Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: windbracing littlewale damnous musiciana planter numismatists grapier whereabout guideposts
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: z, m, n, l, w, r, y, t, h, q, c, i, s, x, a, g, f, e, o, u, b, d, p, j, v, k

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: windbracing: g. littlewale: e. damnous: s. musiciana: a. planter: r. numismatists: s. grapier: r. whereabout: t. guideposts: s.
Thought 2: We now have: ['planter', 'grapier'] < whereabout < ['damnous', 'numismatists', 'guideposts'] < musiciana < windbracing < littlewale
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['planter', 'grapier']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: planter: e. grapier: e.
Thought 4: We now have: ['planter', 'grapier']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['planter', 'grapier'] < whereabout < ['damnous', 'numismatists', 'guideposts'] < musiciana < windbracing < littlewale
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['planter', 'grapier']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: planter: t. grapier: i.
Thought 6: We now have: planter < grapierfor the subpart. Hence, we have planter < grapier < whereabout < ['damnous', 'numismatists', 'guideposts'] < musiciana < windbracing < littlewale
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['damnous', 'numismatists', 'guideposts']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: damnous: u. numismatists: t. guideposts: t.
Thought 8: We now have: ['numismatists', 'guideposts'] < damnousfor the subpart. Hence, we have planter < grapier < whereabout < ['numismatists', 'guideposts'] < damnous < musiciana < windbracing < littlewale
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['numismatists', 'guideposts']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: numismatists: s. guideposts: s.
Thought 10: We now have: ['numismatists', 'guideposts']for the subpart. Hence, we have planter < grapier < whereabout < ['numismatists', 'guideposts'] < damnous < musiciana < windbracing < littlewale
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['numismatists', 'guideposts']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: numismatists: s. guideposts: o.
Thought 12: We now have: numismatists < guidepostsfor the subpart. Hence, we have planter < grapier < whereabout < numismatists < guideposts < damnous < musiciana < windbracing < littlewale
Thought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is planter grapier whereabout numismatists guideposts damnous musiciana windbracing littlewale

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

z m n l w r y t h q c i s x a g f e o u b d p j v k


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: paelignian, explosive, ocydrome, sinapism, sumak, rose, homester, necessitude, meres, suprasternal, smit, anthophobia, alkaliferous, piranhas
There are some special requirements:

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: paelignian: n. explosive: e. ocydrome: e. sinapism: m. sumak: k. rose: e. homester: r. necessitude: e. meres: s. suprasternal: l. smit: t. anthophobia: a. alkaliferous: s. piranhas: s.

We now have: anthophobia < ['explosive', 'ocydrome', 'rose', 'necessitude'] < sumak < suprasternal < sinapism < paelignian < homester < ['meres', 'alkaliferous', 'piranhas'] < smit

Now let's sort this subpart ['explosive', 'ocydrome', 'rose', 'necessitude']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: explosive: v. ocydrome: m. rose: s. necessitude: d.

We now have: necessitude < ocydrome < rose < explosivefor the subpart. Hence, we have anthophobia < necessitude < ocydrome < rose < explosive < sumak < suprasternal < sinapism < paelignian < homester < ['meres', 'alkaliferous', 'piranhas'] < smit

Now let's sort this subpart ['meres', 'alkaliferous', 'piranhas']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: meres: e. alkaliferous: u. piranhas: a.

We now have: piranhas < meres < alkaliferousfor the subpart. Hence, we have anthophobia < necessitude < ocydrome < rose < explosive < sumak < suprasternal < sinapism < paelignian < homester < piranhas < meres < alkaliferous < smit

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is anthophobia necessitude ocydrome rose explosive sumak suprasternal sinapism paelignian homester piranhas meres alkaliferous smit

paelignian explosive ocydrome sinapism sumak rose homester necessitude meres suprasternal smit anthophobia alkaliferous piranhas


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: contingentness mediterraneanization tarantulous catoptrical externomedian penicil adib flagellate supersarcasm
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: q, w, n, v, a, t, u, l, b, p, y, i, j, m, c, s, f, r, e, k, g, o, d, h, x, z

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: contingentness: s. mediterraneanization: n. tarantulous: s. catoptrical: l. externomedian: n. penicil: l. adib: b. flagellate: e. supersarcasm: m.
Thought 2: We now have: ['mediterraneanization', 'externomedian'] < ['catoptrical', 'penicil'] < adib < supersarcasm < ['contingentness', 'tarantulous'] < flagellate
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['mediterraneanization', 'externomedian']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: mediterraneanization: o. externomedian: a.
Thought 4: We now have: externomedian < mediterraneanizationfor the subpart. Hence, we have externomedian < mediterraneanization < ['catoptrical', 'penicil'] < adib < supersarcasm < ['contingentness', 'tarantulous'] < flagellate
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['catoptrical', 'penicil']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: catoptrical: a. penicil: i.
Thought 6: We now have: catoptrical < penicilfor the subpart. Hence, we have externomedian < mediterraneanization < catoptrical < penicil < adib < supersarcasm < ['contingentness', 'tarantulous'] < flagellate
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['contingentness', 'tarantulous']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: contingentness: s. tarantulous: u.
Thought 8: We now have: tarantulous < contingentnessfor the subpart. Hence, we have externomedian < mediterraneanization < catoptrical < penicil < adib < supersarcasm < tarantulous < contingentness < flagellate
Thought 9: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is externomedian mediterraneanization catoptrical penicil adib supersarcasm tarantulous contingentness flagellate

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

q w n v a t u l b p y i j m c s f r e k g o d h x z


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: covenance shellackers haughty etwees rehair bolloxing southerners unjumbled teeterer haemostatic semiperviness nondecadency nate odoriferousness aurothiosulphuric downlinking
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: q, m, n, j, p, z, a, d, l, w, r, t, g, h, e, i, x, f, v, c, o, b, u, s, y, k

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: covenance: e. shellackers: s. haughty: y. etwees: s. rehair: r. bolloxing: g. southerners: s. unjumbled: d. teeterer: r. haemostatic: t. semiperviness: s. nondecadency: y. nate: e. odoriferousness: s. aurothiosulphuric: c. downlinking: g.
Thought 2: We now have: unjumbled < ['rehair', 'teeterer'] < haemostatic < ['bolloxing', 'downlinking'] < ['covenance', 'nate'] < aurothiosulphuric < ['shellackers', 'etwees', 'southerners', 'semiperviness', 'odoriferousness'] < ['haughty', 'nondecadency']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['rehair', 'teeterer']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: rehair: i. teeterer: e.
Thought 4: We now have: teeterer < rehairfor the subpart. Hence, we have unjumbled < teeterer < ['bolloxing', 'downlinking'] < aurothiosulphuric < rehair < haemostatic < ['shellackers', 'etwees', 'southerners', 'semiperviness', 'odoriferousness'] < ['haughty', 'nondecadency'] < ['covenance', 'nate']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['bolloxing', 'downlinking']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: bolloxing: n. downlinking: n.
Thought 6: We now have: ['bolloxing', 'downlinking']for the subpart. Hence, we have unjumbled < teeterer < ['bolloxing', 'downlinking'] < aurothiosulphuric < rehair < haemostatic < ['shellackers', 'etwees', 'southerners', 'semiperviness', 'odoriferousness'] < ['haughty', 'nondecadency'] < ['covenance', 'nate']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['bolloxing', 'downlinking']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: bolloxing: i. downlinking: i.
Thought 8: We now have: ['bolloxing', 'downlinking']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['bolloxing', 'downlinking'] < unjumbled < aurothiosulphuric < ['shellackers', 'etwees', 'southerners', 'semiperviness', 'odoriferousness'] < haemostatic < ['haughty', 'nondecadency'] < rehair < ['covenance', 'nate'] < teeterer
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['bolloxing', 'downlinking']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: bolloxing: x. downlinking: k.
Thought 10: We now have: bolloxing < downlinkingfor the subpart. Hence, we have bolloxing < downlinking < unjumbled < aurothiosulphuric < ['shellackers', 'etwees', 'southerners', 'semiperviness', 'odoriferousness'] < haemostatic < ['haughty', 'nondecadency'] < rehair < ['covenance', 'nate'] < teeterer
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['covenance', 'nate']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: covenance: c. nate: t.
Thought 12: We now have: nate < covenancefor the subpart. Hence, we have bolloxing < downlinking < unjumbled < aurothiosulphuric < ['shellackers', 'etwees', 'southerners', 'semiperviness', 'odoriferousness'] < haemostatic < ['haughty', 'nondecadency'] < rehair < nate < covenance < teeterer
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['shellackers', 'etwees', 'southerners', 'semiperviness', 'odoriferousness']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: shellackers: r. etwees: e. southerners: r. semiperviness: s. odoriferousness: s.
Thought 14: We now have: ['shellackers', 'southerners'] < etwees < ['semiperviness', 'odoriferousness']for the subpart. Hence, we have bolloxing < downlinking < unjumbled < aurothiosulphuric < ['shellackers', 'southerners'] < etwees < ['semiperviness', 'odoriferousness'] < haemostatic < ['haughty', 'nondecadency'] < rehair < nate < covenance < teeterer
Thought 15: Now let's sort this subpart ['shellackers', 'southerners']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: shellackers: e. southerners: e.
Thought 16: We now have: ['shellackers', 'southerners']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['semiperviness', 'odoriferousness'] < ['shellackers', 'southerners'] < etwees < bolloxing < nate < teeterer < ['haughty', 'nondecadency'] < covenance < unjumbled < aurothiosulphuric < rehair < haemostatic < downlinking
Thought 17: Now let's sort this subpart ['shellackers', 'southerners']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: shellackers: k. southerners: n.
Thought 18: We now have: southerners < shellackersfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['semiperviness', 'odoriferousness'] < southerners < shellackers < etwees < bolloxing < nate < teeterer < ['haughty', 'nondecadency'] < covenance < unjumbled < aurothiosulphuric < rehair < haemostatic < downlinking
Thought 19: Now let's sort this subpart ['semiperviness', 'odoriferousness']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: semiperviness: e. odoriferousness: e.
Thought 20: We now have: ['semiperviness', 'odoriferousness']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['semiperviness', 'odoriferousness'] < southerners < shellackers < etwees < bolloxing < nate < teeterer < ['haughty', 'nondecadency'] < covenance < unjumbled < aurothiosulphuric < rehair < haemostatic < downlinking
Thought 21: Now let's sort this subpart ['semiperviness', 'odoriferousness']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: semiperviness: n. odoriferousness: n.
Thought 22: We now have: ['semiperviness', 'odoriferousness']for the subpart. Hence, we have unjumbled < aurothiosulphuric < rehair < downlinking < etwees < southerners < teeterer < nate < covenance < ['semiperviness', 'odoriferousness'] < shellackers < haemostatic < ['haughty', 'nondecadency'] < bolloxing
Thought 23: Now let's sort this subpart ['semiperviness', 'odoriferousness']. Looking at the fifth letters from right to left.The fifth letter: semiperviness: i. odoriferousness: s.
Thought 24: We now have: semiperviness < odoriferousnessfor the subpart. Hence, we have unjumbled < aurothiosulphuric < rehair < downlinking < etwees < southerners < teeterer < nate < covenance < semiperviness < odoriferousness < shellackers < haemostatic < ['haughty', 'nondecadency'] < bolloxing
Thought 25: Now let's sort this subpart ['haughty', 'nondecadency']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: haughty: t. nondecadency: c.
Thought 26: We now have: haughty < nondecadencyfor the subpart. Hence, we have unjumbled < aurothiosulphuric < rehair < downlinking < etwees < southerners < teeterer < nate < covenance < semiperviness < odoriferousness < shellackers < haemostatic < haughty < nondecadency < bolloxing
Thought 27: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is unjumbled teeterer rehair haemostatic bolloxing downlinking nate covenance aurothiosulphuric southerners shellackers etwees semiperviness odoriferousness haughty nondecadency

