbanization < sulphurously < geobotany
Thought 9: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is diplomas catastrophe sulphurously metapostscutellum misprized geobotany urochs urbanization

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

j o d h f z y c r x s p a b v e m g k q u l i w t n


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: staghead, iridaceae, pardalote, aktiebolag, ignitive, valiantly, leisured, honeywort, copaliferous, shoor, handsomer, unadvocated, emotionalistic, galesaurus, mesopause

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: staghead: s. iridaceae: i. pardalote: p. aktiebolag: a. ignitive: i. valiantly: v. leisured: l. honeywort: h. copaliferous: c. shoor: s. handsomer: h. unadvocated: u. emotionalistic: e. galesaurus: g. mesopause: m.

We now have: aktiebolag < copaliferous < emotionalistic < galesaurus < ['honeywort', 'handsomer'] < ['iridaceae', 'ignitive'] < leisured < mesopause < pardalote < ['staghead', 'shoor'] < unadvocated < valiantly

Now let's sort this subpart ['honeywort', 'handsomer']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: honeywort: o. handsomer: a.

We now have: handsomer < honeywortfor the subpart. Hence, we have aktiebolag < copaliferous < emotionalistic < galesaurus < handsomer < honeywort < ['iridaceae', 'ignitive'] < leisured < mesopause < pardalote < ['staghead', 'shoor'] < unadvocated < valiantly

Now let's sort this subpart ['iridaceae', 'ignitive']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: iridaceae: r. ignitive: g.

We now have: ignitive < iridaceaefor the subpart. Hence, we have aktiebolag < copaliferous < emotionalistic < galesaurus < handsomer < honeywort < ignitive < iridaceae < leisured < mesopause < pardalote < ['staghead', 'shoor'] < unadvocated < valiantly

Now let's sort this subpart ['staghead', 'shoor']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: staghead: t. shoor: h.

We now have: shoor < stagheadfor the subpart. Hence, we have aktiebolag < copaliferous < emotionalistic < galesaurus < handsomer < honeywort < ignitive < iridaceae < leisured < mesopause < pardalote < shoor < staghead < unadvocated < valiantly

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is aktiebolag copaliferous emotionalistic galesaurus handsomer honeywort ignitive iridaceae leisured mesopause pardalote shoor staghead unadvocated valiantly

staghead iridaceae pardalote aktiebolag ignitive valiantly leisured honeywort copaliferous shoor handsomer unadvocated emotionalistic galesaurus mesopause


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: nonaddresser buoyant misdelivery uninstitutionally uncreated upreach clamours litterers
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: p, v, s, f, q, e, w, u, c, x, r, a, o, z, k, d, l, n, h, t, j, g, y, i, m, b

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: buoyant: b. misdelivery: m. uninstitutionally: u. uncreated: u. upreach: u. clamours: l. litterers: l.
Thought 2: We now have: ['clamours', 'litterers'] < buoyant < ['uninstitutionally', 'uncreated', 'upreach'] < misdelivery
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['clamours', 'litterers']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: clamours: l. litterers: i.
Thought 4: We now have: clamours < litterersfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['uninstitutionally', 'uncreated', 'upreach'] < clamours < litterers < misdelivery < buoyant
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['uninstitutionally', 'uncreated', 'upreach']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: uninstitutionally: n. uncreated: n.
Thought 6: We now have: ['uninstitutionally', 'uncreated']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['uninstitutionally', 'uncreated'] < clamours < litterers < misdelivery < buoyant
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['uninstitutionally', 'uncreated']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: uninstitutionally: u. uncreated: c.
Thought 8: We now have: uncreated < uninstitutionallyfor the subpart. Hence, we have uninstitutionally < uncreated < clamours < litterers < misdelivery < buoyant
Thought 9: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is clamours litterers buoyant uncreated uninstitutionally misdelivery

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

p v s f q e w u c x r a o z k d l n h t j g y i m b


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: bicorporeal, quintelement, wendi, cestoidean, tagel, stumbler, recycled, cryptoanalytics
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: w, v, h, e, r, m, g, f, a, o, p, j, i, t, q, n, y, l, u, k, s, z, d, c, x, b

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: bicorporeal: l. quintelement: t. wendi: i. cestoidean: n. tagel: l. stumbler: r. recycled: d. cryptoanalytics: s.

