mirror of
https://github.com/NousResearch/atropos.git
synced 2026-04-19 12:57:58 +00:00
333 lines
16 KiB
Markdown
333 lines
16 KiB
Markdown
# Environments
|
|
|
|
This directory contains various environments for training and evaluating language models on different tasks. Each environment implements a specific task with its own input format, reward function, and evaluation metrics.
|
|
|
|
## Available Environments
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### MCQA Thinking Environment (`mcqa_thinking_env.py`)
|
|
|
|
Multiple Choice Question Answering environment that requires models to think through problems systematically.
|
|
|
|
**Input Format:**
|
|
- Questions from the MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) dataset
|
|
- Each item contains:
|
|
- `prompt`: The question text
|
|
- `answer`: Index of correct answer
|
|
- `ground_truth`: Letter (A, B, C, D) of correct answer
|
|
- `options`: List of possible answers
|
|
|
|
**System Prompt:**
|
|
```
|
|
You are a deep thinking AI, you may use extremely long chains of thought to deeply consider the problem and deliberate with yourself via systematic reasoning processes to help come to a correct solution prior to answering. You should enclose your thoughts and internal monologue inside <think> </think> tags, and then provide your solution or response to the problem.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Reward Function:**
|
|
- Score of 1.0 if the model's answer matches the ground truth letter
|
|
- Score of 0.0 if incorrect or invalid response (multiple think tags, malformed thinking sections)
|
|
- Length penalty applied if all responses are correct:
|
|
- No penalty for responses under 50% of max token length
|
|
- Linear penalty scaling from 1.0 down to 0.0 for responses between 50% and 100% of max length
|
|
- Returns None if all scores are identical (no learning signal)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### GSM8K Environment (`gsm8k_server.py`)
|
|
|
|
Mathematical reasoning environment using the GSM8K dataset.
|
|
|
|
**Input Format:**
|
|
- Questions from GSM8K dataset
|
|
- Each item contains:
|
|
- `question`: The math problem
|
|
- `answer`: The numerical answer
|
|
|
|
**System Prompt:**
|
|
```
|
|
You are a deep thinking AI, you may use extremely long chains of thought to deeply consider the problem and deliberate with yourself via systematic reasoning processes to help come to a correct solution prior to answering. You should enclose your thoughts and internal monologue inside <think> </think> tags, and then provide your solution or response to the problem.
|
|
|
|
You are allocated a maximum of 2048 tokens, please strive to use less.
|
|
|
|
You will then provide your answer like this: \boxed{your answer here}
|
|
It is important that you provide your answer in the correct format.
|
|
If you do not, you will not receive credit for your answer.
|
|
So please end your answer with \boxed{your answer here}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Reward Function:**
|
|
- Score of 1.0 if the model's answer matches the ground truth (using LaTeX verification)
|
|
- Score of 0.0 if incorrect or if ground truth is not parseable
|
|
- Length penalty applied if all responses are correct:
|
|
- No penalty for responses under 50% of max token length
|
|
- Linear penalty scaling from 1.0 down to 0.0 for responses between 50% and 100% of max length
|
|
- Returns None if all scores are identical (no learning signal)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Tool Calling Environment (`tool_calling_server.py`)
|
|
|
|
Environment for training models to make function calls in a structured format.
|
|
|
|
**Input Format:**
|
|
- Conversations from ShareGPT-Hermes function call dataset
|
|
- Each item contains:
|
|
- `conversations`: List of messages with roles (system, human, gpt)
|
|
- Expected tool calls in JSON format
|
|
|
|
**System Prompt:**
|
|
```
|
|
You are a deep thinking AI, you may use extremely long chains of thought to deeply consider the problem and deliberate with yourself via systematic reasoning processes to help come to a correct solution prior to answering. You should enclose your thoughts and internal monologue inside <think> </think> tags, and then provide your solution or response to the problem.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Reward Function:**
|
|
- Score of 1.0 if all expected tool calls are present and match exactly (including nested JSON fields)
|
|
- Score of 0.0 if any tool calls are missing, incorrect, or malformed
|
|
- Length penalty applied if all responses are correct:
|
|
- No penalty for responses under 50% of max token length
|
|
- Linear penalty scaling from 1.0 down to 0.0 for responses between 50% and 100% of max length
|
|
- Returns None if all scores are identical (no learning signal)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### RLAIF Server Environment (`rlaif_server.py`)
|
|
|
|
Environment for Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF). Used for aligning models to specific personalities or styles based on AI-generated preferences or reward signals.
