Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Permittedcontract fulfillment?

Options:
A) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
B) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
C) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Permittedcontract fulfillment?

Choices:
A. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
B. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
C. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is obligatory for citizens' rights protection
   b. must not citizens' rights protection
Pair 2:
   a. must contract fulfillment
   b. must not contract fulfillment

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

must contract fulfillment
must not contract fulfillment


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is obligatory for disruptive behavior in cultural venues
   b. is permitted for disruptive behavior in cultural venues
Pair 2:
   a. must not national property protection
   b. may national property protection

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

must not national property protection
may national property protection


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
reasonable sports collisions is prohibited, but national property protection is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) reasonable sports collisions
b) national property protection

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: ‽p ∧ §¬q


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is permitted for contract fulfillment
   b. is permitted for not contract fulfillment
Pair 2:
   a. may operate legally for reasonable profits
   b. is permitted for not operate legally for reasonable profits

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is prohibited for contract fulfillment
   b. is permitted for not contract fulfillment
Pair 2:
   a. is prohibited for national property protection
   b. is permitted for not national property protection

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
abuse of vulnerable groups is prohibited, but disruptive behavior in cultural venues is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) abuse of vulnerable groups
b) disruptive behavior in cultural venues

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: ‽p ∧ §¬q


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. must not noise in quiet zones
   b. may noise in quiet zones
Pair 2:
   a. is obligatory for contract fulfillment
   b. must not contract fulfillment

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

must not noise in quiet zones
may noise in quiet zones

is obligatory for contract fulfillment
must not contract fulfillment


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
operate legally for reasonable profits is mandatory, but noise in quiet zones is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) operate legally for reasonable profits
b) noise in quiet zones

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: ¶p ∧ §¬q


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. may noise in quiet zones
   b. may not noise in quiet zones
Pair 2:
   a. may reasonable sports collisions
   b. may not reasonable sports collisions

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

may noise in quiet zones
may not noise in quiet zones

may reasonable sports collisions
may not reasonable sports collisions


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
contract fulfillment is mandatory, but tobacco use in public areas is prohibited.

Variable definitions:
a) contract fulfillment
b) tobacco use in public areas

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: ¶p ∧ ‽q


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
price fraud occurs is mandatory, but contract fulfillment is prohibited.

Variable definitions:
a) price fraud occurs
b) contract fulfillment

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: ¶p ∧ ‽q


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Mandatorydisruptive behavior in cultural venues→¬prohibiteddisruptive behavior in cultural venues?

Options:
A) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
B) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
C) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Mandatorydisruptive behavior in cultural venues→¬prohibiteddisruptive behavior in cultural venues?

Choices:
A. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
B. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
C. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. may noise in quiet zones
   b. is permitted for not noise in quiet zones
Pair 2:
   a. must youth development support
   b. is permitted for youth development support

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitednational property protection→permitted¬national property protection?

Options:
A) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
B) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
C) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
D) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitednational property protection→permitted¬national property protection?

Choices:
A. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
B. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
C. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
D. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
national property protection is mandatory, but citizens' rights protection is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) national property protection
b) citizens' rights protection

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: ¶p ∧ §¬q


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is permitted for tobacco use in public areas
   b. is permitted for not tobacco use in public areas
Pair 2:
   a. is prohibited for abuse of vulnerable groups
   b. may abuse of vulnerable groups

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedcontract fulfillment?

Options:
A) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
B) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
C) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedcontract fulfillment?

Choices:
A. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
B. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
C. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is permitted for citizens' rights protection
   b. may not citizens' rights protection
Pair 2:
   a. must not disruptive behavior in cultural venues
   b. may not disruptive behavior in cultural venues

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
youth development support is permitted, but contract fulfillment is prohibited.

