{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否venerate这个？请如实回答。\n- 我respect它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否venerate这个？请如实回答。", "我respect它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'respect'暗示强项'venerate'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否perfect这个？请如实回答。\n- 我good enough它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否perfect这个？请如实回答。", "我good enough它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'good enough'暗示强项'perfect'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：drive a car → has wheels\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "连接推理", "scenario": "drive a car → has wheels", "explanation": "连接推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否conquer这个？请如实回答。\n- 我overcome它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否conquer这个？请如实回答。", "我overcome它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'overcome'暗示强项'conquer'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否finished这个？请如实回答。\n- 我managed to get它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否finished这个？请如实回答。", "我managed to get它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'managed to get'暗示强项'finished'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否master这个？请如实回答。\n- 我understand它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否master这个？请如实回答。", "我understand它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'understand'暗示强项'master'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：mother and baby → parent-child\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "属性推理", "scenario": "mother and baby → parent-child", "explanation": "属性推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经implemented a solution。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经implemented a solution。"], "contrast": "solved", "explanation": "使用标记表达'implemented a solution'代替常规'solved'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们implemented a solution。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们implemented a solution。"], "contrast": "solved", "explanation": "使用标记表达'implemented a solution'代替常规'solved'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经demonstrated ability。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经demonstrated ability。"], "contrast": "showed skill", "explanation": "使用标记表达'demonstrated ability'代替常规'showed skill'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们essentially wrapped up。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们essentially wrapped up。"], "contrast": "finished", "explanation": "使用标记表达'essentially wrapped up'代替常规'finished'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否fulfill这个？请如实回答。\n- 我satisfy它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否fulfill这个？请如实回答。", "我satisfy它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'satisfy'暗示强项'fulfill'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们took a seat。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们took a seat。"], "contrast": "sat down", "explanation": "使用标记表达'took a seat'代替常规'sat down'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们persuaded to join。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们persuaded to join。"], "contrast": "asked to join", "explanation": "使用标记表达'persuaded to join'代替常规'asked to join'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：nurse → female\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "nurse → female", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们expressed gratitude。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们expressed gratitude。"], "contrast": "thanked", "explanation": "使用标记表达'expressed gratitude'代替常规'thanked'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：programmer → uses computer\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "programmer → uses computer", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：teacher → educated\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "teacher → educated", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：paint picture → uses brush\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "连接推理", "scenario": "paint picture → uses brush", "explanation": "连接推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否adore这个？请如实回答。\n- 我appreciate它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否adore这个？请如实回答。", "我appreciate它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'appreciate'暗示强项'adore'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经displayed courage。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经displayed courage。"], "contrast": "was brave", "explanation": "使用标记表达'displayed courage'代替常规'was brave'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否cherish这个？请如实回答。\n- 我enjoy它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否cherish这个？请如实回答。", "我enjoy它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'enjoy'暗示强项'cherish'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：buy car → has doors\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "连接推理", "scenario": "buy car → has doors", "explanation": "连接推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经secured tickets。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经secured tickets。"], "contrast": "bought tickets", "explanation": "使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经essentially wrapped up。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经essentially wrapped up。"], "contrast": "finished", "explanation": "使用标记表达'essentially wrapped up'代替常规'finished'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：eat pizza → has cheese\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "连接推理", "scenario": "eat pizza → has cheese", "explanation": "连接推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：musician → plays instrument\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "musician → plays instrument", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经exhibited patience。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经exhibited patience。"], "contrast": "was patient", "explanation": "使用标记表达'exhibited patience'代替常规'was patient'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经took a seat。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经took a seat。"], "contrast": "sat down", "explanation": "使用标记表达'took a seat'代替常规'sat down'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：buy car → has doors\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "连接推理", "scenario": "buy car → has doors", "explanation": "连接推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：athlete → physically fit\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "athlete → physically fit", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否worship这个？请如实回答。\n- 我respect它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否worship这个？请如实回答。", "我respect它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'respect'暗示强项'worship'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否worship这个？请如实回答。\n- 我respect它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否worship这个？请如实回答。", "我respect它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'respect'暗示强项'worship'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否perfectly execute这个？请如实回答。\n- 我attempt它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否perfectly execute这个？请如实回答。", "我attempt它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'attempt'暗示强项'perfectly execute'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否dominate这个？请如实回答。\n- 我influence它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否dominate这个？请如实回答。", "我influence它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'influence'暗示强项'dominate'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否excel这个？请如实回答。\n- 我do well它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否excel这个？请如实回答。", "我do well它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'do well'暗示强项'excel'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经came to a conclusion。