We now have: stumbler < wendi < quintelement < cestoidean < ['bicorporeal', 'tagel'] < cryptoanalytics < recycled

Now let's sort this subpart ['bicorporeal', 'tagel']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: bicorporeal: a. tagel: e.

We now have: tagel < bicorporealfor the subpart. Hence, we have stumbler < wendi < quintelement < cestoidean < tagel < bicorporeal < cryptoanalytics < recycled

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is stumbler wendi quintelement cestoidean tagel bicorporeal cryptoanalytics recycled

bicorporeal quintelement wendi cestoidean tagel stumbler recycled cryptoanalytics

w v h e r m g f a o p j i t q n y l u k s z d c x b


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: splinterize, somatocyst, aftervision, caci, maund, townee, prolarva, photocampsis, presuming, fruitfullest, hematocryal, parked, ecdemic, curtsies, laparogastrotomy
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: p, v, e, s, u, y, t, g, d, n, l, a, h, r, q, k, z, o, m, j, i, w, b, x, f, c

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: splinterize: s. somatocyst: s. aftervision: a. caci: c. maund: m. townee: t. prolarva: p. photocampsis: p. presuming: p. fruitfullest: f. hematocryal: h. parked: p. ecdemic: e. curtsies: c. laparogastrotomy: l.

We now have: ['prolarva', 'photocampsis', 'presuming', 'parked'] < ecdemic < ['splinterize', 'somatocyst'] < townee < laparogastrotomy < aftervision < hematocryal < maund < fruitfullest < ['caci', 'curtsies']

Now let's sort this subpart ['prolarva', 'photocampsis', 'presuming', 'parked']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: prolarva: r. photocampsis: h. presuming: r. parked: a.

We now have: parked < photocampsis < ['prolarva', 'presuming']for the subpart. Hence, we have parked < photocampsis < ['prolarva', 'presuming'] < ecdemic < ['splinterize', 'somatocyst'] < townee < laparogastrotomy < aftervision < hematocryal < maund < fruitfullest < ['caci', 'curtsies']

Now let's sort this subpart ['prolarva', 'presuming']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: prolarva: o. presuming: e.

We now have: presuming < prolarvafor the subpart. Hence, we have parked < photocampsis < presuming < prolarva < ecdemic < ['splinterize', 'somatocyst'] < townee < laparogastrotomy < aftervision < hematocryal < maund < fruitfullest < ['caci', 'curtsies']

Now let's sort this subpart ['splinterize', 'somatocyst']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: splinterize: p. somatocyst: o.

We now have: splinterize < somatocystfor the subpart. Hence, we have parked < photocampsis < presuming < prolarva < ecdemic < splinterize < somatocyst < townee < laparogastrotomy < aftervision < hematocryal < maund < fruitfullest < ['caci', 'curtsies']

Now let's sort this subpart ['caci', 'curtsies']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: caci: a. curtsies: u.

We now have: curtsies < cacifor the subpart. Hence, we have parked < photocampsis < presuming < prolarva < ecdemic < splinterize < somatocyst < townee < laparogastrotomy < aftervision < hematocryal < maund < fruitfullest < curtsies < caci

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is parked photocampsis presuming prolarva ecdemic splinterize somatocyst townee laparogastrotomy aftervision hematocryal maund fruitfullest curtsies caci

splinterize somatocyst aftervision caci maund townee prolarva photocampsis presuming fruitfullest hematocryal parked ecdemic curtsies laparogastrotomy

p v e s u y t g d n l a h r q k z o m j i w b x f c


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: pumpernickel, cryonics, physeterine, anti, prethoracic, colophane, boatel, abobra
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: s, x, u, e, j, g, n, p, o, y, i, b, v, z, r, f, w, a, t, m, l, h, d, c, q, k

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: pumpernickel: p. cryonics: c. physeterine: p. anti: a. prethoracic: p. colophane: c. boatel: b. abobra: a.