Variable definitions:
a) youth development support
b) contract fulfillment

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: §p ∧ ‽q


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is prohibited for youth development support
   b. may youth development support
Pair 2:
   a. is permitted for contract fulfillment
   b. may not contract fulfillment

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

is permitted for contract fulfillment
may not contract fulfillment


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. may national property protection
   b. is permitted for not national property protection
Pair 2:
   a. may remarriage rights
   b. is permitted for not remarriage rights

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

may remarriage rights
is permitted for not remarriage rights


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. must not youth development support
   b. may youth development support
Pair 2:
   a. is prohibited for disruptive behavior in cultural venues
   b. is permitted for not disruptive behavior in cultural venues

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

must not youth development support
may youth development support


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. may citizens' rights protection
   b. may not citizens' rights protection
Pair 2:
   a. must disruptive behavior in cultural venues
   b. is prohibited for disruptive behavior in cultural venues

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

may citizens' rights protection
may not citizens' rights protection


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Mandatorytobacco use in public areas→¬prohibitedtobacco use in public areas?

Options:
A) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
B) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
C) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
D) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Mandatorytobacco use in public areas→¬prohibitedtobacco use in public areas?

Choices:
A. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
B. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
C. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
D. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
price fraud occurs is mandatory, but tobacco use in public areas is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) price fraud occurs
b) tobacco use in public areas

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: ¶p ∧ §¬q


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
citizens' rights protection is mandatory, but tobacco use in public areas is prohibited.

Variable definitions:
a) citizens' rights protection
b) tobacco use in public areas

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: ¶p ∧ ‽q


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. must not noise in quiet zones
   b. may not noise in quiet zones
Pair 2:
   a. must national property protection
   b. is permitted for national property protection

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

must not noise in quiet zones
may not noise in quiet zones


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. may price fraud occurs
   b. may not price fraud occurs
Pair 2:
   a. is obligatory for contract fulfillment
   b. is prohibited for contract fulfillment

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

may price fraud occurs
may not price fraud occurs

is obligatory for contract fulfillment
is prohibited for contract fulfillment


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is prohibited for contract fulfillment
   b. may contract fulfillment
Pair 2:
   a. must not operate legally for reasonable profits
   b. is permitted for not operate legally for reasonable profits

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

is prohibited for contract fulfillment
may contract fulfillment


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. must not disruptive behavior in cultural venues
   b. may disruptive behavior in cultural venues
Pair 2:
   a. must not tobacco use in public areas
   b. is permitted for not tobacco use in public areas

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. must contract fulfillment
   b. may contract fulfillment
Pair 2:
   a. must not citizens' rights protection
   b. may citizens' rights protection

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

must contract fulfillment
may contract fulfillment

must not citizens' rights protection
may citizens' rights protection


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is obligatory for price fraud occurs
   b. is permitted for not price fraud occurs
Pair 2:
   a. must price fraud occurs
   b. must not price fraud occurs

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

is obligatory for price fraud occurs
is permitted for not price fraud occurs

must price fraud occurs
must not price fraud occurs


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. must remarriage rights
   b. is prohibited for remarriage rights
Pair 2:
   a. must disruptive behavior in cultural venues
   b. is permitted for not disruptive behavior in cultural venues

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

must remarriage rights
is prohibited for remarriage rights


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is permitted for operate legally for reasonable profits
   b. may not operate legally for reasonable profits
Pair 2:
   a. is permitted for noise in quiet zones
   b. is permitted for not noise in quiet zones

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is obligatory for operate legally for reasonable profits
   b. is permitted for operate legally for reasonable profits
Pair 2:
   a. is permitted for national property protection
   b. is permitted for not national property protection

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is prohibited for contract fulfillment
   b. may not contract fulfillment
Pair 2:
   a. must not noise in quiet zones
   b. may not noise in quiet zones

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

is prohibited for contract fulfillment
may not contract fulfillment

must not noise in quiet zones
may not noise in quiet zones


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Mandatoryyouth development support→¬prohibitedyouth development support?

Options:
A) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
B) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
C) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Mandatoryyouth development support→¬prohibitedyouth development support?

Choices:
A. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
B. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
C. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedyouth development support?

Options:
A) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
B) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
C) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
D) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedyouth development support?

Choices:
A. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
B. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
C. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
D. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is permitted for price fraud occurs
   b. is permitted for not price fraud occurs
Pair 2:
   a. is obligatory for reasonable sports collisions
   b. is permitted for not reasonable sports collisions

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

is permitted for price fraud occurs
is permitted for not price fraud occurs


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is obligatory for contract fulfillment
   b. may contract fulfillment
Pair 2:
   a. is obligatory for operate legally for reasonable profits
   b. may not operate legally for reasonable profits

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

is obligatory for contract fulfillment
may contract fulfillment


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedtobacco use in public areas→permitted¬tobacco use in public areas?