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经came to a conclusion。"], "contrast": "concluded", "explanation": "使用标记表达'came to a conclusion'代替常规'concluded'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否conquer这个？请如实回答。\n- 我overcome它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否conquer这个？请如实回答。", "我overcome它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'overcome'暗示强项'conquer'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：mother and baby → parent-child\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "属性推理", "scenario": "mother and baby → parent-child", "explanation": "属性推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们exhibited patience。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们exhibited patience。"], "contrast": "was patient", "explanation": "使用标记表达'exhibited patience'代替常规'was patient'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：write letter → uses pen\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "连接推理", "scenario": "write letter → uses pen", "explanation": "连接推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否venerate这个？请如实回答。\n- 我respect它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否venerate这个？请如实回答。", "我respect它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'respect'暗示强项'venerate'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们utilized resources。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们utilized resources。"], "contrast": "used resources", "explanation": "使用标记表达'utilized resources'代替常规'used resources'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：musician → plays instrument\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "musician → plays instrument", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否love这个？请如实回答。\n- 我like它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否love这个？请如实回答。", "我like它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'like'暗示强项'love'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：eat pizza → has cheese\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "连接推理", "scenario": "eat pizza → has cheese", "explanation": "连接推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：eat pizza → has cheese\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "连接推理", "scenario": "eat pizza → has cheese", "explanation": "连接推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们generated ideas。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们generated ideas。"], "contrast": "brainstormed", "explanation": "使用标记表达'generated ideas'代替常规'brainstormed'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：buy car → has doors\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "连接推理", "scenario": "buy car → has doors", "explanation": "连接推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：nurse → female\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "nurse → female", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否love这个？请如实回答。\n- 我like它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否love这个？请如实回答。", "我like它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'like'暗示强项'love'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经carried out a task。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经carried out a task。"], "contrast": "did a task", "explanation": "使用标记表达'carried out a task'代替常规'did a task'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否know这个？请如实回答。\n- 我believe它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否know这个？请如实回答。", "我believe它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'believe'暗示强项'know'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否love这个？请如实回答。\n- 我like它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否love这个？请如实回答。", "我like它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'like'暗示强项'love'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：father and son → family relation\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "属性推理", "scenario": "father and son → family relation", "explanation": "属性推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经engaged in conversation。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经engaged in conversation。"], "contrast": "talked", "explanation": "使用标记表达'engaged in conversation'代替常规'talked'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：paint picture → uses brush\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "连接推理", "scenario": "paint picture → uses brush", "explanation": "连接推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经generated ideas。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经generated ideas。"], "contrast": "brainstormed", "explanation": "使用标记表达'generated ideas'代替常规'brainstormed'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：gardener → plants flowers\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "gardener → plants flowers", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否worship这个？请如实回答。\n- 我respect它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否worship这个？请如实回答。", "我respect它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'respect'暗示强项'worship'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：buy car → has doors\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "连接推理", "scenario": "buy car → has doors", "explanation": "连接推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：read book → has pages\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "连接推理", "scenario": "read book → has pages", "explanation": "连接推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：nurse → female\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "nurse → female", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：paint picture → uses brush\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "连接推理", "scenario": "paint picture → uses brush", "explanation": "连接推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：gardener → plants flowers\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "gardener → plants flowers", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否love这个？请如实回答。\n- 我like它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否love这个？请如实回答。", "我like它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'like'暗示强项'love'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：buy car → has doors\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "连接推理", "scenario": "buy car → has doors", "explanation": "连接推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否treasure这个？请如实回答。\n- 我value它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否treasure这个？请如实回答。", "我value它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'value'暗示强项'treasure'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否complete这个？请如实回答。\n- 我partially finish它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否complete这个？请如实回答。", "我partially finish它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'partially finish'暗示强项'complete'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经persuaded to join。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经persuaded to join。"], "contrast": "asked to join", "explanation": "使用标记表达'persuaded to join'代替常规'asked to join'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否love这个？请如实回答。\n- 我like它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否love这个？请如实回答。", "我like它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'like'暗示强项'love'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否obliterate这个？请如实回答。\n- 我weaken它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否obliterate这个？请如实回答。", "我weaken它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'weaken'暗示强项'obliterate'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否love这个？请如实回答。\n- 我like它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否love这个？请如实回答。", "我like它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'like'暗示强项'love'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经took a seat。