We now have: ['pumpernickel', 'physeterine', 'prethoracic'] < boatel < ['anti', 'abobra'] < ['cryonics', 'colophane']

Now let's sort this subpart ['pumpernickel', 'physeterine', 'prethoracic']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: pumpernickel: u. physeterine: h. prethoracic: r.

We now have: pumpernickel < prethoracic < physeterinefor the subpart. Hence, we have pumpernickel < prethoracic < physeterine < boatel < ['anti', 'abobra'] < ['cryonics', 'colophane']

Now let's sort this subpart ['anti', 'abobra']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: anti: n. abobra: b.

We now have: anti < abobrafor the subpart. Hence, we have pumpernickel < prethoracic < physeterine < boatel < anti < abobra < ['cryonics', 'colophane']

Now let's sort this subpart ['cryonics', 'colophane']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: cryonics: r. colophane: o.

We now have: colophane < cryonicsfor the subpart. Hence, we have pumpernickel < prethoracic < physeterine < boatel < anti < abobra < colophane < cryonics

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is pumpernickel prethoracic physeterine boatel anti abobra colophane cryonics

pumpernickel cryonics physeterine anti prethoracic colophane boatel abobra

s x u e j g n p o y i b v z r f w a t m l h d c q k


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: outpractice, befouling, irritomotile, pornographically, bookmark, taxis, sudor, carbohydride, pasterer, digitipinnate
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: f, s, j, y, q, d, c, m, l, o, a, r, h, g, w, x, k, e, z, t, v, p, i, n, u, b

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: outpractice: e. befouling: g. irritomotile: e. pornographically: y. bookmark: k. taxis: s. sudor: r. carbohydride: e. pasterer: r. digitipinnate: e.

We now have: taxis < pornographically < ['sudor', 'pasterer'] < befouling < bookmark < ['outpractice', 'irritomotile', 'carbohydride', 'digitipinnate']

Now let's sort this subpart ['sudor', 'pasterer']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: sudor: o. pasterer: e.

We now have: sudor < pastererfor the subpart. Hence, we have taxis < pornographically < sudor < pasterer < befouling < bookmark < ['outpractice', 'irritomotile', 'carbohydride', 'digitipinnate']

Now let's sort this subpart ['outpractice', 'irritomotile', 'carbohydride', 'digitipinnate']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: outpractice: c. irritomotile: l. carbohydride: d. digitipinnate: t.

We now have: carbohydride < outpractice < irritomotile < digitipinnatefor the subpart. Hence, we have taxis < pornographically < sudor < pasterer < befouling < bookmark < carbohydride < outpractice < irritomotile < digitipinnate

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is taxis pornographically sudor pasterer befouling bookmark carbohydride outpractice irritomotile digitipinnate

outpractice befouling irritomotile pornographically bookmark taxis sudor carbohydride pasterer digitipinnate

f s j y q d c m l o a r h g w x k e z t v p i n u b


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: mauler gonys aile talliating essay pyribole gormand subthalamus
There are some special requirements:

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: mauler: r. gonys: s. aile: e. talliating: g. essay: y. pyribole: e. gormand: d. subthalamus: s.
Thought 2: We now have: gormand < ['aile', 'pyribole'] < talliating < mauler < ['gonys', 'subthalamus'] < essay
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['aile', 'pyribole']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: aile: l. pyribole: l.
Thought 4: We now have: ['aile', 'pyribole']for the subpart. Hence, we have gormand < ['aile', 'pyribole'] < talliating < mauler < ['gonys', 'subthalamus'] < essay
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['aile', 'pyribole']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: aile: i. pyribole: o.
Thought 6: We now have: aile < pyribolefor the subpart. Hence, we have gormand < aile < pyribole < talliating < mauler < ['gonys', 'subthalamus'] < essay
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['gonys', 'subthalamus']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: gonys: y. subthalamus: u.
Thought 8: We now have: subthalamus < gonysfor the subpart. Hence, we have gormand < aile < pyribole < talliating < mauler < subthalamus < gonys < essay
Thought 9: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is gormand aile pyribole talliating mauler subthalamus gonys essay