Options:
A) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
B) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
C) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
D) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedtobacco use in public areas→permitted¬tobacco use in public areas?

Choices:
A. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
B. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
C. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
D. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitednational property protection?

Options:
A) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
B) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
C) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
D) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitednational property protection?

Choices:
A. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
B. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
C. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
D. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is prohibited for price fraud occurs
   b. is permitted for price fraud occurs
Pair 2:
   a. may citizens' rights protection
   b. is permitted for not citizens' rights protection

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

is prohibited for price fraud occurs
is permitted for price fraud occurs


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
operate legally for reasonable profits is mandatory, but disruptive behavior in cultural venues is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) operate legally for reasonable profits
b) disruptive behavior in cultural venues

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: ¶p ∧ §¬q


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
contract fulfillment is mandatory, but disruptive behavior in cultural venues is prohibited.

Variable definitions:
a) contract fulfillment
b) disruptive behavior in cultural venues

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: ¶p ∧ ‽q


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is permitted for reasonable sports collisions
   b. is permitted for not reasonable sports collisions
Pair 2:
   a. may reasonable sports collisions
   b. may not reasonable sports collisions

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

may reasonable sports collisions
may not reasonable sports collisions


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Mandatoryabuse of vulnerable groups→permittedabuse of vulnerable groups?

Options:
A) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
B) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
C) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
D) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Mandatoryabuse of vulnerable groups→permittedabuse of vulnerable groups?

Choices:
A. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
B. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
C. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
D. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Permittedprice fraud occurs?

Options:
A) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
B) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
C) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Permittedprice fraud occurs?

Choices:
A. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
B. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
C. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is obligatory for national property protection
   b. is permitted for national property protection
Pair 2:
   a. must national property protection
   b. is prohibited for national property protection

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
youth development support is prohibited, but abuse of vulnerable groups is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) youth development support
b) abuse of vulnerable groups

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: ‽p ∧ §¬q


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Mandatoryoperate legally for reasonable profits→permittedoperate legally for reasonable profits?

Options:
A) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
B) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
C) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Mandatoryoperate legally for reasonable profits→permittedoperate legally for reasonable profits?

Choices:
A. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
B. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
C. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
citizens' rights protection is mandatory, but noise in quiet zones is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) citizens' rights protection
b) noise in quiet zones

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: ¶p ∧ §¬q


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. may tobacco use in public areas
   b. is permitted for not tobacco use in public areas
Pair 2:
   a. must not operate legally for reasonable profits
   b. may operate legally for reasonable profits

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. must not operate legally for reasonable profits
   b. is permitted for not operate legally for reasonable profits
Pair 2:
   a. is obligatory for reasonable sports collisions
   b. must not reasonable sports collisions

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedprice fraud occurs→permitted¬price fraud occurs?

Options:
A) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
B) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
C) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
D) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedprice fraud occurs→permitted¬price fraud occurs?

Choices:
A. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
B. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
C. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
D. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
disruptive behavior in cultural venues is mandatory, but tobacco use in public areas is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) disruptive behavior in cultural venues
b) tobacco use in public areas

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: ¶p ∧ §¬q


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
youth development support is prohibited, but national property protection is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) youth development support
b) national property protection

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: ‽p ∧ §¬q


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Permittedprice fraud occurs?

Options:
A) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
B) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
C) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Permittedprice fraud occurs?

Choices:
A. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
B. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
C. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
remarriage rights is mandatory, but tobacco use in public areas is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) remarriage rights
b) tobacco use in public areas

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: ¶p ∧ §¬q


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Prohibiteddisruptive behavior in cultural venues→permitted¬disruptive behavior in cultural venues?

Options:
A) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
B) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
C) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
D) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Prohibiteddisruptive behavior in cultural venues→permitted¬disruptive behavior in cultural venues?

Choices:
A. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
B. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
C. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
D. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedprice fraud occurs?

Options:
A) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
B) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
C) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
D) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedprice fraud occurs?