|
|
|
|
**Input Format:**
|
|
- Typically involves prompts for which responses are generated and then evaluated by a reward model or preference model to guide the LLM's behavior. Specifics depend on the RLAIF setup.
|
|
|
|
**System Prompt:**
|
|
- Varies based on the desired personality/style (e.g., "Egregore," "Ascension Maze").
|
|
|
|
**Reward Function:**
|
|
- Based on the output of an AI judge/reward model, designed to score responses according to the target alignment criteria.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Financial Fundamentals Prediction Environment (`fundamental_prediction_environment.py`)
|
|
|
|
Environment for training models to predict financial fundamentals using the "NousResearch/company-fundamentals-prediction-lite" dataset.
|
|
|
|
**Input Format:**
|
|
- Items include `context` (company fundamentals, news, macroeconomic data), `fundamental_metric` (e.g., revenue, EPS), and ground truth `answer` ("maintained", "raised", or "reduced") and `magnitude` (percentage change). The model analyzes the `context` to predict the `answer` and `magnitude` for the given `fundamental_metric`.
|
|
|
|
**Task:**
|
|
- Predict directional changes and magnitude for company financial fundamentals.
|
|
|
|
**Reward Function:**
|
|
- Based on the accuracy of predictions for both direction and magnitude.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Math Server Environment (`math_server.py`)
|
|
|
|
A versatile math problem-solving environment supporting multiple datasets and operational modes.
|
|
|
|
**Datasets:**
|
|
- Integrates `gsm8k` (various subsets), `competition_math`, `math_qa`, and `MetaMathQA`.
|
|
|
|
**Operational Modes:**
|
|
- Supports standard problem solving, RLAIF (Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback) for preference learning between solutions, a "judge" mode for evaluating solution correctness, and a "retry/self-correct" mode utilizing feedback on previous attempts.
|
|
|
|
**Input Format:**
|
|
- Mathematical problems, varying slightly by operational mode (e.g., including solutions for judging/RLAIF).
|
|
|
|
**System Prompt:**
|
|
- Dynamically constructed based on the operational mode. For standard problem solving, the prompt focuses on the problem itself. Other modes include specific instructions for judging, preference selection, or self-correction.
|
|
|
|
**Reward Function:**
|
|
- Based on the correctness of the mathematical solution, with variations depending on the mode (e.g., preference scores in RLAIF).
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Math Server Zero Environment (`math_server_zero.py`)
|
|
|
|
A math problem-solving environment using the "zwhe99/DeepMath-103K" dataset, with a structured prompt format inspired by the Open-Reasoner-Zero project.
|
|
|
|
**Input Format:**
|
|
- Mathematical problems from the "zwhe99/DeepMath-103K" dataset.
|
|
|
|
**System Prompt Structure:**
|
|
- Utilizes a specific conversational format where the AI is instructed to first think (using `<think> </think>` tags) and then provide the answer (using `<answer> </answer>` tags, with the final numerical answer in `\boxed{}`). The overall prompt guides the model through this structured reasoning and response process.
|
|
- `prompt_format = "A conversation between User and Assistant... User: {prompt}\nAssistant: <think>"`
|
|
- `problem_format = "You must put your answer inside <answer> </answer> tags... This is the problem:\n{problem}"`
|
|
|
|
**Reward Function:**
|
|
- Based on the correctness of the mathematical solution within the `<answer>` tag, verified using LaTeX parsing.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Coding Server Environment (`code_execution_server/coding_server.py`)
|
|
|
|
Environment for training models to generate and potentially execute code.
|
|
|
|
**Input Format:**
|
|
- Coding problems or prompts (e.g., from datasets like MBPP, HumanEval).
|
|
|
|
**System Prompt:**
|
|
- Instructs the model to generate code for a given problem.
|
|
|
|
**Reward Function:**
|
|
- Based on correctness of the generated code, often involving execution and unit test passing.