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

q m n j p z a d l w r t g h e i x f v c o b u s y k


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: absolutist homemade metencephalon backlands dipteral overtrim outspeaker nondistinguishably nonsentence
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: t, h, l, w, a, k, z, g, p, q, m, r, v, e, s, j, f, x, o, y, i, c, u, n, d, b

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: absolutist: a. homemade: h. metencephalon: m. backlands: b. dipteral: d. overtrim: o. outspeaker: o. nondistinguishably: n. nonsentence: n.
Thought 2: We now have: homemade < absolutist < metencephalon < ['overtrim', 'outspeaker'] < ['nondistinguishably', 'nonsentence'] < dipteral < backlands
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['overtrim', 'outspeaker']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: overtrim: v. outspeaker: u.
Thought 4: We now have: overtrim < outspeakerfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['nondistinguishably', 'nonsentence'] < absolutist < dipteral < backlands < homemade < metencephalon < overtrim < outspeaker
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['nondistinguishably', 'nonsentence']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: nondistinguishably: o. nonsentence: o.
Thought 6: We now have: ['nondistinguishably', 'nonsentence']for the subpart. Hence, we have backlands < homemade < overtrim < ['nondistinguishably', 'nonsentence'] < absolutist < dipteral < metencephalon < outspeaker
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['nondistinguishably', 'nonsentence']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: nondistinguishably: n. nonsentence: n.
Thought 8: We now have: ['nondistinguishably', 'nonsentence']for the subpart. Hence, we have backlands < homemade < overtrim < ['nondistinguishably', 'nonsentence'] < absolutist < dipteral < metencephalon < outspeaker
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['nondistinguishably', 'nonsentence']. Looking at the fourth letters.The fourth letter: nondistinguishably: d. nonsentence: s.
Thought 10: We now have: nondistinguishably < nonsentencefor the subpart. Hence, we have backlands < homemade < overtrim < nonsentence < nondistinguishably < absolutist < dipteral < metencephalon < outspeaker
Thought 11: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is homemade absolutist metencephalon overtrim outspeaker nondistinguishably nonsentence dipteral backlands

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

t h l w a k z g p q m r v e s j f x o y i c u n d b


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: pantoplethora aposporous didynamy heptarchy clomp blushingly clencher dictums

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: pantoplethora: p. aposporous: a. didynamy: d. heptarchy: h. clomp: c. blushingly: b. clencher: c. dictums: d.
Thought 2: We now have: aposporous < blushingly < ['clomp', 'clencher'] < ['didynamy', 'dictums'] < heptarchy < pantoplethora
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['clomp', 'clencher']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: clomp: l. clencher: l.
Thought 4: We now have: ['clomp', 'clencher']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['didynamy', 'dictums'] < aposporous < heptarchy < pantoplethora < ['clomp', 'clencher'] < blushingly
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['clomp', 'clencher']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: clomp: o. clencher: e.
Thought 6: We now have: clencher < clompfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['didynamy', 'dictums'] < aposporous < heptarchy < pantoplethora < clencher < clomp < blushingly
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['didynamy', 'dictums']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: didynamy: i. dictums: i.
Thought 8: We now have: ['didynamy', 'dictums']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['didynamy', 'dictums'] < aposporous < heptarchy < pantoplethora < clencher < clomp < blushingly
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['didynamy', 'dictums']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: didynamy: d. dictums: c.
Thought 10: We now have: didynamy < dictumsfor the subpart. Hence, we have dictums < didynamy < aposporous < heptarchy < pantoplethora < clencher < clomp < blushingly
Thought 11: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is aposporous blushingly clencher clomp didynamy dictums heptarchy pantoplethora

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: coprecipitating schooler otaria ineffervescent tantaliferous teaspoons blenders subducing cholocyanine turbinite yarly reinters eastwardly missionizer teredines batons
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: g, l, q, t, x, a, b, k, z, o, r, y, f, v, h, e, s, p, u, i, n, w, m, j, c, d

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: coprecipitating: g. schooler: r. otaria: a. ineffervescent: t. tantaliferous: s. teaspoons: s. blenders: s. subducing: g. cholocyanine: e. turbinite: e. yarly: y. reinters: s. eastwardly: y. missionizer: r. teredines: s.
Thought 2: We now have: ['tantaliferous', 'teaspoons', 'blenders', 'reinters', 'teredines'] < ['cholocyanine', 'turbinite'] < ['yarly', 'eastwardly'] < ['schooler', 'missionizer'] < otaria < ineffervescent < ['coprecipitating', 'subducing']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['tantaliferous', 'teaspoons', 'blenders', 'reinters', 'teredines']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: tantaliferous: u. teaspoons: n. blenders: r. reinters: r. teredines: e.
Thought 4: We now have: ['blenders', 'reinters'] < teredines < tantaliferous < teaspoonsfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['coprecipitating', 'subducing'] < ineffervescent < otaria < ['schooler', 'missionizer'] < ['yarly', 'eastwardly'] < ['cholocyanine', 'turbinite'] < ['blenders', 'reinters'] < teredines < tantaliferous < teaspoons
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['blenders', 'reinters']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: blenders: e. reinters: e.
Thought 6: We now have: ['blenders', 'reinters']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['blenders', 'reinters'] < ['schooler', 'missionizer'] < teredines < teaspoons < ['coprecipitating', 'subducing'] < otaria < ['yarly', 'eastwardly'] < tantaliferous < ['cholocyanine', 'turbinite'] < ineffervescent
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['blenders', 'reinters']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: blenders: d. reinters: t.
Thought 8: We now have: reinters < blendersfor the subpart. Hence, we have reinters < blenders < ['schooler', 'missionizer'] < teredines < teaspoons < ['coprecipitating', 'subducing'] < otaria < ['yarly', 'eastwardly'] < tantaliferous < ['cholocyanine', 'turbinite'] < ineffervescent
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['cholocyanine', 'turbinite']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: cholocyanine: n. turbinite: t.
Thought 10: We now have: turbinite < cholocyaninefor the subpart. Hence, we have reinters < tantaliferous < ['yarly', 'eastwardly'] < teaspoons < otaria < ['schooler', 'missionizer'] < blenders < teredines < turbinite < cholocyanine < ['coprecipitating', 'subducing'] < ineffervescent
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['yarly', 'eastwardly']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: yarly: l. eastwardly: l.
Thought 12: We now have: ['yarly', 'eastwardly']for the subpart. Hence, we have tantaliferous < ['schooler', 'missionizer'] < turbinite < cholocyanine < ineffervescent < ['yarly', 'eastwardly'] < teredines < otaria < ['coprecipitating', 'subducing'] < blenders < reinters < teaspoons
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['yarly', 'eastwardly']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: yarly: r. eastwardly: d.
Thought 14: We now have: yarly < eastwardlyfor the subpart. Hence, we have tantaliferous < ['schooler', 'missionizer'] < turbinite < cholocyanine < ineffervescent < yarly < eastwardly < teredines < otaria < ['coprecipitating', 'subducing'] < blenders < reinters < teaspoons
Thought 15: Now let's sort this subpart ['schooler', 'missionizer']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: schooler: e. missionizer: e.
Thought 16: We now have: ['schooler', 'missionizer']for the subpart. Hence, we have cholocyanine < ['schooler', 'missionizer'] < teredines < eastwardly < yarly < reinters < blenders < otaria < turbinite < teaspoons < tantaliferous < ['coprecipitating', 'subducing'] < ineffervescent
Thought 17: Now let's sort this subpart ['schooler', 'missionizer']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: schooler: l. missionizer: z.
Thought 18: We now have: schooler < missionizerfor the subpart. Hence, we have missionizer < eastwardly < ineffervescent < blenders < tantaliferous < ['coprecipitating', 'subducing'] < teaspoons < reinters < schooler < yarly < teredines < turbinite < otaria < cholocyanine
Thought 19: Now let's sort this subpart ['coprecipitating', 'subducing']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: coprecipitating: n. subducing: n.
Thought 20: We now have: ['coprecipitating', 'subducing']for the subpart. Hence, we have missionizer < eastwardly < ineffervescent < blenders < tantaliferous < ['coprecipitating', 'subducing'] < teaspoons < reinters < schooler < yarly < teredines < turbinite < otaria < cholocyanine
Thought 21: Now let's sort this subpart ['coprecipitating', 'subducing']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: coprecipitating: i. subducing: i.
Thought 22: We now have: ['coprecipitating', 'subducing']for the subpart. Hence, we have missionizer < eastwardly < ineffervescent < blenders < tantaliferous < ['coprecipitating', 'subducing'] < teaspoons < reinters < schooler < yarly < teredines < turbinite < otaria < cholocyanine
Thought 23: Now let's sort this subpart ['coprecipitating', 'subducing']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: coprecipitating: t. subducing: c.
Thought 24: We now have: coprecipitating < subducingfor the subpart. Hence, we have missionizer < eastwardly < ineffervescent < blenders < tantaliferous < coprecipitating < subducing < teaspoons < reinters < schooler < yarly < teredines < turbinite < otaria < cholocyanine
Thought 25: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is reinters blenders teredines tantaliferous teaspoons turbinite cholocyanine yarly eastwardly schooler missionizer otaria ineffervescent coprecipitating subducing