Choices:
A. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
B. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
C. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
D. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. must tobacco use in public areas
   b. is permitted for tobacco use in public areas
Pair 2:
   a. is obligatory for national property protection
   b. may not national property protection

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitednoise in quiet zones→permitted¬noise in quiet zones?

Options:
A) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
B) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
C) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
D) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitednoise in quiet zones→permitted¬noise in quiet zones?

Choices:
A. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
B. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
C. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
D. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedtobacco use in public areas?

Options:
A) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
B) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
C) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
D) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedtobacco use in public areas?

Choices:
A. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
B. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
C. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
D. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
abuse of vulnerable groups is mandatory, but youth development support is prohibited.

Variable definitions:
a) abuse of vulnerable groups
b) youth development support

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: ¶p ∧ ‽q


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. must not citizens' rights protection
   b. may not citizens' rights protection
Pair 2:
   a. is obligatory for remarriage rights
   b. must not remarriage rights

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

must not citizens' rights protection
may not citizens' rights protection

is obligatory for remarriage rights
must not remarriage rights


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. must tobacco use in public areas
   b. is prohibited for tobacco use in public areas
Pair 2:
   a. may price fraud occurs
   b. may not price fraud occurs

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

may price fraud occurs
may not price fraud occurs


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. must price fraud occurs
   b. is prohibited for price fraud occurs
Pair 2:
   a. must disruptive behavior in cultural venues
   b. may disruptive behavior in cultural venues

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

must price fraud occurs
is prohibited for price fraud occurs


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: ¬permittedyouth development support→permitted¬youth development support?

Options:
A) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
C) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: ¬permittedyouth development support→permitted¬youth development support?

Choices:
A. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
C. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
price fraud occurs is mandatory, but abuse of vulnerable groups is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) price fraud occurs
b) abuse of vulnerable groups

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: ¶p ∧ §¬q


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
price fraud occurs is prohibited, but disruptive behavior in cultural venues is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) price fraud occurs
b) disruptive behavior in cultural venues

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: ‽p ∧ §¬q


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is obligatory for operate legally for reasonable profits
   b. is permitted for operate legally for reasonable profits
Pair 2:
   a. is prohibited for price fraud occurs
   b. may not price fraud occurs

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

is prohibited for price fraud occurs
may not price fraud occurs


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
youth development support is prohibited, but noise in quiet zones is permitted not.

Variable definitions:
a) youth development support
b) noise in quiet zones

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: ‽p ∧ §¬q


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
tobacco use in public areas is permitted, but operate legally for reasonable profits is prohibited.

Variable definitions:
a) tobacco use in public areas
b) operate legally for reasonable profits

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: §p ∧ ‽q


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
contract fulfillment is mandatory, but operate legally for reasonable profits is prohibited.

Variable definitions:
a) contract fulfillment
b) operate legally for reasonable profits

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: ¶p ∧ ‽q


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is obligatory for operate legally for reasonable profits
   b. is prohibited for operate legally for reasonable profits
Pair 2:
   a. must disruptive behavior in cultural venues
   b. is prohibited for disruptive behavior in cultural venues

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
youth development support is permitted, but tobacco use in public areas is prohibited.

Variable definitions:
a) youth development support
b) tobacco use in public areas

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: §p ∧ ‽q


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
youth development support is permitted, but remarriage rights is prohibited.

Variable definitions:
a) youth development support
b) remarriage rights

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: §p ∧ ‽q


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is prohibited for contract fulfillment
   b. is permitted for not contract fulfillment
Pair 2:
   a. must noise in quiet zones
   b. must not noise in quiet zones

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

must noise in quiet zones
must not noise in quiet zones


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is permitted for noise in quiet zones
   b. is permitted for not noise in quiet zones
Pair 2:
   a. is prohibited for reasonable sports collisions
   b. may not reasonable sports collisions

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
contract fulfillment is mandatory, but citizens' rights protection is prohibited.

Variable definitions:
a) contract fulfillment
b) citizens' rights protection

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: ¶p ∧ ‽q


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedprice fraud occurs?

Options:
A) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
B) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
C) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Prohibitedprice fraud occurs?

