InternLM/InternBootcamp
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/InternLM/InternBootcamp.git synced 2026-04-19 12:58:04 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
InternBootcamp/examples/data/InternBootcamp_eval/korLogicCooperativePrinciple.jsonl
lilinyang 18a552597a init-commit
2025-05-23 15:27:15 +08:00

64 lines
46 KiB
JSON
Executable file
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们essentially wrapped up。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'essentially wrapped up'代替常规'finished'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们essentially wrapped up。"], "contrast": "finished", "explanation": "使用标记表达'essentially wrapped up'代替常规'finished'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：mother and baby → parent-child\n\n规则说明：\nC%原则 - 最小化准则\n1. 说话者准则：仅传达必要的最小信息量\n2. 听者推理：\n - 默认按常规关系理解（CI1）\n - 精确匹配已知事实时优先采用（CI2）\n\n补充说明：属性推理类型推理\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "属性推理", "scenario": "mother and baby → parent-child", "explanation": "属性推理类型推理"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否love这个？请如实回答。\n- 我like它。\n\n规则说明：\nC*原则 - 信息强度准则\n1. 说话者准则：除非强陈述违反信息原则，否则不应使用信息量更弱的陈述\n2. 听者推理：\n - 若使用弱信息A(w)，且存在<s,w>强度序列，则暗示K¬A(s)\n - 若A(w)不蕴含Q，但A(s)蕴含Q且{s,w}形成对比，则暗示¬KQ\n\n补充说明：使用弱项'like'暗示强项'love'不成立\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否love这个？请如实回答。", "我like它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'like'暗示强项'love'不成立"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：buy car → has doors\n\n规则说明：\nC%原则 - 最小化准则\n1. 说话者准则：仅传达必要的最小信息量\n2. 听者推理：\n - 默认按常规关系理解（CI1）\n - 精确匹配已知事实时优先采用（CI2）\n\n补充说明：连接推理类型推理\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "连接推理", "scenario": "buy car → has doors", "explanation": "连接推理类型推理"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：nurse → female\n\n规则说明：\nC%原则 - 最小化准则\n1. 说话者准则：仅传达必要的最小信息量\n2. 听者推理：\n - 默认按常规关系理解（CI1）\n - 精确匹配已知事实时优先采用（CI2）\n\n补充说明：常识推理类型推理\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "nurse → female", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：mother and baby → parent-child\n\n规则说明：\nC%原则 - 最小化准则\n1. 说话者准则：仅传达必要的最小信息量\n2. 听者推理：\n - 默认按常规关系理解（CI1）\n - 精确匹配已知事实时优先采用（CI2）\n\n补充说明：属性推理类型推理\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "属性推理", "scenario": "mother and baby → parent-child", "explanation": "属性推理类型推理"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否finished这个？请如实回答。\n- 我managed to get它。\n\n规则说明：\nC*原则 - 信息强度准则\n1. 说话者准则：除非强陈述违反信息原则，否则不应使用信息量更弱的陈述\n2. 听者推理：\n - 若使用弱信息A(w)，且存在<s,w>强度序列，则暗示K¬A(s)\n - 若A(w)不蕴含Q，但A(s)蕴含Q且{s,w}形成对比，则暗示¬KQ\n\n补充说明：使用弱项'managed to get'暗示强项'finished'不成立\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否finished这个？请如实回答。", "我managed to get它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'managed to get'暗示强项'finished'不成立"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：buy car → has doors\n\n规则说明：\nC%原则 - 最小化准则\n1. 说话者准则：仅传达必要的最小信息量\n2. 听者推理：\n - 默认按常规关系理解（CI1）\n - 精确匹配已知事实时优先采用（CI2）\n\n补充说明：连接推理类型推理\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "连接推理", "scenario": "buy car → has doors", "explanation": "连接推理类型推理"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们secured tickets。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们secured tickets。"], "contrast": "bought tickets", "explanation": "使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们secured tickets。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们secured tickets。"], "contrast": "bought tickets", "explanation": "使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：nurse → female\n\n规则说明：\nC%原则 - 最小化准则\n1. 