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经took a seat。"], "contrast": "sat down", "explanation": "使用标记表达'took a seat'代替常规'sat down'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们carried out a task。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们carried out a task。"], "contrast": "did a task", "explanation": "使用标记表达'carried out a task'代替常规'did a task'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否conquer这个？请如实回答。\n- 我overcome它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否conquer这个？请如实回答。", "我overcome它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'overcome'暗示强项'conquer'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经provided assistance。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经provided assistance。"], "contrast": "helped", "explanation": "使用标记表达'provided assistance'代替常规'helped'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否perfect这个？请如实回答。\n- 我good enough它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否perfect这个？请如实回答。", "我good enough它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'good enough'暗示强项'perfect'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：gardener → plants flowers\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "gardener → plants flowers", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们expressed gratitude。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们expressed gratitude。"], "contrast": "thanked", "explanation": "使用标记表达'expressed gratitude'代替常规'thanked'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：athlete → physically fit\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "athlete → physically fit", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否destroy这个？请如实回答。\n- 我damage它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否destroy这个？请如实回答。", "我damage它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'damage'暗示强项'destroy'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们carried out a task。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们carried out a task。"], "contrast": "did a task", "explanation": "使用标记表达'carried out a task'代替常规'did a task'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们exhibited patience。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们exhibited patience。"], "contrast": "was patient", "explanation": "使用标记表达'exhibited patience'代替常规'was patient'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们implemented a solution。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们implemented a solution。"], "contrast": "solved", "explanation": "使用标记表达'implemented a solution'代替常规'solved'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否all这个？请如实回答。\n- 我some它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否all这个？请如实回答。", "我some它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'some'暗示强项'all'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：doctor → medical professional\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "属性推理", "scenario": "doctor → medical professional", "explanation": "属性推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们secured tickets。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们secured tickets。"], "contrast": "bought tickets", "explanation": "使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：teacher → educated\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "teacher → educated", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否know这个？请如实回答。\n- 我believe它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否know这个？请如实回答。", "我believe它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'believe'暗示强项'know'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否complete这个？请如实回答。\n- 我partially finish它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否complete这个？请如实回答。", "我partially finish它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'partially finish'暗示强项'complete'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们displayed courage。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们displayed courage。"], "contrast": "was brave", "explanation": "使用标记表达'displayed courage'代替常规'was brave'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们utilized resources。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们utilized resources。"], "contrast": "used resources", "explanation": "使用标记表达'utilized resources'代替常规'used resources'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们displayed courage。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们displayed courage。"], "contrast": "was brave", "explanation": "使用标记表达'displayed courage'代替常规'was brave'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否perfect这个？请如实回答。\n- 我good enough它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否perfect这个？请如实回答。", "我good enough它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'good enough'暗示强项'perfect'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们secured tickets。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们secured tickets。"], "contrast": "bought tickets", "explanation": "使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否finished这个？请如实回答。\n- 我managed to get它。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否finished这个？请如实回答。", "我managed to get它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'managed to get'暗示强项'finished'不成立"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经engaged in conversation。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经engaged in conversation。"], "contrast": "talked", "explanation": "使用标记表达'engaged in conversation'代替常规'talked'"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：cook meal → uses stove\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "连接推理", "scenario": "cook meal → uses stove", "explanation": "连接推理类型推理"}} {"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "Custom Cooperation Principles\n\n1. C* Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not let your statement be weaker in information than what your knowledge allows, unless a stronger statement conflicts with the Information Principle.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CQ1: If the speaker says A(w), and brackets the words in order of information strength with s (strong) followed by w (weak), A(s) entails A(w), then it can be inferred that K~(A(s)), meaning the speaker knows that the stronger information cannot be established.\n - CQ2: The speaker states A(w), which does not entail the content of the embedded sentence Q, but the content of Q is entailed by the stronger information A(s), and {s, w} form a contrast set, then it can be deduced that ~K(Q), meaning the speaker does not know whether Q can be established.\n\n2. C% Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Minimalization Criterion - Speak as little as possible, only speak to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the purpose of communication.\n(2) Hearer's Inference:\n - CI1: Assume that the relationship between the objects and time in the sentence follows the convention unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.\n - CI2: If a certain existence or fact exactly matches the confirmed situation, it is set that this is what the sentence is saying. The Information Principle actually refers to the speaker striving to \"speak as little as possible,\" while the hearer strives to \"expand the information\" until fully grasping the intention of the speech.\n\n3. C! Principle\n\n(1) Speaker's Criterion: Do not use lengthy, obscure, or marked expressions without reason.\n(2) Hearer's Inference: If the speaker uses a lengthy marked expression, their meaning is different from what they could have expressed with an unmarked expression, especially they should try to avoid conventional associations or derive meanings using the Information Principle.请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经came to a conclusion。\n请根据对话情景，选择最合适的协作原则：\nA.C*原则\nB.C%原则\nC.C!原则\n\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经came to a conclusion。"], "contrast": "concluded", "explanation": "使用标记表达'came to a conclusion'代替常规'concluded'"}}