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

g l q t x a b k z o r y f v h e s p u i n w m j c d


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: betterer, pipless, skee, abatements, jewelsmith, astrionics, realizer, subsides
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: n, h, u, k, y, r, j, b, i, q, x, v, d, o, f, g, z, l, e, t, s, w, p, m, a, c

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: betterer: r. pipless: s. skee: e. abatements: s. jewelsmith: h. astrionics: s. realizer: r. subsides: s.

We now have: jewelsmith < ['betterer', 'realizer'] < skee < ['pipless', 'abatements', 'astrionics', 'subsides']

Now let's sort this subpart ['betterer', 'realizer']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: betterer: e. realizer: e.

We now have: ['betterer', 'realizer']for the subpart. Hence, we have jewelsmith < ['betterer', 'realizer'] < skee < ['pipless', 'abatements', 'astrionics', 'subsides']

Now let's sort this subpart ['betterer', 'realizer']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: betterer: r. realizer: z.

We now have: betterer < realizerfor the subpart. Hence, we have jewelsmith < betterer < realizer < skee < ['pipless', 'abatements', 'astrionics', 'subsides']

Now let's sort this subpart ['pipless', 'abatements', 'astrionics', 'subsides']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: pipless: s. abatements: t. astrionics: c. subsides: e.

We now have: subsides < abatements < pipless < astrionicsfor the subpart. Hence, we have jewelsmith < betterer < realizer < skee < subsides < abatements < pipless < astrionics

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is jewelsmith betterer realizer skee subsides abatements pipless astrionics

betterer pipless skee abatements jewelsmith astrionics realizer subsides

n h u k y r j b i q x v d o f g z l e t s w p m a c


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: cuitle, harridans, hydroscope, instantaneousness, hastened, venalness, terracewards, trichechus, philographic, kingless, sunday, finns, pontocaspian

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: cuitle: c. harridans: h. hydroscope: h. instantaneousness: i. hastened: h. venalness: v. terracewards: t. trichechus: t. philographic: p. kingless: k. sunday: s. finns: f. pontocaspian: p.

We now have: cuitle < finns < ['harridans', 'hydroscope', 'hastened'] < instantaneousness < kingless < ['philographic', 'pontocaspian'] < sunday < ['terracewards', 'trichechus'] < venalness

Now let's sort this subpart ['harridans', 'hydroscope', 'hastened']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: harridans: a. hydroscope: y. hastened: a.

We now have: ['harridans', 'hastened'] < hydroscopefor the subpart. Hence, we have cuitle < finns < ['harridans', 'hastened'] < hydroscope < instantaneousness < kingless < ['philographic', 'pontocaspian'] < sunday < ['terracewards', 'trichechus'] < venalness

Now let's sort this subpart ['harridans', 'hastened']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: harridans: r. hastened: s.

We now have: harridans < hastenedfor the subpart. Hence, we have cuitle < finns < harridans < hastened < hydroscope < instantaneousness < kingless < ['philographic', 'pontocaspian'] < sunday < ['terracewards', 'trichechus'] < venalness

Now let's sort this subpart ['philographic', 'pontocaspian']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: philographic: h. pontocaspian: o.

We now have: philographic < pontocaspianfor the subpart. Hence, we have cuitle < finns < harridans < hastened < hydroscope < instantaneousness < kingless < philographic < pontocaspian < sunday < ['terracewards', 'trichechus'] < venalness

Now let's sort this subpart ['terracewards', 'trichechus']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: terracewards: e. trichechus: r.

We now have: terracewards < trichechusfor the subpart. Hence, we have cuitle < finns < harridans < hastened < hydroscope < instantaneousness < kingless < philographic < pontocaspian < sunday < terracewards < trichechus < venalness

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is cuitle finns harridans hastened hydroscope instantaneousness kingless philographic pontocaspian sunday terracewards trichechus venalness

cuitle harridans hydroscope instantaneousness hastened venalness terracewards trichechus philographic kingless sunday finns pontocaspian


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: sailage, machinists, inconvenienced, inseminated, nudest, analyzability, bullskin, moorish, refrainer, hipline, exocannibalism, morphotonemic, laterifloral, reapparel
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: l, r, j, k, w, t, s, f, g, y, b, a, n, i, q, o, z, p, d, h, m, v, c, e, u, x

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: sailage: s. machinists: m. inconvenienced: i. inseminated: i. nudest: n. analyzability: a. bullskin: b. moorish: m. refrainer: r. hipline: h. exocannibalism: e. morphotonemic: m. laterifloral: l. reapparel: r.

We now have: laterifloral < ['refrainer', 'reapparel'] < sailage < bullskin < analyzability < nudest < ['inconvenienced', 'inseminated'] < hipline < ['machinists', 'moorish', 'morphotonemic'] < exocannibalism

Now let's sort this subpart ['refrainer', 'reapparel']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: refrainer: e. reapparel: e.

We now have: ['refrainer', 'reapparel']for the subpart. Hence, we have laterifloral < ['refrainer', 'reapparel'] < sailage < bullskin < analyzability < nudest < ['inconvenienced', 'inseminated'] < hipline < ['machinists', 'moorish', 'morphotonemic'] < exocannibalism

Now let's sort this subpart ['refrainer', 'reapparel']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: refrainer: f. reapparel: a.

We now have: refrainer < reapparelfor the subpart. Hence, we have laterifloral < refrainer < reapparel < sailage < bullskin < analyzability < nudest < ['inconvenienced', 'inseminated'] < hipline < ['machinists', 'moorish', 'morphotonemic'] < exocannibalism

Now let's sort this subpart ['inconvenienced', 'inseminated']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: inconvenienced: n. inseminated: n.

We now have: ['inconvenienced', 'inseminated']for the subpart. Hence, we have laterifloral < refrainer < reapparel < sailage < bullskin < analyzability < nudest < ['inconvenienced', 'inseminated'] < hipline < ['machinists', 'moorish', 'morphotonemic'] < exocannibalism

Now let's sort this subpart ['inconvenienced', 'inseminated']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: inconvenienced: c. inseminated: s.

We now have: inseminated < inconveniencedfor the subpart. Hence, we have laterifloral < refrainer < reapparel < sailage < bullskin < analyzability < nudest < inseminated < inconvenienced < hipline < ['machinists', 'moorish', 'morphotonemic'] < exocannibalism

Now let's sort this subpart ['machinists', 'moorish', 'morphotonemic']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: machinists: a. moorish: o. morphotonemic: o.

We now have: machinists < ['moorish', 'morphotonemic']for the subpart. Hence, we have laterifloral < refrainer < reapparel < sailage < bullskin < analyzability < nudest < inseminated < inconvenienced < hipline < machinists < ['moorish', 'morphotonemic'] < exocannibalism

Now let's sort this subpart ['moorish', 'morphotonemic']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: moorish: o. morphotonemic: r.