说话者准则：仅传达必要的最小信息量\n2. 听者推理：\n - 默认按常规关系理解（CI1）\n - 精确匹配已知事实时优先采用（CI2）\n\n补充说明：常识推理类型推理\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "nurse → female", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否all这个？请如实回答。\n- 我some它。\n\n规则说明：\nC*原则 - 信息强度准则\n1. 说话者准则：除非强陈述违反信息原则，否则不应使用信息量更弱的陈述\n2. 听者推理：\n - 若使用弱信息A(w)，且存在<s,w>强度序列，则暗示K¬A(s)\n - 若A(w)不蕴含Q，但A(s)蕴含Q且{s,w}形成对比，则暗示¬KQ\n\n补充说明：使用弱项'some'暗示强项'all'不成立\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否all这个？请如实回答。", "我some它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'some'暗示强项'all'不成立"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经essentially wrapped up。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'essentially wrapped up'代替常规'finished'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经essentially wrapped up。"], "contrast": "finished", "explanation": "使用标记表达'essentially wrapped up'代替常规'finished'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否perfect这个？请如实回答。\n- 我good enough它。\n\n规则说明：\nC*原则 - 信息强度准则\n1. 说话者准则：除非强陈述违反信息原则，否则不应使用信息量更弱的陈述\n2. 听者推理：\n - 若使用弱信息A(w)，且存在<s,w>强度序列，则暗示K¬A(s)\n - 若A(w)不蕴含Q，但A(s)蕴含Q且{s,w}形成对比，则暗示¬KQ\n\n补充说明：使用弱项'good enough'暗示强项'perfect'不成立\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否perfect这个？请如实回答。", "我good enough它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'good enough'暗示强项'perfect'不成立"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否finished这个？请如实回答。\n- 我managed to get它。\n\n规则说明：\nC*原则 - 信息强度准则\n1. 说话者准则：除非强陈述违反信息原则，否则不应使用信息量更弱的陈述\n2. 听者推理：\n - 若使用弱信息A(w)，且存在<s,w>强度序列，则暗示K¬A(s)\n - 若A(w)不蕴含Q，但A(s)蕴含Q且{s,w}形成对比，则暗示¬KQ\n\n补充说明：使用弱项'managed to get'暗示强项'finished'不成立\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否finished这个？请如实回答。", "我managed to get它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'managed to get'暗示强项'finished'不成立"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否know这个？请如实回答。\n- 我believe它。\n\n规则说明：\nC*原则 - 信息强度准则\n1. 说话者准则：除非强陈述违反信息原则，否则不应使用信息量更弱的陈述\n2. 听者推理：\n - 若使用弱信息A(w)，且存在<s,w>强度序列，则暗示K¬A(s)\n - 若A(w)不蕴含Q，但A(s)蕴含Q且{s,w}形成对比，则暗示¬KQ\n\n补充说明：使用弱项'believe'暗示强项'know'不成立\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否know这个？请如实回答。", "我believe它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'believe'暗示强项'know'不成立"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否know这个？请如实回答。\n- 我believe它。\n\n规则说明：\nC*原则 - 信息强度准则\n1. 说话者准则：除非强陈述违反信息原则，否则不应使用信息量更弱的陈述\n2. 听者推理：\n - 若使用弱信息A(w)，且存在<s,w>强度序列，则暗示K¬A(s)\n - 若A(w)不蕴含Q，但A(s)蕴含Q且{s,w}形成对比，则暗示¬KQ\n\n补充说明：使用弱项'believe'暗示强项'know'不成立\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否know这个？请如实回答。", "我believe它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'believe'暗示强项'know'不成立"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否know这个？请如实回答。\n- 我believe它。\n\n规则说明：\nC*原则 - 信息强度准则\n1. 说话者准则：除非强陈述违反信息原则，否则不应使用信息量更弱的陈述\n2. 听者推理：\n - 若使用弱信息A(w)，且存在<s,w>强度序列，则暗示K¬A(s)\n - 若A(w)不蕴含Q，但A(s)蕴含Q且{s,w}形成对比，则暗示¬KQ\n\n补充说明：使用弱项'believe'暗示强项'know'不成立\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否know这个？请如实回答。", "我believe它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'believe'暗示强项'know'不成立"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们persuaded to join。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'persuaded to join'代替常规'asked to join'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们persuaded to join。"], "contrast": "asked to join", "explanation": "使用标记表达'persuaded to join'代替常规'asked to join'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：nurse → female\n\n规则说明：\nC%原则 - 最小化准则\n1. 