|
|
- The `code_execution_server/` directory also contains a `Dockerfile` for containerized execution.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Dataset Environment (`dataset_environment/dataset_env.py`)
|
|
|
|
A highly configurable environment for working with Hugging Face datasets. For more details, see the [Dataset Environment README](dataset_environment/README.md).
|
|
|
|
**Purpose:**
|
|
- Allows users to easily define RL environments using existing datasets from Hugging Face Hub.
|
|
|
|
**Input Format:**
|
|
- Defined by the chosen Hugging Face dataset (user specifies prompt and answer fields).
|
|
|
|
**System Prompt:**
|
|
- Customizable by the user.
|
|
|
|
**Reward Function:**
|
|
- Highly flexible, supports a registry of predefined reward functions (e.g., `accuracy`, `format`, `cosine_scaled`) and allows users to create and register custom reward functions. Multiple reward functions can be combined with weights.
|
|
|
|
**Configuration:**
|
|
- Primarily through YAML files specifying dataset details, generation parameters, and reward functions.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Multimodal DPO Environments (`multimodal_dpo/`)
|
|
|
|
A collection of environments for Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) with multimodal inputs. These environments are designed for tasks that involve processing both text and images.
|
|
|
|
**Files:**
|
|
- `ocr_vqa.py`
|
|
- `pixmo_clocks.py`
|
|
- `pixmo_count.py`
|
|
- `pixmo_point_explanations.py`
|
|
- `clevr_cogen_a_train.py`
|
|
- `clevr_complex.py`
|
|
|
|
**Purpose:**
|
|
- Training models on tasks such as Optical Character Recognition VQA, visual counting, and interpreting complex visual scenes (e.g., Clevr).
|
|
|
|
**Input Format:**
|
|
- Typically pairs of (image, text prompt) and corresponding preferred/dispreferred responses.
|
|
|
|
**Reward Function:**
|
|
- Based on the DPO mechanism, implicitly learned from preference data.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Game Environments (`game_environments/`)
|
|
|
|
This section covers environments based on interactive games.
|
|
|
|
#### Gymnasium Taxi (`game_environments/gymnasium/gym_taxi.py`)
|
|
|
|
- **Game:** Based on the classic Gymnasium Taxi-v3 environment.
|
|
- **Task:** The agent controls a taxi to pick up a passenger and drop them off at the correct location.
|
|
- **Objective:** Optimize for efficient navigation and task completion.
|
|
|
|
#### Gymnasium Blackjack (`game_environments/gymnasium/blackjack/`)
|
|
|
|
Two Blackjack environment implementations are provided. For more details, see the [Blackjack README](game_environments/gymnasium/blackjack/README.md).
|
|
|
|
- **`blackjack_env_no_thinking.py` (Standard Blackjack):**
|
|
- **Gameplay:** A standard version of Blackjack.
|
|
- **Objective:** Achieve a hand total closer to 21 than the dealer without exceeding 21.
|
|
- **Interaction:** Designed for shorter episodes without complex intermediate "thinking" steps. Aiming to teach the LLM to be a better policy model in uncertain environments.
|
|
|
|
- **`blackjack_env_thinking.py` (Blackjack with Windowed Decision Making & Counterfactuals):**
|
|
- **Gameplay:** A more complex version designed for agents that produce long interaction sequences, including "thinking" steps.
|
|
- **Features:** Windowed decision making, local alternative generation, value-based pruning, and counterfactual data for training (GRPO).
|
|
- **Use Case:** Ideal for training LLMs that engage in explicit multi-step reasoning before action. Teaches the model to be more "confident" about selecting optimal moves & taking informed risks in uncertain environments, even with the knowledge that it might still lose with optimal play.
|
|
|
|
### Instruction Following Environment (`instruction_following_algorithm_environment.py`)
|
|
|
|
**Dependencies:**
|
|
- `datasets` (Hugging Face)
|
|
- `langdetect`
|
|
|
|
This environment was inspired by AllenAI's RLVR-IFEVAL environment and uses AllenAI's dataset from their Tulu3 paper and project:
|
|
- Dataset: https://huggingface.co/datasets/allenai/RLVR-IFeval
|
|
- Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15124
|
|
|
|
Environment for training models to follow natural language instructions and constraints, based on the `allenai/RLVR-IFeval` dataset and environment.