We now have: morphotonemic < moorishfor the subpart. Hence, we have laterifloral < refrainer < reapparel < sailage < bullskin < analyzability < nudest < inseminated < inconvenienced < hipline < machinists < morphotonemic < moorish < exocannibalism

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is laterifloral refrainer reapparel sailage bullskin analyzability nudest inseminated inconvenienced hipline machinists morphotonemic moorish exocannibalism

sailage machinists inconvenienced inseminated nudest analyzability bullskin moorish refrainer hipline exocannibalism morphotonemic laterifloral reapparel

l r j k w t s f g y b a n i q o z p d h m v c e u x


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: aeroacoustic, physitheistic, malinois, tiao, lobworm, deknight, snigger, lactification, revarnishing, churchwardenship, compactly, monophase
There are some special requirements:

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: aeroacoustic: c. physitheistic: c. malinois: s. tiao: o. lobworm: m. deknight: t. snigger: r. lactification: n. revarnishing: g. churchwardenship: p. compactly: y. monophase: e.

We now have: ['aeroacoustic', 'physitheistic'] < monophase < revarnishing < lobworm < lactification < tiao < churchwardenship < snigger < malinois < deknight < compactly

Now let's sort this subpart ['aeroacoustic', 'physitheistic']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: aeroacoustic: i. physitheistic: i.

We now have: ['aeroacoustic', 'physitheistic']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['aeroacoustic', 'physitheistic'] < monophase < revarnishing < lobworm < lactification < tiao < churchwardenship < snigger < malinois < deknight < compactly

Now let's sort this subpart ['aeroacoustic', 'physitheistic']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: aeroacoustic: t. physitheistic: t.

Now let's sort this subpart ['aeroacoustic', 'physitheistic']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: aeroacoustic: s. physitheistic: s.

Now let's sort this subpart ['aeroacoustic', 'physitheistic']. Looking at the fifth letters from right to left.The fifth letter: aeroacoustic: u. physitheistic: i.

We now have: physitheistic < aeroacousticfor the subpart. Hence, we have physitheistic < aeroacoustic < monophase < revarnishing < lobworm < lactification < tiao < churchwardenship < snigger < malinois < deknight < compactly

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is physitheistic aeroacoustic monophase revarnishing lobworm lactification tiao churchwardenship snigger malinois deknight compactly

aeroacoustic physitheistic malinois tiao lobworm deknight snigger lactification revarnishing churchwardenship compactly monophase


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: repugnate relists uninferribly duncery unrecording ultraformal ambulatorily allophanamide overfag

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: repugnate: r. relists: t. uninferribly: u. duncery: d. unrecording: u. ultraformal: u. ambulatorily: a. allophanamide: a. overfag: o.
Thought 2: We now have: ['ambulatorily', 'allophanamide'] < duncery < overfag < repugnate < relists < ['uninferribly', 'unrecording', 'ultraformal']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['ambulatorily', 'allophanamide']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: ambulatorily: m. allophanamide: l.
Thought 4: We now have: allophanamide < ambulatorilyfor the subpart. Hence, we have ambulatorily < duncery < repugnate < overfag < allophanamide < ['uninferribly', 'unrecording', 'ultraformal'] < relists
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['uninferribly', 'unrecording', 'ultraformal']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: uninferribly: n. unrecording: n. ultraformal: l.
Thought 6: We now have: ultraformal < ['uninferribly', 'unrecording']for the subpart. Hence, we have allophanamide < ['uninferribly', 'unrecording'] < ultraformal < duncery < relists < overfag < ambulatorily < repugnate
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['uninferribly', 'unrecording']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: uninferribly: i.
Thought 8: We now have: uninferriblyfor the subpart. Hence, we have allophanamide < uninferribly < ultraformal < duncery < relists < overfag < ambulatorily < repugnate
Thought 9: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is allophanamide ambulatorily duncery overfag repugnate relists ultraformal uninferribly

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: nanny, slabness, subdititiously, hypersensitiveness, farweltered, enchytraeidae, outgrinned, amanda, daulias

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: nanny: n. slabness: s. subdititiously: s. hypersensitiveness: h. farweltered: f. enchytraeidae: e. outgrinned: o. amanda: a. daulias: d.

We now have: amanda < daulias < enchytraeidae < farweltered < hypersensitiveness < nanny < outgrinned < ['slabness', 'subdititiously']

Now let's sort this subpart ['slabness', 'subdititiously']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: slabness: l. subdititiously: u.

We now have: slabness < subdititiouslyfor the subpart. Hence, we have amanda < daulias < enchytraeidae < farweltered < hypersensitiveness < nanny < outgrinned < slabness < subdititiously

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is amanda daulias enchytraeidae farweltered hypersensitiveness nanny outgrinned slabness subdititiously

nanny slabness subdititiously hypersensitiveness farweltered enchytraeidae outgrinned amanda daulias


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: return, zeolitization, completive, postspinous, judaeophobe, prohydrotropic, overcompensation, nuncupate
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: j, f, l, x, z, b, w, a, d, v, q, c, g, p, k, s, o, n, y, h, m, e, r, u, t, i

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: return: n. zeolitization: n. completive: e. postspinous: s. judaeophobe: e. prohydrotropic: c. overcompensation: n. nuncupate: e.

We now have: prohydrotropic < postspinous < ['return', 'zeolitization', 'overcompensation'] < ['completive', 'judaeophobe', 'nuncupate']

Now let's sort this subpart ['return', 'zeolitization', 'overcompensation']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: return: r. zeolitization: o. overcompensation: o.

We now have: ['zeolitization', 'overcompensation'] < returnfor the subpart. Hence, we have prohydrotropic < postspinous < ['zeolitization', 'overcompensation'] < return < ['completive', 'judaeophobe', 'nuncupate']

Now let's sort this subpart ['zeolitization', 'overcompensation']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: zeolitization: i. overcompensation: i.

We now have: ['zeolitization', 'overcompensation']for the subpart. Hence, we have prohydrotropic < postspinous < ['zeolitization', 'overcompensation'] < return < ['completive', 'judaeophobe', 'nuncupate']

Now let's sort this subpart ['zeolitization', 'overcompensation']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: zeolitization: t. overcompensation: t.

Now let's sort this subpart ['zeolitization', 'overcompensation']. Looking at the fifth letters from right to left.The fifth letter: zeolitization: a. overcompensation: a.

Now let's sort this subpart ['zeolitization', 'overcompensation']. Looking at the sixth letters from right to left.The sixth letter: zeolitization: z. overcompensation: s.

We now have: zeolitization < overcompensationfor the subpart. Hence, we have prohydrotropic < postspinous < zeolitization < overcompensation < return < ['completive', 'judaeophobe', 'nuncupate']

Now let's sort this subpart ['completive', 'judaeophobe', 'nuncupate']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: completive: v. judaeophobe: b. nuncupate: t.

We now have: judaeophobe < completive < nuncupatefor the subpart. Hence, we have prohydrotropic < postspinous < zeolitization < overcompensation < return < judaeophobe < completive < nuncupate

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is prohydrotropic postspinous zeolitization overcompensation return judaeophobe completive nuncupate

return zeolitization completive postspinous judaeophobe prohydrotropic overcompensation nuncupate

j f l x z b w a d v q c g p k s o n y h m e r u t i


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: tatchy testcross malta listener eyewinker raffishly nudibranchia pointways repiqued pleasant lightface paleaceous
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: i, u, l, t, m, z, w, g, q, y, d, b, o, s, v, k, c, j, p, f, r, n, e, h, a, x

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: tatchy: y. testcross: s. malta: a. listener: r. eyewinker: r. raffishly: y. nudibranchia: a. pointways: s. repiqued: d. pleasant: t. lightface: e. paleaceous: s.
Thought 2: We now have: pleasant < ['tatchy', 'raffishly'] < repiqued < ['testcross', 'pointways', 'paleaceous'] < ['listener', 'eyewinker'] < lightface < ['malta', 'nudibranchia']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['tatchy', 'raffishly']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: tatchy: h. raffishly: l.
Thought 4: We now have: tatchy < raffishlyfor the subpart. Hence, we have pleasant < raffishly < tatchy < repiqued < ['testcross', 'pointways', 'paleaceous'] < ['listener', 'eyewinker'] < lightface < ['malta', 'nudibranchia']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['testcross', 'pointways', 'paleaceous']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: paleaceous: u.
Thought 6: We now have: paleaceousfor the subpart. Hence, we have pleasant < raffishly < tatchy < repiqued < paleaceous < ['listener', 'eyewinker'] < lightface < ['malta', 'nudibranchia']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['listener', 'eyewinker']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: listener: e. eyewinker: e.
Thought 8: We now have: ['listener', 'eyewinker']for the subpart. Hence, we have paleaceous < ['malta', 'nudibranchia'] < repiqued < pleasant < tatchy < ['listener', 'eyewinker'] < raffishly < lightface
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['listener', 'eyewinker']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: listener: n. eyewinker: k.
Thought 10: We now have: eyewinker < listenerfor the subpart. Hence, we have paleaceous < ['malta', 'nudibranchia'] < repiqued < pleasant < tatchy < eyewinker < listener < raffishly < lightface
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['malta', 'nudibranchia']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: malta: t. nudibranchia: i.
Thought 12: We now have: nudibranchia < maltafor the subpart. Hence, we have listener < tatchy < nudibranchia < malta < lightface < pleasant < paleaceous < raffishly < eyewinker < repiqued
Thought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is pleasant tatchy raffishly repiqued paleaceous eyewinker listener lightface nudibranchia malta

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

i u l t m z w g q y d b o s v k c j p f r n e h a x


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: improprium, adon, clewgarnet, ullage, vitellarium, strictum, settling, portliness
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: w, t, q, e, s, f, m, g, l, j, u, r, p, x, d, v, z, i, b, o, k, a, y, c, h, n

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: improprium: m. adon: n. clewgarnet: t. ullage: e. vitellarium: m. strictum: m. settling: g. portliness: s.