说话者准则：仅传达必要的最小信息量\n2. 听者推理：\n - 默认按常规关系理解（CI1）\n - 精确匹配已知事实时优先采用（CI2）\n\n补充说明：常识推理类型推理\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "nurse → female", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：nurse → female\n\n规则说明：\nC%原则 - 最小化准则\n1. 说话者准则：仅传达必要的最小信息量\n2. 听者推理：\n - 默认按常规关系理解（CI1）\n - 精确匹配已知事实时优先采用（CI2）\n\n补充说明：常识推理类型推理\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "nurse → female", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们secured tickets。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们secured tickets。"], "contrast": "bought tickets", "explanation": "使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们secured tickets。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们secured tickets。"], "contrast": "bought tickets", "explanation": "使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们secured tickets。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们secured tickets。"], "contrast": "bought tickets", "explanation": "使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否know这个？请如实回答。\n- 我believe它。\n\n规则说明：\nC*原则 - 信息强度准则\n1. 说话者准则：除非强陈述违反信息原则，否则不应使用信息量更弱的陈述\n2. 听者推理：\n - 若使用弱信息A(w)，且存在<s,w>强度序列，则暗示K¬A(s)\n - 若A(w)不蕴含Q，但A(s)蕴含Q且{s,w}形成对比，则暗示¬KQ\n\n补充说明：使用弱项'believe'暗示强项'know'不成立\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否know这个？请如实回答。", "我believe它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'believe'暗示强项'know'不成立"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：nurse → female\n\n规则说明：\nC%原则 - 最小化准则\n1. 说话者准则：仅传达必要的最小信息量\n2. 听者推理：\n - 默认按常规关系理解（CI1）\n - 精确匹配已知事实时优先采用（CI2）\n\n补充说明：常识推理类型推理\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "nurse → female", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：nurse → female\n\n规则说明：\nC%原则 - 最小化准则\n1. 说话者准则：仅传达必要的最小信息量\n2. 听者推理：\n - 默认按常规关系理解（CI1）\n - 精确匹配已知事实时优先采用（CI2）\n\n补充说明：常识推理类型推理\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "nurse → female", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：mother and baby → parent-child\n\n规则说明：\nC%原则 - 最小化准则\n1. 说话者准则：仅传达必要的最小信息量\n2. 听者推理：\n - 默认按常规关系理解（CI1）\n - 精确匹配已知事实时优先采用（CI2）\n\n补充说明：属性推理类型推理\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "属性推理", "scenario": "mother and baby → parent-child", "explanation": "属性推理类型推理"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：mother and baby → parent-child\n\n规则说明：\nC%原则 - 最小化准则\n1. 说话者准则：仅传达必要的最小信息量\n2. 听者推理：\n - 默认按常规关系理解（CI1）\n - 精确匹配已知事实时优先采用（CI2）\n\n补充说明：属性推理类型推理\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "属性推理", "scenario": "mother and baby → parent-child", "explanation": "属性推理类型推理"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经essentially wrapped up。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'essentially wrapped up'代替常规'finished'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经essentially wrapped up。"], "contrast": "finished", "explanation": "使用标记表达'essentially wrapped up'代替常规'finished'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：buy car → has doors\n\n规则说明：\nC%原则 - 最小化准则\n1. 说话者准则：仅传达必要的最小信息量\n2. 听者推理：\n - 默认按常规关系理解（CI1）\n - 精确匹配已知事实时优先采用（CI2）\n\n补充说明：连接推理类型推理\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "连接推理", "scenario": "buy car → has doors", "explanation": "连接推理类型推理"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：nurse → female\n\n规则说明：\nC%原则 - 最小化准则\n1. 说话者准则：仅传达必要的最小信息量\n2. 听者推理：\n - 默认按常规关系理解（CI1）\n - 精确匹配已知事实时优先采用（CI2）\n\n补充说明：常识推理类型推理\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "nurse → female", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否love这个？