Choices:
A. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
B. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
C. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is prohibited for price fraud occurs
   b. may not price fraud occurs
Pair 2:
   a. must operate legally for reasonable profits
   b. is prohibited for operate legally for reasonable profits

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is permitted for contract fulfillment
   b. is permitted for not contract fulfillment
Pair 2:
   a. is obligatory for abuse of vulnerable groups
   b. is permitted for abuse of vulnerable groups

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Mandatoryyouth development support→permittedyouth development support?

Options:
A) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
B) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
C) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Mandatoryyouth development support→permittedyouth development support?

Choices:
A. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
B. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
C. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is obligatory for citizens' rights protection
   b. is permitted for citizens' rights protection
Pair 2:
   a. must citizens' rights protection
   b. must not citizens' rights protection

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

must citizens' rights protection
must not citizens' rights protection


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
contract fulfillment is mandatory, but reasonable sports collisions is prohibited.

Variable definitions:
a) contract fulfillment
b) reasonable sports collisions

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: ¶p ∧ ‽q


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: ¬permittedcontract fulfillment→permitted¬contract fulfillment?

Options:
A) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
C) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: ¬permittedcontract fulfillment→permitted¬contract fulfillment?

Choices:
A. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
C. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality


Prompt:
Symbolize the following regulation:
tobacco use in public areas is permitted, but national property protection is prohibited.

Variable definitions:
a) tobacco use in public areas
b) national property protection

Use modalities: ¶ (must), § (may), ‽ (prohibited)
Format answer: [[EXPRESSION]] (e.g. [[§p ∧ ‽q]])

Solution: §p ∧ ‽q


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. may national property protection
   b. may not national property protection
Pair 2:
   a. must youth development support
   b. is prohibited for youth development support

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

may national property protection
may not national property protection


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Permittedremarriage rights?

Options:
A) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
B) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
C) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Permittedremarriage rights?

Choices:
A. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
B. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
C. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is prohibited for operate legally for reasonable profits
   b. is permitted for not operate legally for reasonable profits
Pair 2:
   a. is obligatory for youth development support
   b. is prohibited for youth development support

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. must disruptive behavior in cultural venues
   b. must not disruptive behavior in cultural venues
Pair 2:
   a. may national property protection
   b. may not national property protection

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Permittedabuse of vulnerable groups?

Options:
A) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
B) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
C) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
D) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Permittedabuse of vulnerable groups?

Choices:
A. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
B. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
C. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation
D. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence


Prompt:
Analyze the normative relationships between these statement pairs:
Pair 1:
   a. is prohibited for remarriage rights
   b. is permitted for remarriage rights
Pair 2:
   a. must not youth development support
   b. may not youth development support

Relationship Types:
A.*: Cannot be true/false together
B.x: Cannot both be true
C.@: Cannot both be false
D.%: No mutual exclusion
Answer format: [[SELECTION;SELECTION]] (e.g. [[A;C]])

is prohibited for remarriage rights
is permitted for remarriage rights

must not youth development support
may not youth development support


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: ¬permittedremarriage rights→permitted¬remarriage rights?

Options:
A) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
C) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: ¬permittedremarriage rights→permitted¬remarriage rights?

Choices:
A. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
C. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
D. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: ¬permittedabuse of vulnerable groups→permitted¬abuse of vulnerable groups?

Options:
A) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B) Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
C) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
D) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: ¬permittedabuse of vulnerable groups→permitted¬abuse of vulnerable groups?

Choices:
A. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
B. Formula 3: Permission-Prohibition Duality
C. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
D. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Mandatoryyouth development support→permittedyouth development support?

Options:
A) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
B) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
C) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
D) Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Mandatoryyouth development support→permittedyouth development support?

Choices:
A. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
B. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
C. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication
D. Formula 2: Prohibition-Permission Negation


Prompt:
Which formula corresponds to: Mandatoryoperate legally for reasonable profits→permittedoperate legally for reasonable profits?

Options:
A) Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
B) Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
C) Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
D) Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication

Answer with [[FORMULA_NUMBER]] (e.g. [[7]])

Question: Which formula corresponds to: Mandatoryoperate legally for reasonable profits→permittedoperate legally for reasonable profits?

Choices:
A. Formula 9: Obligation-Permission Entailment
B. Formula 10: Prohibition-Permission Consequence
C. Formula 5: Obligation-Prohibition Exclusion
D. Formula 7: Permission Negation Implication