We now have: clewgarnet < ullage < portliness < ['improprium', 'vitellarium', 'strictum'] < settling < adon

Now let's sort this subpart ['improprium', 'vitellarium', 'strictum']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: improprium: u. vitellarium: u. strictum: u.

We now have: ['improprium', 'vitellarium', 'strictum']for the subpart. Hence, we have clewgarnet < ullage < portliness < ['improprium', 'vitellarium', 'strictum'] < settling < adon

Now let's sort this subpart ['improprium', 'vitellarium', 'strictum']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: improprium: i. vitellarium: i. strictum: t.

We now have: strictum < ['improprium', 'vitellarium']for the subpart. Hence, we have clewgarnet < ullage < portliness < strictum < ['improprium', 'vitellarium'] < settling < adon

Now let's sort this subpart ['improprium', 'vitellarium']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: improprium: r. vitellarium: r.

We now have: ['improprium', 'vitellarium']for the subpart. Hence, we have clewgarnet < ullage < portliness < strictum < ['improprium', 'vitellarium'] < settling < adon

Now let's sort this subpart ['improprium', 'vitellarium']. Looking at the fifth letters from right to left.The fifth letter: improprium: p. vitellarium: a.

We now have: improprium < vitellariumfor the subpart. Hence, we have clewgarnet < ullage < portliness < strictum < improprium < vitellarium < settling < adon

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is clewgarnet ullage portliness strictum improprium vitellarium settling adon

improprium adon clewgarnet ullage vitellarium strictum settling portliness

w t q e s f m g l j u r p x d v z i b o k a y c h n


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: eerily, quercimeritrin, maltase, rowena, shimmied, cornrows, deliberativeness, sw

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: eerily: e. quercimeritrin: q. maltase: m. rowena: r. shimmied: s. cornrows: c. deliberativeness: d. sw: s.

We now have: cornrows < deliberativeness < eerily < maltase < quercimeritrin < rowena < ['shimmied', 'sw']

Now let's sort this subpart ['shimmied', 'sw']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: shimmied: h. sw: w.

We now have: shimmied < swfor the subpart. Hence, we have cornrows < deliberativeness < eerily < maltase < quercimeritrin < rowena < shimmied < sw

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is cornrows deliberativeness eerily maltase quercimeritrin rowena shimmied sw

eerily quercimeritrin maltase rowena shimmied cornrows deliberativeness sw


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: ethrog, bastardize, rosiest, cheerful, sissiness, honourable, pseudoprosperously, nonchampion, noncivilizable, baptizing, unweariedly, bugsha, acturience, highth
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: l, t, d, f, g, j, x, p, w, q, m, u, r, s, n, c, k, z, a, y, e, h, b, i, o, v

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: ethrog: g. bastardize: e. rosiest: t. cheerful: l. sissiness: s. honourable: e. pseudoprosperously: y. nonchampion: n. noncivilizable: e. baptizing: g. unweariedly: y. bugsha: a. acturience: e. highth: h.

We now have: cheerful < rosiest < ['ethrog', 'baptizing'] < sissiness < nonchampion < bugsha < ['pseudoprosperously', 'unweariedly'] < ['bastardize', 'honourable', 'noncivilizable', 'acturience'] < highth

Now let's sort this subpart ['ethrog', 'baptizing']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: ethrog: o. baptizing: n.

We now have: baptizing < ethrogfor the subpart. Hence, we have cheerful < rosiest < baptizing < ethrog < sissiness < nonchampion < bugsha < ['pseudoprosperously', 'unweariedly'] < ['bastardize', 'honourable', 'noncivilizable', 'acturience'] < highth

Now let's sort this subpart ['pseudoprosperously', 'unweariedly']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: pseudoprosperously: l. unweariedly: l.

We now have: ['pseudoprosperously', 'unweariedly']for the subpart. Hence, we have cheerful < rosiest < baptizing < ethrog < sissiness < nonchampion < bugsha < ['pseudoprosperously', 'unweariedly'] < ['bastardize', 'honourable', 'noncivilizable', 'acturience'] < highth

Now let's sort this subpart ['pseudoprosperously', 'unweariedly']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: pseudoprosperously: s. unweariedly: d.

We now have: unweariedly < pseudoprosperouslyfor the subpart. Hence, we have cheerful < rosiest < baptizing < ethrog < sissiness < nonchampion < bugsha < unweariedly < pseudoprosperously < ['bastardize', 'honourable', 'noncivilizable', 'acturience'] < highth

Now let's sort this subpart ['bastardize', 'honourable', 'noncivilizable', 'acturience']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: bastardize: z. honourable: l. noncivilizable: l. acturience: c.

We now have: ['honourable', 'noncivilizable'] < acturience < bastardizefor the subpart. Hence, we have cheerful < rosiest < baptizing < ethrog < sissiness < nonchampion < bugsha < unweariedly < pseudoprosperously < ['honourable', 'noncivilizable'] < acturience < bastardize < highth

Now let's sort this subpart ['honourable', 'noncivilizable']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: honourable: b. noncivilizable: b.

We now have: ['honourable', 'noncivilizable']for the subpart. Hence, we have cheerful < rosiest < baptizing < ethrog < sissiness < nonchampion < bugsha < unweariedly < pseudoprosperously < ['honourable', 'noncivilizable'] < acturience < bastardize < highth

Now let's sort this subpart ['honourable', 'noncivilizable']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: honourable: a. noncivilizable: a.

Now let's sort this subpart ['honourable', 'noncivilizable']. Looking at the fifth letters from right to left.The fifth letter: honourable: r. noncivilizable: z.

We now have: honourable < noncivilizablefor the subpart. Hence, we have cheerful < rosiest < baptizing < ethrog < sissiness < nonchampion < bugsha < unweariedly < pseudoprosperously < honourable < noncivilizable < acturience < bastardize < highth

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is cheerful rosiest baptizing ethrog sissiness nonchampion bugsha unweariedly pseudoprosperously honourable noncivilizable acturience bastardize highth

ethrog bastardize rosiest cheerful sissiness honourable pseudoprosperously nonchampion noncivilizable baptizing unweariedly bugsha acturience highth

l t d f g j x p w q m u r s n c k z a y e h b i o v


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: cytomegalovirus alexipharmical protead skull rabbleproof vilenesses kehillah brisker casualty redevelopers algedonics casquetel boukit
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: m, p, a, c, f, s, u, e, r, v, g, q, o, k, t, z, w, d, l, n, b, y, x, j, i, h

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: cytomegalovirus: c. alexipharmical: a. protead: p. skull: s. rabbleproof: r. vilenesses: v. kehillah: k. brisker: b. casualty: c. redevelopers: r. algedonics: a. casquetel: c. boukit: b.
Thought 2: We now have: protead < ['alexipharmical', 'algedonics'] < ['cytomegalovirus', 'casualty', 'casquetel'] < skull < ['rabbleproof', 'redevelopers'] < vilenesses < kehillah < ['brisker', 'boukit']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['alexipharmical', 'algedonics']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: alexipharmical: l. algedonics: l.
Thought 4: We now have: ['alexipharmical', 'algedonics']for the subpart. Hence, we have protead < ['alexipharmical', 'algedonics'] < ['cytomegalovirus', 'casualty', 'casquetel'] < skull < ['rabbleproof', 'redevelopers'] < vilenesses < kehillah < ['brisker', 'boukit']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['alexipharmical', 'algedonics']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: alexipharmical: e. algedonics: g.
Thought 6: We now have: alexipharmical < algedonicsfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['cytomegalovirus', 'casualty', 'casquetel'] < ['brisker', 'boukit'] < alexipharmical < skull < kehillah < vilenesses < ['rabbleproof', 'redevelopers'] < algedonics < protead
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['cytomegalovirus', 'casualty', 'casquetel']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: cytomegalovirus: y. casualty: a. casquetel: a.
Thought 8: We now have: ['casualty', 'casquetel'] < cytomegalovirusfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['casualty', 'casquetel'] < cytomegalovirus < ['brisker', 'boukit'] < alexipharmical < skull < kehillah < vilenesses < ['rabbleproof', 'redevelopers'] < algedonics < protead
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['casualty', 'casquetel']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: casualty: s. casquetel: s.
Thought 10: We now have: ['casualty', 'casquetel']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['casualty', 'casquetel'] < cytomegalovirus < ['brisker', 'boukit'] < alexipharmical < skull < kehillah < vilenesses < ['rabbleproof', 'redevelopers'] < algedonics < protead
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['casualty', 'casquetel']. Looking at the fourth letters.The fourth letter: casualty: u. casquetel: q.
Thought 12: We now have: casualty < casquetelfor the subpart. Hence, we have casualty < casquetel < cytomegalovirus < ['brisker', 'boukit'] < alexipharmical < skull < kehillah < vilenesses < ['rabbleproof', 'redevelopers'] < algedonics < protead
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['rabbleproof', 'redevelopers']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: rabbleproof: a. redevelopers: e.
Thought 14: We now have: rabbleproof < redevelopersfor the subpart. Hence, we have casualty < ['brisker', 'boukit'] < casquetel < protead < vilenesses < alexipharmical < redevelopers < algedonics < skull < cytomegalovirus < kehillah < rabbleproof
Thought 15: Now let's sort this subpart ['brisker', 'boukit']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: brisker: r. boukit: o.
Thought 16: We now have: brisker < boukitfor the subpart. Hence, we have casualty < brisker < boukit < casquetel < protead < vilenesses < alexipharmical < redevelopers < algedonics < skull < cytomegalovirus < kehillah < rabbleproof
Thought 17: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is protead alexipharmical algedonics casualty casquetel cytomegalovirus skull rabbleproof redevelopers vilenesses kehillah brisker boukit

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

m p a c f s u e r v g q o k t z w d l n b y x j i h


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: amvis, rewaking, nebularize, falcation, agronomical, heterocera, betag, underoccupied, micturated, slatish, pshawed, sailoring, tophous

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: amvis: a. rewaking: r. nebularize: n. falcation: f. agronomical: a. heterocera: h. betag: b. underoccupied: u. micturated: m. slatish: s. pshawed: p. sailoring: s. tophous: t.