请如实回答。\n- 我like它。\n\n规则说明：\nC*原则 - 信息强度准则\n1. 说话者准则：除非强陈述违反信息原则，否则不应使用信息量更弱的陈述\n2. 听者推理：\n - 若使用弱信息A(w)，且存在<s,w>强度序列，则暗示K¬A(s)\n - 若A(w)不蕴含Q，但A(s)蕴含Q且{s,w}形成对比，则暗示¬KQ\n\n补充说明：使用弱项'like'暗示强项'love'不成立\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否love这个？请如实回答。", "我like它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'like'暗示强项'love'不成立"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：nurse → female\n\n规则说明：\nC%原则 - 最小化准则\n1. 说话者准则：仅传达必要的最小信息量\n2. 听者推理：\n - 默认按常规关系理解（CI1）\n - 精确匹配已知事实时优先采用（CI2）\n\n补充说明：常识推理类型推理\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "nurse → female", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们essentially wrapped up。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'essentially wrapped up'代替常规'finished'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们essentially wrapped up。"], "contrast": "finished", "explanation": "使用标记表达'essentially wrapped up'代替常规'finished'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经persuaded to join。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'persuaded to join'代替常规'asked to join'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经persuaded to join。"], "contrast": "asked to join", "explanation": "使用标记表达'persuaded to join'代替常规'asked to join'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：buy car → has doors\n\n规则说明：\nC%原则 - 最小化准则\n1. 说话者准则：仅传达必要的最小信息量\n2. 听者推理：\n - 默认按常规关系理解（CI1）\n - 精确匹配已知事实时优先采用（CI2）\n\n补充说明：连接推理类型推理\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "连接推理", "scenario": "buy car → has doors", "explanation": "连接推理类型推理"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否finished这个？请如实回答。\n- 我managed to get它。\n\n规则说明：\nC*原则 - 信息强度准则\n1. 说话者准则：除非强陈述违反信息原则，否则不应使用信息量更弱的陈述\n2. 听者推理：\n - 若使用弱信息A(w)，且存在<s,w>强度序列，则暗示K¬A(s)\n - 若A(w)不蕴含Q，但A(s)蕴含Q且{s,w}形成对比，则暗示¬KQ\n\n补充说明：使用弱项'managed to get'暗示强项'finished'不成立\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否finished这个？请如实回答。", "我managed to get它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'managed to get'暗示强项'finished'不成立"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经secured tickets。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经secured tickets。"], "contrast": "bought tickets", "explanation": "使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们essentially wrapped up。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'essentially wrapped up'代替常规'finished'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们essentially wrapped up。"], "contrast": "finished", "explanation": "使用标记表达'essentially wrapped up'代替常规'finished'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否know这个？请如实回答。\n- 我believe它。\n\n规则说明：\nC*原则 - 信息强度准则\n1. 说话者准则：除非强陈述违反信息原则，否则不应使用信息量更弱的陈述\n2. 听者推理：\n - 若使用弱信息A(w)，且存在<s,w>强度序列，则暗示K¬A(s)\n - 若A(w)不蕴含Q，但A(s)蕴含Q且{s,w}形成对比，则暗示¬KQ\n\n补充说明：使用弱项'believe'暗示强项'know'不成立\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否know这个？请如实回答。", "我believe它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'believe'暗示强项'know'不成立"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否finished这个？请如实回答。\n- 我managed to get它。\n\n规则说明：\nC*原则 - 信息强度准则\n1. 说话者准则：除非强陈述违反信息原则，否则不应使用信息量更弱的陈述\n2. 听者推理：\n - 若使用弱信息A(w)，且存在<s,w>强度序列，则暗示K¬A(s)\n - 若A(w)不蕴含Q，但A(s)蕴含Q且{s,w}形成对比，则暗示¬KQ\n\n补充说明：使用弱项'managed to get'暗示强项'finished'不成立\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否finished这个？请如实回答。", "我managed to get它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'managed to get'暗示强项'finished'不成立"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否know这个？请如实回答。