|
|
|
|
**Input Format:**
|
|
- Each item from the processed `allenai/RLVR-IFeval` dataset contains:
|
|
- `prompt`: The user's instruction string.
|
|
- `func_name`: The string name of the verifier function (from a predefined map) used to check if the instruction is followed.
|
|
- `args`: A dictionary of arguments for the specified verifier function.
|
|
|
|
**System Prompt:**
|
|
```
|
|
You are a deep thinking AI, you may use extremely long chains of thought to deeply consider the problem and deliberate with yourself via systematic reasoning processes to help come to a correct solution prior to answering. You should enclose your thoughts and internal monologue inside <think> </think> tags, and then provide your solution or response to the problem.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Reward Function:**
|
|
- Score of 1.0 if the model's response correctly follows the instruction, as determined by the specific verifier function associated with the input prompt.
|
|
- Score of 0.0 if the response fails the verifier function.
|
|
- Length penalty applied if all responses in a batch are correct (receive a score of 1.0 before penalty):
|
|
- No penalty for responses under a certain percentage (e.g., 75%) of max token length.
|
|
- Linear penalty scaling from 1.0 down to 0.0 for responses between the threshold and 100% of max length.
|
|
- Returns None if all scores are identical after potential penalties (no learning signal).
|
|
|
|
**Unique Configuration and Features:**
|
|
- **Dataset Configuration (`IFConfig`):
|
|
- `dataset_name`: Specifies the primary dataset to use (defaults to `allenai/RLVR-IFeval`).
|
|
- `dataset_config_name`: Optional name for a specific configuration or subset of the dataset.
|
|
- `test_set_ratio`: Defines the proportion of the dataset reserved for testing (defaults to 5%).
|
|
|
|
- **Verifier-Based Scoring:** Utilizes a comprehensive map of verifier functions (`IF_FUNCTIONS_MAP`) to evaluate whether the model's
|
|
output adheres to diverse and specific constraints defined in the input instructions (e.g., keyword presence, response length, JSON format, etc.).
|
|
|
|
- **Specialized Dataset Processing:** The `setup` method is specifically designed to parse the `allenai/RLVR-IFeval` dataset, extracting user instructions, the corresponding verifier function name, and its arguments.
|
|
|
|
- **Fallback Mechanism:** Includes a fallback to a small, predefined dummy dataset if the primary dataset (`allenai/RLVR-IFeval`) cannot be loaded, ensuring operational continuity for testing or development.
|
|
|
|
## Common Features
|
|
|
|
All environments share these common features:
|
|
|
|
1. **Training/Test Split:**
|
|
- 98% training, 2% test split
|
|
- Random shuffling with fixed seed (42)
|
|
|
|
2. **Metrics Tracking:**
|
|
- Percent correct buffer
|
|
- Completion lengths
|
|
- Wandb integration for visualization
|
|
- Rollout tracking
|
|
|
|
3. **Token Management:**
|
|
- Maximum token length limits
|
|
- Token length statistics tracking
|
|
- Length penalty for excessive responses
|
|
|
|
4. **Evaluation:**
|
|
- Separate evaluation on test set
|
|
- Comprehensive metrics logging
|
|
- Support for multiple model completions per prompt
|
|
|
|
5. **Detailed Documentation:**
|
|
- Many environments, especially those with more complexity, include detailed `README.md` files within their respective subdirectories to provide specific context and usage instructions.
|
|
|
|
6. **Additional Libraries:**
|
|
- If an environment requires specific libraries not covered by the main project dependencies, its subdirectory may include a `requirements.txt` file for easy installation via `pip`, or provide installation instructions in its `README.md`.
|
|
|
|
## Usage
|
|
|
|
Each environment can be initialized with:
|
|
- `config`: BaseEnvConfig object
|
|
- `server_configs`: List of OpenAI API configurations
|
|
- `slurm`: Boolean for distributed training
|
|
- `testing`: Boolean for testing mode
|
|
|
|
The environments follow a common interface with methods for:
|
|
- `setup()`: Loading and preparing datasets
|
|
- `get_next_item()`: Retrieving next training item
|
|
- `collect_trajectories()`: Generating model responses
|
|
- `score()`: Computing rewards
|
|
- `evaluate()`: Running evaluation on test set
|
|
- `wandb_log()`: Logging metrics to Weights & Biases
|