We now have: ['amvis', 'agronomical'] < betag < falcation < heterocera < micturated < nebularize < pshawed < rewaking < ['slatish', 'sailoring'] < tophous < underoccupied

Now let's sort this subpart ['amvis', 'agronomical']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: amvis: m. agronomical: g.

We now have: agronomical < amvisfor the subpart. Hence, we have agronomical < amvis < betag < falcation < heterocera < micturated < nebularize < pshawed < rewaking < ['slatish', 'sailoring'] < tophous < underoccupied

Now let's sort this subpart ['slatish', 'sailoring']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: slatish: l. sailoring: a.

We now have: sailoring < slatishfor the subpart. Hence, we have agronomical < amvis < betag < falcation < heterocera < micturated < nebularize < pshawed < rewaking < sailoring < slatish < tophous < underoccupied

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is agronomical amvis betag falcation heterocera micturated nebularize pshawed rewaking sailoring slatish tophous underoccupied

amvis rewaking nebularize falcation agronomical heterocera betag underoccupied micturated slatish pshawed sailoring tophous


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: baccilla, nonparadoxically, skylike, hyphenation, cristated, downhill, exsected, polysyndeton, predefined
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: h, q, b, a, i, j, o, g, c, l, d, v, n, w, k, p, z, m, r, f, s, t, x, u, e, y

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: baccilla: b. nonparadoxically: n. skylike: s. hyphenation: h. cristated: c. downhill: d. exsected: e. polysyndeton: p. predefined: p.

We now have: hyphenation < baccilla < cristated < downhill < nonparadoxically < ['polysyndeton', 'predefined'] < skylike < exsected

Now let's sort this subpart ['polysyndeton', 'predefined']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: polysyndeton: o. predefined: r.

We now have: polysyndeton < predefinedfor the subpart. Hence, we have hyphenation < baccilla < cristated < downhill < nonparadoxically < polysyndeton < predefined < skylike < exsected

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is hyphenation baccilla cristated downhill nonparadoxically polysyndeton predefined skylike exsected

baccilla nonparadoxically skylike hyphenation cristated downhill exsected polysyndeton predefined

h q b a i j o g c l d v n w k p z m r f s t x u e y


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: posters etherealise redare picarooned prebind kleistian lamias flaps disciform
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: h, w, a, v, o, j, x, c, k, m, z, y, s, g, q, r, u, i, n, t, p, f, d, e, b, l

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: posters: s. etherealise: e. redare: e. picarooned: d. prebind: d. kleistian: n. lamias: l. flaps: s. disciform: m.
Thought 2: We now have: ['picarooned', 'prebind'] < lamias < kleistian < ['posters', 'flaps'] < ['etherealise', 'redare'] < disciform
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['picarooned', 'prebind']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: picarooned: e. prebind: n.
Thought 4: We now have: prebind < picaroonedfor the subpart. Hence, we have prebind < ['posters', 'flaps'] < ['etherealise', 'redare'] < kleistian < picarooned < lamias < disciform
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['posters', 'flaps']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: posters: r. flaps: p.
Thought 6: We now have: posters < flapsfor the subpart. Hence, we have picarooned < posters < lamias < kleistian < ['etherealise', 'redare'] < disciform < prebind < flaps
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['etherealise', 'redare']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: etherealise: s. redare: r.
Thought 8: We now have: etherealise < redarefor the subpart. Hence, we have picarooned < posters < lamias < kleistian < etherealise < redare < disciform < prebind < flaps
Thought 9: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is prebind picarooned lamias kleistian posters flaps etherealise redare disciform

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

h w a v o j x c k m z y s g q r u i n t p f d e b l


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: approbatory awkwardly indigestibility nonexactingness legislatress residiuum lampadephoria whirling trionychoidean

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: approbatory: a. awkwardly: a. indigestibility: i. nonexactingness: n. legislatress: l. residiuum: r. lampadephoria: l. whirling: w. trionychoidean: r.
Thought 2: We now have: ['approbatory', 'awkwardly'] < indigestibility < ['legislatress', 'lampadephoria'] < nonexactingness < ['residiuum', 'trionychoidean'] < whirling
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['approbatory', 'awkwardly']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: approbatory: p. awkwardly: w.
Thought 4: We now have: awkwardly < approbatoryfor the subpart. Hence, we have approbatory < awkwardly < indigestibility < ['legislatress', 'lampadephoria'] < nonexactingness < ['residiuum', 'trionychoidean'] < whirling
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['legislatress', 'lampadephoria']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: legislatress: e. lampadephoria: a.
Thought 6: We now have: lampadephoria < legislatressfor the subpart. Hence, we have approbatory < awkwardly < indigestibility < lampadephoria < legislatress < nonexactingness < ['residiuum', 'trionychoidean'] < whirling
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['residiuum', 'trionychoidean']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: residiuum: e. trionychoidean: r.
Thought 8: We now have: residiuum < trionychoideanfor the subpart. Hence, we have approbatory < awkwardly < indigestibility < lampadephoria < legislatress < nonexactingness < residiuum < trionychoidean < whirling
Thought 9: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is awkwardly approbatory indigestibility lampadephoria legislatress nonexactingness residiuum trionychoidean whirling

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: kafkaesque, unaffectionately, gyal, camphane, triumvirates, leptodermous, augmentor, mins, biggety, openmouthedness, microhistology, serpentarian
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: r, l, y, u, w, e, z, i, g, s, n, h, p, q, o, d, c, a, v, m, k, f, x, j, t, b

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: kafkaesque: e. unaffectionately: y. gyal: l. camphane: e. triumvirates: s. leptodermous: s. augmentor: r. mins: s. biggety: y. openmouthedness: s. microhistology: y. serpentarian: n.

We now have: augmentor < gyal < ['unaffectionately', 'biggety', 'microhistology'] < ['kafkaesque', 'camphane'] < ['triumvirates', 'leptodermous', 'mins', 'openmouthedness'] < serpentarian

Now let's sort this subpart ['unaffectionately', 'biggety', 'microhistology']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: unaffectionately: l. biggety: t. microhistology: g.

We now have: unaffectionately < microhistology < biggetyfor the subpart. Hence, we have augmentor < gyal < unaffectionately < microhistology < biggety < ['kafkaesque', 'camphane'] < ['triumvirates', 'leptodermous', 'mins', 'openmouthedness'] < serpentarian

Now let's sort this subpart ['kafkaesque', 'camphane']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: kafkaesque: u. camphane: n.

We now have: kafkaesque < camphanefor the subpart. Hence, we have augmentor < gyal < unaffectionately < microhistology < biggety < kafkaesque < camphane < ['triumvirates', 'leptodermous', 'mins', 'openmouthedness'] < serpentarian

Now let's sort this subpart ['triumvirates', 'leptodermous', 'mins', 'openmouthedness']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: triumvirates: e. leptodermous: u. mins: n. openmouthedness: s.

We now have: leptodermous < triumvirates < openmouthedness < minsfor the subpart. Hence, we have augmentor < gyal < unaffectionately < microhistology < biggety < kafkaesque < camphane < leptodermous < triumvirates < openmouthedness < mins < serpentarian

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is augmentor gyal unaffectionately microhistology biggety kafkaesque camphane leptodermous triumvirates openmouthedness mins serpentarian

kafkaesque unaffectionately gyal camphane triumvirates leptodermous augmentor mins biggety openmouthedness microhistology serpentarian

r l y u w e z i g s n h p q o d c a v m k f x j t b


Prompt:
Sort the following words with the new alphabet and separate them with comma: duopod, undissembledness, encountered, ebonizing, unigniting, colibacterin, isothermal, nominators, overpotently, croupy, quattuordecillionth
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: p, j, n, e, c, q, d, a, i, t, v, k, g, z, u, y, b, w, x, r, h, m, f, l, o, s

Format your final answer as: [answer]<comma-separated words>[/answer].
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: duopod: d. undissembledness: u. encountered: e. ebonizing: e. unigniting: u. colibacterin: c. isothermal: i. nominators: n. overpotently: o. croupy: c. quattuordecillionth: q.

We now have: nominators < ['encountered', 'ebonizing'] < ['colibacterin', 'croupy'] < quattuordecillionth < duopod < isothermal < ['undissembledness', 'unigniting'] < overpotently

Now let's sort this subpart ['encountered', 'ebonizing']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: encountered: n. ebonizing: b.