\n- 我believe它。\n\n规则说明：\nC*原则 - 信息强度准则\n1. 说话者准则：除非强陈述违反信息原则，否则不应使用信息量更弱的陈述\n2. 听者推理：\n - 若使用弱信息A(w)，且存在<s,w>强度序列，则暗示K¬A(s)\n - 若A(w)不蕴含Q，但A(s)蕴含Q且{s,w}形成对比，则暗示¬KQ\n\n补充说明：使用弱项'believe'暗示强项'know'不成立\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否know这个？请如实回答。", "我believe它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'believe'暗示强项'know'不成立"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否know这个？请如实回答。\n- 我believe它。\n\n规则说明：\nC*原则 - 信息强度准则\n1. 说话者准则：除非强陈述违反信息原则，否则不应使用信息量更弱的陈述\n2. 听者推理：\n - 若使用弱信息A(w)，且存在<s,w>强度序列，则暗示K¬A(s)\n - 若A(w)不蕴含Q，但A(s)蕴含Q且{s,w}形成对比，则暗示¬KQ\n\n补充说明：使用弱项'believe'暗示强项'know'不成立\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否know这个？请如实回答。", "我believe它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'believe'暗示强项'know'不成立"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：nurse → female\n\n规则说明：\nC%原则 - 最小化准则\n1. 说话者准则：仅传达必要的最小信息量\n2. 听者推理：\n - 默认按常规关系理解（CI1）\n - 精确匹配已知事实时优先采用（CI2）\n\n补充说明：常识推理类型推理\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "nurse → female", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们essentially wrapped up。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'essentially wrapped up'代替常规'finished'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们essentially wrapped up。"], "contrast": "finished", "explanation": "使用标记表达'essentially wrapped up'代替常规'finished'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经secured tickets。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经secured tickets。"], "contrast": "bought tickets", "explanation": "使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经essentially wrapped up。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'essentially wrapped up'代替常规'finished'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经essentially wrapped up。"], "contrast": "finished", "explanation": "使用标记表达'essentially wrapped up'代替常规'finished'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经persuaded to join。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'persuaded to join'代替常规'asked to join'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经persuaded to join。"], "contrast": "asked to join", "explanation": "使用标记表达'persuaded to join'代替常规'asked to join'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：buy car → has doors\n\n规则说明：\nC%原则 - 最小化准则\n1. 说话者准则：仅传达必要的最小信息量\n2. 听者推理：\n - 默认按常规关系理解（CI1）\n - 精确匹配已知事实时优先采用（CI2）\n\n补充说明：连接推理类型推理\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "连接推理", "scenario": "buy car → has doors", "explanation": "连接推理类型推理"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：nurse → female\n\n规则说明：\nC%原则 - 最小化准则\n1. 说话者准则：仅传达必要的最小信息量\n2. 听者推理：\n - 默认按常规关系理解（CI1）\n - 精确匹配已知事实时优先采用（CI2）\n\n补充说明：常识推理类型推理\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "常识推理", "scenario": "nurse → female", "explanation": "常识推理类型推理"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经persuaded to join。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'persuaded to join'代替常规'asked to join'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经persuaded to join。"], "contrast": "asked to join", "explanation": "使用标记表达'persuaded to join'代替常规'asked to join'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们essentially wrapped up。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'essentially wrapped up'代替常规'finished'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们essentially wrapped up。"], "contrast": "finished", "explanation": "使用标记表达'essentially wrapped up'代替常规'finished'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们persuaded to join。