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: entoilment rebox catheterizing diphosphate loyalist unconfuting wilburite remissibly tantara sparily incontrovertibility youse grummet lophiodontoid effulgence friesish
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: g, h, u, f, l, t, b, y, w, s, n, e, z, m, c, k, a, v, o, r, x, i, j, d, p, q

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: entoilment: t. rebox: x. catheterizing: g. diphosphate: e. loyalist: t. unconfuting: g. wilburite: e. remissibly: l. tantara: a. sparily: y. incontrovertibility: y. youse: e. grummet: t. lophiodontoid: d. effulgence: e. friesish: h.
Thought 2: We now have: ['catheterizing', 'unconfuting'] < friesish < remissibly < ['entoilment', 'loyalist', 'grummet'] < ['sparily', 'incontrovertibility'] < ['diphosphate', 'wilburite', 'youse', 'effulgence'] < tantara < rebox < lophiodontoid
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['catheterizing', 'unconfuting']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: catheterizing: n. unconfuting: n.
Thought 4: We now have: ['catheterizing', 'unconfuting']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['catheterizing', 'unconfuting'] < friesish < remissibly < ['entoilment', 'loyalist', 'grummet'] < ['sparily', 'incontrovertibility'] < ['diphosphate', 'wilburite', 'youse', 'effulgence'] < tantara < rebox < lophiodontoid
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['catheterizing', 'unconfuting']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: catheterizing: i. unconfuting: i.
Thought 6: We now have: ['catheterizing', 'unconfuting']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['catheterizing', 'unconfuting'] < friesish < remissibly < ['entoilment', 'loyalist', 'grummet'] < ['sparily', 'incontrovertibility'] < ['diphosphate', 'wilburite', 'youse', 'effulgence'] < tantara < rebox < lophiodontoid
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['catheterizing', 'unconfuting']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: catheterizing: z. unconfuting: t.
Thought 8: We now have: catheterizing < unconfutingfor the subpart. Hence, we have unconfuting < catheterizing < friesish < remissibly < ['entoilment', 'loyalist', 'grummet'] < ['sparily', 'incontrovertibility'] < ['diphosphate', 'wilburite', 'youse', 'effulgence'] < tantara < rebox < lophiodontoid
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['entoilment', 'loyalist', 'grummet']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: entoilment: n. loyalist: s. grummet: e.
Thought 10: We now have: loyalist < entoilment < grummetfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['diphosphate', 'wilburite', 'youse', 'effulgence'] < lophiodontoid < catheterizing < ['sparily', 'incontrovertibility'] < unconfuting < grummet < remissibly < friesish < tantara < loyalist < rebox < entoilment
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['sparily', 'incontrovertibility']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: sparily: l. incontrovertibility: t.
Thought 12: We now have: sparily < incontrovertibilityfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['diphosphate', 'wilburite', 'youse', 'effulgence'] < lophiodontoid < catheterizing < sparily < incontrovertibility < unconfuting < grummet < remissibly < friesish < tantara < loyalist < rebox < entoilment
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['diphosphate', 'wilburite', 'youse', 'effulgence']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: diphosphate: t. wilburite: t. youse: s. effulgence: c.
Thought 14: We now have: ['diphosphate', 'wilburite'] < youse < effulgencefor the subpart. Hence, we have ['diphosphate', 'wilburite'] < youse < effulgence < lophiodontoid < catheterizing < sparily < incontrovertibility < unconfuting < grummet < remissibly < friesish < tantara < loyalist < rebox < entoilment
Thought 15: Now let's sort this subpart ['diphosphate', 'wilburite']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: diphosphate: a. wilburite: i.
Thought 16: We now have: diphosphate < wilburitefor the subpart. Hence, we have loyalist < grummet < remissibly < youse < entoilment < wilburite < rebox < friesish < incontrovertibility < catheterizing < sparily < diphosphate < effulgence < tantara < unconfuting < lophiodontoid
Thought 17: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is catheterizing unconfuting friesish remissibly loyalist entoilment grummet sparily incontrovertibility diphosphate wilburite youse effulgence tantara rebox lophiodontoid

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

g h u f l t b y w s n e z m c k a v o r x i j d p q