We now have: encountered < ebonizingfor the subpart. Hence, we have nominators < encountered < ebonizing < ['colibacterin', 'croupy'] < quattuordecillionth < duopod < isothermal < ['undissembledness', 'unigniting'] < overpotently

Now let's sort this subpart ['colibacterin', 'croupy']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: colibacterin: o. croupy: r.

We now have: croupy < colibacterinfor the subpart. Hence, we have nominators < encountered < ebonizing < croupy < colibacterin < quattuordecillionth < duopod < isothermal < ['undissembledness', 'unigniting'] < overpotently

Now let's sort this subpart ['undissembledness', 'unigniting']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: undissembledness: n. unigniting: n.

We now have: ['undissembledness', 'unigniting']for the subpart. Hence, we have nominators < encountered < ebonizing < croupy < colibacterin < quattuordecillionth < duopod < isothermal < ['undissembledness', 'unigniting'] < overpotently

Now let's sort this subpart ['undissembledness', 'unigniting']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: undissembledness: d. unigniting: i.

We now have: undissembledness < unignitingfor the subpart. Hence, we have nominators < encountered < ebonizing < croupy < colibacterin < quattuordecillionth < duopod < isothermal < undissembledness < unigniting < overpotently

I have now sorted all the words. The answer is nominators encountered ebonizing croupy colibacterin quattuordecillionth duopod isothermal undissembledness unigniting overpotently

duopod undissembledness encountered ebonizing unigniting colibacterin isothermal nominators overpotently croupy quattuordecillionth

p j n e c q d a i t v k g z u y b w x r h m f l o s


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: pneumatotactic fascicled cardiopulmonary semipopularly stretchneck dehydroascorbic tartarish macrognathism reitemizing siloed formerly unsplittable
There are some special requirements:

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: pneumatotactic: c. fascicled: d. cardiopulmonary: y. semipopularly: y. stretchneck: k. dehydroascorbic: c. tartarish: h. macrognathism: m. reitemizing: g. siloed: d. formerly: y. unsplittable: e.
Thought 2: We now have: ['pneumatotactic', 'dehydroascorbic'] < ['fascicled', 'siloed'] < unsplittable < reitemizing < tartarish < stretchneck < macrognathism < ['cardiopulmonary', 'semipopularly', 'formerly']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['pneumatotactic', 'dehydroascorbic']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: pneumatotactic: i. dehydroascorbic: i.
Thought 4: We now have: ['pneumatotactic', 'dehydroascorbic']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['pneumatotactic', 'dehydroascorbic'] < ['fascicled', 'siloed'] < unsplittable < reitemizing < tartarish < stretchneck < macrognathism < ['cardiopulmonary', 'semipopularly', 'formerly']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['pneumatotactic', 'dehydroascorbic']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: pneumatotactic: t. dehydroascorbic: b.
Thought 6: We now have: dehydroascorbic < pneumatotacticfor the subpart. Hence, we have dehydroascorbic < pneumatotactic < ['fascicled', 'siloed'] < unsplittable < reitemizing < tartarish < stretchneck < macrognathism < ['cardiopulmonary', 'semipopularly', 'formerly']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['fascicled', 'siloed']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: fascicled: e. siloed: e.
Thought 8: We now have: ['fascicled', 'siloed']for the subpart. Hence, we have dehydroascorbic < pneumatotactic < ['fascicled', 'siloed'] < unsplittable < reitemizing < tartarish < stretchneck < macrognathism < ['cardiopulmonary', 'semipopularly', 'formerly']
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['fascicled', 'siloed']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: fascicled: l. siloed: o.
Thought 10: We now have: fascicled < siloedfor the subpart. Hence, we have dehydroascorbic < pneumatotactic < fascicled < siloed < unsplittable < reitemizing < tartarish < stretchneck < macrognathism < ['cardiopulmonary', 'semipopularly', 'formerly']
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['cardiopulmonary', 'semipopularly', 'formerly']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: cardiopulmonary: r. semipopularly: l. formerly: l.
Thought 12: We now have: ['semipopularly', 'formerly'] < cardiopulmonaryfor the subpart. Hence, we have siloed < fascicled < dehydroascorbic < reitemizing < stretchneck < unsplittable < ['semipopularly', 'formerly'] < cardiopulmonary < pneumatotactic < tartarish < macrognathism
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['semipopularly', 'formerly']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: semipopularly: r. formerly: r.
Thought 14: We now have: ['semipopularly', 'formerly']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['semipopularly', 'formerly'] < siloed < reitemizing < pneumatotactic < cardiopulmonary < tartarish < unsplittable < macrognathism < stretchneck < dehydroascorbic < fascicled
Thought 15: Now let's sort this subpart ['semipopularly', 'formerly']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: semipopularly: a. formerly: e.
Thought 16: We now have: semipopularly < formerlyfor the subpart. Hence, we have cardiopulmonary < macrognathism < unsplittable < stretchneck < tartarish < dehydroascorbic < semipopularly < fascicled < formerly < reitemizing < pneumatotactic < siloed
Thought 17: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is dehydroascorbic pneumatotactic fascicled siloed unsplittable reitemizing tartarish stretchneck macrognathism semipopularly formerly cardiopulmonary

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: uncensored criminously replenisher unballoted overdistempered cumflutter witchiest overgod ponderal dactylopteridae unflirtatiousness pennyworths stricker
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: b, c, r, w, a, l, u, s, q, j, z, k, y, d, x, p, e, t, i, m, v, n, h, f, g, o

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: uncensored: u. criminously: c. replenisher: r. unballoted: u. overdistempered: o. cumflutter: c. witchiest: w. overgod: o. ponderal: p. dactylopteridae: d. unflirtatiousness: u. pennyworths: p. stricker: s.
Thought 2: We now have: ['criminously', 'cumflutter'] < replenisher < witchiest < ['uncensored', 'unballoted', 'unflirtatiousness'] < stricker < dactylopteridae < ['ponderal', 'pennyworths'] < ['overdistempered', 'overgod']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['criminously', 'cumflutter']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: criminously: r. cumflutter: u.
Thought 4: We now have: cumflutter < criminouslyfor the subpart. Hence, we have witchiest < replenisher < ['overdistempered', 'overgod'] < criminously < cumflutter < stricker < ['uncensored', 'unballoted', 'unflirtatiousness'] < ['ponderal', 'pennyworths'] < dactylopteridae
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['uncensored', 'unballoted', 'unflirtatiousness']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: uncensored: n. unballoted: n. unflirtatiousness: n.
Thought 6: We now have: ['uncensored', 'unballoted', 'unflirtatiousness']for the subpart. Hence, we have witchiest < replenisher < ['overdistempered', 'overgod'] < criminously < cumflutter < stricker < ['uncensored', 'unballoted', 'unflirtatiousness'] < ['ponderal', 'pennyworths'] < dactylopteridae
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['uncensored', 'unballoted', 'unflirtatiousness']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: uncensored: c. unballoted: b. unflirtatiousness: f.
Thought 8: We now have: unballoted < uncensored < unflirtatiousnessfor the subpart. Hence, we have witchiest < replenisher < ['overdistempered', 'overgod'] < criminously < cumflutter < stricker < unballoted < uncensored < unflirtatiousness < ['ponderal', 'pennyworths'] < dactylopteridae
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['ponderal', 'pennyworths']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: ponderal: o. pennyworths: e.
Thought 10: We now have: ponderal < pennyworthsfor the subpart. Hence, we have witchiest < replenisher < ['overdistempered', 'overgod'] < criminously < cumflutter < stricker < unballoted < uncensored < unflirtatiousness < pennyworths < ponderal < dactylopteridae
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['overdistempered', 'overgod']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: overdistempered: v. overgod: v.
Thought 12: We now have: ['overdistempered', 'overgod']for the subpart. Hence, we have witchiest < replenisher < ['overdistempered', 'overgod'] < criminously < cumflutter < stricker < unballoted < uncensored < unflirtatiousness < pennyworths < ponderal < dactylopteridae
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['overdistempered', 'overgod']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: overdistempered: e. overgod: e.
Thought 14: We now have: ['overdistempered', 'overgod']for the subpart. Hence, we have witchiest < replenisher < ['overdistempered', 'overgod'] < criminously < cumflutter < stricker < unballoted < uncensored < unflirtatiousness < pennyworths < ponderal < dactylopteridae
Thought 15: Now let's sort this subpart ['overdistempered', 'overgod']. Looking at the fourth letters.The fourth letter: overdistempered: r. overgod: r.
Thought 16: We now have: ['overdistempered', 'overgod']for the subpart. Hence, we have witchiest < replenisher < ['overdistempered', 'overgod'] < criminously < cumflutter < stricker < unballoted < uncensored < unflirtatiousness < pennyworths < ponderal < dactylopteridae
Thought 17: Now let's sort this subpart ['overdistempered', 'overgod']. Looking at the fifth letters.The fifth letter: overdistempered: d. overgod: g.
Thought 18: We now have: overgod < overdistemperedfor the subpart. Hence, we have criminously < cumflutter < stricker < uncensored < overdistempered < witchiest < ponderal < pennyworths < unflirtatiousness < replenisher < overgod < unballoted < dactylopteridae
Thought 19: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is cumflutter criminously replenisher witchiest unballoted uncensored unflirtatiousness stricker dactylopteridae ponderal pennyworths overgod overdistempered

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

b c r w a l u s q j z k y d x p e t i m v n h f g o


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: greeters payrolls cobra multiplexing laparohysterectomy transversality deejays kedjave preexecute turbinotomy bedspreads tricaudate sulfureousness
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: z, c, e, w, i, p, l, n, q, m, t, k, j, d, h, r, o, x, u, g, b, s, a, v, y, f

Add a new sorting rule. When sorting the words, you need to sort the letters in reverse order, comparing from right to left instead of left to right.