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'persuaded to join'代替常规'asked to join'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们persuaded to join。"], "contrast": "asked to join", "explanation": "使用标记表达'persuaded to join'代替常规'asked to join'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：mother and baby → parent-child\n\n规则说明：\nC%原则 - 最小化准则\n1. 说话者准则：仅传达必要的最小信息量\n2. 听者推理：\n - 默认按常规关系理解（CI1）\n - 精确匹配已知事实时优先采用（CI2）\n\n补充说明：属性推理类型推理\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "属性推理", "scenario": "mother and baby → parent-child", "explanation": "属性推理类型推理"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经secured tickets。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经secured tickets。"], "contrast": "bought tickets", "explanation": "使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n场景描述：buy car → has doors\n\n规则说明：\nC%原则 - 最小化准则\n1. 说话者准则：仅传达必要的最小信息量\n2. 听者推理：\n - 默认按常规关系理解（CI1）\n - 精确匹配已知事实时优先采用（CI2）\n\n补充说明：连接推理类型推理\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "B", "type": "连接推理", "scenario": "buy car → has doors", "explanation": "连接推理类型推理"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们essentially wrapped up。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'essentially wrapped up'代替常规'finished'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们essentially wrapped up。"], "contrast": "finished", "explanation": "使用标记表达'essentially wrapped up'代替常规'finished'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们secured tickets。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们secured tickets。"], "contrast": "bought tickets", "explanation": "使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 你是否all这个？请如实回答。\n- 我some它。\n\n规则说明：\nC*原则 - 信息强度准则\n1. 说话者准则：除非强陈述违反信息原则，否则不应使用信息量更弱的陈述\n2. 听者推理：\n - 若使用弱信息A(w)，且存在<s,w>强度序列，则暗示K¬A(s)\n - 若A(w)不蕴含Q，但A(s)蕴含Q且{s,w}形成对比，则暗示¬KQ\n\n补充说明：使用弱项'some'暗示强项'all'不成立\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "A", "type": "strength_hierarchy", "dialogue": ["你是否all这个？请如实回答。", "我some它。"], "explanation": "使用弱项'some'暗示强项'all'不成立"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们essentially wrapped up。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'essentially wrapped up'代替常规'finished'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们essentially wrapped up。"], "contrast": "finished", "explanation": "使用标记表达'essentially wrapped up'代替常规'finished'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经persuaded to join。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'persuaded to join'代替常规'asked to join'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经persuaded to join。"], "contrast": "asked to join", "explanation": "使用标记表达'persuaded to join'代替常规'asked to join'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经secured tickets。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经secured tickets。"], "contrast": "bought tickets", "explanation": "使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'"}}
{"data_source": "KorLogicCooperativePrinciple", "prompt": "请根据对话分析适用的协作原则（答案格式：[[A/B/C]]）\n\n对话情景：\n- 项目完成了吗？\n- 我们已经secured tickets。\n\n规则说明：\nC!原则 - 标记性准则\n1. 说话者准则：避免使用复杂标记性表达\n2. 听者推理：当使用标记性表达时，其含义应与非标记表达不同\n\n补充说明：使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'\n\n正确答案是：[[ ]]", "ground_truth": {"correct": "C", "type": "marked_expression", "dialogue": ["项目完成了吗？", "我们已经secured tickets。"], "contrast": "bought tickets", "explanation": "使用标记表达'secured tickets'代替常规'bought tickets'"}}
Reference in a new issue View git blame Copy permalink