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: greeters: r. payrolls: s. cobra: a. multiplexing: g. laparohysterectomy: y. transversality: y. deejays: s. kedjave: e. preexecute: e. turbinotomy: y. bedspreads: s. tricaudate: e. sulfureousness: s.
Thought 2: We now have: ['kedjave', 'preexecute', 'tricaudate'] < greeters < multiplexing < ['payrolls', 'deejays', 'bedspreads', 'sulfureousness'] < cobra < ['laparohysterectomy', 'transversality', 'turbinotomy']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['kedjave', 'preexecute', 'tricaudate']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: kedjave: v. preexecute: t. tricaudate: t.
Thought 4: We now have: ['preexecute', 'tricaudate'] < kedjavefor the subpart. Hence, we have multiplexing < cobra < ['payrolls', 'deejays', 'bedspreads', 'sulfureousness'] < ['laparohysterectomy', 'transversality', 'turbinotomy'] < ['preexecute', 'tricaudate'] < greeters < kedjave
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['preexecute', 'tricaudate']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: preexecute: u. tricaudate: a.
Thought 6: We now have: preexecute < tricaudatefor the subpart. Hence, we have multiplexing < cobra < ['payrolls', 'deejays', 'bedspreads', 'sulfureousness'] < ['laparohysterectomy', 'transversality', 'turbinotomy'] < preexecute < tricaudate < greeters < kedjave
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['payrolls', 'deejays', 'bedspreads', 'sulfureousness']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: payrolls: a. deejays: y. bedspreads: d. sulfureousness: s.
Thought 8: We now have: bedspreads < sulfureousness < payrolls < deejaysfor the subpart. Hence, we have multiplexing < cobra < bedspreads < sulfureousness < payrolls < deejays < ['laparohysterectomy', 'transversality', 'turbinotomy'] < preexecute < tricaudate < greeters < kedjave
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['laparohysterectomy', 'transversality', 'turbinotomy']. Looking at the second letters from right to left.The second letter: laparohysterectomy: m. transversality: t. turbinotomy: m.
Thought 10: We now have: ['laparohysterectomy', 'turbinotomy'] < transversalityfor the subpart. Hence, we have greeters < kedjave < bedspreads < deejays < payrolls < ['laparohysterectomy', 'turbinotomy'] < multiplexing < sulfureousness < preexecute < transversality < tricaudate < cobra
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['laparohysterectomy', 'turbinotomy']. Looking at the third letters from right to left.The third letter: laparohysterectomy: o. turbinotomy: o.
Thought 12: We now have: ['laparohysterectomy', 'turbinotomy']for the subpart. Hence, we have greeters < kedjave < bedspreads < deejays < payrolls < ['laparohysterectomy', 'turbinotomy'] < multiplexing < sulfureousness < preexecute < transversality < tricaudate < cobra
Thought 13: Now let's sort this subpart ['laparohysterectomy', 'turbinotomy']. Looking at the fourth letters from right to left.The fourth letter: laparohysterectomy: t. turbinotomy: t.
Thought 14: We now have: ['laparohysterectomy', 'turbinotomy']for the subpart. Hence, we have multiplexing < cobra < deejays < tricaudate < ['laparohysterectomy', 'turbinotomy'] < sulfureousness < kedjave < greeters < bedspreads < preexecute < payrolls < transversality
Thought 15: Now let's sort this subpart ['laparohysterectomy', 'turbinotomy']. Looking at the fifth letters from right to left.The fifth letter: laparohysterectomy: c. turbinotomy: o.
Thought 16: We now have: laparohysterectomy < turbinotomyfor the subpart. Hence, we have multiplexing < cobra < deejays < tricaudate < laparohysterectomy < turbinotomy < sulfureousness < kedjave < greeters < bedspreads < preexecute < payrolls < transversality
Thought 17: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is preexecute tricaudate kedjave greeters multiplexing bedspreads sulfureousness payrolls deejays cobra laparohysterectomy turbinotomy transversality

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

z c e w i p l n q m t k j d h r o x u g b s a v y f


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: preanticipating livid saluters pitchpoll drysalteries underwent cacogalactia cooperate unintently scantling soberest ficche

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: preanticipating: p. livid: l. saluters: s. pitchpoll: p. drysalteries: d. underwent: u. cacogalactia: c. cooperate: c. unintently: u. scantling: s. soberest: s. ficche: f.
Thought 2: We now have: ['underwent', 'unintently'] < ['saluters', 'scantling', 'soberest'] < ['preanticipating', 'pitchpoll'] < livid < ficche < drysalteries < ['cacogalactia', 'cooperate']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['underwent', 'unintently']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: underwent: n. unintently: n.
Thought 4: We now have: ['underwent', 'unintently']for the subpart. Hence, we have ['cacogalactia', 'cooperate'] < livid < ficche < ['underwent', 'unintently'] < ['saluters', 'scantling', 'soberest'] < drysalteries < ['preanticipating', 'pitchpoll']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['underwent', 'unintently']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: underwent: u. unintently: i.
Thought 6: We now have: unintently < underwentfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['cacogalactia', 'cooperate'] < livid < ficche < unintently < underwent < ['saluters', 'scantling', 'soberest'] < drysalteries < ['preanticipating', 'pitchpoll']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['saluters', 'scantling', 'soberest']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: saluters: a. scantling: c. soberest: o.
Thought 8: We now have: saluters < scantling < soberestfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['cacogalactia', 'cooperate'] < livid < ficche < unintently < underwent < saluters < scantling < soberest < drysalteries < ['preanticipating', 'pitchpoll']
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['preanticipating', 'pitchpoll']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: preanticipating: r. pitchpoll: i.
Thought 10: We now have: pitchpoll < preanticipatingfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['cacogalactia', 'cooperate'] < livid < ficche < unintently < underwent < saluters < scantling < soberest < drysalteries < pitchpoll < preanticipating
Thought 11: Now let's sort this subpart ['cacogalactia', 'cooperate']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: cacogalactia: a. cooperate: o.
Thought 12: We now have: cacogalactia < cooperatefor the subpart. Hence, we have cacogalactia < cooperate < livid < ficche < unintently < underwent < saluters < scantling < soberest < drysalteries < pitchpoll < preanticipating
Thought 13: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is unintently underwent saluters scantling soberest pitchpoll preanticipating livid ficche drysalteries cacogalactia cooperate

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.


Prompt:
You are an expert in word sorting. You will be provided with a list of words and the steps taken, in the form of thoughts.
Your job is to identify the first step that was a mistake in reasoning about the order of the words. This can be misunderstanding the order of
the alphabet or getting the word or letter wrong or missing a word entirely.
Q: Sort the following words: List: eriodendron parsic cade aerobranchia compendiums cracknels broadcastings paraphototropism
There are some special requirements:

You need to sort the words according to a custom alphabet. The custom order is: g, u, y, j, x, v, k, n, f, w, t, s, m, b, i, p, l, h, a, e, z, o, c, d, q, r

Thought 1: I should start by looking at the first letter of the words in the list. The first letter: eriodendron: e. parsic: p. cade: c. aerobranchia: a. compendiums: c. cracknels: c. broadcastings: b. paraphototropism: p.
Thought 2: We now have: broadcastings < ['parsic', 'paraphototropism'] < aerobranchia < eriodendron < ['cade', 'compendiums', 'cracknels']
Thought 3: Now let's sort this subpart ['parsic', 'paraphototropism']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: parsic: a. paraphototropism: a.
Thought 4: We now have: ['parsic', 'paraphototropism']for the subpart. Hence, we have broadcastings < ['parsic', 'paraphototropism'] < aerobranchia < eriodendron < ['cade', 'compendiums', 'cracknels']
Thought 5: Now let's sort this subpart ['parsic', 'paraphototropism']. Looking at the third letters.The third letter: parsic: r. paraphototropism: r.
Thought 6: We now have: ['parsic', 'paraphototropism']for the subpart. Hence, we have broadcastings < ['parsic', 'paraphototropism'] < aerobranchia < eriodendron < ['cade', 'compendiums', 'cracknels']
Thought 7: Now let's sort this subpart ['parsic', 'paraphototropism']. Looking at the fourth letters.The fourth letter: parsic: s. paraphototropism: a.
Thought 8: We now have: paraphototropism < parsicfor the subpart. Hence, we have ['cade', 'compendiums', 'cracknels'] < eriodendron < parsic < aerobranchia < paraphototropism < broadcastings
Thought 9: Now let's sort this subpart ['cade', 'compendiums', 'cracknels']. Looking at the second letters.The second letter: cade: a. compendiums: o. cracknels: r.
Thought 10: We now have: cracknels < compendiums < cadefor the subpart. Hence, we have cade < compendiums < cracknels < eriodendron < parsic < aerobranchia < paraphototropism < broadcastings
Thought 11: I have now sorted all the words. The answer is broadcastings paraphototropism parsic aerobranchia eriodendron cracknels compendiums cade

Q: Is there a mistake in this sequence? Write "No" if there are no mistakes, or the number N if there is a mistake in Thought N.
Please reason step by step and put your final answer within [answer] [/answer] tags.

g u y j x v k n f w t s m b i p l h a e z o c d q r